Secondary Extra-anatomic Infrainguinal Bypass following Lower Limb Tumoral Resection.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue malignancy of lower limb can involve femoral triangle by direct tumoral invasion or secondary to ganglionic metastasis. Secondary arterial complications can appear during follow-up after initial tumoral resection and local radiation therapy. The aim of this study is to report our experience of secondary extra-anatomical lower limb revascularization following lower limb oncological resection with femoral bifurcation involvement. METHODS: This is a retrospective monocentric study including patients who underwent extra-anatomical iliopopliteal bypass, with a previous treated neoplasia involving homolateral femoral bifurcation. Proximal anastomosis was performed on the iliac artery, tunnelization was made through iliac wing, and distal anastomosis was done on distal superficial femoral or popliteal artery. RESULTS: Five patients underwent extra-anatomic iliopopliteal bypass for oncological purpose from 2008 to 2018 at our institution. Mean age at surgery time was 52 years (standard deviation = 19.3). Prosthetic graft was used in all cases. Primitive tumor involved Scarpa triangle in 3 cases (soft tissue sarcomas) and ganglionic metastasis involved Scarpa triangle in 2 cases (epidermoid carcinoma). Clinical presentation was ischemic in 4 cases and hemorrhagic in 1 case. One patient died during hospitalization. Of the 4 survivors, 3 patients had a patent bypass at the end of follow-up (2 had bypass thrombectomy, 1 patient had major amputation). CONCLUSIONS: Secondary iliopopliteal bypasses through the iliac wing following lower limb tumoral resection have acceptable results. It is a valid option for limb salvage especially after local radiation therapy and tumoral resection. Multidisciplinary management is necessary to obtain acceptable results and follow-up is mandatory.

AT1 receptor blockade prevents the decrease in conduit artery flow-mediated dilatation during NOS inhibition in humans.

Whether AT(1) (angiotenin II type 1) receptor blockade can prevent the decrease in conduit artery FMD (flow-mediated dilatation) during NOS (nitric oxide synthase) inhibition by alternative endothelial pathways has not been explored previously in humans. In 12 healthy subjects, we measured radial artery diameter (echotracking) and flow (Doppler) during FMD induced by sustained reactive hyperaemia during a control period and following NOS inhibition [1.5 mg.min(-1).l(-1) L-NMMA (N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine)], after a single oral administration of telmisartan (80 mg) or placebo, using a randomized double-blind cross-over design. In six volunteers, we also assessed the roles of prostacyclin and EDHF (endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor) during radial FMD after AT(1) receptor blockade by oral administration of aspirin (500 mg) alone, aspirin+L-NMMA or aspirin+L-NMMA+fluconazole (a cytochrome epoxygenases inhibitor; 0.37 mg.min(-1).l(-1)). Telmisartan did not affect radial artery FMD in the control period (10.9+/-0.6% with placebo compared with 9.9+/-0.7% with telmisartan), but prevented its decrease after L-NMMA (9.3+/-0.8% with placebo compared with 12.6+/-1.2% with telmisartan; P<0.05) with no modification in baseline parameters, hyperaemia and radial artery endothelium-independent dilatation to sodium nitroprusside. Moreover, in telmisartan-treated subjects, radial artery FMD, compared with control (9.0+/-1.0%), was not modified by aspirin alone (9.4+/-0.7%) or associated with L-NMMA (9.5+/-0.5%), but was reduced by the combination of aspirin, L-NMMA and fluconazole (7.5+/-0.6%; P<0.05). These results demonstrate that AT(1) receptor blockade prevents the decrease in conduit artery FMD during NOS inhibition in humans, suggesting the development of a compensatory endothelial mechanism. This mechanism appears to be independent of prostacyclin and could possibly be related to an EDHF release.

Randomized comparison of eptifibatide versus abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the EVA-AMI Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare eptifibatide and abciximab as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor abciximab as adjunct to primary PCI in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions has been shown to reduce ischemic complications and improve clinical outcomes. So far, no trial has been performed to compare the efficacy of another GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, eptifibatide, and abciximab in primary PCI. METHODS: A total of 427 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions <12 h and planned primary PCI were randomized to double-bolus eptifibatide (n = 226) followed by a 24-h infusion or single-bolus abciximab (n = 201) followed by a 12-h infusion. In this noninferiority trial, the primary end point was the incidence of complete (> or =70%) ST-segment resolution (STR) 60 min after PCI, a measure of myocardial reperfusion. The assumption was a 60% complete STR rate in the abciximab group. The noninferiority margin was set to 15%. RESULTS: The incidence of complete STR at 60 min after PCI in the intention-to-treat analysis was 62.6% after eptifibatide and 56.3% after abciximab (adjusted difference: 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: 2.7% to 17.0%). All-cause mortality 6.2% versus 4.5% (p = 0.50); reinfarction 0.4% versus 3.5% (p = 0.03); target vessel revascularization 4.4% versus 6.5% (p = 0.40); the combined end point of death, nonfatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization 10.6% versus 10.9% (p = 0.90); stroke 0.5% versus 0.5% (p = 1.00) after 6 months; and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding complications 4.0% versus 2.0% (p = 0.20) after 30 days were observed after eptifibatide and abciximab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Eptifibatide as an adjunct to primary PCI is equally as effective as abciximab with respect to STR. (Efficacy of Eptifibatide Compared to Abciximab in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] for Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [STEMI]; NCT00426751).

Multicenter safety and efficacy analysis of assisted closure after antegrade arterial punctures using the StarClose device.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the StarClose device for closure of antegrade punctures following infrainguinal endovascular interventions. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 221 consecutive patients treated with the StarClose device in a 12-month period at 5 centers (4 French and 1 British). Of these, 107 patients (69 men; median age 75 years, range 44-93) were from the UK cohort (111 closures), and 94 patients (75 men; median age 67 years, range 32-95) were from the French cohort (111 closures). Technical success, complication rates, demographic data, medical history, and procedural details were gathered for all patients. Residual bleeding and the requirement for additional manual compression were recorded when the device failed. Clinical evaluation was performed at discharge; color-coded duplex ultrasonography was done in a subset of French patients. RESULTS: The overall technical success rate was 94.6% (210/222; 95% CI 3.1%-9.2%). The results were similar in the 2 cohorts: 95.5% (106/111; 95% CI 1.9%-10.1%) in the UK and 93.7% (104/111; 95% CI 3.1%-12.4%) in France. The 12 failures (5 UK and 7 France) were due to several mechanisms: device failure (n=5), obesity (n=1), groin scarring (n=2), and unexplained (n=4). In 2 failed cases, open surgical closure of the arteriotomy was performed because pressure hemostasis failed. Two pseudoaneurysms were observed: one after immediate failure was successfully treated by prolonged pressure; the other, after apparent success of the device, required surgical therapy. The incidence of serious vascular complication was 1.8% (4/222; 95% CI 0.7%-4.5%); 2 patients from each cohort. CONCLUSION: The StarClose device safely and effectively closes antegrade punctures after infrainguinal endovascular intervention, even in patients who would be considered to be at high risk for puncture-site bleeding. However, a randomized trial would be required to support any definitive recommendations.