Molecularly guided therapy versus chemotherapy after disease control in unfavourable cancer of unknown primary (CUPISCO): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unfavourable subset cancer of unknown primary (CUP) have a poor prognosis when treated with standard platinum-based chemotherapy. Whether first-line treatment guided by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can improve outcomes is unknown. The CUPISCO trial was designed to inform a molecularly guided treatment strategy to improve outcomes over standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP. The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of molecularly guided therapy (MGT) versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients. This was to determine whether the inclusion of CGP in the initial diagnostic work-up leads to improved outcomes over the current standard of care. We herein report the primary analysis. METHODS: CUPISCO was a phase 2, prospective, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre trial done at 159 sites in 34 countries outside the USA. Patients with central eligibility review-confirmed disease (acceptable histologies included adenocarcinoma and poorly differentiated carcinoma) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, evaluated by CGP, who reached disease control after three cycles of standard first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:1 via a block-stratified randomisation procedure to MGT versus chemotherapy continuation for at least three further cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03498521, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS: From July 10, 2018, to Dec 9, 2022, 636 (42%) of 1505 screened patients were enrolled. Median follow-up in the treatment period was 24·1 months (IQR 11·6-35·6). Of 438 patients who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, 436 were randomly assigned: 326 (75%) to the MGT group and 110 (25%) to the chemotherapy group. Median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 6·1 months (95% CI 4·7-6·5) in the MGT group versus 4·4 months (4·1-5·6) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·56-0·92]; p=0·0079). Related adverse event rates per 100-patient-years at risk were generally similar or lower with MGT versus chemotherapy. INTERPRETATION: In patients with previously untreated, unfavourable, non-squamous CUP who reached disease control after induction chemotherapy, CGP with subsequent MGTs resulted in longer progression-free survival than standard platinum-based chemotherapy. On the basis of these results, we recommend that CGP is performed at initial diagnosis in patients with unfavourable CUP. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Frequency and Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Cancer of Unknown Primary.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is defined as a primary metastatic malignancy, in which the primary tumor remains elusive in spite of a comprehensive diagnostic workup. The frequency and prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are considered to be the source of metastasis, has not yet been systematically evaluated in CUP. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CUP according to the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, who presented to our clinic between July 2021 and May 2023, provided blood samples for CTC quantification using CellSearch methodology. CTC counts were correlated with demographic, clinical, and molecular data generated by comprehensive genomic profiling of tumor tissue. RESULTS: CTCs were detected in 26% of all patients at initial presentation to our department. The highest CTC frequency was observed among patients with unfavorable CUP (35.5%), while patients with single-site/oligometastatic CUP harbored the lowest CTC frequency (11.4%). No statistically significant association between CTC positivity and the number of affected organs (P = 0.478) or disease burden (P = 0.120) was found. High CTC levels (≥5 CTCs/7.5 mL; 12/95 analyzed patients) predicted for adverse overall survival compared to negative or low CTC counts (6-months overall survival rate 90% vs 32%, log-rank P < 0.001; HR 5.43; 95% CI 2.23-13.2). CTC dynamics were also prognostic for overall survival by landmark analysis (log-rank P < 0.001, HR 10.2, 95% CI 1.95-52.9). CONCLUSIONS: CTC frequency is a strong, independent predictor of survival in patients with CUP. CTC quantification provides a useful prognostic tool in the management of these patients.

Prognostic impact of copy number alterations and tumor mutational burden in carcinoma of unknown primary.

INTRODUCTION: Chromosomal aberrations are known to drive metastatic spread, but their profile is still elusive in carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the chromosomal aberration pattern in CUP depending on histological and clinical features and to assess its prognostic impact together with chromothripsis, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and mutational profiles as potential prognostic biomarkers. METHODS: Chromosomal aberrations and chromothripsis were detected by methylation-based copy number variation (CNV) analysis, whereas TMB and MSI were calculated based on large next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Putative primaries were assigned by consensus between two independent oncologists. RESULTS: CNV losses varied depending on putative primaries and were more abundant in patients harboring TP53 mutations and/or deletions 17p. CNV loss was prognostically adverse in localized CUP treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy, but not in disseminated poor-risk CUP treated with palliative chemotherapy. CNV loss also worsened the prognosis in squamous cell CUP. Chromothripsis was detected in 18/59 (30.5%) patients without prognostic effect. TMB was highest in cases with MSI, squamous cell histology, and with lung, anal or cervical putative primaries. CONCLUSION: Overall, CNV, chromothripsis, TMB, and MSI profiles in CUP are reminiscent of biological characteristics known from other cancer entities without a unifying CUP-specific signature. Markedly, high-level CNV loss is an adverse predictive biomarker in localized but not disseminated chemotherapy-treated CUP. This implies that chromosomal losses drive CUP progression, but also increase susceptibility to chemotherapy, with both effects apparently leveling out in disseminated CUP.

A Challenging Task: Identifying Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) According to ESMO Guidelines: The CUPISCO Trial Experience.

BACKGROUND: CUPISCO is an ongoing randomized phase II trial (NCT03498521) comparing molecularly guided therapy versus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients newly diagnosed with "unfavorable" cancer of unknown primary (CUP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an unfavorable CUP diagnosis, as defined by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and available cancer tissue for molecular sequencing are generally eligible. Potential patients with CUP entering screening undergo a review involving reference histopathology and clinical work-up by a central eligibility review team (ERT). Patients with "favorable" CUP, a strongly suspected primary site of origin, lack of tissue, or unmet inclusion criteria are excluded. RESULTS: As of April 30, 2020, 628 patients had entered screening and 346 (55.1%) were screen failed. Screen fails were due to technical reasons (n = 89), failure to meet inclusion and exclusion criteria not directly related to CUP diagnosis (n = 89), and other reasons (n = 33). A total of 124 (35.8%) patients were excluded because unfavorable adeno- or poorly differentiated CUP could not be confirmed by the ERT. These cases were classified into three groups ineligible because of (a) histologic subtype, such as squamous and neuroendocrine, or favorable CUP; (b) evidence of a possible primary tumor; or (c) noncarcinoma histology. CONCLUSION: Experience with CUPISCO has highlighted challenges with standardized screening in an international clinical trial and the difficulties in diagnosing unfavorable CUP. Reconfirmation of unfavorable CUP by an ERT in a clinical trial can result in many reasons for screen failures. By sharing this experience, we aim to foster understanding of diagnostic challenges and improve diagnostic pathology and clinical CUP algorithms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A high unmet need exists for improved treatment of cancer of unknown primary (CUP); however, study in a trial setting is faced with the significant challenge of definitively distinguishing CUP from other cancer types. This article reports the authors' experience of this challenge so far in the ongoing CUPISCO trial, which compares treatments guided by patients' unique genetic signatures versus standard chemotherapy. The data presented will aid future decision-making regarding diagnosing true CUP cases; this will have far-reaching implications in the design, execution, and interpretation of not only CUPISCO but also future clinical studies aiming to find much-needed treatment strategies.

Cryostorage to What End? - Autologous Stem Cell Products in Burkitt Lymphoma, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, and Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, we identified a huge discrepancy between the collection practice and the actual utilization of cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). Specifically, patients with Burkitt lymphoma, acute leukemia, and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were frequently not referred for ABSCT after successful PBSC collection. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify variables that are associated with the non-utilization of PBSC grafts. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the collection, storage, and disposal of PBSC grafts in Burkitt lymphoma (n = 18), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 22), MPN (n = 18), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 71) patients. Patients who underwent autologous PBSC collection at 2 collection and transplantation centers between 2001 and 2012 were included and followed up until 2016. RESULTS: None of the Burkitt lymphoma patients were referred for ABSCT. Only in 1 (6%) patient, the graft was discarded after the patient's death. In all other patients (n = 17, 94%), the grafts were stored independently of the patient's status (death, n = 4, 22%; no follow-up, n = 6, 33%; no indication for ABSCT given, n = 7, 39%). In ALL patients, 4 (18%) patients underwent ABSCT after a median follow-up of 74 (1-182) months. In the remaining patients, PBSC grafts were either discarded (8 patients, 36%) or stored until the reference date (10 patients, 45%). Seven of 18 MPN patients (39%) underwent ABSCT. ABSCT was performed in 24 (34%) AML patients. In 20 (28%) patients who were not referred to ABSCT, an allogeneic transplantation (TPL) was performed. Fifteen (21%) patients received palliative care or deceased, and their grafts were discarded in all but 1 patient. Additional grafts were discarded in 21 (31%) patients and stored in 9 (13%) patients who underwent ABSCT or allogeneic TPL (n = 44). CONCLUSIONS: As the role and efficacy of autologous HDCT/ABSCT are not established in the analyzed entities, the indication for PBSC collection should be reanalyzed in regular intervals. Moreover, PBSC grafts from patients who have deceased, have insufficient grafts, or have already undergone an allogeneic TPL should be considered for disposal or (if applicable) for research use, to economize storage costs on a rational basis.

