Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 44
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(1): 119-122, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742870

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study is to determine the financial practicality for the use of nasal povidone-iodine (NP-I) in the preoperative holding area in attempt to decrease the rate of infection that is associated with operative fixation of closed pilon fractures. Institutional costs for treating postoperative infection following a closed pilon fracture, along with costs associated with preoperative NP-I use, were obtained. A break-even equation was used to analyze these costs to determine if the use of NP-I would decrease the current infection rate (17%) enough to be financially beneficial for routine use preoperatively. The total cost of treating a postoperative infection was found to be $18,912, with the cost of NP-I being $30 per patient dose. Considering a 17% infection rate and utilizing the break-even equation, NP-I was found to be economically viable if it decreased the current infection rate by 0.0016% (Number Needed to Treat = 63,051.7). This break-even model suggests that the use of NP-I in the preoperative holding area is financially beneficial for decreasing the rate of infection associated with the treatment of closed pilon fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Fijación de Fractura
2.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 28(2): 137-143, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31411960

RESUMEN

Timing of definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures is a subject of continued controversy. The purpose of this study was to determine if early definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures in the setting of polytrauma decreased the risk of pulmonary complications and mortality. The 2009-2012 National Sample Program of the National Trauma Data Bank was queried for all patients 18 to 65 years with Injury Severity Scores (ISS) >15 who underwent definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures. Mortality, perioperative complications, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were the primary outcome measures of interest. Following multivariate analyses, increased time to surgery was found to portend a statistically significant increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS), mean ventilator time, length of ICU and hospital stay, and mortality. Earlier definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures in the setting of polytrauma is associated with significantly decreased risk of ARDS, mean ventilator time, length of ICU and hospital stay, and mortality. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 28(2):137-143, 2019).


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Traumatismo Múltiple , Fracturas del Fémur/complicaciones , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/prevención & control , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
3.
CMAJ ; 190(31): E923-E932, 2018 08 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30087128

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The appropriate timing of hip fracture surgery remains a matter of debate. We sought to estimate the effect of changes in timing policy and the proportion of deaths attributable to surgical delay. METHODS: We obtained discharge abstracts from the Canadian Institute for Health Information for hip fracture surgery in Canada (excluding Quebec) between 2004 and 2012. We estimated the expected population-average risks of inpatient death within 30 days if patients were surgically treated on day of admission, inpatient day 2, day 3 or after day 3. We weighted observations with the inverse propensity score of surgical timing according to confounders selected from a causal diagram. RESULTS: Of 139 119 medically stable patients with hip fracture who were aged 65 years or older, 32 120 (23.1%) underwent surgery on admission day, 60 505 (43.5%) on inpatient day 2, 29 236 (21.0%) on day 3 and 17 258 (12.4%) after day 3. Cumulative 30-day in-hospital mortality was 4.9% among patients who were surgically treated on admission day, increasing to 6.9% for surgery done after day 3. We projected an additional 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8 to 15.1) deaths per 1000 surgeries if all surgeries were done after inpatient day 3 instead of admission day. The attributable proportion of deaths for delays beyond inpatient day 2 was 16.5% (95% CI 12.0% to 21.0%). INTERPRETATION: Surgery on admission day or the following day was estimated to reduce postoperative mortality among medically stable patients with hip fracture. Hospitals should expedite operating room access for patients whose surgery has already been delayed for nonmedical reasons.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posterior , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
4.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(2): 204-210, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28986048

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses have failed to collectively favor either open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation. The purpose of our investigation was to elucidate the optimal decision between ORIF and IMN for acute traumatic operative humeral shaft fractures through an expected value decision analysis. METHODS: We performed an expected value decision analysis and sensitivity analysis to elucidate the difference between ORIF and IMN fixation for patients with acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures. We surveyed 100 consecutive, randomly selected volunteers for their outcome preferences. Outcomes included union, delayed union, major complications, minor complications, and infection. A literature review was used to establish probabilities for each of these respective outcomes. A decision tree was constructed and a fold-back analysis was performed to find an expected patient value for each treatment option. RESULTS: The overall patient expected values for ORIF and IMN were 12.7 and 11.2, respectively. Despite artificially decreasing the rates of major complications, infection, delayed union, and nonunion each to 0% for IMN fixation (sensitivity analysis), ORIF continued to maintain a greater overall patient expected value (12.7 vs. 11.4, 11.2, 11.2, and 12.1, respectively). Only if the rate of nonunion after ORIF was increased from 6.1% to 16.8% did the overall expected outcome after ORIF equal that of IMN (11.2). CONCLUSION: Our expected value decision analysis demonstrates that patients favor ORIF over IMN as the optimal treatment decision for an acute traumatic humeral shaft fracture.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 27(2): 113-118, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084818

RESUMEN

Current literature is deficient in its description of acute complications following major traumatic upper extremity amputations (UEAs). This study sought to identify acute complications following major UEAs by the 2009-2012 National Trauma Databank to extract demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, and surgical characteristics for major traumatic UEA patients. Multivariate analyses identified significant predictors of mortality and major systemic complications. Major traumatic upper extremity amputations were identified in 1190 patients. Major systemic complications occurred in 13% of patients and most often involved pulmonary (7.4%) or renal (4.7%) systems. Overall in-hospital mortality rate was 11%. Male sex, prehospital systolic blood pressure less than 90, Injury Severity Score > 16, and initial Glasgow Coma Scale > 8 were risk factors for complications or in-hospital mortality. Acute replantation was performed in 0.12%. Systemic complications following major traumatic UEA typically affect the pulmonary system. Injury or patient-dependent factors did not influence acute treatment with revision amputation versus replantation. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 27(2):113-118, 2018).


Asunto(s)
Amputación Traumática/complicaciones , Amputación Traumática/mortalidad , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Adolescente , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedades Respiratorias/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Sístole , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 24(3): 155-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26688984

RESUMEN

Returning to active military duty and to recreational activities has been difficult for service members sustaining combat-related high-energy lower extremity trauma (HELET). The Return to Run (RTR) clinical pathway was introduced in 2009 with favorable results in returning active duty service members to running, sports participation, active duty, and deployments. The RTR pathway was introduced at a second institution in 2011 to determine if the pathway could be reproduced at a different institution. In this study, a series of patients is presented who underwent limb salvage procedures after sustaining HELET at an outside military treatment facility and subsequently participated in the authors' RTR protocol. They received a novel orthotic device from the San Antonio Military Medical Center and returned to their home institution for rehabilitation. In this cohort, an improvement in functional capability was obtained in nearly all patients. In conclusion, successful translation of the integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative to outside institutions is possible.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión/rehabilitación , Vías Clínicas , Fracturas Óseas/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Pierna/rehabilitación , Recuperación del Miembro/métodos , Personal Militar , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Heridas Relacionadas con la Guerra/rehabilitación , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/rehabilitación , Accidentes por Caídas , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Fijadores Externos , Fijación de Fractura , Humanos , Masculino , Reinserción al Trabajo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323930

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of pelvic ring injuries is 34.3% per 100,000 capita. No studies have determined the ability of a female patient to have a vaginal delivery after undergoing pelvic fracture fixation. However, many obstetricians are generally unwilling to have their patients attempt a vaginal delivery in the setting of symphyseal or sacroiliac fixation. METHODS: An exhaustive search of the National Library of Medicine database was performed, and it is hypothesized that cesarean section rates would be higher for women who have a child after one of these pelvic ring injuries. RESULTS: There is a 15% increase in cesarean rates using data from the National Center for Health Statistics. In addition, there is an observable increase in new cesarean rates. DISCUSSION: Currently, there is no clear evidence to support an elective cesarean section as the sole indication after a prior pelvic fracture. To date, no studies have determined the ability of a female patient to have a vaginal delivery after undergoing pelvic fracture fixation. CONCLUSION: Thus, until the increased cesarean section rate has been explained, it could be problematic to counsel the patient to avoid a vaginal delivery after sustaining a pelvic ring fracture. Hence, conducting additional studies on this topic would deem to be necessary.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Fracturas Óseas , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Parto Obstétrico , Pelvis , Bases de Datos Factuales
8.
Foot Ankle Int ; 34(6): 890-7, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23564426

