Perioperative risk of major non-cardiac surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a reappraisal in contemporary practice.

AIMS: Severe aortic stenosis (SAS) is a major risk factor for death after non-cardiac surgery, but most supporting data are from studies over a decade old. We evaluated the risk of non-cardiac surgery in patients with SAS in contemporary practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: SAS patients (valve area ≤1 cm(2), mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or peak aortic velocity ≥4 m/s) undergoing intermediate or high-risk surgery were identified from surgical and echo databases of 2000-2010. Controls were matched for age, sex, and year of surgery. Post-operative (30 days) death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death, stroke, myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, and new or worsening heart failure, and 1-year survival were determined. There were 256 SAS patients and 256 controls (age 76 ± 11, 54.3% men). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (5.9% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.13). Severe aortic stenosis patients had more MACE (18.8% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.01), mainly due to heart failure. Emergency surgery, atrial fibrillation, and serum creatinine levels of >2 mg/dL were predictors of post-operative death by multivariate analysis [area under the curve: 0.81, 95% confidence intervals: 0.71-0.91]; emergency surgery was the strongest predictor of 30-day mortality for both SAS and controls. Severe aortic stenosis was the strongest predictor of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Severe aortic stenosis is associated with increased risk of MACE. In contemporary practice, perioperative mortality of patients with SAS is lower than previously reported and the difference from controls did not reach statistical significance. Emergency surgery is the strongest predictor of post-operative death. These results have implications for perioperative risk assessment and management strategies in patients with SAS.

Best uses of osteopathic manipulation.

With the growing number of DOs and the high utilization of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), it is important for all physicians to understand the role OMT can play in the treatment of conditions ranging from low back pain to irritable bowel syndrome so that patients may be offered, or referred for, the treatment when appropriate.

The association between thromboembolic complications and blood group in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blood type affects the risk of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Mayo Clinic electronic medical record was searched (between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2010) to identify all patients with AF with blood group assessment. Records were analyzed for stroke, transient ischemic attack, left atrium appendage thrombus, cerebral or peripheral embolism, and hemorrhagic stroke. All events were adjusted for Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >75 Years, Diabetes mellitus, and Stroke/transient ischemic attack score. RESULTS: Of the 47,816 patients with AF, 14,462 had blood group type available (40% women; mean age, 73±12 years). These included 12,363 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (40% women; mean age, 73±12 years) and 2099 patients with valvular AF (41% women, mean age, 73±12 years). Within patients with NVAF, the rate of peripheral embolization was significantly lower in those with blood type O (2.0%) than in those with other blood types (3.0%; odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P<.001). Neither cerebral thromboembolic (8.1% for "O" vs 8.2% for "non-O" blood group for NVAF and 7.29% vs 7.76% for valvular AF) nor cerebral hemorrhage (2.0% each group) events rates differed by blood group. CONCLUSION: Blood group O may be protective against peripheral cardioembolic complications of NVAF, which may relate, in part, to reduced circulating von Willebrand factor levels. Cerebral thromboembolic event rates did not differ by blood group.