Simple, accurate calculation of mechanical power in pressure controlled ventilation (PCV).

BACKGROUND: Mechanical power is a promising new metric to assess energy transfer from a mechanical ventilator to a patient, which combines the contributions of multiple parameters into a single comprehensive value. However, at present, most ventilators are not capable of calculating mechanical power automatically, so there is a need for a simple equation that can be used to estimate this parameter at the bedside. For volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), excellent equations exist for calculating power from basic ventilator parameters, but for pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), an accurate, easy-to-use equation has been elusive. RESULTS: Here, we present a new power equation and evaluate its accuracy compared to the three published PCV power equations. When applied to a sample of 50 patients on PCV with a non-zero rise time, we found that our equation estimated power within an average of 8.4% ± 5.9% (mean ± standard deviation) of the value obtained by numerical integration of the P-V loop. The other three equations estimated power with an error of 19.4% ± 12.9% (simplified Becher equation), 10.0% ± 6.8% (comprehensive Becher equation), and 16.5% ± 14.6% (van der Meijden equation). CONCLUSIONS: Our equation calculates power more accurately than the other three published equations, and is much easier to use than the only previously published equation with similar accuracy. The proposed new mechanical power equation is accurate and simple to use, making it an attractive option to estimate power in PCV cases at the bedside.

Mechanical Power: A New Concept in Mechanical Ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation is a potentially life-saving therapy for patients with acute lung injury, but the ventilator itself may cause lung injury. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is sometimes an unfortunate consequence of mechanical ventilation. It is not clear however how best to minimize VILI through adjustment of various parameters including tidal volume, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). No single parameter provides a clear indication for onset of lung injury attributable exclusively to the ventilator. There is currently interest in quantifying how static and dynamic parameters contribute to VILI. One concept that has emerged is the consideration of the amount of energy transferred from the ventilator to the respiratory system per unit time, which can be quantified as mechanical power. This review article reports on recent literature in this emerging field and future roles for mechanical power assessments in prospective studies.

Ovine smoke/burn ARDS model: a new ventilator-controlled smoke delivery system.

BACKGROUND: Our current ovine smoke/burn acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) model utilizes a manual bee smoker. This smoke delivery system lacks standardization and reproducibility, with 20% of sheep failing to meet ARDS criteria. Time to reach ARDS criteria and survival time are also variable. The mild volutrauma (15 mL/kg) applied after smoke/burn injury may also fail to induce ARDS within 24 h. We hypothesized that these inconsistencies were associated with the bee smoker and the mild volutrauma. In the current study, we addressed these problems to improve the consistency of the smoke/burn ARDS model. METHODS: Adult female sheep (n = 10) were given a 40% total body surface area third degree cutaneous burn and 48 breaths (4 × 12) of cotton smoke under general anesthesia. A modified ventilator was then used to deliver a precise and consistent smoke volume (tidal volume) to the sheep. Additional barotrauma was induced by pressure control ventilation (40 cm H(2)0). When ARDS criteria (PaO(2)/FiO(2) < 200) were met, the ARDS Network low tidal volume ventilation protocol (6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight) was used. RESULTS: Carboxyhemoglobin levels were 81.4% ± 5.6% immediately following smoke injury. All sheep met ARDS criteria within 24 h (12.5 ± 4.9 h). Mean survival time post-injury was 62.1 ± 26.4 h. White blood cells and granulocytes were significantly elevated at 24 h post-smoke/burn injury. Lung tissue at necropsy was consistent with ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: The refinements made to the original ovine smoke/burn ARDS model produce a more reliable time to ARDS onset, injury severity, and time of death.