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Customized foot plates attached to the foot ring of an ankle-spanning circular external fixator present a unique opportunity for patients undergoing complex lower-extremity limb salvage to participate in highly advanced weight-bearing physical therapy. The purpose of this study was to identify the rehabilitation capabilities afforded by this external fixator modification. METHODS: Surgical logs and radiographs were reviewed to identify all lower-extremity limb salvage patients from February 2008 to December 2010 treated with an ankle-spanning circular external fixator and a customized foot plate treated by the same orthopedic surgeon and enrolled in our institution's Return To Run clinical pathway. Medical records were reviewed to identify a series of exercises that each patient was able to perform. RESULTS: Eleven patients were identified. All patients were treated by the same physical therapist. All 11 patients were able to bear full weight on their foot plates and perform regular and split squats. Six of 11 patients were able to ambulate unassisted, and 5 patients required a cane. All 11 patients could navigate stairs and use an elliptical and stair-stepping machine. Six of 11 patients could perform single-leg hack squats. Eight of 11 patients were able to perform double-leg shuttle jumps, although only 5 of 11 patients could perform single-leg shuttle jumps. Five of 11 patients were able to perform a single-leg balance. Only 1 patient was able to run on the foot plate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing lower-extremity limb salvage with an ankle-spanning circular external fixator and a customized foot plate were able to participate in highly advanced weight-bearing physical therapy exercises during the osseous and soft-tissue healing process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.


Asunto(s)
Fijadores Externos , Peroné/cirugía , Fracturas Óseas/rehabilitación , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/rehabilitación , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Traumatismos por Explosión/cirugía , Diseño de Equipo , Peroné/lesiones , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal Militar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Adulto Joven
9.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(7): e294-e300, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36730795

RESUMEN

SUMMARY: A single implant all-internal magnet-driven bone transport nail (BTN-NuVasive Specialized Orthopaedics Inc) has recently been introduced as a treatment method for segmental tibial bone defects. This innovation provides promise in the management of segmental bone defects because it negates numerous complications associated with circular external fixation and the need for multiple implants when considering hybrid plate-assisted bone segment transport constructs. Given the novelty of the BTN, description of the surgical application and patient outcome measures are scarce in the current literature. To date, we have treated 4 patients with an average age of 27 years (range 19-44 years) using the BTN for segmental tibial defects ranging from 50 to 128 mm. We have accumulated data over an average follow-up of 18.07 months (range 12.96-25.13 months), demonstrating good patient tolerance of the device. Three patients successfully completed their treatment course with a calculated average bone healing index of 41.4 days/cm (range 31.41-54.82 days/cm). One patient was noted to experience an asymptomatic docking site nonunion requiring subsequent surgery for nonunion repair. Implant-associated complications included symptomatic implant, axial malalignment, docking site nonunion, and external remote control technical malfunction. Injury-related complications were encountered and noted to include: superficial infection, wound dehiscence, peroneal tendonitis, and joint rigidity. In this study, the authors present a case series using this implant to date and discuss our experiences with the BTN with reference to clinical indications, tibial bone preparation, BTN implantation, transport protocol, docking site procedure, and clinical/radiographic outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fracturas de la Tibia , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Fijadores Externos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
OTA Int ; 6(4 Suppl): e235, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448567

RESUMEN

Soft tissue defects involving the distal lower extremity present challenging problems for orthopaedic surgeons to manage. Historically, wounds not amenable to primary closure have necessitated assistance from multidisciplinary teams using plastic surgeons to obtain adequate soft tissue coverage through rotational flap or free tissue transfer procedures. Techniques related to soft tissue rearrangement and local rotational flap coverage have advanced over the years with a growing knowledge of local anatomy and vasculature. The reverse sural flap may be performed to cover soft tissue defects within 10 cm of the foot or ankle region, negating the need for microvascular intervention. The simplistic nature of the reverse sural flap is appealing to orthopaedic surgeons as a means to provide timely patient care without additional support because it does not require microvasculature work or the need for intraoperative microscopes and has been popularized among orthopaedic trauma surgeons as a necessary tool to possess. Here, we discuss the reverse sural flap to include history, relevant anatomy, clinical indications, and a description of the technique for application.

11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37285513

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The US Department of Homeland Security has reported increases in encounters and apprehensions at the US Southwest border for the past several years. The purposes of this study were to assess the demographics, patterns of injuries, and surgical interventions, associated with falls from height along the US-Mexico border. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at a Level I trauma center from January 2016 through December 2021 of all patients who fell from height crossing the US-Mexico border and presented with injuries requiring admission. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were admitted with a median age of 30 years (interquartile range [IQR] 16, range 6 to 65). Monthly frequency of admissions increased markedly with a median of 18.5 (IQR 5.3) in 2021. Patients presented with limited health data, and comorbidities were identified in 111 patients (24.7%). Median height fallen was 5.5 m (18 ft). Patients sustaining a fall from ≥ 5.5 m were markedly more likely to have an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15. Median length of stay was 9 days (IQR 11). There were a total of 1,066 injuries with 723 extremity and pelvic; 236 spine; and 107 head or neck, face, thorax, or abdominal injuries. Median ISS was 9.0 (IQR 7, range 1 to 75, 33% > 15). Tibial plafond fracture and spine injury were markedly associated with longer lengths of stay and ISS > 15. All injuries resulted in 635 separate surgical events and 930 procedures. Clinical follow-up occurred in 55 patients (12.2%), with median duration of 28 days (range 6 days to 8 months). DISCUSSION: Injuries associated with border crossings and falls from height were serious and increased in frequency. As the US policy on border security evolves, surgeons in these regions should be prepared to handle the associated injuries and sequelae. Prevention of these serious and debilitating injuries should be undertaken to decrease the burden of disease.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Vertebrales , Centros Traumatológicos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Adulto , México/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidentes por Caídas
12.
J Orthop ; 38: 32-37, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36942091

RESUMEN

Aims & objectives: YouTube is a non-peer-reviewed platform with a large library of healthcare-related videos which attempt to provide educational content. The goal of this study is to analyze the quality, absorbability, and educational content of videos available to patients on YouTube regarding ankle fractures. Materials & methods: On May 31, 2022, over 550 videos populated the initial search of "ankle fracture" within YouTube's platform. The first 100 videos were reviewed, and 62 videos were included in the final analysis. Video characteristics were recorded and evaluated. Videos were assessed using three objective scoring systems: (1) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, (2) the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio and visual materials (PEMAT), and (3) the novel Ankle Fracture Content Score (AFCS). Results: Each scoring system had high internal consistency and interrater reliability. The mean JAMA, PEMAT understandability, PEMAT actionability, and AFCS were 2.92, 61.85%, 16.38%, and 4.67, respectively. No association was seen between video popularity metrics and quality of information. The understandability of the patient-targeted videos was greater than those targeted at healthcare professionals (P = 0.049). Conclusion: The information regarding ankle fractures available on YouTube for patient education is poor with no correlation between quality and popularity. This study illustrates the need for future collaboration between YouTube and trusted medical societies to provide patients with the highest quality information.

13.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 53(3): 297-310, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35725038

RESUMEN

Soft tissue reconstructive techniques are powerful tools for the orthopedic surgeon caring for lower extremity trauma. This article seeks to inform orthopedic surgeons about useful techniques for skin closure, secondary wound closure techniques, and rotational flaps of the lower leg. Split thickness skin grafting, piecrusting, and the use of negative pressure wound therapy for skin closure, as well as rotational gastrocnemius, soleus, and reverse sural artery flaps are discussed with emphasis on techniques for the nonvascular and nonmicrovascular orthopedic surgeon.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Pierna , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Pierna/cirugía , Traumatismos de la Pierna/cirugía , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Injury ; 53(10): 3471-3474, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948512

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nails (IMN) in the initial management of Gustilo-Anderson type Ⅲ (GAIII) open tibia fractures. METHODS: A break-even equation was used to analyze the costs associated with antibiotic cement-coated IMN and postoperative infection following GAⅢ open tibia fractures. This equation produced a new infection rate, which defines what percentage the antibiotic coated IMN needs to decrease the initial infection rate for its prophylactic use to be cost-effective. The postoperative infection rate used for calculations was 30%, a value established in current literature for these fracture types (6-33%). The institutional costs associated with a single operative debridement and resultant inpatient stay and treatment were determined. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to demonstrate how various total costs of infection and different infection rates affected the break-even rate, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), and the number needed to treat (NNT). RESULTS: Financial review yielded an average institutional cost of treating a postoperative infection to be $13,282.85. This number was inclusive of all procedures during an inpatient stay. The added cost of the antibiotic coated implant to the hospital is $743.42. Utilizing the break-even formula with these costs and a 30% initial infection rate, antibiotic coated IMN was economically viable if it decreased infection rate by 0.056% (NNT = 1,785.714). CONCLUSION: This break-even analysis model suggests the initial use of an antibiotic coated IMN in the setting of GAⅢ open tibia fractures is cost-effective.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Abiertas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cementos para Huesos/uso terapéutico , Clavos Ortopédicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Foot Ankle Spec ; 15(1): 18-26, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32517507

