Preemptive treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant patients reduces subsequent risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction or death.

The development of donor-specific antibodies after lung transplantation is associated with downstream acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), or death. It is unknown whether preemptive (early) treatment of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs), in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of allograft dysfunction, reduces the risk of subsequent CLAD or death. We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study to determine if early treatment of dnDSAs in lung transplant patients reduces the risk of the composite endpoint of CLAD or death. In the cohort of 445 patients, 145 patients developed dnDSAs posttransplant. Thirty patients received early targeted treatment for dnDSAs in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms of AMR. Early treatment of dnDSAs was associated with a decreased risk of CLAD or death (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.76; P < .01). Deferring treatment until the development of clinical AMR was associated with an increased risk of CLAD or death (hazard ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-6.18; P < .01). This study suggests that early, preemptive treatment of donor-specific antibodies in lung transplant patients may reduce the subsequent risk of CLAD or death.

Clinical features and allograft failure rates of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection categories.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) consensus criteria categorize AMR by diagnostic certainty. This study aims to define the clinical features and associated outcomes of these recently defined AMR categories. METHODS: Adjudication committees reviewed clinical data of 335 lung transplant recipients to define clinical or subclinical AMR based on the presence of allograft dysfunction, and the primary endpoints, time from transplant to allograft failure, a composite endpoint of chronic lung allograft dysfunction and/or death. Clinical AMR was subcategorized based on diagnostic certainty as definite, probable or possible AMR if 4, 3, or 2 characteristic features were present, respectively. Allograft injury was assessed via plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA). Risk of allograft failure and allograft injury was compared for AMR categories using regression models. RESULTS: Over the 38.5 months follow-up, 28.7% of subjects developed clinical AMR (n = 96), 18.5% developed subclinical AMR (n = 62) or 58.3% were no AMR (n = 177). Clinical AMR showed higher risk of allograft failure and ddcfDNA levels compared to subclinical or no AMR. Clinical AMR included definite/probable (n = 21) or possible AMR (n = 75). These subcategories showed similar clinical characteristics, ddcfDNA levels, and risk of allograft failure. However, definite/probable AMR showed greater measures of AMR severity, including degree of allograft dysfunction and risk of death compared to possible AMR. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical AMR showed greater risk of allograft failure than subclinical AMR or no AMR. Subcategorization of clinical AMR based on diagnostic certainty correlated with AMR severity and risk of death, but not with the risk of allograft failure.