RESUMEN
AIM: Validated clinical decision rules on neuroimaging are not available for children who are evaluated more than 24 h after a minor head trauma. We compared clinically important traumatic brain injuries in children who presented with a minor head trauma within or after 24 h. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients aged 0-17 years, who were evaluated for minor head traumas by five paediatric emergency departments in Northern Italy between January 2019 and June 2020. Children with clinically important traumatic brain injuries were divided into those who had presented within and after 24 h. RESULTS: The study comprised 5981 children (59.9% boys), with a median age of 2 years, including 243 (4.1%) who had presented more than 24 h after their minor head trauma. Neuroimaging was performed on 448 (7.5%) patients and the time of presentation had no impact on the rates of clinically important traumatic brain injuries. Multiple logistic regression did not show any association between clinically important traumatic brain injuries and late presentation. CONCLUSION: Delayed presentation to a paediatric emergency department after a minor head trauma did not alter the risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries and the same neuroimaging rules could apply.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Encefálicas , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
Infection with soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is a major public health problem in many developing countries, with pregnant women and children particularly at risk. Preventive chemotherapy, which is the intervention currently recommended by the WHO against the main helminth infections including those caused by STHs, aims at reducing morbidity through periodical administration of anthelminthic drugs either alone or in combination. The Expanded Programme on Immunization is one of the most widely implemented health programmes in the world and has well established access to children and women. The present study investigated the cost of the provision of anthelminthic drugs during existing immunisation campaigns. In Lao PDR, use of this integrated approach compared with implementation of the vertical deworming campaign alone allowed a reduction of the individual cost of deworming by 10 times (from US$0.23 in the vertical deworming campaign to US$0.03 in the integrated campaign). When drug cost was excluded, the cost of deworming an individual was US$0.007, implying that deworming 100 children would cost less than US$1 if drug donation was in place. The burden posed on health workers by the integration process was perceived as minimal and manageable. Moreover, delivery of anthelminthic drugs during immunisation campaigns enabled campaign teams to observe drug intake directly, which assured safety. These findings prove that integration is an opportunity to maximise health benefits through the delivery of multiple health products and the attainment of high coverage.