RESUMEN

Background: Literature evaluating outcomes following operative fixation of Lisfranc injuries has demonstrated high rates of chronic disability, particularly in those returning to prior levels of physical function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the occupational outcomes and return to running after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or arthrodesis for Lisfranc fracture-dislocations in a moderate- to high-demand military cohort. Methods: All active-duty servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodesis (Current Procedural Terminology 28615 and 28730, respectively) for confirmed Lisfranc fracture-dislocations (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 838.03 or 838.13) with minimum 2-year follow-up were isolated from the Military Health System. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded. Return to military function, return to running, perioperative morbidity, and rates of reoperation for complication were the outcomes of interest. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate logistic regression determined the association between patient demographics, type of fracture fixation (ie, ORIF vs arthrodesis) and functional outcomes, including medical separation. Results: Among Lisfranc injuries, 64 patients underwent ORIF while 6 underwent primary arthrodeses with a mean age of 28.1 years. At mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range, 2.0-6.3 years), 20% of servicemembers underwent medical separation due to limitations related to their injuries. body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 (OR 17.67; 95% CI, 3.69-84.53) and Army or Marines service branch (OR 3.86; 95% CI, 1.08-13.86) were significant independent predictors for medical separation. Among servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodeses, 69% returned to occupationally required daily running during the follow-up period. Servicemembers with a BMI <30 kg/m2 were more likely to return to running (OR 13.14, 95% CI, 2.50-69.19). Radiographic evidence of posttraumatic Lisfranc osteoarthritis occurred in 10 (16%) servicemembers who underwent internal fixation, and 82% of ORIF patients underwent implant removal. Conclusions: At mean 3.5-year follow-up, 80% of servicemembers undergoing ORIF or primary arthrodeses for Lisfranc injuries remained on active duty or successfully completed their military service, and 69% were able to resume occupationally required daily running. Surgeons should preoperatively counsel patients with these injuries on the possibility of persistent long-term disability.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective series.


Asunto(s)
Fractura-Luxación , Carrera , Adulto , Artrodesis , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Reducción Abierta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Mil Med ; 187(1-2): e17-e21, 2022 01 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484247

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Trauma systems within the United States have adapted the "golden hour" principle to guide prehospital planning with the goal to deliver the injured to the trauma facility in under 60 minutes. In an effort to reduce preventable prehospital death, in 2009, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates mandated that prehospital transport of injured combat casualties must be less than 60 minutes. The U.S. Military has implemented a 60-minute timeline for the transport of battlefield causalities to medical teams to include Forward Surgical Teams and Forward Resuscitative Surgical Teams. The inclusion of orthopedic surgeons on Forward Surgical Teams has been extrapolated from the concept of damage control orthopedics (DCO). However, it is not clear if orthopedic surgeons have yielded a demonstrable benefit in morbidity or mortality reduction. The purpose of this article is to investigate the function of orthopedic surgeons during the military "golden hour." MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English literature was reviewed for evidence supporting the use of orthopedic surgeons within the golden hour. Literature was reviewed in light of the 2009 golden hour mandate by Secretary Gates as well as those papers which highlighted the utility of DCO within the golden hour. RESULTS: Evidence for orthopedic surgery within the "golden hour" or in the current conflicts when the United States enjoys air superiority was not identified. CONCLUSIONS: Within the military context, DCO, specifically pertaining to fracture fixation, should not be considered an element of golden hour planning and thus orthopedic surgeons are best utilized at more centralized Role 3 facility locations. The focus within the first hour after injury on the battlefield should be maintained on rapid and effective prehospital care combined with timely evacuation, as these are the most critical factors to reducing mortality.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Militar , Personal Militar , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Humanos , Resucitación , Estados Unidos
17.
Injury ; 53(11): 3742-3747, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104254

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in ABOS part II candidate's operative management of geriatric (≥65 years) proximal humerus fractures over the 2010-2020 decade. METHODS: This retrospective database cohort study utilized the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) database for candidates taking Part II of their boards. Surgical coding was reviewed and the ICD10 data was correlated to the CPT code for shoulder arthroplasty or open reduction internal fixation. We investigated the number of proximal humerus fracture operative cases per year, the percent arthroplasty used per year, the stratification of percent arthroplasty per orthopaedic fellowship subspecialty and geographic region. RESULTS: A total of 2,409 operative cases for proximal humerus fractures in patients 65 years of age and older were submitted by 1,420 ABOS candidates. There was a 37% reduction in operatively managed proximal humerus fractures among ABOS part II candidates between the first half of the decade (2010-2015, 263.2 +/- 13.4) and the second half of the decade (2016-2020, 166 +/- 31.2; p<.05). There also was a downward trend with a 53% reduction in percent treated with arthroplasty as compared to ORIF during those same windows (2010-2015, 34.4 +/-11.7) and (2016-2020, 16.2 +/- 6.4; p<.5). Partitioned by single fellowship training, Shoulder and Elbow (S&E) surgeons performed the highest percent arthroplasty at 25.2%, followed by Sports at 23.1% and the lowest percent arthroplasty was Trauma at 11.7%. The Southeast United States had the lowest percentage arthroplasty at 15.8% as compared to the Midwest (23.8%) and Northeast (25.8%). CONCLUSION: Despite the rapid growth of both the elderly population and related geriatric proximal humerus fractures, ABOS candidates are treating less with surgery. There has been approximately a 37% decrease in the total number of operatively treated proximal humerus fractures between the first and second half 2010-2020 decade. When operative treatment is performed, there is a trend towards ORIF over an arthroplasty. Trauma fellowship trained surgeons are less likely to perform an arthroplasty as compared to other subspecialties. The Southeast region is least likely to perform an arthroplasty as compared to the Midwest or Northeast.


Asunto(s)
Ortopedia , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Hombro , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Húmero/lesiones , Reducción Abierta
18.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(8): 375, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992194

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To review and evaluate the validity of common perceptions and practices regarding radiation safety in orthopaedic trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. SUBJECTS: N/A. INTERVENTION: The intervention involved personal protective equipment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measurements included radiation dose estimates. RESULTS: Surgeon radiation exposure estimates performed at the level of the thyroid, chest, and pelvis demonstrate an estimated total annual exposure of 1521 mR, 2452 mR, and 1129 mR, respectively. In all cases, wearing lead provides a significant reduction (90% or better) in the amount of radiation exposure (in both radiation risk and levels of radiation reaching the body) received by the surgeon. Surgeons are inadequately protected from radiation exposure with noncircumferential lead. The commonly accepted notion that there is negligible exposure when standing greater than 6 feet from the radiation source is misleading, particularly when cumulative exposure is considered. Finally, we demonstrated that trauma surgeons specializing in pelvis and acetabular fracture care are at an increased risk of exposure to potentially dangerous levels of radiation, given the amount of radiation required for their caseload. CONCLUSION: Common myths and misperceptions regarding radiation in orthopaedic trauma are unfounded. Proper use of circumferential personal protective equipment is critical in preventing excess radiation exposure.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Exposición a la Radiación , Cirujanos , Humanos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
J Trauma ; 71(1 Suppl): S120-4, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21795870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ability to return to running and sports participation after lower extremity limb salvage has not been well documented previously. Although the ability to ambulate without pain or assistive devices is generally a criteria for a good limb salvage outcome, many patients at our institution have expressed a desire to return to a more athletic lifestyle to include running and sports participation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the types of athletic endeavors our high-energy lower extremity trauma patients were able to pursue after limb salvage. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed lower extremity limb salvage patients who were at least 12 weeks status after external fixation removal and participated in our limb salvage return-to-running clinical pathway. Patients were rehabilitated to their highest functional level through a sports medicine-based approach. A custom energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis was implemented to help augment plantarflexion strength in conjunction with running gait retraining. RESULTS: The first 10 patients to complete the clinical pathway were identified. All patients were treated at the same institution by the same orthopedic surgeon and physical therapist. Eight patients have returned to running, and 10 patients have returned to weight-lifting. Seven patients have returned to cycling, three have returned to golf, three to basketball, and two to softball. Two patients have completed a mini-triathlon. CONCLUSION: Aggressive rehabilitation, an energy-storing ankle-foot orthosis, and running gait retraining can restore an active recreational lifestyle to patients who have undergone lower extremity limb salvage.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Pierna/rehabilitación , Recuperación del Miembro/rehabilitación , Carrera , Deportes , Adulto , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro/efectos adversos , Masculino , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
20.
J Surg Orthop Adv ; 20(1): 67-73, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21477537

RESUMEN

There is a significant need for orthopaedic care in developing countries. For the past 10 years, the United States Army has supported annual orthopaedic hand surgery humanitarian missions to Honduras. The goal of this article is to compare the premission planning to the realities of mission execution to provide a template for future missions. Premission planning began 1 year before the mission. Based on previous missions, supplies were brought for 50 surgical cases. The mission began with 1 preoperative clinic day followed by 8 operative days and 1 postoperative clinic day. Of the 99 prescreened patients, 65 were indicated for surgery. A total of 58 surgeries were performed using innovative methods to stretch available supplies. A multidisciplinary and multination concerted effort is required for a successful humanitarian medical mission. A premission plan is critical prior to arrival and a contingency plan must be in place for missing mission-critical items.


Asunto(s)
Misiones Médicas/organización & administración , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Altruismo , Honduras , Humanos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA