Emergency Airway Response Team Simulation Training: A Nursing Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education is an important tool in the training of professionals in the medical field, especially for low-frequency, high-risk events. An interprofessional simulation-based training program was developed to enhance Emergency Airway Response Team (EART) knowledge, team dynamics, and personnel confidence. This quality improvement study evaluated the EART simulation training results of nurse participants. METHOD: Twenty-four simulation-based classes of 4-hour sessions were conducted during a 12-week period. Sixty-three nurses from the emergency department (ED) and the intensive care units (ICUs) completed the simulation. Participants were evaluated before and after the simulation program with a knowledge-based test and a team dynamics and confidence questionnaire. Additional comparisons were made between ED and ICU nurses and between nurses with previous EART experience and those without previous EART experience. RESULTS: Comparison of presimulation (presim) and postsimulation (postsim) results indicated a statistically significant gain in both team dynamics and confidence and Knowledge Test scores (P < .01). There were no differences in scores between ED and ICU groups in presim or postsim scores; nurses with previous EART experience demonstrated significantly higher presim scores than nurses without EART experience, but there were no differences between these nurse groups at postsim. CONCLUSIONS: This project supports the use of simulation training to increase nurses' knowledge, confidence, and team dynamics in an EART response. Importantly, nurses with no previous experience achieved outcome scores similar to nurses who had experience, suggesting that emergency airway simulation is an effective way to train both new and experienced nurses.

Fracture locations influence the likelihood of rectal and lower urinary tract injuries in patients sustaining pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: Rectal and lower urinary tract injuries in pelvic fractures can lead to significant complications. We sought to determine whether fracture locations could serve as markers for injury. METHODS: In our retrospective review of patients with blunt pelvic fractures, the association of fracture locations with injury to the rectum, bladder, and urethra was explored with Fisher's exact test and subsequently analyzed with multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 362 patients reviewed, 8 had rectal injury and 24 had lower urinary tract injury. The following locations were found to be significant. Rectum: symphysis pubis (relative risk [RR] = 3.3, p < 0.001) and sacroiliac (SI) joint (RR = 2.1, p = 0.014). Bladder: symphysis pubis (RR = 2.1, p < 0.001), SI joint (RR = 2.0, p < 0.001), and sacrum (RR = 1.6, p = 0.002). Urethra: symphysis pubis (RR = 2.9, p = 0.003), SI joint (RR = 1.8, p = 0.04), and inferior ramus (RR = 4.6, p = 0.008). After multivariate analysis, the primary and independent predictors for each of the injuries were as follows: rectal injury, widened symphysis; bladder injury, widened symphysis and SI joint; and urethral injury, widened symphysis and fracture of the inferior pubic ramus. Although these associations were significant, the overall prevalence of associated rectal and urologic injuries was low. Consequently, the predictive values of these radiologic findings were also low, ranging from 5% to 9% for urethral and rectal injuries to 20% for bladder injuries. CONCLUSION: Certain fracture locations are associated with increased risk for rectal, bladder, or urethral injury. Fractures involving these locations should prompt further work-up for assessment.

Guidelines for improving nutritional delivery in the intensive care unit.

Optimizing nutritional delivery in the intensive care unit (ICU) continues to be a challenge. Nutritional guidelines were developed at a metropolitan Level I trauma center as an institutional response to ensure the timeliness of patient evaluation, initiation of therapy, and attainment of goal therapy. A post-implementation review of 525 consecutive ICU patients revealed that the guidelines enabled the staff to evaluate 86% of all ICU patients and initiate appropriate therapy in 68% of them within 48 hours of admission. Goal therapy was achieved in more than 90% of patients within 72 hours. The establishment of nutritional guidelines is an integral step to improving nutritional therapy in the ICU.