RESUMEN
As emissions regulations for transportation become stricter, it is increasingly important to develop accurate nitrogen oxide (NO x ) emissions models for heavy-duty vehicles. However, estimation of transient NO x emissions using physics-based models is challenging due to its highly dynamic nature, which arises from the complex interactions between power demand, engine operation, and exhaust aftertreatment efficiency. As an alternative to physics-based models, a multi-dimensional data-driven approach is proposed as a framework to estimate NO x emissions across an extensive set of representative engine and exhaust aftertreatment system operating conditions. This paper employs Deep Neural Networks (DNN) to develop two models, an engine-out NO x and a tailpipe NO x model, to predict heavy-duty vehicle NO x emissions. The DNN models were developed using variables that are available from On-board Diagnostics from two datasets, an engine dynamometer and a chassis dynamometer dataset. Results from trained DNN models using the engine dynamometer dataset showed that the proposed approach can predict NO x emissions with high accuracy, where R 2 scores are higher than 0.99 for both engine-out and tailpipe NO x models on cold/hot Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and Ramped Mode Cycle (RMC) data. Similarly, the engine-out and tailpipe NO x models using the chassis dynamometer dataset achieved R 2 scores of 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. All models developed in this study have a mean absolute error percentage of approximately 1% relative to maximum NO x in the datasets, which is comparable to that of physical NO x emissions measurement analyzers. The input feature importance studies conducted in this work indicate that high accuracy DNN models (R 2 = 0.92-0.95) could be developed by utilizing minimal significant engine and aftertreatment inputs. This study also demonstrates that DNN NO x emissions models can be very effective tools for fault detection in Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems.
RESUMEN
Airborne respiratory diseases such as COVID-19 pose significant challenges to public transportation. Several recent outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 indicate the high risk of transmission among passengers on public buses if special precautions are not taken. This study presents a combined experimental and numerical analysis to identify transmission mechanisms on an urban bus and assess strategies to reduce risk. The effects of the ventilation and air-conditioning systems, opening windows and doors, and wearing masks are analyzed. Specific attention is paid to the transport of submicron- and micron-sized particles relevant to typical respiratory droplets. High-resolution instrumentation was used to measure size distribution and aerosol response time on a campus bus of the University of Michigan under these different conditions. Computational fluid dynamics was employed to measure the airflow within the bus and evaluate risk. A risk metric was adopted based on the number of particles exposed to susceptible passengers. The flow that carries these aerosols is predominantly controlled by the ventilation system, which acts to uniformly distribute the aerosol concentration throughout the bus while simultaneously diluting it with fresh air. The opening of doors and windows was found to reduce the concentration by approximately one half, albeit its benefit does not uniformly impact all passengers on the bus due to the recirculation of airflow caused by entrainment through windows. Finally, it was found that well fitted surgical masks, when worn by both infected and susceptible passengers, can nearly eliminate the transmission of the disease.
RESUMEN
AIM: It remains unclear whether cardiac arrest (CA) resuscitation generates aerosols that can transmit respiratory pathogens. We hypothesize that chest compression and defibrillation generate aerosols that could contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a swine CA model. METHODS: To simulate witnessed CA with bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 3 female non-intubated swine underwent 4â¯min of ventricular fibrillation without chest compression or defibrillation (no-flow) followed by ten 2-min cycles of mechanical chest compression and defibrillation without ventilation. The diameter (0.3-10⯵m) and quantity of aerosols generated during 45-s intervals of no-flow and chest compression before and after defibrillation were analyzed by a particle analyzer. Aerosols generated from the coughs of 4 healthy human subjects were also compared to aerosols generated by swine. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the total aerosols generated during chest compression before defibrillation compared to no-flow. In contrast, chest compression after defibrillation generated significantly more aerosols than chest compression before defibrillation or no-flow (72.4⯱â¯41.6â¯×â¯104 vs 12.3⯱â¯8.3â¯×â¯104 vs 10.5⯱â¯11.2â¯×â¯104; pâ¯<â¯0.05), with a shift in particle size toward larger aerosols. Two consecutive human coughs generated 54.7⯱â¯33.9â¯×â¯104 aerosols with a size distribution smaller than post-defibrillation chest compression. CONCLUSIONS: Chest compressions alone did not cause significant aerosol generation in this swine model. However, increased aerosol generation was detected during chest compression immediately following defibrillation. Additional research is needed to elucidate the clinical significance and mechanisms by which aerosol generation during chest compression is modified by defibrillation.