Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock.

After surviving the acute phase of resuscitation, septic shock is the cause of death in the majority of burn patients. Therefore, the management of septic shock is a cornerstone in modern burn care. Whereas sepsis therapy in general has undergone remarkable developments in the past decade, the management of septic shock in burn patients still has a long way to go. Instead, the differences of burn patients with septic shock versus general patients have been emphasized and thus, burn patients were excluded in every sepsis study which are the basis for modern sepsis therapy. However, due to the lack of evidence in burn patients, the standards of procedure for general sepsis therapy have been adopted in burn care. This review identifies the differences of burn patients with sepsis versus other septic patients and summarizes the scientific basis for modern sepsis therapy in general ICU patients and burn patients. Consequently, the results in general sepsis research should be transferred to burn care, which means the implementation of effective screening, early resuscitation, and efficient antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, on the basis of past developments and in the light of the current update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, this review introduces the "Burn SOFA score" and the "3 H's of burn sepsis" as a screening tool for early sepsis recognition in burn patients.

A History of Fluid Management-From "One Size Fits All" to an Individualized Fluid Therapy in Burn Resuscitation.

Fluid management is a cornerstone in the treatment of burns and, thus, many different formulas were tested for their ability to match the fluid requirements for an adequate resuscitation. Thereof, the Parkland-Baxter formula, first introduced in 1968, is still widely used since then. Though using nearly the same formula to start off, the definition of normovolemia and how to determine the volume status of burn patients has changed dramatically over years. In first instance, the invention of the transpulmonary thermodilution (TTD) enabled an early goal directed fluid therapy with acceptable invasiveness. Furthermore, the introduction of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has triggered more individualized schemes of fluid therapy. This article explores the historical developments in the field of burn resuscitation, presenting different options to determine the fluid requirements without missing the red flags for hyper- or hypovolemia. Furthermore, the increasing rate of co-morbidities in burn patients calls for a more sophisticated fluid management adjusting the fluid therapy to the actual necessities very closely. Therefore, formulas might be used as a starting point, but further fluid therapy should be adjusted to the actual need of every single patient. Taking the developments in the field of individualized therapies in intensive care in general into account, fluid management in burn resuscitation will also be individualized in the near future.

Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using a Tensor Fascia Lata/Anterior Lateral Thigh-Freestyle Flap After Extensive Electric Burn: A Case Report.

AIMS: Reconstruction of breasts and chest wall deformities in female patients after severe burn injury is a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. In these patients, neither implant-based procedures nor standard free flaps are sometimes applicable because of limited skin quality and unavailability of donor sites at the abdomen, back, buttock, or medial thigh. METHODS: We present a case of a young female patient with a history of 80 % total body surface area burn after electric high-voltage injury. The burn occurred at the age of 9 years, and during the initial treatment, the right breast required amputation because of deep, full-thickness burn. Because the rigid and instable scar including chronic wound developed and an implant-based breast reconstruction was not feasible, the choice of possible free flaps was limited to the right lateral/proximal thigh. Preoperative computed tomography angiography demonstrated 2 intact perforators branching off the lateral femoral circumflex artery and a combined 17 × 24-cm tensor fascia lata/anterior lateral thigh perforator flap with in-flap anastomosis was transferred to the right breast after wound debridement and histological exclusion of Majolin ulcer in the instable scar. The internal mammary vessels were chosen as recipient vessels, and the donor site was covered with a split-thickness skin graft. RESULTS: The postoperative course was uneventful at the right breast; however, the recipient site healed secondarily at the proximal pole. The resulting breast asymmetry was corrected by lipofilling of the central zone of the reconstructed breast and new definition of the inframammary fold as well as a minor liposuction at the cranial margin of the flap. The patient was very satisfied with the result, and no further correction was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous breast reconstruction is a valuable option for patients after severe burn injury. However, microsurgical expertise and an individualized and flexible surgical strategy are required for optimal reconstructive results. Computed tomography angiography is helpful for preoperative planning of the procedure.

Mechanical ventilation as a surrogate for diagnosing the onset of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in severely burned patients (TIRIFIC-study Part II).

Intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a devastating complication in burn patients with a high mortality. Apart from high-volume resuscitation as known risk factor, also mechanical ventilation seems to influence the development of ACS. The TIRIFIC trial is a retrospective, matched-pair analysis. Thirty-eight burn patients with ACS were matched for burned total body surface area (TBSA), age and mechanical ventilation (MV). In contrast to the already published part I addressing fluid resuscitation as a risk factor, the parameters analyzed in part II were maximum and average PEEP and peak pressure levels as well as serum lactate levels and prokinetic therapy. For subgroup-analysis the ACS-group was split up into an early-onset and late-onset ACS-group according to the median time between burn trauma and ACS. The groups were analyzed with a two-sided Mann-Whitney-U-test with significance set at p < 0.05. In the ACS-group all ventilation pressures (maximum and average PEEP and peak pressure levels) were significantly increased compared to control. The subgroup-analysis showed significantly increased maximum PEEP and peak pressure levels in early- and late-onset ACS-groups versus control. However, the average ventilation pressure levels were only increased in the early-onset ACS-group (average PEEP p = 0.0069; average peak pressure p = 0.05). The TIRIFIC trial showed significantly increased ventilation pressures in the ACS group in general as a surrogate parameter to support early diagnostics. Especially, maximum PEEP levels and peak pressures are significantly increased in both, early- and late-onset ACS. As an addition to the actual WSACS guidelines we suggest IAP measurement in mechanically ventilated burn patients if ventilating pressures are rising continuously without a clear pulmonary or otherwise identifiable reason.

Fluid Management as a Risk Factor for Intra-abdominal Compartment Syndrome in Burn Patients: A Total Body Surface Area-Independent Multicenter Trial Part I.

Fluid management is one of the anticipated risk factors for intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Since fluid requirements depend on the burned total body surface area (TBSA), an independent analysis is necessary to adapt resuscitation protocols and prevent this life-threatening complication. A retrospective multicenter study with matched-pair analysis was conducted in four German burn centers, including 38 burn patients with ACS who underwent decompressive laparotomy. Potential risk factors were analyzed, such as resuscitation volume, total fluid intake, mean fluid administration per day, fluid balance, and blood transfusion. The ACS group and control were compared with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05). The ACS group was split up into an early and late ACS group for statistical subgroup analysis. Total fluid intake, fluid balance, and the total volume of colloids showed no significant difference in the ACS group (mean TBSA 50%) versus control (mean TBSA 49%). The subgroup analysis showed significant higher total resuscitation volume, fluid administration per kilogram body weight, and fluid balance in the first 24 hours in the late-onset ACS group. This study shows a different risk factor profile for early-onset ACS in the first 4 days after trauma and late-onset ACS. Herein, fluid therapy is a fundamental risk factor for late-onset ACS. In early-onset ACS, fluid administration contributes significantly to the development of intra-abdominal hypertension, but other risk factors seem to turn the balance for the development of early-onset ACS in burn patients.