Performance of conventional cytogenetic analysis on chorionic villi when only one cell layer, cytotrophoblast or mesenchyme alone, is analyzed.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an estimation of the probability of error when chorionic villi (CV) cytogenetic analysis is limited to a single placental layer; either a direct preparation (Dir) or long-term culture (LTC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cytogenetic studies on 81,593 consecutive CV samples in which both Dir and LTC were analyzed. All mosaic cases received amniocentesis. The false omission and false discovery rates were calculated by assessing the results that would have been reported when analysis was limited to either Dir or LTC. RESULTS: For all abnormalities combined, the proportion of normal Dir or LTC only reports that would have been inconsistent with a subsequent amniocentesis was 0.09% and 0.03%, respectively (false omissions). Among abnormal reports based on Dir or LTC alone, 8.01% and 3.17%, respectively, would be inconsistent with a subsequent amniocentesis result (false discoveries). Differences are present for individual abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of identifying all abnormalities of potential clinical significance, the analysis of both placental layers is optimal. LTC alone is the preferred approach if only one layer of placenta is to be analyzed. Although rare, it is important to acknowledge that one cell layer analysis alone can cause misdiagnosis due to undetected mosaicism.

An evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos following preimplantation genetic screening.

The aim of this study was to devise an evidence-based scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos for transfer. A retrospective analysis was performed of all sequential cytogenetic and molecular results on chorionic villi samples (n = 72,472) and products of conception (n = 3806) analysed at a single centre. The likelihood that a mosaic aneuploidy detected in chorionic villi samples will involve the fetus, the incidence of clinically significant fetal uniparental disomy in the presence of a mosaic in chorionic villi and the chance of the mosaicism culminating in miscarriage were used to generate a scoring system for prioritizing mosaic aneuploid embryos detected by preimplantation genetic screening. A composite score was obtained for each individual mosaic aneuploidy after assignment of an individual risk score based on the incidence/likelihood of each adverse outcome. A final additional score was assigned to viable full or mosaic aneuploidies with a well-defined phenotype. The higher the composite score the lower the priority for embryo transfer. In conclusion, due to the paucity of prospective studies on the actual transfer of mosaic aneuploid embryos, we suggest using this evidence-based scoring system to provide a useful tool for clinicians, embryologists and patients.

Frequency of fetal karyotype abnormalities in women undergoing invasive testing in the absence of ultrasound and other high-risk indications.

OBJECTIVES: No previous studies have reported the frequencies of individual chromosomal anomalies in normal-appearing fetuses stratified by maternal age (MA) and gestational age (GA). We therefore sought to (1) characterize the frequency of all fetal karyotype anomalies in sonographically normal appearing fetuses without pretest risk factors, and (2) assess MA and GA impact on the proportion of anomalies targeted by screening and consequent impact on residual risk following a negative result. METHODS: Fetal karyotypes from samples without prior risk assessment or ultrasound anomalies were analyzed. We calculated, per single-year MA and in two GA intervals, the predicted frequency of each cytogenetic defect. RESULTS: A total of 129 263 karyotypes were analyzed. The risk for significant, cytogenetically visible chromosomal anomalies, at 15 to 20 weeks GA, varies between 1/301 at MA of 18 years, and 1/9 at MA of 48 years. The proportion of clinically significant anomalies not addressed by current screening methods is 47% at MA of 18 years and 5% at MA of 48 years. CONCLUSIONS: By determining frequencies for individual karyotype anomalies stratified by MA and GA, in the setting of normal-appearing fetuses, a more personalized risk assessment, including the residual risk after a normal fetal aneuploidy screening result, can be provided. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Chromosomal mosaicism in the fetoplacental unit.

Cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis on chorionic villi (CV) can be complicated by the detection of "chromosomal mosaicism." This is one of the main issues of first-trimester cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis as it can involve different types of chromosomal abnormalities, and the prediction of the fetal involvement is challenging because the detected abnormal mosaic cell line is not necessarily extended to fetal tissues. In addition, because the cell-free fetal DNA that is targeted by the new technologies for fetal aneuploidy risk assessment is mainly derived from the CV cells, the same challenges related to chromosomal mosaicism can be transferred into this new clinical field. This review illustrates the phenomenon of fetoplacental mosaicism, the management of prenatal diagnosis cases complicated by the detection of such a biological phenomenon, and the implications of its presence for the management of high-risk cfDNA testing results for fetal aneuploidies.