Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Qual Life Res ; 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38874697

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Iron deficiency anemia is common in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), causing deterioration in quality of life, which can be reversed by treatment that increases iron stores and hemoglobin levels. The present post hoc analyses estimate health state utility values for patients with IBD after treatment with ferric derisomaltose or ferric carboxymaltose and evaluate the health domains driving the changes. METHODS: SF-36v2 responses were recorded at baseline and day 14, 35, 49, and 70 from 97 patients enrolled in the randomized, double-blind, PHOSPHARE-IBD trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03466983), in which patients with IBD across five European countries were randomly allocated to either ferric derisomaltose or ferric carboxymaltose. Changes in SF-36v2 scale scores and SF-6Dv2 health utility values were analyzed by mixed models. RESULTS: In both treatment arms, SF-6Dv2 utility values and all SF-36v2 scale scores, except Bodily Pain, improved significantly (p = < 0.0001). The improvement in SF-6Dv2 utility values showed no significant treatment group difference. The improvement in utility values was completely explained by improvement in Vitality scores. Vitality scores showed significantly larger improvement with ferric derisomaltose versus ferric carboxymaltose (p = 0.026). Patients with the smallest decrease in phosphate had significantly larger improvements in Vitality scores at each time point (p = < 0.05 for all comparisons) and overall (p = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: Utility values improved significantly with intravenous iron treatment. Improvement in utility values was primarily driven by Vitality scores, which showed significantly greater improvement in the ferric derisomaltose arm. Smaller decreases in phosphate were associated with significantly higher Vitality scores, suggesting that quality of life improvement is attenuated by hypophosphatemia. The utility values can inform future cost-utility analysis.

2.
Public Health ; 214: 153-162, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563464

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The use of normative data has become well-accepted and a common strategy to interpret individual's health outcome scores, which can help in making decisions. The objectives of this study were to obtain population normative data for the domains and component summaries of the 36-item SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36), and to evaluate its reliability and construct validity. METHODS: This study was conducted using population-based data from the Welsh Health Survey (WHS; 2011-2015). This study used version 2 of the SF-36 (SF-36v2® Health Survey). The descriptive statistics and normative data for the eight domains and two summaries, physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS), were calculated. Reliability assessment used internal consistency methods and construct validity assessment used known group comparisons and item-scale correlations. STUDY DESIGN AND SAMPLE: We performed a secondary analyses of data from the Welsh Health Survey (WHS). RESULTS: This study included 74,578 participants aged 16 years or older (53.6% were women). Participants aged 16-24 years scored higher on SF-36 scale than older groups on all domains. The SF-36 profiles by age group demonstrated lower scores for older age groups, with the most pronounced differences shown on the physical-related scales. Across the age groups, men had higher PCS and MCS scores than women. All SF-36 domains and PCS and MCS achieved a good to excellent internal consistency reliability exceeding 0.7. The scales demonstrated construct validity by showing associations with a range of factors known to be related to health. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides SF-36 normative data for Wales based on a representative data and confirms the construct validity and reliability of the SF-36.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas Epidemiológicas
3.
Diabet Med ; 37(11): 1861-1865, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31811666

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate labour market outcomes in type 1 or type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Individuals with type 1 (n = 431) and type 2 diabetes (n = 4047) were identified in Danish national registers from 1994 to 2011 and compared with individuals without diabetes (n = 101 295). Multi-state Cox proportional hazards analyses estimated hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for transitions between work, sickness absence, unemployment and disability pension. RESULTS: We observed significantly higher HR of sickness absence in type 1 diabetes (women: 1.34, 95% CI 1.12-1.62; men: 1.43, 1.01-2.03) and type 2 diabetes (women: 1.46, 95% CI 1.35-1.58; men: 1.64, 1.46-1.85) compared with people without diabetes. HR of unemployment was higher for men with type 1 diabetes (1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.53) and women with type 2 diabetes (1.09, 95% CI 1.03-1.16) and men with type 2 diabetes (1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27). HR of disability pension was higher in type 1 diabetes (women: 1.90, 95% CI 1.46-2.46; men: 2.09, 1.38-3.18) and type 2 diabetes (women: 1.78, 95% CI 1.62-1.96; men: 2.11, 1.86-2.40). Only women with type 2 diabetes were less likely to return to work from sickness absence (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.98) or unemployment (0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.94). We found no significant difference between the two types of diabetes. Hazard ratios for diabetes regarding unemployment, sickness absence while unemployed and disability pension were significantly higher for men than for women. CONCLUSIONS: Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes affect labour market outcomes, but future studies should also consider comorbidity and social gradient.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
4.
Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) ; 14(2): 192-200, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31149257

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: ThyPRO is a recently developed thyroid-specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire applicable to patients with benign thyroid disorders(BTD). The aim of the present study was to translate ThyPRO and ThyPRO-39 into Romanian, and to evaluate reliability and cross-cultural validity. METHODS: Standard methodology for translation and linguistic validation of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) was applied. The questionnaire was completed by 130 patients with benign thyroid diseases seen at Department of Endocrinology in the Emergency County Hospital, Tîrgu Mures, Romania, between October 2015 and March 2016. Internal reliability of the Romanian version of the ThyPRO (ThyPROro) scales was assessed for multi-item scales using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. An efficient method for testing cross-cultural validity is analysis of differential item functioning (DIF). Uniform DIF between the Romanian and the original Danish sample was investigated using ordinal logistic regression. The translation process proceeded without difficulties, and any disagreements were revised by one of the developers and the language coordinator. RESULTS: Internal reliability for ThyPRO was satisfactory. Cronbach`s alpha coefficients for the 13 scales ranged from 0.78 to 0.93 for the ThyPROro and 0.78 to 0.87 for the ThyPROro-39. In the 85-item ThyPRO, nine instances of DIF were found. Most were minor, explaining <3% of the variation in scale score, but DIF in positively worded items were larger, with explained variance (R2's) around 10-15%. CONCLUSION: The ThyPROro questionnaire is ready for assessment of health-related quality of life in Romanian patients with benign thyroid diseases.

5.
Psychol Med ; 47(8): 1342-1356, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28122650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse psychosocial working environments characterized by job strain (the combination of high demands and low control at work) are associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms among employees, but evidence on clinically diagnosed depression is scarce. We examined job strain as a risk factor for clinical depression. METHOD: We identified published cohort studies from a systematic literature search in PubMed and PsycNET and obtained 14 cohort studies with unpublished individual-level data from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working Populations (IPD-Work) Consortium. Summary estimates of the association were obtained using random-effects models. Individual-level data analyses were based on a pre-published study protocol. RESULTS: We included six published studies with a total of 27 461 individuals and 914 incident cases of clinical depression. From unpublished datasets we included 120 221 individuals and 982 first episodes of hospital-treated clinical depression. Job strain was associated with an increased risk of clinical depression in both published [relative risk (RR) = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.13] and unpublished datasets (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55). Further individual participant analyses showed a similar association across sociodemographic subgroups and after excluding individuals with baseline somatic disease. The association was unchanged when excluding individuals with baseline depressive symptoms (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.65), but attenuated on adjustment for a continuous depressive symptoms score (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.32). CONCLUSIONS: Job strain may precipitate clinical depression among employees. Future intervention studies should test whether job strain is a modifiable risk factor for depression.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/etiología , Estrés Laboral/complicaciones , Humanos
6.
Allergy ; 69(6): 775-83, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24725175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients and healthcare professionals believe that work-related psychosocial stress, such as job strain, can make asthma worse, but this is not corroborated by empirical evidence. We investigated the associations between job strain and the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations in working-age European men and women. METHODS: We analysed individual-level data, collected between 1985 and 2010, from 102 175 working-age men and women in 11 prospective European studies. Job strain (a combination of high demands and low control at work) was self-reported at baseline. Incident severe asthma exacerbations were ascertained from national hospitalization and death registries. Associations between job strain and asthma exacerbations were modelled using Cox regression and the study-specific findings combined using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10 years, 1 109 individuals experienced a severe asthma exacerbation (430 with asthma as the primary diagnostic code). In the age- and sex-adjusted analyses, job strain was associated with an increased risk of severe asthma exacerbations defined using the primary diagnostic code (hazard ratio, HR: 1.27, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.00, 1.61). This association attenuated towards the null after adjustment for potential confounders (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.55). No association was observed in the analyses with asthma defined using any diagnostic code (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that job strain is probably not an important risk factor for severe asthma exacerbations leading to hospitalization or death.


Asunto(s)
Asma Ocupacional/epidemiología , Asma Ocupacional/etiología , Estrés Psicológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Población Blanca
7.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 15(6): 564-71, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23451759

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate health-related quality of life (health utility) scores in patients with diabetes receiving insulin degludec (IDeg) or insulin glargine (IGlar). METHODS: Patient-level data from six, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicentre, confirmatory, treat-to-target trials of 26- or 52 weeks' duration were pooled in this analysis. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) version-2 health questionnaire was completed by patients at baseline and end-of-trial. SF-36 scores for 4001 individual patients were then mapped onto the EuroQol-5D health utility scale, which has a range from -0.59 (a state worse than death) to 1.00 (perfect health). RESULTS: IDeg treatment exhibited a significant improvement in health status of 0.005 (CI: 0.0006; 0.009) points compared with IGlar (p < 0.024). Gender, region, trial and age also had a significant influence on estimated utility scores as did baseline utility scores, p < 0.05. Prior to the removal of interaction variables a difference of 0.008 points was observed, p < 0.045. Previous insulin treatment did not have an impact on the final outcome. CONCLUSION: This study shows that IDeg is associated with a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in health utility compared with IGlar in patients with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina de Acción Prolongada/administración & dosificación , Calidad de Vida , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Insulina Glargina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Qual Life Res ; 22(5): 1085-92, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22695829

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity and participants' acceptance of an online assessment of role function using computer adaptive test (RF-CAT). METHODS: The RF-CAT and a set of established quality of life instruments were administered in a cross-sectional study in a panel sample (n = 444) recruited from the general population with over-selection of participants with selected self-report chronic conditions (n = 225). The efficiency, score accuracy, validity, and acceptability of the RF-CAT were evaluated and compared to existing measures. RESULTS: The RF-CAT with a stopping rule of six items with content balancing used 25 of the available bank items and was completed on average in 66 s. RF-CAT and the legacy tools scores were highly correlated (.64-.84) and successfully discriminated across known groups. The RF-CAT produced a more precise assessment over a wider range than the SF-36 Role Physical scale. Patients' evaluations of the RF-CAT system were positive overall, with no differences in ratings observed between the CAT and static assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The RF-CAT was feasible, more precise than the static SF-36 RP and equally acceptable to participants as legacy measures. In empirical tests of validity, the better performance of the CAT was not uniformly statistically significant. Further research exploring the relationship between gained precision and discriminant power of the CAT assessment is needed.


Asunto(s)
Computadores , Indicadores de Salud , Psicometría/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Rol del Enfermo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Diagnóstico por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Autoinforme , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
9.
J Intern Med ; 272(1): 65-73, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22077620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence of an association between job strain and obesity is inconsistent, mostly limited to small-scale studies, and does not distinguish between categories of underweight or obesity subclasses. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between job strain and body mass index (BMI) in a large adult population. METHODS: We performed a pooled cross-sectional analysis based on individual-level data from 13 European studies resulting in a total of 161 746 participants (49% men, mean age, 43.7 years). Longitudinal analysis with a median follow-up of 4 years was possible for four cohort studies (n = 42 222). RESULTS: A total of 86 429 participants were of normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg m(-2) ), 2149 were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg m(-2) ), 56 572 overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg m(-2) ) and 13 523 class I (BMI 30-34.9 kg m(-2) ) and 3073 classes II/III (BMI ≥ 35 kg m(-2) ) obese. In addition, 27 010 (17%) participants reported job strain. In cross-sectional analyses, we found increased odds of job strain amongst underweight [odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.25], obese class I (odds ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12) and obese classes II/III participants (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28) as compared with participants of normal weight. In longitudinal analysis, both weight gain and weight loss were related to the onset of job strain during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of European data, we found both weight gain and weight loss to be associated with the onset of job strain, consistent with a 'U'-shaped cross-sectional association between job strain and BMI. These associations were relatively modest; therefore, it is unlikely that intervention to reduce job strain would be effective in combating obesity at a population level.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Empleo/psicología , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Sobrepeso/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/psicología , Oportunidad Relativa , Aumento de Peso
10.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 61(1): 17-33, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18083459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was initiated to improve precision, reduce respondent burden, and enhance the comparability of health outcomes measures. We used item response theory (IRT) to construct and evaluate a preliminary item bank for physical function assuming four subdomains. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Data from seven samples (N=17,726) using 136 items from nine questionnaires were evaluated. A generalized partial credit model was used to estimate item parameters, which were normed to a mean of 50 (SD=10) in the US population. Item bank properties were evaluated through Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) simulations. RESULTS: IRT requirements were fulfilled by 70 items covering activities of daily living, lower extremity, and central body functions. The original item context partly affected parameter stability. Items on upper body function, and need for aid or devices did not fit the IRT model. In simulations, a 10-item CAT eliminated floor and decreased ceiling effects, achieving a small standard error (< 2.2) across scores from 20 to 50 (reliability >0.95 for a representative US sample). This precision was not achieved over a similar range by any comparable fixed length item sets. CONCLUSION: The methods of the PROMIS project are likely to substantially improve measures of physical function and to increase the efficiency of their administration using CAT.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoartritis/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis/rehabilitación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Clin Obes ; 6(4): 233-42, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27198973

RESUMEN

Obesity has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes study investigated the effect of liraglutide 3.0 mg, as adjunct to diet and exercise, on HRQoL in patients with obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg m(-2) ] or overweight (BMI ≥ 27 kg m(-2) ) with comorbidity. Participants were advised on a 500 kcal d(-1) deficit diet and a 150-min week(-1) exercise programme and were randomised 2:1 to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg or placebo. HRQoL was assessed using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) v2 health questionnaires. Individuals on liraglutide 3.0 mg (n = 2046) had significantly greater improvements in IWQOL-Lite total score (10.6 ± 13.3) vs. placebo (n = 1020) (7.7 ± 12.8) and SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores (PCS, 3.6 ± 6.8; MCS, 0.2 ± 8.1) vs. placebo (PCS, 2.2 ± 7.7; MCS, -0.9 ± 9.1). The estimated treatment differences were IWQOL-Lite total score 3.1 (95% CI: 2.2; 4.0), P < 0.0001; SF-36 PCS 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2; 2.2), P < 0.0001 and MCS 0.9 (95% CI: 0.3; 1.5), P = 0.003. All subscales of the IWQOL-Lite and SF-36 were significantly improved with liraglutide 3.0 mg vs. placebo. More patients on liraglutide 3.0 mg experienced meaningful improvement on the IWQOL-Lite total (P < 0.0001) and the SF-36 PCS (P < 0.0001) scores.


Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Liraglutida/uso terapéutico , Sobrepeso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Adulto Joven
12.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 48(6): 805-16, 1995 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7769411

RESUMEN

Item bias (differential item functioning) analysis examines whether the construction of an index from two or more variables results in bias in relation to sex, age, or other criteria. Item bias may lead to erroneous conclusions because of distortion or dilution of the effects measured. In comparing groups, item bias analysis, tests whether the information about possible differences between groups, obtained by the variables constituting an index, are correctly passed on by the index score. We examined a quality of life questionnaire answered by 1189 breast cancer patients. We found age-bias or bias in the comparison of groups receiving different treatments in three out of nine indexes. Recommendations for the interpretation of these indexes are made. Item bias analysis is a useful method examining an issue not covered by traditional psychometric tests.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Sesgo , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 1001-11, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817118

RESUMEN

We used general population data (n = 4084) to examine data completeness, response consistency, tests of scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36 Health Survey. We compared traditional multitrait scaling analyses to analyses using polychoric correlations and Spearman correlations. The frequency of missing values was low, except for elderly people and people with lower levels of education. Response consistency was high and compared well with results for the U.S. SF-36. For respondents with computable scales in all eight domains, scaling assumptions (item internal consistency, item discriminant validity, equal item-own scale correlations, and equal variances) were satisfactory in the total sample and in all subgroups. The SF-36 could discriminate between levels of health in all subgroups, but there were skewness, kurtosis, and ceiling effects in many subgroups (elderly people and people with chronic diseases excepted). Concerning correlation methods, we found interesting differences indicating advantages of using methods that do not assume a normal distribution of answers as an addition to traditional methods.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Comparación Transcultural , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones
14.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 991-9, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817117

RESUMEN

This article reports on the Danish translation of SF-36 and discusses the procedures used for translation improvement, translation evaluation, and scale evaluation. We followed the standard procedures of the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project including forward and backward translation, independent assessment of translation quality, assessment of response-choice weighting through visual analogue scale (VAS) investigations, and psychometric testing of the translated questionnaire. We found that backward translation, independent quality assessment, and VAS studies provided useful information for translation improvement. The Danish SF-36 received a favorable translation evaluation by independent rating; however, interrater agreement was low. Preliminary validity studies generally supported the internal consistency and homogeneity of the Danish SF-36, and the questionnaire performed satisfactorily in distinguishing depressive patients from nonpatients. On the basis of this and other studies, we recommend use of the Danish SF-36 in research.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Traducciones , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducción
15.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 1189-202, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817137

RESUMEN

Statistical analyses of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) can be used for rigorous translation evaluations. DIF techniques test whether each item functions in the same way, irrespective of the country, language, or culture of the respondents. For a given level of health, the score on any item should be independent of nationality. This requirement can be tested through contingency-table methods, which are efficient for analyzing all types of items. We investigated DIF in the Danish translation of the SF-36 Health Survey, using two general population samples (USA, n = 1,506; Denmark, n = 3,950). DIF was identified for 12 out of 35 items. These results agreed with independent ratings of translation quality, but the statistical techniques were more sensitive. When included in scales, the items exhibiting DIF had only a little impact on conclusions about cross-national differences in health in the general population. However, if used as single items, the DIF items could seriously bias results from cross-national comparisons. Also, the DIF items might have larger impact on cross-national comparison of groups with poorer health status. We conclude that analysis of DIF is useful for evaluating questionnaire translations.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Traducciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Comparación Transcultural , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 52(6): 523-30, 1999 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10408991

RESUMEN

Breast cancer and its treatment have been associated with psychological morbidity. In this study our aim was to quantify the excess anxiety and depression resulting from breast cancer. We compared 538 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at low risk of recurrence (87.0% responded) to 872 women randomly selected from the Danish general population (69.7% responded) using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Contrary to expectations, the proportions classified as "cases" of anxiety and depression were not significantly different in the two groups. The breast cancer patients' mean HADS scores were significantly lower than those in the general population sample (anxiety, P = 0.021; depression, P < 0.001), indicating less anxiety and depression. However, we question the validity of this comparison. The HADS may not be suitable for use in the general population and there may be methodological problems in comparisons of groups whose life situations are very different.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inventario de Personalidad , Recurrencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sesgo de Selección
17.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 1171-8, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817135

RESUMEN

Data from general population surveys (n = 1483 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to cross-validate the selection of questionnaire items for the SF-12 Health Survey and scoring algorithms for 12-item physical and mental component summary measures. In each country, multiple regression methods were used to select 12 SF-36 items that best reproduced the physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 Health Survey. Summary scores then were estimated with 12 items in three ways: using standard (U.S.-derived) SF-12 items and scoring algorithms; standard items and country-specific scoring; and country-specific sets of 12 items and scoring. Replication of the 36-item summary measures by the 12-item summary measures was then evaluated through comparison of mean scores and the strength of product-moment correlations. Product-moment correlations between SF-36 summary measures and SF-12 summary measures (standard and country-specific) were very high, ranging from 0.94-0.96 and 0.94-0.97 for the physical and mental summary measures, respectively. Mean 36-item summary measures and comparable 12-item summary measures were within 0.0 to 1.5 points (median = 0.5 points) in each country and were comparable across age groups. Because of the high degree of correspondence between summary physical and mental health measures estimated using the SF-12 and SF-36, it appears that the SF-12 will prove to be a practical alternative to the SF-36 in these countries, for purposes of large group comparisons in which the focus is on overall physical and mental health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Comparación Transcultural , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 1179-88, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817136

RESUMEN

A crucial prerequisite to the use of the SF-36 Health Survey in multinational studies is the reproduction of the conceptual model underlying its scoring and interpretation. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test these aspects of the construct validity of the SF-36 in ten IQOLA countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Data came from general population surveys fielded to gather normative data. Measurement and structural models developed in the United States were cross-validated in random halves of the sample in each country. SEM analyses supported the eight first-order factor model of health that underlies the scoring of SF-36 scales and two second-order factors that are the basis for summary physical and mental health measures. A single third-order factor was also observed in support of the hypothesis that all responses to the SF-36 are generated by a single, underlying construct--health. In addition, a third second-order factors, interpreted as general well-being, was shown to improve the fit of the model. This model (including eight first-order factors, three second-order factors, and one third-order factor) was cross-validated using a holdout sample within the United States and in each of the nine other countries. These results confirm the hypothesized relationships between SF-36 items and scales and justify their scoring in each country using standard algorithms. Results also suggest that SF-36 scales and summary physical and mental health measures will have similar interpretations across countries. The practical implications of a third second-order SF-36 factor (general well-being) warrant further study.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Comparación Transcultural , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Análisis Factorial , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 1203-14, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817138

RESUMEN

Rasch models for polytomous items were used to assess the scaling assumptions and compare item response patterns in the 10-item SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10) for general population respondents in Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Rasch model of physical functioning developed in the United States was compared to models for other countries, and each country was compared to a multinational composite. Strong scale congruence across the seven countries was demonstrated; items that varied between countries and from the composite may reflect unique cultural response patterns or differences in translation. Scoring algorithms based on the Rasch model for each country were superior to the current Likert scoring in tests of relative validity (RV) in discriminating among age groups in all countries. In relation to the Likert PF-10 scoring (RV = 1.00), scores estimated using the Rasch rating scale model achieve a median RV of 1.31 (range: 1.01-1.59), while the Rasch partial credit model attained a median RV of 1.44 (range: 1.01-2.23). Rasch models hold good potential for improving health status measures, estimating individual scores when responses to scale items are missing, and equating scores across countries.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Comparación Transcultural , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traducciones
20.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 51(11): 933-44, 1998 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9817110

RESUMEN

The similarity in meaning assigned to response choice labels from the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) was evaluated across countries. Convenience samples of judges (range, 10 to 117; median = 48) from 13 countries rated translations of response choice labels, using a variation of the Thurstone method of equal appearing intervals. Judges marked a point on a 10-cm line-representing the magnitude of a response choice label (e.g., "good" relative to the anchors of "poor" and "excellent"). Ratings were evaluated to determine the ordinal consistency of response choice labels within a response scale; the degree to which differences between adjacent response choice labels were equal interval; and the amount of variance due to response choice label, country, judge, and interaction between response choice label and country. Results confirmed the hypothesized ordering of response choice labels; the percentage of ordinal pairs ranged from 88.7% to 100% (median = 98.2%) across countries and response scales. Examination of the average magnitudes of response choice labels supported the "quasi-interval" nature of the scales. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results supported the generalizability of response choice magnitudes across countries; labels explained 64% to 77% of the variance in ratings, and country explained 1% to 3%. These results support the equivalence of SF-36 response choice labels across countries. Departures from the assumption of equal intervals, when observed, were similar across countries and were greatest for the two response scales that are recalibrated under standard SF-36 scoring. Results provide justification for scoring translations of individual items using standard SF-36 scoring; whether these items form the same scales in other countries as they do in the United States is evaluated with tests of scaling assumptions.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Traducciones , Análisis de Varianza , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Humanos , Psicometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducción , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA