SGIP1 modulates kinetics and interactions of the cannabinoid receptor 1 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 signalosome.

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R), a G protein-coupled receptor, plays a fundamental role in synaptic plasticity. Abnormal activity and deregulation of CB1R signaling result in a broad spectrum of pathological conditions. CB1R signaling is regulated by receptor desensitization including phosphorylation of residues within the intracellular C terminus by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) that may lead to endocytosis. Furthermore, CB1R signaling is regulated by the protein Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like (SGIP1) that hinders receptor internalization, while enhancing CB1R association with ß-arrestin. It has been postulated that phosphorylation of two clusters of serine/threonine residues, 425 SMGDS429 and 460 TMSVSTDTS468 , within the CB1R C-tail controls dynamics of the association between receptor and its interaction partners involved in desensitization. Several molecular determinants of these events are still not well understood. We hypothesized that the dynamics of these interactions are modulated by SGIP1. Using a panel of CB1Rs mutated in the aforementioned serine and threonine residues, together with an array of Bioluminescence energy transfer-based (BRET) sensors, we discovered that GRK3 forms complexes with Gßγ subunits of G proteins that largely independent of GRK3's interaction with CB1R. Furthermore, CB1R interacts only with activated GRK3. Interestingly, phosphorylation of two specific residues on CB1R triggers GRK3 dissociation from the desensitized receptor. SGIP1 increases the association of GRK3 with Gßγ subunits of G proteins, and with CB1R. Altogether, our data suggest that the CB1R signalosome complex is dynamically controlled by sequential phosphorylation of the receptor C-tail and is also modified by SGIP1.

Nonclassical Ligand-Independent Regulation of Go Protein by an Orphan Class C G-Protein-Coupled Receptor.

The orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) GPR158 is expressed in the brain, where it is involved in the osteocalcin effect on cognitive processes, and at the periphery, where it may contribute to glaucoma and cancers. GPR158 forms a complex with RGS7-ß5, leading to the regulation of neighboring GPCR-induced Go protein activity. GPR158 also interacts with αo, although no canonical Go coupling has been reported. GPR158 displays three VCPWE motifs in its C-terminal domain that are putatively involved in G-protein regulation. Here, we addressed the scaffolding function of GPR158 and its VCPWE motifs on Go. We observed that GPR158 interacted with and stabilized the amount of RGS7-ß5 through a 50-residue region downstream of its transmembrane domain and upstream of the VCPWE motifs. We show that two VCPWE motifs are involved in αo binding. Using a Gαo-ßγ bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) sensor, we found that GPR158 decreases the BRET signal as observed upon G-protein activation; however, no constitutive activity of GPR158 could be detected through the measurement of various G-protein-mediated downstream responses. We propose that the effect of GPR158 on Go is unlikely due to a canonical activation of Go, but rather to the trapping of Gαo by the VCPWE motifs, possibly leading to its dissociation from ßγ Such action of GPR158 is expected to prolong the ßγ activity, as also observed with some activators of G-protein signaling. Taken together, our data revealed a complex functional scaffolding or signaling role for GPR158 controlling Go through an original mechanism.

Post-endocytotic Deubiquitination and Degradation of the Metabotropic γ-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor by the Ubiquitin-specific Protease 14.

Mechanisms controlling the metabotropic γ-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABAB) cell surface stability are still poorly understood. In contrast with many other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), it is not subject to agonist-promoted internalization, but is constitutively internalized and rapidly down-regulated. In search of novel interacting proteins regulating receptor fate, we report that the ubiquitin-specific protease 14 (USP14) interacts with the GABAB(1b)subunit's second intracellular loop. Probing the receptor for ubiquitination using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we detected a constitutive and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-induced ubiquitination of the receptor at the cell surface. PMA also increased internalization and accelerated receptor degradation. Overexpression of USP14 decreased ubiquitination while treatment with a small molecule inhibitor of the deubiquitinase (IU1) increased receptor ubiquitination. Treatment with the internalization inhibitor Dynasore blunted both USP14 and IU1 effects on the receptor ubiquitination state, suggesting a post-endocytic site of action. Overexpression of USP14 also led to an accelerated degradation of GABABin a catalytically independent fashion. We thus propose a model whereby cell surface ubiquitination precedes endocytosis, after which USP14 acts as an ubiquitin-binding protein that targets the ubiquitinated receptor to lysosomal degradation and promotes its deubiquitination.

[Calcium, vitamin D and health]. / Kalcium, vitamin D a zdraví

The authors describe briefly recent views on physiological, pathological and practical aspects of calcium and vitamin D. The sources of calcium are the nutrients, mammal milk and milk products as well as pharmaceutical products. Their beneficial and potentially hazardous effects are discussed. The insufficiency of vitamin D [25(OH)D3] is a global health problem and the necessity of monitoring of this hepatic metabolite (as a marker) is emphasized due to its role in physio-logical and pathological processes.Key words: calcium - physiological and pathophysiological effects - vitamin D.

SGIP1 Deletion in Mice Attenuates Mechanical Hypersensitivity Elicited by Inflammation.

Background: Activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) in the nervous system modulates the processing of acute and chronic pain. CB1R activity is regulated by desensitization and internalization. SH3-containing GRB2-like protein 3-interacting protein 1 (SGIP1) inhibits the internalization of CB1R. This causes increased and prolonged association of the desensitized receptor with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (GRK3) and beta-arrestin on the cell membrane and results in decreased activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway. Genetic deletion of SGIP1 in mice leads to altered CB1R-related functions, such as decreased anxiety-like behaviors, modified cannabinoid tetrad behaviors, reduced acute nociception, and increased sensitivity to analgesics. In this work, we asked if deletion of SGIP1 affects chronic nociception and analgesic effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and WIN 55,212-2 (WIN) in mice. Methods: We measured tactile responses of hind paws to increasing pressure in wild-type and SGIP1 knock-out mice. Inflammation in the paw was induced by local injection of carrageenan. To determine the mechanical sensitivity, the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) was measured using an electronic von Frey instrument with the progression of the applied force. Results: The responses to mechanical stimuli varied depending on the sex, genotype, and treatment. SGIP1 knock-out male mice exhibited lower PWT than wild-type males. On the contrary, the female mice exhibited comparable PWT. Following THC or WIN treatment in male mice, SGIP1 knock-out males exhibited PWT lower than wild-type males. THC treatment in SGIP1 knock-out females resulted in PWT higher than after THC treatment of wild-type females. However, SGIP1 knock-out and wild-type female mice exhibited similar PWT after WIN treatment. Conclusions: We provide evidence that SGIP1, possibly by interacting with CB1R, is involved in processing the responses to chronic pain. The absence of SGIP1 results in enhanced sensitivity to mechanical stimuli in males, but not females. The antinociceptive effect of THC is superior to that of WIN in SGIP1 knock-out mice in the carrageenan-induced model of chronic pain.

Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) driven activation of cannabinoid receptor 1 results in biased intracellular signaling.

The Cannabis sativa plant has been used for centuries as a recreational drug and more recently in the treatment of patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders. In many instances, treatment goals include relief from posttraumatic disorders, anxiety, or to support treatment of chronic pain. Ligands acting on cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) are also potential targets for the treatment of other health conditions. Using an evidence-based approach, pharmacological investigation of CB1R agonists is timely, with the aim to provide chronically ill patients relief using well-defined and characterized compounds from cannabis. Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC), currently available over the counter in many countries to adults and even children, is of great interests to policy makers, legal administrators, and healthcare regulators, as well as pharmacologists. Herein, we studied the pharmacodynamics of HHC epimers, which activate CB1R. We compared their key CB1R-mediated signaling pathway activities and compared them to the pathways activated by Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). We provide evidence that activation of CB1R by HHC ligands is only broadly comparable to those mediated by Δ9-THC, and that both HHC epimers have unique properties. Together with the greater chemical stability of HHC compared to Δ9-THC, these molecules have a potential to become a part of modern medicine.

SGIP1 in axons prevents internalization of desensitized CB1R and modifies its function.

In the central nervous system (CNS), cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R) is preferentially expressed in axons where it has a unique property, namely resistance to agonist-driven endocytosis. This review aims to summarize what we know about molecular mechanisms of CB1R cell surface stability in axonal compartments, how these impact CB1R signaling, and to consider their physiological consequences. This review then focuses on a potential candidate for maintaining axonal CB1R at the cell surface, Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like endophilin interacting protein 1 (SGIP1). SGIP1 may contribute to the polarized distribution of CB1R and modify its signaling in axons. In addition, deletion of SGIP1 results in discrete behavioral changes in modalities controlled by the endocannabinoid system in vivo. Several drugs acting directly via CB1R have important therapeutic potential, however their adverse effects limit their clinical use. Future studies might reveal chemical approaches to target the SGIP1-CB1R interaction, with the aim to exploit the endocannabinoid system pharmaceutically in a discrete way, with minimized undesired consequences.

A collection of cannabinoid-related negative findings from autaptic hippocampal neurons.

Autaptic hippocampal neurons are an architecturally simple model of neurotransmission that express several forms of cannabinoid signaling. Over the past twenty years this model has proven valuable for studies ranging from enzymatic control of endocannabinoid production and breakdown, to CB1 receptor structure/function, to CB2 signaling, understanding 'spice' (synthetic cannabinoid) pharmacology, and more. However, while studying cannabinoid signaling in these neurons, we have occasionally encountered what one might call 'interesting negatives', valid and informative findings in the context of our experimental design that, given the nature of scientific publishing, may not otherwise find their way into the scientific literature. In autaptic hippocampal neurons we have found that: (1) The fatty acid binding protein (FABP) blocker SBFI-26 does not alter CB1-mediated neuroplasticity. (2) 1-AG signals poorly relative to 2-AG in autaptic neurons. (3) Indomethacin is not a CB1 PAM in autaptic neurons. (4) The CB1-associated protein SGIP1a is not necessary for CB1 desensitization. We are presenting these negative or perplexing findings in the hope that they will prove beneficial to other laboratories and elicit fruitful discussions regarding their relevance and significance.

SGIP1 is involved in regulation of emotionality, mood, and nociception and modulates in vivo signalling of cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like endophilin interacting protein 1 (SGIP1) interacts with cannabinoid CB1 receptors. SGIP1 is abundantly and principally expressed within the nervous system. SGIP1 and CB1 receptors co-localize in axons and presynaptic boutons. SGIP1 interferes with the internalization of activated CB1 receptors in transfected heterologous cells. Consequently, the transient association of CB1 receptors with ß-arrestin2 is enhanced and prolonged, and CB1 receptor-mediated ERK1/2 signalling is decreased. Because of these actions, SGIP1 may modulate affect, anxiety, pain processing, and other physiological processes controlled by the endocannabinoid system (ECS). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using a battery of behavioural tests, we investigated the consequences of SGIP1 deletion in tasks regulated by the ECS in SGIP1 constitutive knockout (SGIP1-/- ) mice. KEY RESULTS: In SGIP1-/- mice, sensorimotor gating, exploratory levels, and working memory are unaltered. SGIP1-/- mice have decreased anxiety-like behaviours. Fear extinction to tone is facilitated in SGIP1-/- females. Several cannabinoid tetrad behaviours are altered in the absence of SGIP1. SGIP1-/- males exhibit abnormal behaviours on Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol withdrawal. SGIP1 deletion also reduces acute nociception, and SGIP1-/- mice are more sensitive to analgesics. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: SGIP1 was detected as a novel protein associated with CB1 receptors, and profoundly modified CB1 receptor signalling. Genetic deletion of SGIP1 particularly affected behavioural tests of mood-related assessment and the cannabinoid tetrad. SGIP1-/- mice exhibit decreased nociception and augmented responses to CB1 receptor agonists and morphine. These in vivo findings suggest that SGIP1 is a novel modulator of CB1 receptor-mediated behaviour.

GPR10 gene deletion in mice increases basal neuronal activity, disturbs insulin sensitivity and alters lipid homeostasis.

G-protein-coupled receptor GPR10 is expressed in brain areas regulating energy metabolism. In this study, the effects of GPR10 gene deficiency on energy homeostasis in mice of both sexes fed either standard chow or a high-fat diet (HFD) were studied, with a focus on neuronal activation of PrRP neurons, and adipose tissue and liver metabolism. GPR10 deficiency in males upregulated the phasic and tonic activity of PrRP neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract. GPR10 knockout (KO) males on a standard diet displayed a higher body weight than their wild-type (WT) littermates due to an increase in adipose tissue mass; however, HFD feeding did not cause weight differences between genotypes. Expression of lipogenesis genes was suppressed in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of GPR10 KO males. In contrast, GPR10 KO females did not differ in body weight from their WT controls, but showed elevated expression of lipid metabolism genes in the liver and subcutaneous adipose tissue compared to WT controls. An attenuated non-esterified fatty acids change after glucose load compared to WT controls suggested a defect in insulin-mediated suppression of lipolysis in GPR10 KO females. Indirect calorimetry did not reveal any differences in energy expenditure among groups. In conclusion, deletion of GPR10 gene resulted in changes in lipid metabolism in mice of both sexes, however in different extent. An increase in adipose tissue mass observed in only GPR10 KO males may have been prevented in GPR10 KO females owing to a compensatory increase in the expression of metabolic genes.

Surface expression of metabotropic glutamate receptor variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b in transfected HEK293 cells.

Class C G-protein coupled receptors form obligatory dimers. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are found commonly as homodimers. Alternative splicing of mGluR1 gene results in vivo in the expression of a long variant mGluR1a and at least two short variants mGluR1b and d. The amino acid sequences diverge within their carboxyl-termini six amino acid residues following RRKK motif. This four basic residue sequence was shown to have pronounced impact on function and trafficking of the short variants, while for mGluR1a the long C-terminus reduces the effects caused by presence of the RRKK motif. Here we investigated consequences of interactions between long mGluR1a and short mGluR1b variants. Our results show that mGluR1a interferes with mGluR1b trafficking to the cell surface in HEK293 transfected cells. Expression of a mGlu1a mutant incapable of activating G-proteins with mGluR1b mutated in the glutamate binding site led to the formation of a functional heterodimer. Moreover, we show that swapping long mGluR1a and/or short mGluR1b C-termini with corresponding regions in chimerical GB1 and GB2 gamma-amino butyric acid b (GABAb) receptor subunits do not exclude heterodimerization. These data reveal that the C-terminal ends of mGluR1 do not control subunit association, such that mGluR1 dimers with two distinct C-termini can form and function properly.

Assembly-dependent surface targeting of the heterodimeric GABAB Receptor is controlled by COPI but not 14-3-3.

Cell surface expression of transmembrane proteins is strictly regulated. Mutually exclusive interaction with COPI or 14-3-3 proteins has been proposed as a mechanism underlying such trafficking control of various proteins. In particular, 14-3-3 dimers have been proposed to "sense" correctly assembled oligomers, allowing their surface targeting by preventing COPI-mediated intracellular retention. Here we examined whether such a mechanism is involved in the quality control of the heterodimeric G protein-coupled GABAB receptor. Its GB1 subunit, carrying the retention signal RSR, only reaches the cell surface when associated with the GB2 subunit. We show that COPI and 14-3-3 specifically bind to the GB1 RSR sequence and that COPI is involved in its intracellular retention. However, we demonstrate that the interaction with 14-3-3 is not required for proper function of the GABAB receptor quality control. Accordingly, competition between 14-3-3 and COPI cannot be considered as a general trafficking control mechanism. A possible other role for competition between COPI and 14-3-3 binding is discussed.

Reelin, very-low-density lipoprotein receptor, and apolipoprotein E receptor 2 control somatic NMDA receptor composition during hippocampal maturation in vitro.

Reelin is a secreted protein that regulates brain layer formation during embryonic development. Reelin binds several receptors, including two members of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, the apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) and the very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR). Despite the high level of expression of Reelin and ApoER2 in the postnatal brain, their functions in the adult CNS remain elusive. Here, using electrophysiological, immunocytochemical, and biochemical approaches in cultured postnatal hippocampal neurons, we show that Reelin controls the change in subunit composition of somatic NMDA glutamate receptors (NMDARs) during maturation. We found that maturation is characterized by the gradual decrease of the participation of NR1/2B receptors to whole-cell NMDAR-mediated currents. This maturational change was mirrored by a timely correlated increase of both Reelin immunoreactivity in neuronal somata and the amount of secreted Reelin. Chronic blockade of the function of Reelin with antisense oligonucleotides or the function-blocking antibody CR-50 prevented the decrease of NR1/2B-mediated whole-cell currents. Conversely, exogenously added recombinant Reelin accelerated the maturational changes in NMDA-evoked currents. The maturation-induced change in NMDAR subunits also was blocked by chronic treatment with an inhibitor of the Src kinase signaling pathway or an antagonist of the LDL receptors, but not by inhibitors of another class of Reelin receptor belonging to the integrin family. Consistent with these results, immunocytochemistry revealed that NR1-expressing neurons also expressed ApoER2 and VLDLR. These data reveal a new role for Reelin and LDL receptors and reinforce the idea of a prominent role of extracellular matrix proteins in postnatal maturation.

SGIP1 alters internalization and modulates signaling of activated cannabinoid receptor 1 in a biased manner.

Many diseases of the nervous system are accompanied by alterations in synaptic functions. Synaptic plasticity mediated by the endogenous cannabinoid system involves the activation of the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R). The principles of CB1R signaling must be understood in detail for its therapeutic exploration. We detected the Src homology 3-domain growth factor receptor-bound 2-like (endophilin) interacting protein 1 (SGIP1) as a novel CB1R partner. SGIP1 is functionally linked to clathrin-mediated endocytosis and its overexpression in animals leads to an energy regulation imbalance resulting in obesity. We report that SGIP1 prevents the endocytosis of activated CB1R and that it alters signaling via the CB1R in a biased manner. CB1R mediated G-protein activation is selectively influenced by SGIP1, ß-arrestin associated signaling is changed profoundly, most likely as a consequence of the prevention of the receptor's internalization elicited by SGIP1.

Activation mechanism of the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.

The GABA(B) receptor was the first heteromeric G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) identified. Indeed, both GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits appear necessary to get a functional GABA(B) receptor. Soon after the cloning of both subunits, it was demonstrated that GABA(B2) was required for GABA(B1) to reach the cell surface. However, even a mutated GABA(B1) able to reach the cell surface is not functional alone despite its ability to bind GABA(B) ligands. This clearly demonstrated that GABA(B2) is not only required for the correct trafficking of GABA(B1) but also for the correct functioning of the receptor. In the present review article, we will summarize our actual knowledge of the specific role of each subunit in ligand recognition, intramolecular transduction, G-protein activation and allosteric modulation. We will show that the GABA(B) receptor is an heterodimer (not an hetero-oligomer), that agonists bind in GABA(B1), whereas GABA(B2) controls agonist affinity and is responsible for G-protein coupling. Finally, we will show that the recently identified positive allosteric modulator CGP7930 acts as a direct activator of the heptahelical domain of GABA(B2), being therefore the first GABA(B2) ligand identified so far.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 splice variants mGluR1a and mGluR1b combine in mGluR1a/b dimers in vivo.

The assembly of two covalently linked monomers into dimeric complexes is a prerequisite for metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) function. The former concept of a strictly homodimeric subunit contribution in metabotropic glutamate receptor complexes has recently been brought into question. Alternative splicing of the GRM1 gene results in expression of variants that vary within their intracellular C-termini. Here we bring evidence that the short mGluR1b variant is found preferentially in a complex with the long mGluR1a variant in the rodent brain. The mGluR1a and mGluR1b variants distribution overlaps in Purkinje cells and the two variants colocalize in their spines. However mGluR1a and mGluR1b show distinct sub-cellular localization when expressed alone in neurons. We discovered that trafficking of mGluR1b to distal dendrites is reliant on its association with mGluR1a and that the long C-terminus of mGluR1a within the mGluR1a/b dimer is necessary for trafficking of the complex.

Sequential inter- and intrasubunit rearrangements during activation of dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor 1.

The metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1), a class C member of the heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor family, is a constitutive dimer that regulates excitatory neurotransmission. We investigated the role of homodimer formation in mGluR1 activation by examining activation-dependent inter- and intrasubunit conformational changes by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). We inserted yellow and cyan fluorescent proteins in the second intracellular loop and at the carboxyl terminus of mGluR1 to act as FRET sensors and expressed these proteins in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Agonist-dependent activation of these mGluR1 chimeras rapidly increased the intersubunit FRET, suggesting rapid movement of the subunits relative to each other. After intersubunit movement, the intrasubunit FRET decreased, reflecting conformational changes within a subunit. Cotransfection of chimeric receptor subunits that were capable or incapable of G protein coupling revealed that only a single subunit assumes an active state in an mGluR1 receptor dimer.

Intestinal cell-specific vitamin D receptor (VDR)-mediated transcriptional regulation of CYP3A4 gene.

CYP3A4 is the most important drug-metabolizing enzyme that is involved in biotransformation of more than 50% of drugs. Pregnane X receptor (PXR) dominantly controls CYP3A4 inducibility in the liver, whereas vitamin D receptor (VDR) transactivates CYP3A4 in the intestine by secondary bile acids. Four major functional PXR-binding response elements of CYP3A4 have been discovered and their cooperation was found to be crucial for maximal up-regulation of the gene in hepatocytes. VDR and PXR recognize similar response element motifs and share DR3(XREM) and proximal ER6 (prER6) response elements of the CYP3A4 gene. In this work, we tested whether the recently discovered PXR response elements DR4(eNR3A4) in the XREM module and the distal ER6 element in the CLEM4 module (CLEM4-ER6) bind VDR/RXRalpha heterodimer, whether the elements are involved in the intestinal transactivation, and whether their cooperation with other elements is essential for maximal intestinal expression of CYP3A4. Employing a series of gene reporter plasmids with various combinations of response element mutations transiently transfected into four intestinal cell lines, electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP), we found that the CLEM4-ER6 motif interacts with VDR/RXRalpha heterodimer and partially cooperates with DR3(XREM) and prER6 in both basal and VDR-mediated inducible CYP3A4 regulation in intestinal cells. In contrast, eNR3A4 is involved only in the basal transactivation in intestinal cells and in the PXR-mediated rifampicin-induced transactivation of CYP3A4 in LS174T intestinal cells. We thus describe a specific ligand-induced VDR-mediated transactivation of the CYP3A4 gene in intestinal cells that differs from PXR-mediated CYP3A4 regulation in hepatocytes.