Manuka oil based ECMT-154 versus vehicle control for the topical treatment of eczema: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in community pharmacies in Aotearoa New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Eczema is a chronic, relapsing skin condition commonly managed by emollients and topical corticosteroids. Prevalence of use and demand for effective botanical therapies for eczema is high worldwide, however, clinical evidence of benefit is limited for many currently available botanical treatment options. Robustly-designed and adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are essential to determine evidence of clinical benefit. This protocol describes an RCT that aims to investigate whether a manuka oil based emollient cream, containing 2% ECMT-154, is a safe and effective topical treatment for moderate to severe eczema. METHODS: This multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 118 participants from community pharmacies in Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive topical cream with 2% ECMT-154 or vehicle control, and will apply assigned treatment twice daily to affected areas for six weeks. The primary outcome is improvement in subjective symptoms, assessed by change in POEM score. Secondary outcomes include change in objective symptoms assessed by SCORAD (part B), PO-SCORAD, DLQI, and treatment acceptability assessed by TSQM II and NRS. DISCUSSION: Recruitment through community pharmacies commenced in January 2022 and follow up will be completed by mid-2023. This study aims to collect acceptability and efficacy data of manuka oil based ECMT-154 for the treatment of eczema. If efficacy is demonstrated, this topical may provide an option for a novel emollient treatment. The community-based design of the trial is anticipated to provide a generalisable result. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from Central Health and Disability Ethics Committee (reference: 2021 EXP 11490). Findings of the study will be disseminated to study participants, published in peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12621001096842. Registered on August 18, 2021 ( https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=382412&isReview=true ). PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.1 (Dated 18/05/2022).

START CARE: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of step-wise budesonide-formoterol reliever-based treatment in children.

Background: Asthma is the most common chronic childhood respiratory condition globally. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever-based regimens reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations compared with conventional short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) reliever-based regimens in adults and adolescents. The current limited evidence for anti-inflammatory reliever therapy in children means it is unknown whether these findings are also applicable to children. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are needed. Objective: The study aim is to determine the efficacy and safety of budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) compared with standard therapy: budesonide or budesonide-formoterol maintenance, both with terbutaline reliever, in children aged 5 to 11 years with mild, moderate and severe asthma. Methods: A 52-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, phase III, two-sided superiority RCT will recruit 400 children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either budesonide-formoterol 100/6 µg Turbuhaler reliever alone or MART; or budesonide or budesonide-formoterol Turbuhaler maintenance, with terbutaline Turbuhaler reliever. The primary outcome is moderate and severe asthma exacerbations as rate per participant per year. Secondary outcomes are asthma control, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide and treatment step change. Assessment of Turbuhaler technique and cost-effectiveness analysis are also planned. Conclusion: This will be the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of a step-wise budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or MART regimen with conventional inhaled ICS or ICS-long-acting ß-agonist maintenance plus SABA reliever in children. The results will provide a much-needed evidence base for the treatment of asthma in children.

Adipose derived stem cell extracellular vesicles modulate primary human macrophages to an anti-inflammatory phenotype in vitro.

EVs released by adipose derived stem cells (ADSCs) have shown promise as a therapeutic for tissue repair because of their purported immune-regulatory properties. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from ADSCs could be beneficial in improving graft retention rates for autologous fat grafting (AFG) post-mastectomy as, currently, grafted tissue rates are variable. Enriching grafted tissue with ADSC-EVs may improve retention rates by modulating macrophages resident within both the breast and lipoaspirate. We aimed to identify key macrophage phenotypes that are modulated by ADSC-EVs in vitro. ADSCs were isolated from lipoaspirates of women undergoing AFG and characterised by flow cytometry and differentiation potential. ADSC-EVs were isolated from culture media and characterised by tuneable resistive pulse sensing, transmission electron microscopy and Western blot. Primary monocyte-derived macrophages were polarized to an M1-like (GM-CSF, IFNγ), M2-like phenotype (M-CSF, IL-4) or maintained (M0-like; M-CSF) and ADSC-EVs were co-cultured with macrophages for 48 h. Flow cytometry and high-dimensional analysis clustered macrophages post co-culture. A manual gating strategy was generated to recapitulate these clusters and was applied to a repeat experimental run. Both runs were analysed to examine the prevalence of each cluster, representing a unique macrophage phenotype, with and without ADSC-EVs. Following the addition of ADSC-EVs, M0-like macrophages demonstrated a reciprocal shift of cell distribution from a cluster with a 'high inflammatory profile' (CD36+++CD206+++CD86+++; 16.5 ± 7.0%; p < 0.0001) to a cluster with a 'lower inflammatory profile' (CD36+CD206+CD86+; 35  ± 21.5%; p < 0.05). M1-like macrophages shifted from a cluster with a 'high inflammatory profile' (CD206++CD11b++CD36++CD163++; 26.1 ± 9.4%; p = 0.0024) to a 'lower inflammatory profile' (CD206+CD11b+CD36+CD163+; 72.8  ± 8.7%; p = 0.0007). There was no shift in M2-like clusters following ADSC-EV treatment. ADSC-EVs are complex regulators of macrophage phenotype that can shift macrophages away from a heightened pro-inflammatory state.

Efficacy of a 3% Kanuka oil cream for the treatment of moderate-to-severe eczema: A single blind randomised vehicle-controlled trial.

Background: Maori, the indigenous people of New Zealand, have traditionally used the kanuka tree as part of their healing system, Rongoa Maori, and the oil from the kanuka tree has demonstratable anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial properties. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of a 3% kanuka oil (KO) cream compared to vehicle control (VC) for the topical treatment of eczema. The trial was conducted through a nationwide community pharmacy research network. Methods: This single-blind, parallel-group, randomised, vehicle-controlled trial was undertaken in 11 research trained community pharmacies across New Zealand. Eighty adult participants with self-reported moderate-to-severe eczema, assessed by Patient Orientated Eczema Measure (POEM) were randomised by blinded investigators to apply 3% KO cream or VC topically, twice daily, for six weeks. Randomisation was stratified by site and eczema severity, moderate versus severe. Primary outcome was difference in POEM scores at week six between groups by intention to treat. The study is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) reference number, ACTRN12618001754235. Findings: Eighty participants were recruited between 17 May 2019 and 10 May 2021 (41 KO group, 39 VC group). Mean POEM score (standard deviation) improved between baseline and week six for KO group, 18·4 (4·4) to 6·8 (5·5), and VC group, 18·7 (4·5) to 9·8 (6·5); mean difference between groups (95% confidence interval) was -3·1 (-6·0 to -0·2), p = 0·036. There were three adverse events reported in the KO group related to the intervention and two in the control group. Interpretation: The KO group had a significant improvement in POEM score compared to VC. Rates of adverse events and withdrawals were similar between groups with no serious adverse events reported. Treatment acceptability was high for both groups across all domains. Our results suggest that in adults with moderate-to-severe eczema, the addition of KO to a daily emollient regimen led to a reduction in POEM score compared to VC. KO may represent an effective, safe, and well tolerated treatment for moderate-to-severe eczema in adults. Funding: Hikurangi Bioactives (Ruatoria, New Zealand) and HoneyLab (Tauranga, New Zealand), supported by a grant from Callaghan Innovation.