Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(5): 968-976, 2024 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical susceptibility breakpoints have been lacking for antimicrobial agents used for diphtheria. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods and create a dataset of MIC values and inhibition zone diameters (ZDs) from which breakpoints could be determined. METHODS: We included 400 recent clinical isolates equally distributed by species (Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans) and by national surveillance programmes (France and Germany). Non-duplicate toxigenic and non-toxigenic isolates were chosen to enable the inclusion of a diversity of susceptibility levels for the 13 agents tested. Broth microdilution and disc diffusion, using EUCAST methodology for fastidious organisms, were used. RESULTS: The distributions of MIC and ZD values were largely in agreement among methods and countries. Breakpoints to allow categorization of WT isolates as susceptible, i.e. susceptible (S) or susceptible, increased exposure (I) were determined for 12 agents. The data supported a breakpoint for benzylpenicillin and amoxicillin of resistant (R) > 1 mg/L since WT isolates were inhibited by 1 mg/L or less. WT isolates were categorized as I (S ≤ 0.001 mg/L) for benzylpenicillin, emphasizing the need for increased exposure, and S (S ≤ 1 mg/L) for amoxicillin. Erythromycin breakpoints were set at S ≤ 0.06 mg/L and R > 0.06 mg/L. The corresponding ZD breakpoints were determined for all agents except amoxicillin, for which categorization was based on benzylpenicillin results. CONCLUSIONS: This work provided a large set of antimicrobial susceptibility data for C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, using a harmonized methodology. The dataset allowed EUCAST and experts in the diphtheria field to develop evidence-based breakpoints in January 2023.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Corynebacterium , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Humanos , Corynebacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Corynebacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/efectos de los fármacos , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/aislamiento & purificación , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/genética , Alemania , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/microbiología , Difteria/microbiología , Francia
2.
Infection ; 2024 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190269

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: From September 2022 an increase in Corynebacterium diphtheriae (C. diphtheriae) infections was reported in Europe. Our study focuses on 31 adolescent and young adult refugees with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infections detected in Germany. We examined treatment regimens and outcomes to provide targeted insights into the management of this infection. METHODS: We distributed a standardized survey, focused on children and adolescents presenting to paediatric clinics through the German Paediatric Infectious Diseases Society (DGPI) and additional professional contacts in Germany. Data were extracted from routine medical documentation and reported anonymously. RESULTS: A total of 31 individuals with cutaneous C. diphtheriae infection were reported by 9 centres. Two of these showed diphtheria toxin (DT) related systemic symptoms and four exhibited systemic inflammation requiring complex management. The remaining 25 cases, with exclusively cutaneous manifestations, were afebrile. Treatment with topical antiseptics and systemic antibiotics, mainly aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) (35%) or clindamycin (25%), achieved eradication in all but two cases treated with aminopenicillin/BLI. Treatment duration varied between 5 and 17 days. CONCLUSIONS: In refugees presenting with chronic skin wounds, C. diphtheriae should be included into the differential diagnosis. Fever seems to be a valuable marker to differentiate severe cases with potentially DT-mediated sequelae from exclusively cutaneous diphtheria (CD). For afebrile CD, topical antiseptics and oral antibiotic therapy with clindamycin for 7 days, followed by clinical surveillance appears to be a safe treatment regimen. Patients with CD who present with fever or pharyngitis should be thoroughly investigated including blood and pharyngeal swab cultures.

3.
Infection ; 50(6): 1591-1595, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053480

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Diphtheria, still present in many countries of the world, is caused by toxigenic strains of species of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae complex, mainly Corynebacterium diphtheriae and the emerging zoonotic pathogen C. ulcerans. The immunoprecipitation test according to Elek is the gold standard for detection of the major virulence factor diphtheria toxin (DT) in toxigenic corynebacteria. Due to its sophisticated methodological requirements, the classical Elek test is performed mainly by specialized reference laboratories. It was revealed that the current modification of the Elek test does not detect the toxin in weakly toxigenic isolates. Therefore, a more robust method for detecting free DT is urgently needed, especially for toxigenic C. ulcerans strains which are known to produce often much lower amounts of DT than C. diphtheriae. METHODS: Thirty-one tox-positive C. ulcerans isolates with a negative standard Elek test result previously determined as NTTB (non-toxigenic tox bearing) were re-analyzed in this study using a modified immunoprecipitation method optimized regarding different parameters including type and concentration of antitoxin, medium volume, inoculum distance from the antitoxin disk and position of controls. RESULTS: All 31 C. ulcerans strains tested positive in the optimized Elek test. CONCLUSION: Only with a reliable and easy-to-handle method for detecting the toxigenicity of C. ulcerans, it is possible to assess the etiological role of this emerging zoonotic bacterium in human pathology.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxinas , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Humanos , Difteria/diagnóstico , Difteria/microbiología , Toxina Diftérica , Corynebacterium
4.
Euro Surveill ; 27(46)2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36398576

RESUMEN

From July 2022, cases of imported diphtheria with toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae remarkably increased among migrants arriving in Germany. Up to 30 September 2022, 44 cases have been reported to the national public health institute, all laboratory-confirmed, male, and mainly coming from Syria (n = 21) and Afghanistan (n = 17). Phylogeny and available journey information indicate that most cases (n = 19) were infected along the Balkan route. Active case finding, increased laboratory preparedness and epicentre localisation in countries along this route are important.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Migrantes , Masculino , Humanos , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/genética , Difteria/diagnóstico , Difteria/epidemiología , Difteria/microbiología , Corynebacterium , Brotes de Enfermedades , Alemania/epidemiología
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(10): 2686-2690, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34545798

RESUMEN

Toxin-producing Corynebacterium ulcerans, a causative agent of diphtheria in humans, was isolated from 53 hedgehogs in Belgium during the spring of 2020. Isolates showed low levels of acquired antimicrobial drug resistance. Strain diversity suggests emergence from an endemic situation. These findings stress the need for raising public awareness and improved wildlife disease surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Corynebacterium , Erizos , Animales , Corynebacterium/genética , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/epidemiología , Toxina Diftérica , Humanos
6.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek ; 114(9): 1361-1371, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34170418

RESUMEN

Corynebacterium (C.) diphtheriae is one of the two etiological pathogens for human diphtheria with significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, members of its biovar Belfanti have been described as two novel species, C. belfantii and C. rouxii. The most important virulence factor and also the premise to cause diphtheria is the isolate's capacity to encode and express the diphtheria toxin (DT). In contrast to C. ulcerans, which represents a potentially zoonotic pathogen, C. diphtheriae (incl. the novel deduced species) has almost exclusively been found to comprise a human pathogen. We here report three rare cases of C. rouxii isolation from dogs suffering from disseminated poly-bacterial exsudative to purulent dermatitis and a traumatic labial defect, respectively. The isolates were identified as C. diphtheriae based on commercial biochemistry and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis. However, recently described specific spectral peaks were highly similar to spectra of C. rouxii, which was confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Further investigations of the dog isolates for the presence of DT by tox gene qPCR revealed negative results. The findings from this study point out that skin infections in companion animals can be colonized by uncommon and so believed human specific pathogens, thereby resembling the clinical signs of cutaneous diphtheria.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Corynebacterium , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Enfermedades de los Perros , Úlcera Cutánea , Animales , Corynebacterium/genética , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/veterinaria , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/genética , Difteria/veterinaria , Toxina Diftérica , Enfermedades de los Perros/microbiología , Perros , Úlcera Cutánea/microbiología , Úlcera Cutánea/veterinaria , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
7.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(9): 2180-2181, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32818407

RESUMEN

In October 2016, an adolescent boy sought care for acute genital ulceration in Cologne, Germany. We presumed a sexually transmitted infection, but initial diagnostic procedures yielded negative results. He was hospitalized because swab samples from the lesion grew toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae, leading to the diagnosis of possibly sexually transmitted cutaneous diphtheria.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Adolescente , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/genética , Difteria/diagnóstico , Genitales , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino
8.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(10): 2885-2893, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diphtheria is mainly caused by diphtheria-toxin-producing strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans. The recommended first-line antibiotic is penicillin or erythromycin, but reliable susceptibility data are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To define WT MIC distributions of 12 antimicrobial agents and provide data for the determination of tentative epidemiological cut-off values (TECOFFs) for potentially toxigenic corynebacteria and to evaluate the potential usefulness of a gradient test (Etest) for susceptibility testing of penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin. METHODS: For the 421 human or veterinary isolates from the period 2011-17, MICs of 12 antimicrobial agents were determined. Etest performance was evaluated for penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin. RESULTS: MIC distributions were characterized and TECOFFs could be set for 11 out of 24 antibiotic/species combinations. The current EUCAST clinical breakpoints, predominantly determined for Corynebacterium species other than C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, divide the WT MIC distributions of penicillin and clindamycin, thereby making reproducible susceptibility testing of C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans difficult. For erythromycin, 4% of C. diphtheriae and 2% of C. ulcerans had MICs higher than those for WT isolates. Phenotypically detectable resistance to other antibiotics was rare. Etest underestimated MICs of penicillin and lower concentrations needed to be included for erythromycin, while for clindamycin the Etest was not a good surrogate method. CONCLUSIONS: MIC distributions based on reference broth microdilution for potentially toxigenic Corynebacterium spp. were developed. For five and six agents, TECOFFs were suggested for C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans, respectively, but for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis the number of isolates was too low.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Corynebacterium , Alemania , Humanos
9.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 70(6): 3614-3624, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32368999

RESUMEN

A total of 34 Corynebacterium sp. strains were isolated from caseous lymph node abscesses of wild boar and roe deer in different regions of Germany. They showed slow growth on Columbia sheep blood agar and sparse growth on Hoyle's tellurite agar. Cellular fatty acid analysis allocated them in the C. diphtheriae group of genus Corynebacterium. MALDI-TOF MS using specific database extensions and rpoB sequencing resulted in classification as C. ulcerans. Their quinone system is similar to C. ulcerans, with major menaquinone MK-8(H2). Their complex polar lipid profile includes major lipids phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol-mannoside, diphosphatidylglycerol, but also unidentified glycolipids, distinguishing them clearly from C. ulcerans. They ferment glucose, ribose and maltose (like C. ulcerans), but do not utilise d-xylose, mannitol, lactose, sucrose and glycogen (like C. pseudotuberculosis). They showed activity of catalase, urease and phospholipase D, but variable results for alkaline phosphatase and alpha-glucosidase. All were non-toxigenic, tox gene bearing and susceptible to clindamycin, penicillin and erythromycin. In 16SrRNA gene and RpoB protein phylogenies the strains formed distinct brancheswith C. ulcerans as nearest relative.Whole genome sequencing revealed the unique sequence type 578, a distinctbranch in pangenomic core genome MLST, average nucleotide identities <91%, enhancedgenome sizes (2.55 Mbp) and G/C content (54.4 mol%) compared to related species.These results suggest that the strains represent a novel species, for which wepropose the name Corynebactriumsilvaticum sp. nov., based on their first isolation from forest-dwellinggame animals. The type strain isKL0182T (= CVUAS 4292T = DSM 109166T = LMG 31313T= CIP 111 672T).


Asunto(s)
Absceso/microbiología , Corynebacterium/clasificación , Ciervos/microbiología , Ganglios Linfáticos/microbiología , Filogenia , Sus scrofa/microbiología , Animales , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Composición de Base , Corynebacterium/aislamiento & purificación , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Ácidos Grasos/química , Alemania , Glucolípidos/química , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Fosfolípidos/química , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Porcinos , Vitamina K 2/análogos & derivados , Vitamina K 2/química , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma
10.
Euro Surveill ; 25(9)2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32156330

RESUMEN

The need for timely establishment of diagnostic assays arose when Germany was confronted with the first travel-associated outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Europe. We describe our laboratory experiences during a large contact tracing investigation, comparing previously published real-time RT-PCR assays in different PCR systems and a commercial kit. We found that assay performance using the same primers and probes with different PCR systems varied and the commercial kit performed well.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Neumonía Viral , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/genética , Alemania , Humanos , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/análisis , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Flujo de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA