Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor povorcitinib (INCB054707) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Janus kinase 1 inhibition may alleviate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-associated inflammation and improve symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and safety of povorcitinib (selective oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor) in HS. METHODS: This placebo-controlled phase 2 study randomized patients with HS 1:1:1:1 to receive povorcitinib 15, 45, or 75 mg or placebo for 16 weeks. Primary and key secondary end points were mean change from baseline in abscess and inflammatory nodule count and percentage of patients achieving HS Clinical Response at week 16. RESULTS: Of 209 patients randomized (15 mg, n = 52; 45 mg, n = 52; 75 mg, n = 53; placebo, n = 52), 83.3% completed the 16-week treatment. At week 16, povorcitinib significantly reduced abscess and inflammatory nodule count from baseline (least squares mean [SE] change: 15 mg, -5.2 [0.9], P = .0277; 45 mg, -6.9 [0.9], P = .0006; 75 mg, -6.3 [0.9], P = .0021) versus placebo (-2.5 [0.9]). More povorcitinib-treated patients achieved HS Clinical Response at week 16 (15 mg, 48.1%, P = .0445; 45 mg, 44.2%, P = .0998; 75 mg, 45.3%, P = .0829) versus placebo (28.8%). A total of 60.0% and 65.4% of povorcitinib- and placebo-treated patients had adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Baseline lesion counts were mildly imbalanced between groups. CONCLUSION: Povorcitinib demonstrated efficacy in HS, with no evidence of increased incidence of adverse events among doses.

Medication Guide Reading Behaviors and Attitudes Among Subjects With Migraine, Asthma, or COPD.

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional survey describes attitudes and reading behaviors toward medication guides among 785 subjects with migraine, asthma, or COPD who reported recent use of Treximet (sumatriptan/naproxen sodium) or Advair (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol). RESULTS: The survey demonstrated that the majority (82%) of subjects had read their medication guide, but most read it exactly once and did not read it thoroughly. Patients did not read medication guides with each refill, with the most frequent reasons being that they did not expect the information to have changed and that a doctor would tell them what they needed to know. Factors significantly associated with patients hypothetically being more likely to read medication guides associated with their new prescription included increasing age, simplification to format and content of the medication guide, and where subjects typically received their medication safety information. Patients reported acquiring medication safety from doctors or pharmacists more frequently than from medication guides. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide insights into potential revisions to the medication guides that may improve reading behaviors.

Incidence of type 2 diabetes among patients exposed to the combination of pravastatin and paroxetine.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of concomitant pravastatin and paroxetine use on the incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A new-user retrospective cohort design was employed using data selected from US health insurance claims databases (OptumInsight and MarketScan) between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2009. Patients included were of age ≥18; newly prescribed pravastatin or paroxetine; and enrolled in the database for ≥180 days prior to the index date (i.e., first prescription of incident drug). Patients were assigned to either incident pravastatin or incident paroxetine user groups. Patients were followed until the study endpoint (T2DM), discontinuation of incident drug, second drug, or end of study/patient data. Cox proportional hazards models compared T2DM in users of pravastatin who were also taking paroxetine at index the date (combination users) versus pravastatinonly users. A similar analysis among users of paroxetine evaluated the use or non-use of pravastatin at index date. RESULTS: OptumInsight yielded 288,678 incident users of pravastatin or paroxetine; 443,137 were identified in MarketScan. The risk of T2DM among combination users compared to incident pravastatin only users was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.44) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.97) in OptumInsight and MarketScan, respectively. The risk of T2DM among combination users compared to incident paroxetine only users was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.54) in OptumInsight and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.07) in MarketScan. CONCLUSION: The results indicate no increase in the risk of T2DM due to combined use of pravastatin and paroxetine compared to individual use of the two drugs; however, this study is limited by short mean follow-up.