How Much Delay Matters? How Time to Treatment Impacts Overall Survival in Early Stage Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify drivers of time from diagnosis to treatment (TTT) of surgically resected early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and determine the effect of TTT on post-resection survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Large database studies that lack relevant comorbidity data have identified longer TTT asa driver of worse overall survival. METHODS: From January 1, 2014 to April 1, 2018, 599 patients underwent lung resection for clinical stage I and II NSCLC. Random forest classification, regression, and survival were used to estimate likelihood of TTT = 0 (tissue diagnosis obtained at surgery), >0 (diagnosis obtained pre-resection), and effect of TTT on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients with TTT > 0 (n = 413) had median TTT of 42 days (25-75 th percentile: 27-59 days). Patients with TTT = 0 (n = 186) had smaller tumors and higher percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 %). Patients with history of stroke, oncology consultation, invasive mediastinal staging, low and high extremes of FEV 1 % had longer TTT. Higher clinical stage, lack of preoperative stress test, anemia, older age, lower FEV1% and diffusion lung capacity, larger tumor size, and longer TTT were the most important predictors of all-cause mortality. One- and 5-year overall survival decreased when TTT was >50 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative physiologic workup and multidisciplinary evaluation were the predominant drivers of longer TTT. Patients with TTT = 0have more favorable presentation and should be considered in TTT analyses for early stage lung cancer populations. The time needed to clinically stage and optimize patients for resection is not deleterious to overall survival until resection is performed after 50 days from diagnosis.

DAP12 expression in lung macrophages mediates ischemia/reperfusion injury by promoting neutrophil extravasation.

Neutrophils are critical mediators of innate immune responses and contribute to tissue injury. However, immune pathways that regulate neutrophil recruitment to injured tissues during noninfectious inflammation remain poorly understood. DAP12 is a cell membrane-associated protein that is expressed in myeloid cells and can either augment or dampen innate inflammatory responses during infections. To elucidate the role of DAP12 in pulmonary ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), we took advantage of a clinically relevant mouse model of transplant-mediated lung IRI. This technique allowed us to dissect the importance of DAP12 in tissue-resident cells and those that infiltrate injured tissue from the periphery during noninfectious inflammation. Macrophages in both mouse and human lungs that have been subjected to cold ischemic storage express DAP12. We found that donor, but not recipient, deficiency in DAP12 protected against pulmonary IRI. Analysis of the immune response showed that DAP12 promotes the survival of tissue-resident alveolar macrophages and contributes to local production of neutrophil chemoattractants. Intravital imaging demonstrated a transendothelial migration defect into DAP12-deficient lungs, which can be rescued by local administration of the neutrophil chemokine CXCL2. We have uncovered a previously unrecognized role for DAP12 expression in tissue-resident alveolar macrophages in mediating acute noninfectious tissue injury through regulation of neutrophil trafficking.

Surgical Diaphragm: Anatomy and Physiology.

The diaphragm is a musculoaponeurotic structure separating the thoracic and abdominal cavities. It plays important roles in both respiration and maintaining gastrointestinal function. A careful consideration of anatomy should be taken during surgical procedures to minimize injury to this crucial organ.

Development and validation of a universal esophageal patient-reported outcome measure: The Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ).

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) applicable to all esophageal diseases. Our objective was to create a psychometrically robust, validated universal esophageal PROM that can also objectively assess patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The pilot PROM constructed based on expert opinions, literature review, and previous unpublished institutional research had 27 items covering 8 domains. It was completed by 30 patients in the outpatient clinic followed by a structured debriefing interview, which allowed for refining the PROM. The final PROM: Cleveland Clinic Esophageal Questionnaire (CEQ) included 34 items across 6 domains (Dysphagia, Eating, Pain, Reflux & Regurgitation, Dyspepsia, Dumping), each accompanied by a corresponding QoL component. Further psychometric assessment of the PROM was conducted by evaluating (1) acceptability, (2) construct validity, (3) reliability, and (4) responsiveness. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-six unique patients (median 63.7 years [54.3-71.7], 53% male [287], 86% White) completed CEQ at >90% completion within 5 minutes. Construct validity was demonstrated by differentiating scores across esophageal cancer (n = 146), achalasia (n = 170), hiatal hernia (n = 160), and other diagnoses (n = 70). Internal reliability (Cronbach alpha 0.83-0.89), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.63-0.85) were strong. Responsiveness was demonstrated through CEQ domains improving for 53 patients who underwent surgery for achalasia or hiatal hernia (Cohen d 0.86-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: We have constructed a psychometrically robust, universal esophageal PROM that allows concise, consistent, objective quantification of symptoms and their effect on the patient. The CEQ is valuable in prognostication and tracking of longitudinal outcomes in both benign and malignant esophageal diseases.

Clinical T2 N0 M0 Esophageal Cancer: Identifying Predictive Factors of Upstaging.

BACKGROUND: Inaccuracy of clinical staging renders management of clinical T2 N0 M0 (cT2 N0 M0) esophageal cancer difficult. When an underlying advanced-stage disease is understaged to cT2 N0 M0, patients miss the opportunity to gain the potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict underlying advanced-stage esophageal cancer. METHODS: From 2000 to 2020, 1579 patients with esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy. Sixty patients who underwent upfront surgery for cT2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer were included in this study. The median age was 62.5 years, and 78% (n = 47) of these patients were male. Radiologic, clinical, and endoscopic factors were evaluated as preoperative markers. The Fisher exact and the Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for categoric and continuous variables, respectively. Random forest classification was used to identify preoperative factors for predicting upstaging and downstaging. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, 8 (13%) were found to have pathologic T2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer. Sixteen (27%) patients had cancer that was pathologically downstaged, and 36 (60%) had upstaged disease. Seven (19%) patients had upstaged cancer on the basis of the pathologic T stage, 14 (39%) had upstaging on the basis of the pathologic N stage, and 15 (42%) had upstaging on the basis of both T and N stages. Dysphagia (P = .003) and tumor maximum standardized uptake value (P = .048) were predictors of upstaging, with a combined predictive value of up to 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of dysphagia and of high maximum standardized uptake value (≥5) of the tumor is predictive of more advanced underlying disease for patients with cT2 N0 M0 esophageal cancer, and these patients should be considered for neoadjuvant therapy.

Preoperative predictors of spread through air spaces in lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a new histologic feature of invasion of non-small cell lung cancer that lacks sensitivity and specificity on frozen sections and is associated with higher recurrence and worse survival with sublobar resections. Our objective is to identify preoperative characteristics that are predictive of STAS to guide operative decisions. METHODS: From January 2018 through December 2021, 439 cT1-3N0 M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a median age of 68 years, 255 (58%) women, who underwent primary surgery at our institution were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and whose STAS status was not documented were excluded. Age, sex, smoking status, tumor size, ground-glass opacities, maximum standardized uptake values, and molecular markers on preoperative biopsy were evaluated as preoperative markers. Comparisons between groups were conducted using standardized mean differences and random forest classification was used for prediction modeling. RESULTS: Of the 439 patients, 177 had at least 1 STAS-positive tumor, and 262 had no STAS-positive tumors. Overall, 179 STAS tumors and 293 non-STAS tumors were evaluated. Younger age (50 years or younger), solid tumor, size ≥2 cm, and maximum standardized uptake value ≥2.5 were independently predictive of STAS with prediction probabilities of 50%, 40%, 38%, and 40%, respectively. STAS tumors were more likely to harbor KRAS mutations and be PD-L1 negative. CONCLUSIONS: Young age (50 years or younger), larger (≥2 cm) solid tumors, high maximum standardized uptake values, and presence of KRAS mutation, are risk factors for STAS and can be considered for lobectomy. Smoking status and gender are still controversial risk factors for STAS.

Pulmonary Pathology of COVID-19 Following 8 Weeks to 4 Months of Severe Disease: A Report of Three Cases, Including One With Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Current knowledge of the pulmonary pathology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based largely on postmortem studies. In most, the interval between disease onset and death is relatively short (<1 month). Information regarding lung pathology in patients who survive for longer periods is scant. We describe the pathology in three patients with severe COVID-19 who underwent antemortem examination of lung tissue at least 8 weeks after initial diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series. RESULTS: The first patient developed acute respiratory failure and was started on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on day 21, with subsequent hemothorax. Debridement (day 38) showed extensive lung infarction with diffuse alveolar damage and Candida overgrowth. The second patient developed acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation that did not improve despite ECMO. Surgical lung biopsy on day 74 showed diffuse interstitial fibrosis with focal microscopic honeycomb change. The third patient also required ECMO and underwent bilateral lung transplantation on day 126. The explanted lungs showed diffuse interstitial fibrosis with focal microscopic honeycomb change. CONCLUSIONS: This series provides histologic confirmation that complications of COVID-19 after 8 weeks to 4 months of severe disease include lung infarction and diffuse interstitial fibrosis.

Looking beyond the eyeball test: A novel vitality index to predict recovery after esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) measure 4 physiologic metrics before esophagectomy, (2) use these in an index to predict composite postoperative outcome after esophagectomy, and (3) compare predictive accuracy of this index to that of the Fried Frailty Index and Modified Frailty Index. METHODS: Grip strength (kilograms), 30-second chair sit-stands (number), 6-minute walk distance (meters), and normalized psoas muscle area (cm2/m) were measured for 77 consenting patients from January 1, 2018, to April 1, 2019. Imbalanced random forest classification estimated probability of a composite postoperative outcome, which included mortality, respiratory complications, anastomotic leak, delirium, length of stay ≥14 days, discharge to nursing facility, and readmission. G-mean error was used to compare predictive accuracy among indexes. RESULTS: Median grip strength was 38 kg (25th-75th percentiles, 31-44), number of sit-stands 11 (10-14), psoas muscle area to height ratio 6.9 cm2/m (6.0-8.2), and 6-minute walk distance 407 m (368-451). There was generally weak correlation between these metrics, with the highest between 30-second sit-stands and 6-minute walk distance (r = 0.57). Age, degree of patient-reported exhaustion, and the 4 objective metrics comprised the Esophageal Vitality Index, which had a lower G-mean error of 32% (31-33) than the Fried Frailty Index, 37% (37-38), and the Modified Frailty Index, 48% (47-48). CONCLUSIONS: The Esophageal Vitality Index, an objective, simple assessment consisting of grip strength, 30-second chair sit-stands, 6-minute walk, and psoas muscle area to height ratio outperformed commonly used frailty indexes in predicting postesophagectomy mortality and morbidity. The index provides a robust picture of patients' fitness for surgery beyond the qualitative "eyeball" test.

Signet Ring Cell Histology Confers Worse Overall Survival in Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Signet ring cell (SRC) histology is regarded as a poor prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer. The objectives of this study were to understand the clinical presentation and stage-specific survival outcomes of patients with SRC and nonsignet adenocarcinoma (AC). METHODS: From 2004 to 2016, 140,324 patients were diagnosed with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers in the National Cancer Database. Demographics, tumor variables, and treatment were studied. Overall survival was shown by the Kaplan-Meier method, and random survival forest identified important predictors. RESULTS: SRC patients (N = 3825) comprised roughly 3% of esophageal cancers per year. SRC patients were less likely to present at early stage disease (cStage I: 10.2% vs 17.8% for AC; P < .001) and more likely to have pathologic upstaging (28% vs 16%, P < .001) and less pathologic downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy (36% vs 48%, P < .001). More SRC patients had positive margins after resection (15% vs 6.0%, P < .001). In a stage-matched comparison median survival for SRC patients was worse than for AC patients (cStage I: 60 vs 113 months; cStage II: 31 vs 40 months; cStage III: 22 vs 30 months). Clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy sequence, and age were important predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: SRC patients had worse survival than their AC counterparts. Worse biology and higher rates of incomplete resection in SRC should steer patients away from undergoing limited resection, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, even when identified at very early stages. In future esophageal cancer staging iterations, separating SRC from AC appears to be indicated because of their different clinical behavior and response to therapy.

Natural History of Pleural Complications After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in lung transplantation, 5-year survival remains at 56%. Although the focus has been on chronic lung allograft dysfunction and infection, pleural complications in some may contribute to adverse outcomes. Therefore, we determined (1) the prevalence of, and risk factors for, pleural complications after lung transplantation and (2) their association with allograft function and mortality. METHODS: From 2006 to 2017, 1039 adults underwent primary lung transplantation at Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio. Multivariable analyses were performed in the multiphase mixed longitudinal and hazard function domains to identify risk factors associated with allograft function and survival. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients (45%) had pleural complications, including pleural effusion in 271 (26%), pneumothorax in 152 (15%), hemothorax in 128 (12%), empyema in 47 (5%), and chylothorax in 9 (1%). Risk factors for pleural complications within the first 3 months included higher recipient-to-donor weight ratio, lower recipient albumin, and recipient-to-donor race mismatch; risk factors extending beyond 3 months included older age, hypertension, smoking history, lower lung allocation score, and donor death from anoxia. Cardiopulmonary bypass and previous thoracic interventions were not risk factors in patients with pleural effusions who were treated with thoracentesis only, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second improved after drainage; however, repeat percutaneous or surgical interventions did not impart a similar benefit. Pleural complications were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural complications are common after lung transplantation and are associated with worse allograft function and survival. These complications are likely secondary to other underlying clinical problems. Malnourishment and size mismatch are modifiable risk factors.

Evolution of Recipient Characteristics Over 3 Decades and Impact on Survival After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a definitive treatment for end-stage lung disease. Herein, we reviewed our center experience over 3 decades to examine the evolution of recipient characteristics and contemporary predictors of survival for LTx. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of LTx procedures performed at our institution from January 1990 to January 2019 (n = 1819). The cohort is divided into 3 eras; I: 1990-1998 (n = 152), II: 1999-2008 (n = 521), and III: 2009-2018 (n = 1146). Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival in era III were performed. RESULTS: Pulmonary fibrosis has become the leading indication for LTx (13% in era I, 57% in era III). Median recipient age increased (era I: 46 y-era III: 61 y) as well as intraoperative mechanical circulatory support (era I: 0%-era III: 6%). Higher lung allocation score was associated with primary graft dysfunction (P < 0.0001), postoperative extracorporeal mechanical support (P < 0.0001), and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.002). In era III, hypoalbuminemia, thrombocytopenia, and high primary graft dysfunction grade were multivariate predictors of early mortality. The 5-y survival in eras II (55%) and III (55%) were superior to era I (40%, P < 0.001). Risk factors for late mortality in era III included recipient age, chronic allograft dysfunction, renal dysfunction, high model for end-stage liver disease score, and single LTx. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal single-center study, recipient characteristics have evolved to include sicker patients with greater complexity of procedures and risk for postoperative complications but without significant impact on hospital mortality or long-term survival. With advancing surgical techniques and perioperative management, there is room for further progress in the field.

Surgical Management of Chest Wall Sarcoma.

Chest wall sarcoma is a rare and challenging pathology best managed by a multidisciplinary team experienced in the management of a multiple different pathologies. Knowledge of the management sequence is important for each sarcoma type in order to provide optimal treatment. Surgical resection of chest wall resections remains the primary treatment of disease isolated to the chest wall. Optimal margins of resection and reconstruction techniques have yet to be determined.

Robotic Approach Offers Similar Nodal Upstaging to Open Lobectomy for Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate nodal dissection during pulmonary resection improves pathologic staging accuracy. Detection of unexpected nodal metastases can be a surrogate for nodal dissection adequacy and reflect oncologic resection quality. The goal of this study was to determine whether robotic lobectomy carries worse, same, or better incidence of nodal upstaging as open lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Data for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (≤cT2a N0 M0, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th Edition) who underwent lobectomy from 2010 through 2015 were abstracted from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Propensity score matching was performed for robotic (n = 7452) and open (n = 50,186) approaches. Primary outcomes were the number of lymph nodes examined and incidence of nodal upstaging, defined as unexpected hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement. Secondary outcomes included resection margins and overall survival. RESULTS: Matching generated 7452 well-matched pairs. There were no differences in nodal upstaging between robotic and open procedures (820 [11.0%] vs 863 [11.6%], P = .28), despite more examined lymph nodes in the robotic group (10 vs 8, P < .001). Incidence of positive margins (145 [2.0%] vs 178 [2.4%], P = .071) was similar. The robotic group had lower 30-day (73 [1.3%] vs 105 [1.9%], P = .02) and 90-day mortality (125 [2.3%] vs 188 [3.5%], P < .001). The 5-year overall survival was similar between both groups (65.6% vs 66.7%, log-rank P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic lobectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC is an equivalent to open lobectomy as assessed by similar nodal upstaging rates, completeness of resection, and overall survival. This suggests that the robotic technology has been adopted appropriately in early-stage NSCLC.