When Is a Clay-Shoveler's Fracture, Not a Clay-Shoveler's Fracture?: A Case Report.

CASE: A 71-year-old man with a history of C5-7 anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) sustained a C7 spinous process fracture after falling from a ladder. He was initially managed nonoperatively but developed anterolisthesis and kyphosis at C7-T1 with left hand weakness over the course of 11 days. Surgical treatment included spinous process wiring and C5-T3 posterior fusion. At 14-month follow-up, he demonstrated resolution of pain and returned motor function. CONCLUSION: The patient's ACDF likely created a longer lever arm, allowing the force of his fall to be concentrated at C7-T1. Patients with a suspected Clay-Shoveler's fracture require close follow-up.

Technical Factors Contributing to Nonunion in Supracondylar Distal Femur Fractures Treated With Lateral Locked Plating: A Risk-Stratified Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify technical factors associated with nonunion after operative treatment with lateral locked plating. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ten Level I trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures (OTA/AO type 33A or C) treated with lateral locked plating from 2010 through 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Surgery for nonunion stratified by risk for nonunion. RESULTS: The cohort included 615 patients with supracondylar distal femur fractures. The median patient age was 61 years old (interquartile range: 46 -72years) and 375 (61%) were female. Observed were nonunion rates of 2% in a low risk of nonunion group (n = 129), 4% in a medium-risk group (n = 333), and 14% in a high-risk group (n = 153). Varus malreduction with an anatomic lateral distal femoral angle greater than 84 degrees, was associated with double the odds of nonunion compared to those without such varus [odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-4.2; P = 0.03]. Malreduction by medial translation of the articular block increased the odds of nonunion, with 30% increased odds per 4 mm of medial translation (95% CI, 1.0-1.6; P = 0.03). Working length increased the odds of nonunion in the medium risk group, with an 18% increase in nonunion per 10-mm increase in working length (95% CI, 1.0-1.4; P = 0.01). Increased proximal screw density was protective against nonunion (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; P = 0.02) but yielded lower mRUST scores with each 0.1 increase in screw density associated with a 0.4-point lower mRUST (95% CI, -0.55 to -0.15; P < 0.001). Lateral plate length and type of plate material were not associated with nonunion. ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Malreduction is a surgeon-controlled variable associated with nonunion after lateral locked plating of supracondylar distal femur fractures. Longer working lengths were associated with nonunion, suggesting that bridge plating may be less likely to succeed for longer fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reaming the intramedullary canal during tibial nailing does not affect in vivo intramuscular pH of the anterior tibialis.

Many investigations have evaluated local and systemic consequences of intramedullary (IM) reaming and suggest that reaming may cause, or exacerbate, injury to the soft tissues adjacent to fractures. To date, no study has examined the effect on local muscular physiology as measured by intramuscular pH (IpH). Here, we observe in vivo IpH during IM reaming for tibia fractures. Methods: Adults with acute tibia shaft fractures (level 1, academic, 2019-2021) were offered enrollment in an observational cohort. During IM nailing, a sterile, validated IpH probe was placed into the anterior tibialis (<5 cm from fracture, continuous sampling, independent research team). IpH before, during, and after reaming was averaged and compared through repeated measures ANOVA. As the appropriate period to analyze IpH during reaming is unknown, the analysis was repeated over periods of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 minutes prereaming and postreaming time intervals. Results: Sixteen subjects with tibia shaft fractures were observed during nailing. Average time from injury to surgery was 35.0 hours (SD, 31.8). Starting and ending perioperative IpH was acidic, averaging 6.64 (SD, 0.21) and 6.74 (SD, 0.17), respectively. Average reaming time lasted 15 minutes. Average IpH during reaming was 6.73 (SD, 0.15). There was no difference in IpH between prereaming, intrareaming, and postreaming periods. IpH did not differ regardless of analysis over short or long time domains compared with the duration of reaming. Conclusions: Reaming does not affect IpH. Both granular and broad time domains were tested, revealing no observable local impact.

Post-operative complications following primary ACL reconstruction using allogenic and autogenic soft tissue grafts: increased relative morbidity risk is associated with increased graft diameter.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the risk of peri-operative complication events associated with allogenic and autogenic grafts during routine follow-up for six months after primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study identified patients that underwent ACL reconstruction via an arthroscopically assisted single tunnel technique. Fixation was primarily cortical suspension (endobutton) from the femora and bicortical fixation (Washer-loc) in the tibia. Patients were monitored for six months following surgery. Morbidity was defined as complications during this period requiring medical or surgical intervention. Risk of complications was compared according to tissue type and patient characteristics. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method was applied to estimate risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals (CI) as the measure of association between graft type and morbidity risk. RESULTS: The cohort included 413 eligible patients. Sixty six percent received allograft tissue, while the remainder received autograft tissue. Morbidity risk was 7.0% among patients receiving allograft tissue and 2.8% among patients receiving autograft tissue. Allograft demonstrated elevated risk of complication versus autograft (RR=2.3 (95% CI: 0.9-7.2)), though the data are of borderline significance (p=0.11). Complications were associated with larger graft diameter in comparison to patients who experienced no complication (9.0+/-1.2 mm v. 8.4+/-1.0mm, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The relative morbidity risk was about two-fold greater among patients receiving allograft tissue. Regardless of tissue type, graft size was larger among patients who experienced a complication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.