Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Intervertebral Discs: Spin-Echo Echo-Planar Imaging Sequence Validation.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an imaging technique that can noninvasively assess the shear properties of the intervertebral disc (IVD). Unlike the standard gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE technique, a spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequence has the potential to improve imaging efficiency and patient compliance. PURPOSE: To validate the use of an SE-EPI sequence for MRE of the IVD compared against the standard GRE sequence. STUDY TYPE: Cross-over. SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (15 males and 13 females, age range: 19-55). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T; GRE, SE-EPI with breath holds (SE-EPI-BH) and SE-EPI with free breathing (SE-EPI-FB) MRE sequences. ASSESSMENT: MRE-derived shear stiffnesses were calculated via principal frequency analysis. SE-EPI derived shear stiffness and octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratios (OSS-SNR) were compared against those derived using the GRE sequence. The reproducibility and repeatability of SE-EPI stiffness measurements were determined. Shear stiffness was evaluated in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) regions of the disc. Scan times between sequences were compared. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linear mixed models, Bland-Altman plots, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were used with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Good correlation was observed between shear stiffnesses derived from the SE-EPI sequences with those derived from the GRE sequence with CCC values greater than 0.73 and 0.78 for the NP and AF regions, respectively. OSS-SNR was not significantly different between GRE and SE-EPI sequences (P > 0.05). SE-EPI sequences generated highly reproducible and repeatable stiffness measurements with CCC values greater than 0.97 in the NP and AF regions and reduced scan time by at least 51% compared to GRE. SE-EPI-BH and SE-EPI-FB stiffness measurements were similar with CCC values greater than 0.98 for both regions. DATA CONCLUSION: SE-EPI-based MRE-derived stiffnesses were highly reproducible and repeatable and correlated with current standard GRE MRE-derived stiffness estimates while reducing scan times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.

Can activated titanium interbody cages accelerate or enhance spinal fusion? a review of the literature and a design for clinical trials.

While spinal interbody cage options have proliferated in the past decade, relatively little work has been done to explore the comparative potential of biomaterial technologies in promoting stable fusion. Innovations such as micro-etching and nano-architectural designs have shown purported benefits in in vitro studies, but lack clinical data describing their optimal implementation. Here, we critically assess the pre-clinical data supportive of various commercially available interbody cage biomaterial, topographical, and structural designs. We describe in detail the osteointegrative and osteoconductive benefits conferred by these modifications with a focus on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium (Ti) interbody implants. Further, we describe the rationale and design for two randomized controlled trials, which aim to address the paucity of clinical data available by comparing interbody fusion outcomes between either PEEK or activated Ti lumbar interbody cages. Utilizing dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), these studies will evaluate the relative implant-bone integration and fusion rates achieved by either micro-etched Ti or standard PEEK interbody devices. Taken together, greater understanding of the relative osseointegration profile at the implant-bone interface of cages with distinct topographies will be crucial in guiding the rational design of further studies and innovations.

MR Elastography-derived Stiffness: A Biomarker for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Purpose To determine the repeatability of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements of the intervertebral disc (IVD) taken throughout the day and their relationship with IVD degeneration and subject age. Materials and Methods In a cross-sectional study, in vivo lumbar MR elastography was performed once in the morning and once in the afternoon in 47 subjects without current low back pain (IVDs = 230; age range, 20-71 years) after obtaining written consent under approval of the institutional review board. The Pfirrmann degeneration grade and MR elastography-derived shear stiffness of the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus regions of all lumbar IVDs were assessed by means of principal frequency analysis. One-way analysis of variance, paired t tests, concordance and Bland-Altman tests, and Pearson correlations were used to evaluate degeneration, diurnal changes, repeatability, and age effects, respectively. Results There were no significant differences between morning and afternoon shear stiffness across all levels and there was very good technical repeatability between the morning and afternoon imaging results for both nucleus pulposus (R = 0.92) and annulus fibrosus (R = 0.83) regions. There was a significant increase in both nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus MR elastography-derived shear stiffness with increasing Pfirrmann degeneration grade (nucleus pulposus grade 1, 12.5 kPa ± 1.3; grade 5, 16.5 kPa ± 2.1; annulus fibrosus grade 1, 90.4 kPa ± 9.3; grade 5, 120.1 kPa ± 15.4), and there were weak correlations between shear stiffness and age across all levels (R ≤ 0.32). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness measurements are highly repeatable, weakly correlate with age, and increase with advancing IVD degeneration. These results suggest that MR elastography-derived shear stiffness may provide an objective biomarker of the IVD degeneration process. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Tilting the gantry for CT-guided spine procedures.

Percutaneous spine procedures can be performed with computed tomography (CT) guidance. The use of CT guidance is cumbersome for procedures where an oblique needle trajectory is imposed by the spatial orientation of the spine, often requiring complex needle triangulation relative to the true axial scan plane. We describe a procedural modification to overcome this limitation. A combination of variable CT gantry tilt, and strategic bolster placement under the patient can be used to obtain optimal imaging planes for guidance along the desired needle trajectory. The needle is aligned with the CT gantry laser beam to guide the needle access to the target, maintained within a single CT slice. We describe our clinical experience using the modified procedure relative to the conventional technique, and provide representative examples.

A Prospective Registry Study of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Incorporation Into Treatment Planning of Intracranial Meningiomas.

PURPOSE: The current standard for meningioma treatment planning involves magnetic resonance imaging-based guidance. Somatostatin receptor ligands such as 68Ga-DOTATATE are being explored for meningioma treatment planning due to near-universal expression of somatostatin receptors 1 and 2 in meningioma tissue. We hypothesized that 68Ga-DOTATATE positron emission tomography (PET)-guided treatment management for patients with meningiomas is safe and effective and can identify which patients benefit most from adjuvant radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A single-institution prospective registry study was created for inclusion of patients with intracranial meningiomas who received a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT to assist with radiation oncologist decision making. Patients who received a PET scan from January 1, 2018, to February 25, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients included, 40%, 47%, and 5% had World Health Organization grades 1, 2, and 3 meningiomas, respectively, and 8% (5 patients) had no grade assigned. According to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0539 criteria, 22%, 72%, and 7% were categorized as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively. After completing their PET scans, 48 patients, 11 patients, and 1 patient proceeded with radiation therapy, observation, and redo craniotomy, respectively. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 19.5 months. Of the 3 patients (5%) who experienced local failure between 9.2 and 28.5 months after diagnosis, 2 had PET-avid disease in their postoperative cavity and elected for observation before recurrence, and 1 high-risk patient with multifocal disease experienced local failure 2 years after a second radiation course and multiple previous recurrences. Notably, 5 patients did not have any local PET uptake and were observed; none of these patients experienced recurrence. Only 1 grade 3 toxicity was attributed to PET-guided radiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study examined one of the largest known populations of patients with intracranial meningiomas followed by physicians who used 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-guided therapy. Incorporating 68Ga-DOTATATE PET into future trials may assist with clinician decision making and improve patient outcomes.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Suspected Intracranial Hypotension.

The clinical syndrome of intracranial hypotension refers to the symptoms caused by cerebrospinal fluid hypovolemia and is primarily characterized by postural headaches, but can be associated with a multitude of other neurological symptoms. Imaging plays a critical role in helping to establish a diagnosis of intracranial hypotension, localize the source of cerebrospinal fluid leak, and assist in directing targeted treatments. Using the best available evidence, this document provides diagnostic imaging recommendations for the workup of intracranial hypotension across various clinical presentations. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Back Pain.

Thoracic back pain is a common site for inflammatory, neoplastic, metabolic, infectious, and degenerative conditions, and may be associated with significant disability and morbidity. Uncomplicated acute thoracic back pain and/or radiculopathy does not typically warrant imaging. Imaging may be considered in those patients who have persistent pain despite 6 weeks of conservative treatment. Early imaging may also be warranted in patients presenting with "red flag" history or symptoms, including those with a known or suspected history of cancer, infection, immunosuppression, or trauma; in myelopathic patients; or in those with a history of prior thoracic spine fusion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Advancing Beyond the Hippocampus to Preserve Cognition for Patients With Brain Metastases: Dosimetric Results From a Phase 2 Trial of Memory-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Recent advances to preserve neurocognitive function in patients treated for brain metastases include stereotactic radiosurgery, hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and memantine administration. The hippocampus, corpus callosum, fornix, and amygdala are key neurocognitive substructures with a low propensity for brain metastases. Herein, we report our preliminary experience using a "memory-avoidance" WBRT (MA-WBRT) approach that spares these substructures for patients with >15 brain metastases. Methods and Materials: Ten consecutive patients treated with MA-WBRT on a phase 2 clinical trial were reviewed. In each patient, the hippocampi, amygdalae, corpus callosum, and fornix were contoured. Patients were not eligible for MA-WBRT if they had metastases in these substructures. A memory-avoidance region was created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around these substructures. Hotspots were avoided in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Coverage of brain metastases was prioritized over memory avoidance dose constraints. Dose constraints for these avoidance structures included a D100% ≤ 9 Gy and D0.03 cm3 ≤ 16 Gy (variation acceptable to 20 Gy). LINAC-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Results: On average, the memory avoidance structure volume was 37.1 cm3 (range, 25.2-44.6 cm3), occupying 2.5% of the entire whole brain target volume. All treatment plans met the D100% dose constraint, and 8 of 10 plans met the D0.03 cm3 constraint, with priority given to tumor coverage for the remaining 2 cases. Target coverage (D98% > 25 Gy) and homogeneity (D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy) were achieved for all plans. Conclusions: Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus, amygdala, corpus callosum, and fornix with good target coverage and homogeneity. After enrollment is completed, quality of life and cognitive data will be evaluated to assess the efficacy of MA-WBRT to mitigate declines in quality of life and cognition after whole brain radiation.

Concurrent Lapatinib With Brain Radiation Therapy in Patients With HER2+ Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases: NRG Oncology-KROG/RTOG 1119 Phase 2 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Lapatinib plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was hypothesized to improve the 12-week intracranial complete response (CR) rate compared with either option of radiation therapy (RT) alone for patients with brain metastases (BM) from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study included patients with HER2+ breast cancer with ≥1 measurable, unirradiated BM. Patients were randomized to WBRT (37.5 Gy/3 wk)/SRS (size-based dosing) ± concurrent lapatinib (1000 mg daily for 6 weeks). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), lesion-specific response, central nervous system progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: From July 2012 to September 2019, 143 patients were randomized, with 116 analyzable for the primary endpoint. RT + lapatinib did not improve 12-week CR (0% vs 6% for RT alone, 1-sided P = .97), or ORR at 12 weeks. At 4 weeks, RT + lapatinib showed higher ORR (55% vs 42%). Higher graded prognostic assessment and ≤10 lesions were associated with higher 12-week ORR. Grade 3 and 4 adverse event rates were 8% and 0% for RT and 28% and 6% for RT + lapatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 6 weeks of concomitant lapatinib to WBRT/SRS did not improve the primary endpoint of 12-week CR rate or 12-week ORR. Adding lapatinib to WBRT/SRS showed improvement of 4-week ORR, suggesting a short-term benefit from concomitant therapy.

Vertebral Compression Fracture After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: The Role of Vertebral Endplate Disruption.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a common, but serious toxicity of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Several variables that place patients at high risk of VCF have previously been identified, including advanced Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), a widely adopted clinical decision criterion to assess spinal instability. We examine the role of tumoral endplate (EP) disruption in the risk of VCF and attempt to incorporate it into a simple risk stratification system. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study from a single institution. Demographic and treatment information was collected for patients who received spinal SBRT between 2013 and 2019. EP disruption was noted on pre-SBRT computed tomography scan. The primary end point of 1-year cumulative incidence of VCF was assessed on follow-up MRI and computed tomography scans at 3-month intervals after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were included. The median follow-up was 18 months. Approximately 48 patients (43%) had at least one EP disruption. Twenty patients (18%) experienced a VCF at a median of 5.2 months from SBRT. Patients with at least one EP disruption were more likely to experience VCF than those with no EP disruption (29% vs 6%, P < .001). A nomogram was created using the variables of EP disruption, a SINS of ≥7, and adverse histology. Patients were stratified into groups at low and high risk of VCF, which were associated with 2% and 38% risk of VCF ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: EP disruption is a novel risk factor for VCF in patients who will undergo spinal SBRT. A simple nomogram incorporating EP disruption, adverse histology, and SINS score is effective for quickly assessing risk of VCF. These data require validation in prospective studies and could be helpful in counseling patients regarding VCF risk and referring for prophylactic interventions in high-risk populations.

Neoadjuvant Arterial Embolization of Spine Metastases Associated With Improved Local Control in Patients Receiving Surgical Decompression and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Spine metastases often cause significant pain, instability, and/or neurological morbidity. Local control (LC) of spine metastases has been augmented with advances in systemic therapies, radiation, and surgical technique. Prior reports suggest an association between preoperative arterial embolization and improved LC and palliative pain control. OBJECTIVE: To further elucidate the role of neoadjuvant embolization on LC of spine metastases and the potential for improved pain control in patients receiving surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHOD: A retrospective single-center review between 2012 and 2020 identified 117 patients with spinal metastases from various solid tumor malignancies managed with surgery and adjuvant SBRT with or without preoperative spinal arterial embolization. Demographic information, radiographic studies, treatment characteristics, Karnofsky Performance Score, Defensive Veterans Pain Rating Scale, and mean daily doses of analgesic medications were reviewed. LC was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging obtained at a median 3-month interval and defined as progression at the surgically treated vertebral level. RESULTS: Of 117 patients, 47 (40.2%) underwent preoperative embolization, followed by surgery and SBRT and 70 (59.8%) underwent surgery and SBRT alone. Within the embolization cohort, the median LC was 14.2 months compared with 6.3 months among the nonembolization cohort ( P = .0434). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggests ≥82.5% embolization predicted significantly improved LC (area under the curve = 0.808; P < .0001). Defensive Veterans Pain Rating Scale mean and maximum scores significantly decreased immediately after embolization ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization was associated with improved LC and pain control suggesting a novel role for its use. Additional prospective study is warranted.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET-Based Radiation Contouring Creates More Precise Radiation Volumes for Patients With Meningioma.

PURPOSE: Radiation treatment planning for meningiomas traditionally involves magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhanced images to define residual tumor. However, the gross tumor volume may be difficult to delineate for patients with a meningioma in the skull base sagittal sinus or after resection. Advanced positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using 68Ga-DOTATATE, which has been shown to be more sensitive and specific than MRI imaging, can be used for target volume delineation in these circumstances. We hypothesized that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scan-based treatment planning would lead to smaller radiation volumes and would detect additional areas of disease compared with standard MRI alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our data evaluated retrospective, deidentified, and blinded gross tumor volume contour delineation with 7 central nervous system (CNS) specialists (4 CNS radiation oncologists and 3 neuroradiologists) for 25 patients with a meningioma diagnosis who received both a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and an MRI for radiation treatment planning. Both the MRI and the PET were nonsequentially contoured by each physician for each patient. RESULTS: The median MRI volume for each physician ranged from 16.94-25.53 cm3. The median PET volume for each physician ranged from 2.09 to 8.36 cm3. The median PET volume was smaller for each physician. In addition, 7 of the 25 patients (28%) had new nonadjacent areas contoured on PET by at least 6 of the 7 physicians that were not contoured by these physicians on the corresponding MRI. These new areas would not have been in the traditional MRI-based volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports that 68Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging may help radiation oncologists create more precise radiation treatment volumes through finding undetected areas of disease not seen on MRI. Treatment planning guided by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET should be studied prospectively.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of circumferential spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Background: With advances in systemic therapy translating to improved survival in metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have become an increasingly common source of morbidity. Achieving durable local control (LC) for patients with circumferential epidural disease can be particularly challenging. Circumferential stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC for circumferential vertebral and/or epidural metastatic spinal disease, but prospective (and retrospective) data are extremely limited. We sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes with this novel approach to circumferential spinal disease. Methods: We retrospectively identified all circumferential SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for post-operative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14-27.5 Gy in one to five fractions. Feasibility was assessed by determining the proportion of plans for which ≥95% planning target volume (PTV) was coverable by ≥95% prescription dose. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity were assessed. Detailed dosimetric data were collected. Results: Fifty-eight patients receiving 64 circumferential SBRT courses were identified (median age 61, KPS ≥70, 57% men). With a median follow-up of 15 months, the 12-month local control was 85% (eight events). Five and three recurrences were in the epidural space and bone, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increased PTV and uncontrolled systemic disease were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of LF; ≥95% PTV was covered by ≥95% prescription dose in 94% of the cases. The rate of new or progressive vertebral compression fracture was 8%. There were no myelitis events or any grade 3+ acute or late toxicities. Conclusions: For patients with circumferential disease, circumferential spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. A prospective evaluation of this approach is warranted.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Three or More Contiguous Vertebral Levels.

Background: With survival improving in many metastatic malignancies, spine metastases have increasingly become a source of significant morbidity; achieving durable local control (LC) is critical. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may offer improved LC and/or symptom palliation. However, due to setup concerns, SBRT is infrequently offered to patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels. Because data are limited, we sought to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and cancer control outcomes of spine SBRT delivered to ≥3 contiguous levels. Methods: We retrospectively identified all SBRT courses delivered between 2013 and 2019 at a tertiary care institution for postoperative or intact spine metastases. Radiotherapy was delivered to 14-35 Gy in 1-5 fractions. Patients were stratified by whether they received SBRT to 1-2 or ≥3 contiguous levels. The primary endpoint was 1-year LC and was compared between groups. Factors associated with increased likelihood of local failure (LF) were explored. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed. In-depth dosimetric data were collected. Results: Overall, 165 patients with 194 SBRT courses were identified [54% were men, median age was 61 years, 93% had Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70, and median follow-up was 15 months]. One hundred thirteen patients (68%) received treatment to 1-2 and 52 to 3-7 (32%) levels. The 1-year LC was 88% (89% for 1-2 levels vs. 84% for ≥3 levels, p = 0.747). On multivariate analysis, uncontrolled systemic disease was associated with inferior LC for patients with ≥3 treated levels. No other demographic, disease, treatment, or dosimetric variables achieved significance. Rates of new/progressive fracture were equivalent (8% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.839). There were no radiation-induced myelopathy or grade 3+ acute or late toxicities in either group. Coverage of ≥95% of the planning target volume with ≥95% prescription dose was similar between groups (96% 1-2 levels vs. 89% ≥3 levels, p = 0.078). Conclusions: For patients with ≥3 contiguous involved levels, spine SBRT is feasible and may offer excellent LC without significant toxicity. Prospective evaluation is warranted.

Use of high-pitch dual-source computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis to markedly reduce scan time: clinical feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing image pitch in computed tomographic (CT) imaging is a method through which scan time can be reduced, which can reduce motion artifacts. In this study, we assess the clinical feasibility of ultrahigh-pitch CT imaging made possible by dual-source CT. METHODS: Image pitch, total scan time, and image quality assessments were compared between 45 patients who underwent a high-pitch dual-source CT and 34 patients imaged by standard CT technique. Image noise and diagnostic image quality were assessed by 2 independent blinded readers on a 5-point scale. RESULTS: Mean pitch of high-pitch CT was 2.5 (mean scan time, 1.9 seconds) compared with the standard CT mean pitch of 0.6 (mean scan time, 9.8 seconds). There was no statistically significant difference in image noise between high-pitch CT (12.6) and standard CT (12.0); P > 0.3. Although reader 1 rated standard CT as superior to high-pitch CT (P 0.005), reader 2 rated no significant difference. No high-pitch CT studies were rated as limited diagnostically by either reader. CONCLUSION: High-pitch dual-source CT can reduce scan time while leading to minor losses of image quality, which may be useful in some patients.

Recurrent adamantinoma metastatic to the spine: Clinical and imaging considerations.

Metastatic adamantinoma involving the spine is an extremely rare occurrence. In this case report, we present a patient with recurrent adamantinoma of the tibia which was found to have metastasized to the spine. The metastatic involvement was diagnosed pathologically, status post CT guided percutaneous core needle biopsy, performed after the patient returned with concerning symptoms and imaging findings suggestive of metastasis. The patient was ultimately treated surgically with vertebrectomy and reconstruction. A thoughtful review of this disease process is explored, emphasizing the pathology, imaging characteristics, and pertinent differential diagnostic considerations. While uncommon, knowledge of this rare disease process and its presentation can improve future patient diagnosis and outcomes.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Myelopathy: 2021 Update.

Myelopathy is a clinical diagnosis with localization of the neurological findings to the spinal cord, rather than the brain or the peripheral nervous system, and then to a particular segment of the spinal cord. Myelopathy can be the result of primary intrinsic disorders of the spinal cord or from secondary conditions, which result in extrinsic compression of the spinal cord. While the causes of myelopathy may be multiple, the acuity of presentation and symptom onset frame a practical approach to the differential diagnosis. Imaging plays a crucial role in the evaluation of myelopathy with MRI the preferred modality. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Low Back Pain: 2021 Update.

In the United States, acute low back pain, with or without radiculopathy, is the leading cause of years lived with disability and the third ranking cause of disability-adjusted life-years. Uncomplicated acute low back pain and/or radiculopathy is a benign, self-limited condition that does not warrant any imaging studies. Imaging is considered in those patients who have had up to 6 weeks of medical management and physical therapy that resulted in little or no improvement in their back pain. It is also considered for those patients presenting with red flags, raising suspicion for a serious underlying condition, such as cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, fracture, or infection. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Plexopathy: 2021 Update.

Plexopathy may be caused by diverse pathologies, including trauma, nerve entrapment, neoplasm, inflammation, infection, autoimmune disease, hereditary disease, and idiopathic etiologies. For patients presenting with brachial or lumbosacral plexopathy, dedicated plexus MRI is the most appropriate initial imaging modality for all clinical scenarios and can identify processes both intrinsic and extrinsic to the nerves. Other imaging tests may be appropriate for initial imaging depending on the clinical scenario. This document addresses initial imaging strategies for brachial and lumbosacral plexopathy in the following clinical situations: nontraumatic plexopathy with no known malignancy, traumatic plexopathy (not perinatal), and plexopathy occurring in the context of a known malignancy or posttreatment syndrome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Infection.

Spine infection is both a clinical and diagnostic imaging challenge due to its relatively indolent and nonspecific clinical presentation. The diagnosis of spine infection is based upon a combination of clinical suspicion, imaging evaluation and, when possible, microbiologic confirmation performed from blood cultures or image-guided percutaneous or open spine biopsy. With respect to the imaging evaluation of suspected spine infection, MRI without and with contrast of the affected spine segment is the initial diagnostic test of choice. As noncontrast MRI of the spine is often used in the evaluation of back or neck pain not responding to conservative medical management, it may show findings that are suggestive of infection, hence this procedure may also be considered in the evaluation of suspected spine infection. Nuclear medicine studies, including skeletal scintigraphy, gallium scan, and FDG-PET/CT, may be helpful in equivocal or select cases. Similarly, radiography and CT may be appropriate for assessing overall spinal stability, spine alignment, osseous integrity and, when present, the status of spine instrumentation or spine implants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.