A Panel-Based Mutational Signature of Mismatch Repair Deficiency is Associated With Durable Response to Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in prostate cancer (PCa). Better biomarkers are needed to predict responses to ICIs. We sought to demonstrate that a panel-based mutational signature identifies mismatch repair (MMR) deficient (MMRd) PCa and is a biomarker of response to pembrolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinico-genomic data was obtained for 2664 patients with PCa sequenced at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK). Clinical outcomes were collected for patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) treated with pembrolizumab at DFCI. SigMA was used to characterize tumors as MMRd or MMR proficient (MMRp). The concordance between MMRd with microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was assessed. Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected for patients treated with pembrolizumab. Event-time distributions were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: Across both cohorts, 100% (DFCI: 12/12; MSK: 43/43) of MSI-H tumors were MMRd. However, 14% (2/14) and 9.1% (6/66) of MMRd tumors in the DFCI and MSK cohorts respectively were microsatellite stable (MSS), and 26% (17/66) were MSI-indeterminate in the MSK cohort. Among patients treated with pembrolizumab, those with MMRd (n = 5) versus MMRp (n = 14) mCRPC experienced markedly improved rPFS (HR = 0.088, 95% CI: 0.011-0.70; P = .0064) and OS (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.014-0.80; P = .010) from start of treatment. Four patients with MMRd experienced remissions of >= 2.5 years. CONCLUSION: SigMA detects additional cases of MMRd as compared to MSI testing in PCa and identifies patients likely to experience durable response to pembrolizumab.

Addition of Germline Testing to Tumor-Only Sequencing Improves Detection of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend somatic and germline testing for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Barriers to widespread implementation result in underutilization of germline testing. Somatic testing alone risks missing pathogenic germline variants (PGVs). We sought to determine whether the addition of germline testing to tumor-only sequencing improves detection of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. Secondarily, we sought to define the added value of combining somatic and germline testing to optimize detection of clinically actionable alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed results of independent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing from 100 men with advanced PCa from a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03328091). The primary outcome was the proportion of PGVs not reported with tumor-only sequencing. The secondary outcome was the association of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity for PGVs in homologous recombination genes with clinical-genomic features. RESULTS: In the 100 men who underwent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing, 24 PGVs were identified, 17 of which were clinically actionable, in 23 patients. Tumor-only sequencing failed to report four (17%) of the PGVs. One additional PGV (4.2%) had variant allele frequency on tumor-sequencing below the threshold for follow-up germline testing. When integrating tumor-only sequencing with germling testing results, 33% of patients harbored clinically actionable alterations. Rates of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity were higher for BRCA2 PGVs in castration-resistant PCa than PGVs in other homologous recombination genes in hormone-sensitive PCa (P = .029). CONCLUSION: Tumor-only sequencing failed to report more than 20% of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. These findings strongly support guideline recommendations for universal germline and somatic testing in this population. Combining tumor and germline sequencing doubled the chance of detecting a clinically actionable alteration.

Post-stroke rehabilitation: Factors predicting discharge to acute versus subacute rehabilitation facilities.

The aim of this study was to examine predictors of discharge of hospitalized stroke patients to either an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or subacute skilled nursing facility (SNF).A retrospective cohort study was done in a large multicampus urban academic medical center of individuals hospitalized for stroke between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015 and who were discharged to either an IRF (n = 84) or SNF (n = 59). A set of characteristics and scales were collected on each patient and assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.Although univariate analyses revealed multiple measures were associated with discharge destination, the most predictive multivariate logistic regression model for discharge to SNF incorporated age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.13), premorbid physical disability (OR 7.52, 95% CI 1.66-34.14), and inability to ambulate before discharge (OR 5.84, 95% CI 2.01-16.92) with an overall c-statistic of 0.85.Increasing age, premorbid physical disability, and inability to ambulate increase the overall likelihood of discharge to a SNF. These findings need to be replicated in larger samples to determine whether they are generalizable.