Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 102(4): 115635, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35216863

RESUMEN

Use of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19 has become widespread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal rapid antigen diagnostic (RAD) immunoassay LumiraDx UK in an Emergency Department (ED). All patients admitted to our ED between November 11 and December 8, 2020, and had both a RAD test and a real-time-reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) test were enrolled. RAD was considered as the index test and RT-PCR test was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated with the 95% confidence interval. The sensitivity and specificity of RAD were 34.2% and 92.3%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.4 and 0.71. Our results demonstrate that the diagnostic accuracy of the LumiraDx RAD test is too low for routine use as a diagnostic method in the ED.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Antígenos Virales/análisis , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Eur J Intern Med ; 52: e12-e14, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29657108
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA