Toxicologic Pathology Forum Opinion: Apoptosis/Single Cell Necrosis as a Possible Procedural Effect in Primate Brain Following Ice-Cold Saline Perfusion.

Nonclinical studies of test articles (TAs) in nonhuman primates are often designed to assess both biodistribution and toxicity. For this purpose, studies commonly use intravenous perfusion of ice-cold (2°C-8°C) saline to facilitate measurements of TA-associated nucleic acids and proteins, after which tissues undergo later fixation by immersion for histological processing and microscopic evaluation. Intriguingly, minimal apoptosis/single cell necrosis (A/SCN) of randomly distributed neural cells is evident in the cerebral cortex and less often the hippocampus in animals from all groups, including vehicle-treated controls. Affected cells exhibit end-stage features such as cytoplasmic hypereosinophilia, nuclear condensation or fragmentation, and shape distortions, so their lineage(s) generally cannot be defined; classical apoptotic bodies are exceedingly rare. In addition, A/SCN is not accompanied by glial reactions, leukocyte infiltration/inflammation, or other parenchymal changes. The severity is minimal in controls but may be slightly exacerbated (to mild) by TA that accumulate in neural cells. One plausible hypothesis explaining this A/SCN exacerbation is that cold shock (perhaps complicated by concurrent tissue acidity and hypoxia) drives still-viable but TA-stressed cells to launch a self-directed death program. Taken together, these observations indicate that A/SCN in brain processed by cold saline perfusion with delayed immersion fixation represents a procedural artifact and not a TA-related lesion.

Incidental Gliosis in the Central Nervous System of Control Nonhuman Primates and Rats.

Gliosis, including microgliosis and astrocytosis, can be challenging to interpret in nonclinical studies. Incidences of glial foci in brains and spinal cords of control rats and nonhuman primates (NHPs) were reviewed in the historical control databases from two contract research organizations, including one specializing in neuropathology. In the brain, minimal to mild (grades 1-2) microgliosis was the most common diagnosis, especially in NHPs, although occasional moderate or marked microgliosis (grades 3 and 4) was encountered in both species. Microgliosis was more common in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and medulla oblongata in both species and was frequent in the white matter (brain), thalamus, and basal nuclei of NHPs. Gliosis ("not otherwise specified") of minimal severity was diagnosed in similar brain sub-sites for both species and was more common in NHPs compared with rats. Astrocytosis was most prominent in the cerebellum (molecular layer) of NHPs but was otherwise uncommon. In the spinal cord, microgliosis was most common in the lateral white matter tracts in rats and NHPs, and in the dorsal white matter tracts in NHPs. These data indicate that low-grade spontaneous glial responses occur with some frequency in control animals of two common nonclinical species.

Novel MECP2 gene therapy is effective in a multicenter study using two mouse models of Rett syndrome and is safe in non-human primates.

The AAV9 gene therapy vector presented in this study is safe in mice and non-human primates and highly efficacious without causing overexpression toxicity, a major challenge for clinical translation of Rett syndrome gene therapy vectors to date. Our team designed a new truncated methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) promoter allowing widespread expression of MECP2 in mice and non-human primates after a single injection into the cerebrospinal fluid without causing overexpression symptoms up to 18 months after injection. Additionally, this new vector is highly efficacious at lower doses compared with previous constructs as demonstrated in extensive efficacy studies performed by two independent laboratories in two different Rett syndrome mouse models carrying either a knockout or one of the most frequent human mutations of Mecp2. Overall, data from this multicenter study highlight the efficacy and safety of this gene therapy construct, making it a promising candidate for first-in-human studies to treat Rett syndrome.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum Opinion: Interpretation of Gliosis in the Brain and Spinal Cord Observed During Nonclinical Safety Studies.

Gliosis, defined as a nonneoplastic reaction (hypertrophy and/or proliferation) of astrocytes and/or microglial cells, is a frequent finding in the central nervous system (CNS [brain and/or spinal cord]) in nonclinical safety studies. Gliosis in rodents and nonrodents occurs at low incidence as a spontaneous finding and is induced by various test articles (e.g., biomolecules, cell and gene therapies, small molecules) delivered centrally (i.e., by injection or infusion into cerebrospinal fluid or neural tissue) or systemically. Several CNS gliosis patterns occur in nonclinical species. First, gliosis may accompany degeneration and/or necrosis of cells (mainly neurons) or neural parenchyma (neuron processes and myelin). Second, gliosis often follows inflammation (i.e., leukocyte accumulation causing parenchymal damage) or neoplasm formation. Third, gliosis may appear as variably sized, randomly scattered foci of reactive glial cells in the absence of visible parenchymal damage or inflammation. In interpreting test article-related CNS gliosis, adversity is indicated by parenchymal injury (e.g., degeneration, necrosis, or inflammation) and not the mere existence of a glial reaction. In the absence of clear structural damage to the parenchyma, gliosis as a standalone CNS finding should be interpreted as a nonadverse reaction to regional alterations in microenvironmental conditions rather than as evidence of a glial reaction associated with neurotoxicity.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum Opinion: Rational Approaches to Expanded Neurohistopathology Evaluation for Nonclinical General Toxicity Studies and Juvenile Animal Studies.

Existing nervous system sampling and processing "best practices" for nonclinical general toxicity studies (GTS) were designed to assess test articles with unknown, no known, or well-known neurotoxic potential. Similar practices are applicable to juvenile animal studies (JAS). In GTS and JAS, the recommended baseline sampling for all species includes brain (7 sections), spinal cord (cervical and lumbar divisions [cross and longitudinal sections for each]), and 1 nerve (sciatic or tibial [cross and longitudinal sections]) in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. Extra sampling and processing (ie, an "expanded neurohistopathology evaluation" [ENHP]) are used for agents with anticipated neuroactivity (toxic ± therapeutic) of incompletely characterized location and degree. Expanded sampling incorporates additional brain (usually 8-15 sections total), spinal cord (thoracic ± sacral divisions), ganglia (somatic ± autonomic, often 2-8 total), and/or nerves (2-6 total) depending on the species and study objectives. Expanded processing typically adds special neurohistological procedures (usually 1-4 for selected samples) to characterize glial reactions, myelin integrity, and/or neuroaxonal damage. In my view, GTS and JAS designs should sample neural tissues at necropsy as if ENHP will be needed eventually, and when warranted ENHP may incorporate expanded sampling and/or expanded processing depending on the study objective(s).

Toxicologic Neuropathology of Novel Biotherapeutics.

Biotherapeutic modalities such as cell therapies, gene therapies, nucleic acids, and proteins are increasingly investigated as disease-modifying treatments for severe and life-threatening neurodegenerative disorders. Such diverse bio-derived test articles are fraught with unique and often unpredictable biological consequences, while guidance regarding nonclinical experimental design, neuropathology evaluation, and interpretation is often limited. This paper summarizes key messages offered during a half-day continuing education course on toxicologic neuropathology of neuro-targeted biotherapeutics. Topics included fundamental neurobiology concepts, pharmacology, frequent toxicological findings, and their interpretation including adversity decisions. Covered biotherapeutic classes included cell therapies, gene editing and gene therapy vectors, nucleic acids, and proteins. If agents are administered directly into the central nervous system, initial screening using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of currently recommended neural organs (brain [7 levels], spinal cord [3 levels], and sciatic nerve) may need to expand to include other components (e.g., more brain levels, ganglia, and/or additional nerves) and/or special neurohistological procedures to characterize possible neural effects (e.g., cell type-specific markers for reactive glial cells). Scientists who evaluate the safety of novel biologics will find this paper to be a practical reference for preclinical safety testing and risk assessment.

Toxicologic Pathology Forum: Opinion on Interpretive Challenges for Procedure-Related Effects Associated With Direct Central Nervous System Delivery of Oligonucleotides to Rodents, Dogs, and Nonhuman Primates.

Direct delivery of therapeutics to the central nervous system (CNS) greatly expands opportunities to treat neurological diseases but is technically challenging. This opinion outlines principal technical aspects of direct CNS delivery via intracerebroventricular (ICV) or intrathecal (IT) injection to common nonclinical test species (rodents, dogs, and nonhuman primates) and describes procedure-related clinical and histopathological effects that confound interpretation of test article-related effects. Direct dosing is by ICV injection in mice due to their small body size, while other species are dosed IT in the lumbar cistern. The most frequent procedure-related functional effects are transient absence of lower spinal reflexes after IT injection or death soon after ICV dosing. Common procedure-related microscopic findings in all species include leukocyte infiltrates in CNS meninges or perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces; nerve fiber degeneration in the spinal cord white matter (especially dorsal and lateral tracts compressed by dosing needles or indwelling catheters), spinal nerve roots, and sciatic nerve; meningeal fibrosis at or near IT injection sites; hemorrhage; and gliosis. Findings typically are minimal to occasionally mild. Findings tend to be more severe and/or have a higher incidence in the spinal cord segments and spinal nerve roots at or close to the site of administration.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Sampling, Processing, Evaluation, Interpretation, and Reporting of Test Article-Related Ganglion Pathology for Nonclinical Toxicity Studies.

Certain biopharmaceutical products consistently affect dorsal root ganglia, trigeminal ganglia, and/or autonomic ganglia. Product classes targeting ganglia include antineoplastic chemotherapeutics, adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies, antisense oligonucleotides, and anti-nerve growth factor agents. This article outlines "points to consider" for sample collection, processing, evaluation, interpretation, and reporting of ganglion findings; these points are consistent with published best practices for peripheral nervous system evaluation in nonclinical toxicity studies. Ganglion findings often occur as a combination of neuronal injury (e.g., degeneration, necrosis, and/or loss) and/or glial effects (e.g., increased satellite glial cell cellularity) with leukocyte accumulation (e.g., mononuclear cell infiltration or inflammation). Nerve fiber degeneration and/or glial reactions may be seen in nerves, dorsal spinal nerve roots, spinal cord, and occasionally brainstem. Interpretation of test article (TA)-associated effects may be confounded by incidental background changes or experimental procedure-related changes and limited historical control data. Reports should describe findings at these sites, any TA relationship, and the criteria used for assigning severity grades. Contextualizing adversity of ganglia findings can require a weight-of-evidence approach because morphologic changes of variable severity occur in ganglia but often are not accompanied by observable overt in-life functional alterations detectable by conventional behavioral and neurological testing techniques.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Technical Review: Biology and Pathology of Ganglia in Animal Species Used for Nonclinical Safety Testing.

Dorsal root ganglia (DRG), trigeminal ganglia (TG), other sensory ganglia, and autonomic ganglia may be injured by some test article classes, including anti-neoplastic chemotherapeutics, adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies, antisense oligonucleotides, nerve growth factor inhibitors, and aminoglycoside antibiotics. This article reviews ganglion anatomy, cytology, and pathology (emphasizing sensory ganglia) among common nonclinical species used in assessing product safety for such test articles (TAs). Principal histopathologic findings associated with sensory ganglion injury include neuron degeneration, necrosis, and/or loss; increased satellite glial cell and/or Schwann cell numbers; and leukocyte infiltration and/or inflammation. Secondary nerve fiber degeneration and/or glial reactions may occur in nerves, dorsal spinal nerve roots, spinal cord (dorsal and occasionally lateral funiculi), and sometimes the brainstem. Ganglion findings related to TA administration may result from TA exposure and/or trauma related to direct TA delivery into the central nervous system or ganglia. In some cases, TA-related effects may need to be differentiated from a spectrum of artifactual and/or spontaneous background changes.

Oral chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study of alpha-glycosyl isoquercitrin (AGIQ) in Sprague Dawley rats.

alpha-Glycosyl isoquercitrin (AGIQ) is a flavonoid that possesses antioxidant and tumor suppressive capabilities and is marketed as a food additive in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the potential for oral chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of AGIQ in male and female Sprague Dawley rats following up to 5.0% dietary exposure. In the chronic toxicity study, rats were exposed to AGIQ or vehicle for one year with a 6-month interim termination point; for the carcinogenicity study, rats were treated for 24 months. No signs of AGIQ-related toxicity clinically or histologically were observed for up to one year except for yellow discoloration of bone. In the carcinogenicity study, a statistically significant increase in the incidence of malignant glioma of the brain or spinal cord was observed in female rats exposed to 5.0% AGIQ compared to those exposed to control feed. A Scientific Advisory Panel of experienced neuropathologists reviewed the gliomas (routine stains and glial cell markers) and concluded that the gliomas were a rare, spontaneous, rat-specific neoplasm: malignant microglial tumor. The lesions could not definitively be attributed to AGIQ exposure and have limited implications with respect to predicting human cancer risk.

Selected Resources for Pathology Evaluation of Nonhuman Primates in Nonclinical Safety Assessment.

Humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) share numerous anatomical and physiological characteristics, thereby explaining the importance of NHPs as essential animal models for translational medicine and nonclinical toxicity testing. Researchers, toxicologic pathologists, toxicologists, and regulatory reviewers must be familiar with normal and abnormal NHP biological traits when designing, performing, and interpreting data sets from NHP studies. The current compilation presents a list of essential books, journal articles, and websites that provide context to safety assessment and research scientists working with NHP models. The resources used most frequently by the authors have been briefly annotated to permit readers to rapidly ascertain their applicability to particular research endeavors. The references are aimed primarily for toxicologic pathologists working with cynomolgus and rhesus macaques and common marmosets in efficacy and safety assessment studies.

Society of Toxicologic Pathology Neuropathology Interest Group Article: Neuropathologic Findings in Nonhuman Primates Associated With Administration of Biomolecule-Based Test Articles.

The increasing specificity of novel druggable targets coupled with the complexity of emerging therapeutic modalities for treating human diseases has created a growing need for nonhuman primates (NHPs) as models for translational drug discovery and nonclinical safety assessment. In particular, NHPs are critical for investigating potential unexpected/undesired on-target and off-target liabilities associated with administration of candidate biotherapeutics (nucleic acids, proteins, viral gene therapy vectors, etc.) to treat nervous system disorders. Nervous system findings unique to or overrepresented in NHPs administered biomolecule-based ("biologic") test articles include mononuclear cell infiltration in most neural tissues for all biomolecule classes as well as neuronal necrosis with glial cell proliferation in sensory ganglia for certain viral vectors. Such test article-related findings in NHPs often must be differentiated from procedural effects (e.g., local parenchymal or meningeal reactions associated with an injection site or implanted catheter to administer a test article directly into the central nervous system) or spontaneous background findings (e.g., neuronal autophagy in sensory ganglia).

A Technical Guide to Sampling the Beagle Dog Nervous System for General Toxicity and Neurotoxicity Studies.

Beagle dogs are a key nonrodent species in nonclinical safety evaluation of new biomedical products. The Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP) has published "best practices" recommendations for nervous system sampling in nonrodents during general toxicity studies (Toxicol Pathol 41[7]: 1028-1048, 2013), but their adaptation to the Beagle dog has not been defined specifically. Here we provide 2 trimming schemes suitable for evaluating the unique neuroanatomic features of the dog brain in nonclinical toxicity studies. The first scheme is intended for general toxicity studies (Tier 1) to screen test articles with unknown or no anticipated neurotoxic potential; this plan using at least 7 coronal hemisections matches the STP "best practices" recommendations. The second trimming scheme for neurotoxicity studies (Tier 2) uses up to 14 coronal levels to investigate test articles where the brain is a suspected or known target organ. Collection of spinal cord, ganglia (somatic and autonomic), and nerves for dogs during nonclinical studies should follow published STP "best practices" recommendations for sampling the central (Toxicol Pathol 41[7]: 1028-1048, 2013) and peripheral (Toxicol Pathol 46[4]: 372-402, 2018) nervous systems. This technical guide also demonstrates the locations and approaches to collecting uncommonly sampled peripheral nervous system sites.

Histology Atlas of the Developing Mouse Placenta.

The use of the mouse as a model organism is common in translational research. This mouse-human similarity holds true for placental development as well. Proper formation of the placenta is vital for development and survival of the maturing embryo. Placentation involves sequential steps with both embryonic and maternal cell lineages playing important roles. The first step in placental development is formation of the blastocyst wall (approximate embryonic days [E] 3.0-3.5). After implantation (∼E4.5), extraembryonic endoderm progressively lines the inner surface of the blastocyst wall (∼E4.5-5.0), forming the yolk sac that provides histiotrophic support to the embryo; subsequently, formation of the umbilical vessels (∼E8.5) supports transition to the chorioallantoic placenta and hemotrophic nutrition. The fully mature ("definitive") placenta is established by ∼E12.5. Abnormal placental development often leads to embryonic mortality, with the timing of death depending on when placental insufficiency takes place and which cells are involved. This comprehensive macroscopic and microscopic atlas highlights the key features of normal and abnormal mouse placental development from E4.5 to E18.5. This in-depth overview of a transient (and thus seldom-analyzed) developmental tissue should serve as a useful reference to aid researchers in identifying and describing mouse placental changes in engineered, induced, and spontaneous disease models.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Points to Consider: Nonclinical Research and Development of In Vivo Gene Therapy Products, Emphasizing Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors.

Sequencing of the human genome and numerous advances in molecular techniques have launched the era of genetic medicine. Increasingly precise technologies for genetic modification, manufacturing, and administration of pharmaceutical-grade biologics have proved the viability of in vivo gene therapy (GTx) as a therapeutic modality as shown in several thousand clinical trials and recent approval of several GTx products for treating rare diseases and cancers. In recognition of the rapidly advancing knowledge in this field, the regulatory landscape has evolved considerably to maintain appropriate monitoring of safety concerns associated with this modality. Nonetheless, GTx safety assessment remains complex and is designed on a case-by-case basis that is determined by the disease indication and product attributes. This article describes our current understanding of fundamental biological principles and possible procedures (emphasizing those related to toxicology and toxicologic pathology) needed to support research and development of in vivo GTx products. This article is not intended to provide comprehensive guidance on all GTx modalities but instead provides an overview relevant to in vivo GTx generally by utilizing recombinant adeno-associated virus-based GTx-the most common in vivo GTx platform-to exemplify the main points to be considered in nonclinical research and development of GTx products.

Scientific and Regulatory Policy Committee Best Practices: Recommended ("Best") Practices for Informed (Non-blinded) Versus Masked (Blinded) Microscopic Evaluation in Animal Toxicity Studies.

This article describes the Society of Toxicologic Pathology's (STP) five recommended ("best") practices for appropriate use of informed (non-blinded) versus masked (blinded) microscopic evaluation in animal toxicity studies intended for regulatory review. (1) Informed microscopic evaluation is the default approach for animal toxicity studies. (2) Masked microscopic evaluation has merit for confirming preliminary diagnoses for target organs and/or defining thresholds ("no observed adverse effect level" and similar values) identified during an initial informed evaluation, addressing focused hypotheses, or satisfying guidance or requests from regulatory agencies. (3) If used as the approach for an animal toxicity study to investigate a specific research question, masking of the initial microscopic evaluation should be limited to withholding only information about the group (control or test article-treated) and dose equivalents. (4) The decision regarding whether or not to perform a masked microscopic evaluation is best made by a toxicologic pathologist with relevant experience. (5) Pathology peer review, performed to verify the microscopic diagnoses and interpretations by the study pathologist, should use an informed evaluation approach. The STP maintains that implementing these five best practices has and will continue to consistently deliver robust microscopic data with high sensitivity for animal toxicity studies intended for regulatory review. Consequently, when conducting animal toxicity studies, the advantages of informed microscopic evaluation for maximizing sensitivity outweigh the perceived advantages of minimizing bias through masked microscopic examination.

Neuropathology Evaluation in Juvenile Toxicity Studies in Rodents: Comparison of Developmental Neurotoxicity Studies for Chemicals With Juvenile Animal Studies for Pediatric Pharmaceuticals.

The developmental neuropathology examination in juvenile toxicity studies depends on the nature of the product candidate, its intended use, and the exposure scenario (eg, dose, duration, and route). Expectations for sampling, processing, and evaluating neural tissues differ for developmental neurotoxicity studies (DNTS) for chemicals and juvenile animal studies (JAS) for pediatric pharmaceuticals. Juvenile toxicity studies typically include macroscopic observations, brain weights, and light microscopic evaluation of routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections from major neural tissues (brain, spinal cord, and sciatic nerve) as neuropathology endpoints. The DNTS is a focused evaluation of the nervous system, so the study design incorporates perfusion fixation, plastic embedding of at least one nerve, quantitative analysis of selected brain regions, and sometimes special neurohistological stains. In contrast, the JAS examines multiple systems, so neural tissues undergo conventional tissue processing (eg, immersion fixation, paraffin embedding, H&E staining only). An "expanded neurohistopathology" (or "expanded neuropathology") approach may be performed for JAS if warranted, typically by light microscopic evaluation of more neural tissues (usually additional sections of brain, ganglia, and/or more nerves) or/and special neurohistological stains, to investigate specific questions (eg, a more detailed exploration of a potential neuroactive effect) or to fulfill regulatory requests.

Regulatory Perspectives on Juvenile Animal Toxicologic Pathology.

The Society of Toxicologic Pathology's Annual Virtual Symposium (2021) included a session on "Regulatory Perspectives on Juvenile Animal Toxicologic Pathology." The following narrative summarizes the key concepts from the four talks included in this symposium session chaired by Drs Deepa Rao and Alan Hoberman. These encompass an overview of various global regulations impacting the conduct of juvenile animal studies in pharmaceutical drug development and chemical toxicity assessments in a talk by Dr Alan Hoberman. Given the numerous regulatory guidances and legal statutes that have covered the conduct of juvenile animal studies and the recent harmonization of these guidances for pharmaceuticals, Dr Paul Brown provided an update on the harmonization of these guidances for pharmaceuticals, in the recently finalized version of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use S11 guidance document, "Nonclinical Safety Testing in Support of Development of Pediatric Medicines." The first two talks on regulations were followed by two talks focused on an evaluation of the postnatal development of two major organ systems relevant in juvenile animals. Dr Aurore Varela covered study design and endpoints impacting the skeletal system (bone), while Dr Brad Bolon presented a talk on the study design and conduct of neuropathology evaluations for the developing nervous system.

Impact of Preanalytical Factors During Histology Processing on Section Suitability for Digital Image Analysis.

Digital image analysis (DIA) is impacted by the quality of tissue staining. This study examined the influence of preanalytical variables-staining protocol design, reagent quality, section attributes, and instrumentation-on the performance of automated DIA software. Our hypotheses were that (1) staining intensity is impacted by subtle differences in protocol design, reagent quality, and section composition and that (2) identically programmed and loaded stainers will produce equivalent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. We tested these propositions by using 1 hematoxylin and eosin stainer to process 13 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) mouse tissues and by using 3 identically programmed and loaded immunostainers to process 5 FFPE mouse tissues for 4 cell biomarkers. Digital images of stained sections acquired with a commercial whole slide scanner were analyzed by customizable algorithms incorporated into commercially available DIA software. Staining intensity as viewed qualitatively by an observer and/or quantitatively by DIA was affected by staining conditions and tissue attributes. Intrarun and inter-run IHC staining intensities were equivalent for each tissue when processed on a given stainer but varied measurably across stainers. Our data indicate that staining quality must be monitored for each method and stainer to ensure that preanalytical factors do not impact digital pathology data quality.

Neuroanatomy and Sampling of Central Projections for the Visual System in Mammals Used in Toxicity Testing.

Visual system toxicity may manifest anywhere in the visual system, from the eye proper to the visual brain. Therefore, effective screening for visual system toxicity must evaluate not only ocular structures (ie, eye and optic nerve) but also multiple key brain regions involved in vision (eg, optic tract, subcortical relay nuclei, and primary and secondary visual cortices). Despite a generally comparable pattern across species, the neuroanatomic organization and function of the visual brain in rodents and rabbits exhibit appreciable differences relative to nonrodents. Currently recognized sampling practices for general toxicity studies in animals, which are based on easily discerned external neuroanatomic landmarks and guided by extant stereotaxic brain atlases, typically will permit histopathologic evaluation of many brain centers involved in visual sensation (eg, optic chiasm, optic tract, dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, primary and secondary visual cortices) and often some subcortical brain nuclei involved in light-modulated nonvisual activities needed for visual attention and orientation (eg, rostral colliculus in quadrupeds, termed the superior colliculus in bipeds; several cranial nerve nuclei). Pathologic findings induced by toxicants in the visual brain centers are similar to those that are produced in other brain regions.