Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Sante Publique ; 34(HS2): 133-143, 2023.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336727

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of lesbians and other women who have sex with women (WSW) remains largely unexplored in Switzerland. A cross-sectional web- and pa-per-based survey was conducted in 2012. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: The aim of this study was to gain more knowledge on the SRH of the WSW in French-speaking Switzerland in order to inform preventive activities and promote more adequate SRH services for these women. RESULTS: Sexual practices between women are very diverse, some of them potentially risky in terms of transmitting various STIs, but 71% of WSW never practice safer sex or other risk reduction strategies for HIV and other STIs with their female partners. Only 69% have had a gynecological check-up in the last 3 years. 16% had one or more children. 29% reported having experienced violence in a lesbian relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Specific information on SRH should be developed to match the specificities and needs of WSW and more research is needed on their SRH, their risk regarding breast cancer and ways to improve the cultural sensitivity and knowledge of gynecologists and other health care providers towards their lesbian, bisexual and other WSW patients.


Asunto(s)
Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Salud Reproductiva , Estudios Transversales , Suiza/epidemiología , Conducta Sexual
2.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 34(4): 416-426, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31502306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Monitoring severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) appears essential for optimising care and informing health care policies, especially given changes in obstetric practices and mother profiles. International comparisons can identify areas where improvement is needed, but the comparability of indicators must be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of monitoring SAMM using common definitions from hospital discharge databases across Europe. METHODS: We used hospital discharge data in eight countries (2 826 868 deliveries) to identify women with SAMM among all hospitalisations of women of reproductive age admitted for antenatal or delivery care. Five SAMM indicators were investigated: eclampsia, septicaemia, hysterectomy, hysterectomy associated with a diagnosis of obstetric haemorrhage, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion associated with a diagnosis of obstetric haemorrhage. Between-country variation was described, by the ratio of the highest to lowest rates, while external validation was assessed by comparing with population-based studies on maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Ratios for hysterectomy and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the context of obstetric haemorrhage were 1:2.1 and 1:3.5, respectively. High values of hysterectomy and low values of transfusion were both consistent with high maternal mortality from haemorrhage (France, Italy, Portugal). Ratios across countries were relatively low for eclampsia (1:3.4) but very high for septicaemia (1:22.5). Compared to population-based morbidity estimates, eclampsia was over-reported in hospital databases whereas the two indicators of severe haemorrhage had good external validity. CONCLUSIONS: In association with diagnosis codes indicating obstetric haemorrhage, hysterectomy and RBC transfusion appear to be good candidates for surveillance of maternal morbidity in Europe.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Posparto , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/terapia , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/clasificación , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 8: 100167, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34557855

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To inform the on-going debate about the use of universal prescriptive versus national intrauterine growth charts, we compared perinatal mortality for small and large-for-gestational-age (SGA/LGA) infants according to international and national charts in Europe. METHODS: We classified singleton births from 33 to 42 weeks of gestation in 2010 and 2014 from 15 countries (N = 1,475,457) as SGA (birthweight <10th percentile) and LGA (>90th percentile) using the international Intergrowth-21st newborn standards and national charts based on the customised charts methodology. We computed sex-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for stillbirth, neonatal and extended perinatal mortality by this classification using multilevel models. FINDINGS: SGA and LGA prevalence using national charts were near 10% in all countries, but varied according to international charts with a north to south gradient (3.0% to 10.1% and 24.9% to 8.0%, respectively). Compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants by both charts, risk of perinatal mortality was increased for SGA by both charts (aOR[95% confidence interval (CI)]=6.1 [5.6-6.7]) and infants reclassified by international charts from SGA to AGA (2.7 [2.3-3.1]), but decreased for those reclassified from AGA to LGA (0.6 [0.4-0.7]). Results were similar for stillbirth and neonatal death. INTERPRETATION: Using international instead of national charts in Europe could lead to growth restricted infants being reclassified as having normal growth, while infants with low risks of mortality could be reclassified as having excessive growth. FUNDING: InfAct Joint Action, CHAFEA Grant n°801,553 and EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking ConcePTION grant n°821,520. AH received a PhD grant from EHESP.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA