RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transradial cardiac catheterization is equally effective but has fewer vascular complications than transfemoral catheterization. There is a paucity of data on biradial approach for alcohol septal ablation (ASA). This study seeks to study the differences in procedural outcomes between the transradial vs traditional transfemoral approach in ASA. METHODS: A total of 274 consecutive patients who underwent ASA were retrospectively assigned to the study subgroups (137 transradial, 137 femoral). Procedural success, reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG), contrast volume, fluoroscopy time, and complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in reduction of resting LVOTG (91% vs 92%; P=.50), provoked LVOTG (80% vs 82%; P=.47) post procedure between transradial vs transfemoral subgroups. Iodinated contrast volume was significantly lower in the transradial group (98 mL vs 111 mL; P=.04), whereas fluoroscopy time was higher in the transradial group (17.42 minutes vs 13.00 minutes; P<.001). The incidence of complications was lower in the transradial group (0.13 vs 0.23; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: ASA via transradial approach is equally effective and associated with significantly less contrast use and fewer complications as compared with the traditional transfemoral approach.