RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Research indicates that most providers give opiates after endoscopic sinonasal surgery. The effectiveness of non-opiate medications after sinonasal surgery is poorly understood and most studies do not assess medication failure. This study compares oral opiate, oral opiate and topical steroid, and oral non-opiate pain control. Patient call-backs are used as a proxy for pain medication failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares three medication regiments after sinonasal surgery for 180 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were instructed to take acetaminophen for mild pain. For moderate/severe pain, patients used: 1) oxycodone-acetaminophen, 2) oxycodone-acetaminophen + budesonide nasal rinses, or 3) meloxicam + acetaminophen. Patients were instructed to call clinic if pain was not controlled. Descriptive statistics compared cohorts. Chi-square tests compared call-backs between cohorts. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline differences in covariates, comorbidities, and operative sites. RESULTS: Cohorts had similar age, sex distribution, disease features, and extent of surgery. The meloxicam cohort had less subjects with pain disorders. The oxycodone cohort had less subjects with diabetes, septoplasty, and turbinate reduction. After adjusting for baseline differences and using oxycodone as the reference group (n = 50), the odds of calling clinic for poorly controlled pain was 0.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.6) in the meloxicam cohort (n = 45) and 0.19 (95% CI:0.07-0.5) in the oxycodone + budesonide rinses cohort (n = 85). CONCLUSION: In this study, both meloxicam and oxycodone + budesonide rinses were more effective at controlling pain after sinonasal surgery than oxycodone alone.
Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Endoscopía/métodos , Meloxicam/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/métodos , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Combinación de Medicamentos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is a significant cause of morbidity worldwide and currently has no curative treatment. Technological advancements in stem cell therapy have led to numerous studies that examine the generation of otic sensory cells from progenitors to restore inner ear function. Recently, organoids have emerged as a promising technique to further advance the process of creating functional replacement cells after irreversible hearing loss. Organoids are the three-dimensional generation of stem cells in culture to model the tissue organization and cellular components of the inner ear. Organoids have emerged as a promising technique to create functioning cochlear structures in vitro and may provide crucial information for the utilization of stem cells to restore SNHL. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to discuss the recent advancements in stem cell-based regenerative therapy for SNHL. RESULTS: Recent studies have improved our understanding about the developmental pathways involved in the generation of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons. However, significant challenges remain in elucidating the molecular interactions and interplay required for stem cells to differentiate and function as otic sensory cells. A few of the challenges encountered with traditional stem cell therapy may be addressed with organoids. CONCLUSION: Stem cell-based regenerative therapy holds a great potential for developing novel treatment modalities for SNHL. Further advancements are needed in addressing the challenges associated with stem cell-based regenerative therapy and promote their translation from bench to bedside.
Asunto(s)
Oído Interno , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/cirugía , Humanos , Organoides , Células Madre , TecnologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Improvement in sinonasal quality of life (QoL) following sinus surgery has been well-documented across the literature. To our knowledge, only one series has evaluated long-term QoL in patients undergoing tumor resection, and that study demonstrated no improvement in rhinologic QoL following malignant tumor resection at 2-year follow-up. The objective of the present study was to evaluate QoL in the 2 years following endoscopic malignant tumor resection. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, including patients with both malignant and benign sinonasal tumors in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients undergoing endoscopic tumor resection who had completed Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) questionnaires were included in the cohort. SNOT-22 questionnaires were administered preoperatively and over a 2-year follow-up period at clinic visits. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects regression was used to compare preoperative QoL to QoL over the 2 years following surgery. RESULTS: Among 145 patients included in this study, 64 had malignant tumors. There was a statistically significant improvement in SNOT-22 score from baseline to 2 years for patients with both malignant tumors (37.0, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 32.0-42.1 at baseline; 26.5 95% CI 20.8-32.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001) and benign tumors (26.5, 95% CI 21.4-30.4 at baseline; 12.9 95% CI 7.6-18.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In contrast to previously reported series, in this cohort endoscopic resection of sinonasal tumors appears to be followed by an improvement in QoL, which is sustained over a 2-year period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:789-793, 2018.