The CanMEDS Competency Framework in laboratory medicine: a phenomenographic study exploring how professional roles are applied outside the clinical environment.

Background: The CanMEDS Competency Framework is an internationally recognized model used to outline the proficiencies of a physician. It has predominantly been studied in clinical environments but not all medical specialties take part in direct patient contact. In laboratory medicine, the role of the physician is to promote and enhance patient diagnostics by managing and overseeing the functions of a diagnostic laboratory. Methods: This phenomenographic study explores the lived experiences of biochemistry, microbiology, and pathology residency program directors to better understand how they utilize the CanMEDS competencies. Eight laboratory medicine program directors from across Canada were individually interviewed using a semi-structured interview, and the data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: The findings show that the current framework is disconnected from the unique context of laboratory medicine with some competencies appearing unrelatable using the current standardized definitions and expectations. Nevertheless, participants considered the framework to be an appropriate blueprint of the competencies necessary for their professional environment, but to make it accessible more autonomy is required to adapt the framework to their needs. Conclusion: Newer renditions of the CanMEDS Competency Framework should better consider the realities of non-clinical disciplines.

Contexte: Le référentiel CanMEDS est un modèle reconnu à l'échelle internationale qui décrit les compétences nécessaires d'un médecin. Cependant, il a été principalement étudié dans des environnements cliniques, mais ce ne sont pas toutes les spécialités médicales qui ont des contacts directs avec les patients. En médecine de laboratoire, le rôle du médecin est de promouvoir et d'améliorer les analyses diagnostiques des patients en supervisant les fonctions d'un laboratoire diagnostic. Méthodes: Cette étude phénoménographique explore les expériences vécues de directeurs de programmes de résidence en biochimie, microbiologie et pathologie afin de mieux comprendre comment leurs programmes de formation utilisent les compétences CanMEDS. Huit directeurs de programme Canadiens en médecine de laboratoire ont participé à une entrevue semi-structurée individuelle et les données recueillies ont été analysées par une analyse thématique inductive. Résultats: Les résultats démontrent que le référentiel actuel est déconnecté de la médecine de laboratoire et que certaines compétences semblent incompatibles en utilisant les définitions normalisées en vigueur. Néanmoins, les participants considèrent que le référentiel est un schéma approprié des compétences nécessaires dans leur environnement professionnel, mais une plus grande autonomie est nécessaire pour l'adapter à leurs besoins. Conclusion: Les prochaines révisions du référentiel de compétences CanMEDS devraient mieux tenir compte des réalités des disciplines non cliniques.

Investigation of a Carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak using whole genome sequencing versus a standard epidemiologic investigation.

Background: The standard epidemiologic investigation of outbreaks typically relies on spatiotemporal data and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), but whole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming increasingly used. This investigation aimed to characterize a carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii (CPAb) nosocomial outbreak using WGS compared to a standard outbreak investigation. Methods: The CPAb outbreak occurred in a single center between 2012 and 2014. The standard investigation used spatiotemporal data and PFGE to generate a chain of transmission. A separate WGS investigation generated a chain of transmission based solely on WGS and date of sampling and was blinded to all other spatiotemporal data and PFGE. Core single nucleotide variant (SNV) phylogenetic analysis was performed on WGS data generated using the Illumina MiSeq platform. The chains of transmission were compared quantitatively and qualitatively to assess the concordance between both methods. Results: 28 colonized and infected cases were included. Of the 27 transmission events identified using the standard investigation, 12 (44%) were identical to the transmission events using WGS. WGS identified several transmission events that had not been detected by traditional method, and numerous transmission events that had occurred on different hospital wards than suspected by standard methods. The average number (standard deviation [SD]) of SNVs per transmission events was 1.63 (SD, 1.31) by traditional method and 0.63 (SD, 0.79) by WGS (p = 0.001) All isolates harbored the rare carbapenemase blaOXA-237. Conclusions: The traditional and WGS investigations had moderate concordance. When used alongside epidemiologic data and clinical information, WGS could help improve the mapping of transmission events.