Integrated clinicomolecular characterization identifies RAS activation and CDKN2A deletion as independent adverse prognostic factors in cancer of unknown primary.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) denotes a malignancy with histologically confirmed metastatic spread while the primary tumor remains elusive. Here, we address prognostic and therapeutic implications of mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) detected in tumor tissue in the context of a comprehensive clinical risk assessment. Targeted panel sequencing was performed in 252 CUP patients. 71.8% of patients had unfavorable CUP according to ESMO guidelines. 74.7% were adeno- and 13.7% squamous cell carcinomas. DNA was extracted from microdissected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. For library preparation, mostly multiplex PCR-based Ion Torrent AmpliSeq™ technology with Oncomine comprehensive assays was used. Most frequent genetic alterations were mutations/deletions of TP53 (49.6%), CDKN2A (19.0%) and NOTCH1 (14.1%) as well as oncogenic activation of KRAS (23.4%), FGFR4 (14.9%) and PIK3CA (10.7%). KRAS activation was predominantly found in adenocarcinomas (p = 0.01), PIK3CA activation in squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.03). Male sex, high ECOG score, unfavorable CUP, higher number of involved organs and RAS activation predicted decreased event-free and overall survival in multivariate analysis. Deletions of CDKN2A were prognostically adverse regarding overall survival. TP53 mutations did not significantly influence prognosis in the overall cohort, but worsened prognosis in otherwise favorable CUP subtypes. Although not standard in CUP, for 17/198 (8.6%) patients molecularly targeted treatment was recommended and 10 patients (5.1%) were treated accordingly. In conclusion, besides the identification of drug targets, panel sequencing in CUP is prognostically relevant, with RAS activation and CDKN2A deletion emerging as novel independent risk factors in a comprehensive assessment with clinicopathological data.

Micronucleus formation in human cancer cells is biased by chromosome size.

Chromosomal instability is one of the hallmarks of cancer and caused by chromosome missegregation during mitosis, a process frequently associated with micronucleus formation. Micronuclei are formed when chromosomes fail to join a daughter nucleus during cell division and are surrounded by their own nuclear membrane. Although it has been commonly assumed that the gain or loss of specific chromosomes is random during compromised cell division, recent data suggest that the size of chromosomes can impact on chromosome segregation fidelity. To test whether chromosome missegregation rates scale with chromosome size in primary human cancer cells, we assessed chromosome sequestration into micronuclei in patient-derived primary NCH149 glioblastoma cells, which display high-level numerical chromosome instability (CIN), pronounced spontaneous micronucleus formation but virtually no structural CIN. The cells were analyzed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific painting probes for all chromosomes. Overall, 33% of early passage NCH149 cells harbored micronuclei. Entrapment within a micronucleus clearly correlated with chromosome size with larger chromosomes being significantly more frequently missegregated into micronuclei than smaller chromosomes in primary glioblastoma cells. These findings extend the concept that chromosome size determines segregation fidelity by implying that size-specific micronucleus entrapment occurs in primary human cancer cells as well.

Comparative genetic profiling aids diagnosis and clinical decision making in challenging cases of CUP syndrome.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) denotes cancer cases where metastatic spread is histologically confirmed, but no respective primary tumor can be identified. The challenging diagnosis of CUP is further complicated in cases with previously identified malignancies or with dubious clonal relationship between metastatic sites due to ambiguous histology. Our study aims at elucidating clonal relationships by comparing the respective mutational spectra. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) employing formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue was performed on 174 consecutive CUP patients. Among these, 43/174 (24.7%) patients had a documented prior malignancy. Data on pairwise targeted NGS testing to address clonal relationships between the previous malignancy and the presumed CUP (n = 11) or between different CUP metastatic sites (n = 7) was available in 18 patients. NGS could clarify clonal relationships in 16/18 cases. Among the 11 CUP patients with antecedent malignancies, four cases were clonally independent of the previous malignancy but harbored deleterious germline mutations in BRCA/BAP1/ATM genes. Seven CUP cases were clonally related to the antecedent malignancy, changing the CUP diagnosis to relapse of the prior malignancy. In the seven CUP cases, with doubtfully related metastatic sites, NGS confirmed clonal relationship in five cases and was inconclusive in two. In conclusion, NGS proved an efficient tool to elucidate clonal relationships in clinically challenging CUP cases. Our study cautions against a premature diagnosis of CUP. Relapses of antecedent malignancies should be carefully considered. CUPs clonally independent from the antecedent malignancy should raise a red flag of a potential cancer-predisposing germline mutation.

AL amyloidosis patients with low amyloidogenic free light chain levels at first diagnosis have an excellent prognosis.

The difference between involved minus uninvolved serum free light chains (dFLC) has been established as an invaluable hematologic parameter in systemic amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, patients with an initial dFLC level <50 mg/L are currently deemed not evaluable for response to therapy. Therefore, we aimed to characterize this subgroup of patients and to define novel hematologic response parameters. We retrospectively analyzed 783 AL patients newly diagnosed at our center between 2002 and 2016. Patients with a dFLC level <50 mg/L showed smaller bone marrow plasmacytosis compared to patients with a dFLC level ≥50 mg/L (7% vs 10%, P < .001), but no significant differences in all analyzed chromosomal aberrations. Cardiac involvement was less frequent (45% vs 80%, P < .001) and less severe (Mayo 2004 stage III: 18% vs 51%, P < .001), whereas kidney involvement was more prevalent (83% vs 53%, P < .001) and proteinuria was higher (7.3 g/L vs 5.0 g/L, P < .001). In multivariate analyses, a dFLC level <50 mg/L appeared to be an independent prognostic factor with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50, P = .003) and renal survival (HR = 0.56, P = .020). Patients with a dFLC level <50 mg/L showed a higher proportion of complete hematologic response after first-line therapy compared to patients with a dFLC level ≥50 mg/L (39% vs 9%, P < .001). Receiver-operating characteristics analysis identified a low-dFLC partial response (dFLC <10 mg/L for patients with a dFLC between 20 and 50 mg/L), which predicted overall and renal survival already at 3 months after the start of therapy. Importantly, a parallel Italian study validated this new hematologic remission parameter. The outcome of prospective clinical trials might be adversely influenced by exclusion of the favorable clinical subgroup with an initial dFLC <50 mg/L. We propose the appreciation of dFLC in hematologic response assessment for all patients with a baseline dFLC >20 mg/L.

Marker chromosomes can arise from chromothripsis and predict adverse prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.

Metaphase karyotyping is an established diagnostic standard in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for risk stratification. One of the cytogenetic findings in AML is structurally highly abnormal marker chromosomes. In this study, we have assessed frequency, cytogenetic characteristics, prognostic impact, and underlying biological origin of marker chromosomes. Given their inherent gross structural chromosomal damage, we speculated that they may arise from chromothripsis, a recently described phenomenon of chromosome fragmentation in a single catastrophic event. In 2 large consecutive prospective, randomized, multicenter, intensive chemotherapy trials (AML96, AML2003) from the Study Alliance Leukemia, marker chromosomes were detectable in 165/1026 (16.1%) of aberrant non-core-binding-factor (CBF) karyotype patients. Adverse-risk karyotypes displayed a higher frequency of marker chromosomes (26.5% in adverse-risk, 40.3% in complex aberrant, and 41.2% in abnormality(17p) karyotypes, P < .0001 each). Marker chromosomes were associated with a poorer prognosis compared with other non-CBF aberrant karyotypes and led to lower remission rates (complete remission + complete remission with incomplete recovery), inferior event-free survival as well as overall survival in both trials. In multivariate analysis, marker chromosomes independently predicted poor prognosis in the AML96 trial ≤60 years. As detected by array comparative genomic hybridization, about one-third of marker chromosomes (18/49) had arisen from chromothripsis, whereas this phenomenon was virtually undetectable in a control group of marker chromosome-negative complex aberrant karyotypes (1/34). The chromothripsis-positive cases were characterized by a particularly high degree of karyotype complexity, TP53 mutations, and dismal prognosis. In conclusion, marker chromosomes are indicative of chromothripsis and associated with poor prognosis per se and not merely by association with other adverse cytogenetic features.

Performance analysis of AL amyloidosis cardiac biomarker staging systems with special focus on renal failure and atrial arrhythmia.

Systemic light chain amyloidosis is a rare and life-threatening disorder, for which accurate risk stratification is crucial. Current cardiac staging systems (MAYO2004, MAYO3b, and MAYO2012) are mainly based on biomarkers, which have uncertain reliability in the context of atrial fibrillation, arrhythmia or pacemaker stimulation as well as renal insufficiency. We compared the performance of the established staging systems with particular regard to these comorbidities in 1,224 patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis diagnosed at our center from July 2002 until March 2017. We first characterized the subsets with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (415 patients) and any kind of atrial arrhythmia (183 patients) as unique high-risk subgroups with similarly increased cardiac biomarkers (χ2-test, all P<0.001). This resulted in a shift towards higher risk stages and reduced median overall survival compared to those of patients with better kidney function or without atrial arrhythmia in univariate analyses (13 vs 46 months and 17 vs 53 months, respectively; both P<0.001). Performance analysis revealed that predictions in the entire cohort were least precise with the MAYO2004 staging system and most precise with the MAYO3b system. This performance pattern was almost preserved for patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m2, but less so for those with atrial arrhythmias. The MAYO3b staging system was most robust. Importantly, atrial arrhythmia retained its prognostic value in multivariable analysis including age, difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains, and any staging system, while estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 was not statistically significant in multivariable analysis with the MAYO3b staging system. In conclusion, our results favor the MAYO3b staging system due to its consistently best performance and retained applicability in the subgroups with atrial arrhythmia and estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Measurable residual disease-guided treatment with azacitidine to prevent haematological relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (RELAZA2): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who achieve a morphological complete remission can predict haematological relapse. In this prospective study, we aimed to determine whether MRD-guided pre-emptive treatment with azacitidine could prevent relapse in these patients. METHODS: The relapse prevention with azacitidine (RELAZA2) study is an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial done at nine university health centres in Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older with advanced MDS or AML, who had achieved a complete remission after conventional chemotherapy or allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation, were prospectively screened for MRD during 24 months from baseline by either quantitative PCR for mutant NPM1, leukaemia-specific fusion genes (DEK-NUP214, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFb-MYH11), or analysis of donor-chimaerism in flow cytometry-sorted CD34-positive cells in patients who received allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. MRD-positive patients in confirmed complete remission received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously on days 1-7 of a 29-day cycle for 24 cycles. After six cycles, MRD status was reassessed and patients with major responses (MRD negativity) were eligible for a treatment de-escalation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were relapse-free and alive 6 months after the start of pre-emptive treatment. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClincialTrials.gov, number NCT01462578, and finished recruitment on Aug 21, 2018. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2011, and Aug 20, 2015, we screened 198 patients with advanced MDS (n=26) or AML (n=172), of whom 60 (30%) developed MRD during the 24-month screening period and 53 (88%) were eligible to start study treatment. 6 months after initiation of azacitidine, 31 (58%, 95% CI 44-72) of 53 patients were relapse-free and alive (p<0·0001; one-sided binomial test for null hypothesis pexp≤0·3). With a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 8·5-22·8) after the start of MRD-guided treatment, relapse-free survival at 12 months was 46% (95% CI 32-59) in the 53 patients who were MRD-positive and received azacitidine. In MRD-negative patients, 12-month relapse-free survival was 88% (95% CI 82-94; hazard ratio 6·6 [95% CI 3·7-11·8], p<0·0001). The most common (grade 3-4) adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in 45 (85%) of 53 patients. One patient with neutropenia died because of an infection considered possibly related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Pre-emptive therapy with azacitidine can prevent or substantially delay haematological relapse in MRD-positive patients with MDS or AML who are at high risk of relapse. Our study also suggests that continuous MRD negativity during regular MRD monitoring might be prognostic for patient outcomes. FUNDING: Celgene Pharma, José Carreras Leukaemia Foundation, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Foundation.

Prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations in AL amyloidosis patients after high-dose melphalan: a long-term follow-up study.

Cytogenetic aberrations detected by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) of plasma cells are routinely evaluated as prognostic markers in multiple myeloma. This long-term follow-up study aimed to assess the prognosis of systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) patients treated with high-dose melphalan (HDM) chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, depending on iFISH results. Therefore, we analyzed a consecutive cohort of 123 AL patients recruited from 2003 to 2014. HDM was safe, with only 1 of 123 patients dying as a result of treatment-related mortality, and effective, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 34%. Translocation t(11;14) as the most prevalent aberration (59%) led to an improved CR rate after high-dose therapy (41.2% vs 20.0%; P = .02), translating into a prolonged hematologic event-free survival (hemEFS; median, 46.1 vs 28.1 months; P = .05) and a trend for better overall survival (median, not reached vs 93.7 months; P = .07). In multivariate analysis, t(11;14) was confirmed as a favorable prognostic factor regarding hemEFS along with lower values for the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains. Conversely, deletion 13q14, gain of 1q21, and hyperdiploidy had no significant prognostic impact. The high-risk cytogenetic aberrations t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p13) conferred an unfavorable prognosis, although statistical significance was reached only for univariate CR analysis in this small group of 9 patients. Thus, t(11;14) positivity in HDM-treated AL patients conferred superior CR rates and hemEFS. In view of the reduced response of t(11;14) to bortezomib, this highlights the impact of therapy on the prognostic role of cytogenetic aberrations.

Integrated Histogenetic Analysis Reveals BAP1-Mutated Epithelioid Mesothelioma in a Patient With Cancer of Unknown Primary.

This case report presents a male patient with epithelioid mesothelioma that was initially misdiagnosed as cancer of unknown primary (CUP) and correctly identified using molecular panel sequencing. The patient had a prior history of colon and breast cancer. To assess the enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes, retrosternal lymphadenectomy was performed in 2016. The lymph nodes were histologically deemed unrelated to the known breast cancer by the reference pathologist, thus leading to the diagnosis of a CUP syndrome. When the patient presented to our center, targeted deep sequencing of both breast cancer and presumed CUP was performed to address the clonal relationship between both malignancies. A missense mutation in BAP1 was revealed in both samples, with coverage data indicating a germline event. The patient was subsequently counseled by a human geneticist and underwent genetic testing, which confirmed the germline nature of this mutation. Collectively, these data led to the diagnosis of BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein-1) tumor predisposition syndrome (TPDS). With the knowledge of an underlying BAP1 mutation and its known frequent association with epithelioid mesothelioma, the histology was reassessed and the diagnosis was revised to epithelioid mesothelioma. At this point, peritoneal involvement of mesothelioma could be diagnosed and histologically confirmed. This case illustrates the potential of integrated histopathologic and molecular diagnostics in helping to decipher CUP syndromes and establish the correct diagnosis. Additionally, this case highlights typical features of BAP1 TPDS with its general susceptibility to cancers, with pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas as most prevalent clinical entities and the typically more benign course of these epithelioid mesotheliomas compared with BAP1-unrelated cases of mesotheliomas.

Enasidenib.

Enasidenib is an orally available, selective, potent, small molecule inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2). Neomorphic mutations in IDH2 are frequently found in both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and lead to the production of the oncometabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate. Increased levels of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate cause histone and DNA hypermethylation associated with blocked differentiation and tumorigenesis. In PDX mice transplanted with human IDH2-mutant acute myeloid leukemia cells, enasidenib treatment led to normalization of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate serum levels, differentiation of leukemic blasts and increased survival. Early clinical data in patients with relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutant acute myeloid leukemia show that enasidenib is well tolerated and induces durable complete remissions as a single agent in about 20% of cases. One notable drug-related adverse effect is differentiation syndrome. On the basis of these results the compound has recently been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutant acute myeloid leukemia in the USA. Although no data are available yet, clinical trials on the treatment of patients with several types of IDH2-mutant solid tumors including gliomas, chondrosarcomas and cholangiocarcinomas are currently being performed.

Diagnosis and management of metastatic neoplasms with unknown primary.

In cancer of unknown primary (CUP), metastases are clinically and histologically confirmed, but the primary tumor site remains elusive after extensive work-up. CUPs make up for 2-3% of all epithelial malignancies. The two prevailing histologies are adenocarcinomas and undifferentiated carcinomas, whereas squamous cell carcinomas, neuroendocrine carcinomas and rare histologies account for the remaining 10%. The diagnostic work-up in CUP relies strongly on a detailed immunohistological (IHC) analysis in order to characterize the tumor type, nowadays aided by molecular techniques. Diagnostics also include a thorough clinical examination, a basic lab draw with the most relevant tumor markers, and cross sectional imaging. Additional PET-CT is recommended in cervical lymph nodes suggestive of head and neck cancer and in limited metastases potentially treatable in curative intent. As for treatment, it is paramount to identify patients who fall into one of the six well defined "favorable" subset categories, namely extragonadal germ cell tumors, adenocarcinoma with isolated unilateral axillary lymph nodes in female patients, squamous cell carcinoma with neck lymph nodes, squamous cell carcinoma with inguinal lymph nodes, serous papillary peritoneal carcinomatosis in females and blastic bone metastasis in males with elevated PSA. These subsets are distinct both regarding the required treatment and the comparably favorable prognosis. Within the remaining "unfavorable" group, patients of colon and renal cancer type should be identified based on IHC and clinical picture, since the prognosis of these patients seems to improve with the use of therapy tailored to the presumed primary as well. For the few patients with limited metastases it should be assessed whether they are candidates for surgery, radiotherapy or surgery followed by irradiation in curative intent. The remaining majority of patients are treated with empiric palliative chemotherapy, typically a platinum - paclitaxel combination, though the level of evidence for this therapy recommendation is low. Gemcitabine alone or in combination can be used as an alternative. Decoding of the molecular profiles in CUP offers the prospect of targeted therapy with novel agents. However, there appears to be no uniform molecular pattern for CUP, and the observed molecular diversity thus poses a challenge to respective clinical trials.

Novel recurrent chromosomal aberrations detected in clonal plasma cells of light chain amyloidosis patients show potential adverse prognostic effect: first results from a genome-wide copy number array analysis.

Immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by the deposition of abnormal amyloid fibrils in multiple organs, thus impairing their function. In the largest cohort studied up to now of 118 CD138-purified plasma cell samples from previously untreated immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis patients, we assessed in parallel copy number alterations using high-density copy number arrays and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH). We used fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for the IgH translocations t(11;14), t(4;14), and t(14;16) or any other IgH rearrangement as well as numerical aberrations of the chromosome loci 1q21, 8p21, 5p15/5q35, 11q22.3 or 11q23, 13q14, 15q22, 17p13, and 19q13. Recurrent gains included chromosomes 1q (36%), 9 (24%), 11q (24%), as well as 19 (15%). Recurrent losses affected chromosome 13 (29% monosomy) and partial losses of 14q (19%), 16q (14%) and 13q (12%), respectively. In 88% of patients with translocation t(11;14), the hallmark chromosomal aberration in AL amyloidosis, a concomitant gain of 11q22.3/11q23 detected by iFISH was part of the unbalanced translocation der(14)t(11;14)(q13;q32) with the breakpoint in the CCND1/MYEOV gene region. Partial loss of chromosome regions 14q and 16q were significantly associated to gain 1q. Gain 1q21 detected by iFISH almost always resulted from a gain of the long arm of chromosome 1 and not from trisomy 1, whereas deletions on chromosome 1p were rarely found. Overall and event-free survival analysis found a potential adverse prognostic effect of concomitant gain 1q and deletion 14q as well as of deletion 1p. In conclusion, in the first whole genome report of clonal plasma cells in AL amyloidosis, novel aberrations and hitherto unknown potential adverse prognostic effects were uncovered.

Reduced hematopoietic stem cell frequency predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

In patients with acute myeloid leukemia and low percentages of aldehyde-dehydrogenase-positive cells, non-leukemic hematopoietic stem cells can be separated from leukemic cells. By relating hematopoietic stem cell frequencies to outcome we detected poor overall- and disease-free survival of patients with low hematopoietic stem cell frequencies. Serial analysis of matched diagnostic and follow-up samples further demonstrated that hematopoietic stem cells increased after chemotherapy in patients who achieved durable remissions. However, in patients who eventually relapsed, hematopoietic stem cell numbers decreased dramatically at the time of molecular relapse demonstrating that hematopoietic stem cell levels represent an indirect marker of minimal residual disease, which heralds leukemic relapse. Upon transplantation in immune-deficient mice cases with low percentages of hematopoietic stem cells of our cohort gave rise to leukemic or no engraftment, whereas cases with normal hematopoietic stem cell levels mostly resulted in multi-lineage engraftment. Based on our experimental data, we propose that leukemic stem cells have increased niche affinity in cases with low percentages of hematopoietic stem cells. To validate this hypothesis, we developed new mathematical models describing the dynamics of healthy and leukemic cells under different regulatory scenarios. These models suggest that the mechanism leading to decreases in hematopoietic stem cell frequencies before leukemic relapse must be based on expansion of leukemic stem cells with high niche affinity and the ability to dislodge hematopoietic stem cells. Thus, our data suggest that decreasing numbers of hematopoietic stem cells indicate leukemic stem cell persistence and the emergence of leukemic relapse.

Lenalidomide/melphalan/dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: results of a prospective phase 2 study with long-term follow up.

Chemotherapy in light chain amyloidosis aims to normalize the involved free light chain in serum, which leads to an improvement, or at least stabilization of organ function in most responding patients. We performed a prospective single center phase 2 trial with 50 untreated patients not eligible for high-dose treatment. The treatment schedule comprised 6 cycles of oral lenalidomide, melphalan and dexamethasone every 4 weeks. After 6 months, complete remission was achieved in 9 patients (18%), very good partial remission in 16 (32%) and partial response in 9 (18%). Overall, organ response was observed in 24 patients (48%). Hematologic and cardiac toxicities were predominant adverse events. Mortality at 3 months was low at 4% (n=2) despite the inclusion of 36% of patients (n=18) with cardiac stage Mayo 3. After a median follow-up of 50 months, median overall and event-free survival were 67.5 months and 25.1 months, respectively. We conclude that the treatment of lenalidomide, melphalan and dexamethasone is very effective in achieving a hematologic remission, organ response and, consecutively, a long survival in transplant ineligible patients with light chain amyloidosis. However, as toxicity and tolerability are the major problems of a 3-drug regimen, a strict surveillance program is necessary and sufficient to avoid severe toxicities. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 00883623 (Eudract2008-001405-41).

Mesenchymal stromal cells contribute to quiescence of therapy-resistant leukemic cells in acute myeloid leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: Persistence of leukemic cells after induction therapy has been shown to correlate with poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, we tested if human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) have protective effects on leukemic cells undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: Persistent disease was used as marker to identify cases with therapy-resistant leukemic cells in 95 patients with AML. Immunophenotyping, cell cycle, and apoptosis assays were assessed by flow cytometry. AML coculture studies were performed with hMSC of healthy donors. RESULTS: Samples from patients with persistent disease had increased fractions of CD34+ CD38- and quiescent leukemic cells. Comparison of sample series collected at time points of diagnosis and blast persistence showed a relative therapy resistance of quiescent leukemic cells. Consistent with these observations, relapsed disease always displayed higher proportions of quiescent cells compared to samples of first diagnosis suggesting that quiescence is an important therapy escape mechanism of resistant cells. Co-culture studies demonstrated that hMSC protect leukemic cells from the effect of AraC treatment by enriching for quiescent cells, mimicking the effects observed in patients. This effect was even detectable when no direct stromal contact was established. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that hMSC contribute to quiescence and therapy resistance of persistent AML cells.