Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 63(4): 381-94, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24487961

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Survivin is a member of the inhibitor-of-apoptosis family. Essential for tumor cell survival and overexpressed in most cancers, survivin is a promising target for anti-cancer immunotherapy. Immunogenicity has been demonstrated in multiple cancers. Nonetheless, few clinical trials have demonstrated survivin-vaccine-induced immune responses. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This phase I trial was conducted to test whether vaccine EMD640744, a cocktail of five HLA class I-binding survivin peptides in Montanide(®) ISA 51 VG, promotes anti-survivin T-cell responses in patients with solid cancers. The primary objective was to compare immunologic efficacy of EMD640744 at doses of 30, 100, and 300 µg. Secondary objectives included safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients who received ≥2 EMD640744 injections with available baseline- and ≥1 post-vaccination samples [immunologic-diagnostic (ID)-intention-to-treat] were analyzed by ELISpot- and peptide/MHC-multimer staining, revealing vaccine-activated peptide-specific T-cell responses in 31 patients (63 %). This cohort included the per study protocol relevant ID population for the primary objective, i.e., T-cell responses by ELISpot in 17 weeks following first vaccination, as well as subjects who discontinued the study before week 17 but showed responses to the treatment. No dose-dependent effects were observed. In the majority of patients (61 %), anti-survivin responses were detected only after vaccination, providing evidence for de novo induction. Best overall tumor response was stable disease (28 %). EMD640744 was well tolerated; local injection-site reactions constituted the most frequent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with EMD640744 elicited T-cell responses against survivin peptides in the majority of patients, demonstrating the immunologic efficacy of EMD640744.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Epítopos de Linfocito T/inmunología , Proteínas Inhibidoras de la Apoptosis/inmunología , Neoplasias/terapia , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Vacunación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta Inmunológica , Femenino , Antígenos HLA-A/inmunología , Antígeno HLA-B7/inmunología , Humanos , Ensayos de Liberación de Interferón gamma , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas de Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Survivin , Especificidad del Receptor de Antígeno de Linfocitos T
3.
Acta Oncol ; 50(7): 1105-10, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21184645

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The broad spectrum of antitumor activity of both the oral platinum analogue satraplatin (S) and capecitabine (C), along with the advantage of their oral administration, prompted a clinical study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four dose levels of S (mg/m(2)/day) and C (mg/m(2)/day) were evaluated in adult patients with advanced solid tumors: 60/1650, 80/1650, 60/2000, 70/2000; a course consisted of 28 days with sequential administration of S (days 1-5) and C (days 8-21) followed by one week rest. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were treated, 24 in the dose escalation and 13 in the expansion phase; at the MTD, defined at S 70/C 2000, two patients presented dose limiting toxicities: lack of recovery of neutropenia by day 42 and nausea with dose skip of C. Most frequent toxicities were nausea (57%), diarrhea (51%), neutropenia (46%), anorexia, fatigue, vomiting (38% each). Two partial responses were observed in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer and one in prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: At S 70/C 2000 the combination of sequential S and C is tolerated with manageable toxicities; its evaluation in platinum and fluorouracil sensitive tumor types is worthwhile because of the easier administration and lack of nephro- and neurotoxicity as compared to parent compounds.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/patología , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA