Galunisertib plus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a single-arm, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: TGF-ß is an immunosuppressive cytokine that is upregulated in colorectal cancer. TGF-ß blockade improved response to chemoradiotherapy in preclinical models of colorectal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to test the hypothesis that adding the TGF-ß type I receptor kinase inhibitor galunisertib to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy would improve pathological complete response rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: This was an investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 study done in two medical centres in Portland (OR, USA). Eligible patients had previously untreated, locally advanced, rectal adenocarcinoma, stage IIA-IIIC or IV as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0-2; and were aged 18 years or older. Participants completed two 14-day courses of oral galunisertib 150 mg twice daily, before and during fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (intravenous fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 over 24 h daily 7 days per week during radiotherapy or oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice per day 5 days per week during radiotherapy; radiotherapy consisted of 50·4-54·0 Gy in 28-30 fractions). 5-9 weeks later, patients underwent response assessment. Patients with a complete response could opt for non-operative management and proceed to modified FOLFOX6 (intravenous leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on day 1, intravenous fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 on day 1 then 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h, and intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 delivered every 2 weeks for eight cycles) or CAPEOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 3 weeks for four cycles). Patients with less than complete response underwent surgical resection. The primary endpoint was complete response rate, which was a composite of pathological complete response in patients who proceeded to surgery, or clinical complete response maintained at 1 year after last therapy in patients with non-operative management. Safety was a coprimary endpoint. Both endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02688712, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Oct 19, 2016, and Aug 31, 2020, 38 participants were enrolled. 25 (71%) of the 35 patients who completed chemoradiotherapy proceeded to total mesorectal excision surgery, five (20%) of whom had pathological complete responses. Ten (29%) patients had non-operative management, three (30%) of whom ultimately chose to have total mesorectal excision. Two (67%) of those three patients had pathological complete responses. Of the remaining seven patients in the non-operative management group, five (71%) had clinical complete responses at 1 year after their last modified FOLFOX6 infusion. In total, 12 (32% [one-sided 95% CI ≥19%]) of 38 patients had a complete response. Common grade 3 adverse events during treatment included diarrhoea in six (16%) of 38 patients, and haematological toxicity in seven (18%) patients. Two (5%) patients had grade 4 adverse events, one related to chemoradiotherapy-induced diarrhoea and dehydration, and the other an intraoperative ischaemic event. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The addition of galunisertib to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer improved the complete response rate to 32%, was well tolerated, and warrants further assessment in randomised trials. FUNDING: Eli Lilly via ExIST program, The Providence Foundation.

Drug-induced reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the renal side effects of crizotinib have not been investigated previously. METHODS: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration creatinine-based prediction equation during the first 12 weeks of crizotinib therapy and after crizotinib but before the introduction of any further systemic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients with stage IV anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with crizotinib were identified. The mean eGFR decreased by 23.9% compared with baseline (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval, 21.3%-26.6%), with the majority of the decrease occurring within the first 2 weeks of therapy. Clinical history and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratios did not suggest prerenal causes. The objective response rate among evaluable patients (n = 27) was 41%. Tumor shrinkage was not correlated with changes in eGFR (correlation coefficient, -0.052; P = .798). Among the 16 patients for whom data after treatment with crizotinib were available, recovery to within 84% of the baseline eGFR occurred in all patients. After adjusting for the number of scans with intravenous contrast and the use of known nephrotoxic drugs, the issue of whether a patient was on or off crizotinib treatment was found to be significantly associated with changes in eGFR (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: As assessed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration prediction equation, eGFR is reduced by treatment with crizotinib, but the majority of patients will recover their eGFR after the cessation of therapy. The early onset, size of the change, minimal cumulative effect, and rapid reversibility raise the possibility that this may be a pharmacological and/or tubular creatinine secretion effect rather than a direct nephrotoxic effect. Increased vigilance with regard to the concomitant use of renally cleared medications or nephrotoxic agents should be considered for patients receiving crizotinib and, when eGFR is reduced, additional renal investigations should be undertaken.

Understanding patterns of brain metastasis in breast cancer and designing rational therapeutic strategies.

One of the most feared sequelae after a diagnosis of advanced breast cancer is development of metastases to the brain as this diagnosis can affect physical function, independence, relationships, quality of life, personality, and ultimately one's sense of self. The propensity to develop breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs) varies by subtype, occurring in up to one half of those with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), approximately a third of HER+ breast cancers and 14% in hormone positive disease. Median survival after BCBM diagnosis can be as short as 5 months in TNBC and 10-18 months in the other subtypes. Here, we review the biology of BCBMs and how it informs the rational design of new therapeutic approaches and agents. We discuss application of novel targeted and immunotherapies by breast cancer subtype. It is noteworthy that there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments specifically for BCBMs currently. Nevertheless, there are legitimate grounds for hope as patients with BCBMs are now being included in clinical trials of systemic therapies and a better understanding of the biology and genetic underpinning of BCBMs is driving an increased range of options for patients.

Crizotinib effects on creatinine and non-creatinine-based measures of glomerular filtration rate.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid reductions in creatinine-based estimates of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) have recently been reported secondary to crizotinib use. Whether these reflect drug-induced changes in the true GFR or the validity of creatinine as a measure of kidney function in the presence of crizotinib is unknown. METHODS: Two anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer patients (one with pre-existing renal impairment) were identified during periods of time on and off crizotinib. Creatinine- and iothalamate-based estimates of renal function were conducted in the presence and absence of crizotinib. RESULTS: Crizotinib is associated with both acute and chronic effects on kidney function. Chronic creatinine changes seem to reflect a true reduction in the GFR. In contrast, acute effects include a reduction in creatinine-based estimates of the GFR without a reduction in non-creatinine-based measurements (consistent with, e.g., an acute effect of crizotinib on creatinine secretion), in addition to some reduction in the true GFR (with this latter effect seeming to be more prominent in the presence of pre-existing renal impairment). CONCLUSION: If crizotinib-associated changes in creatinine-based kidney function suggest a change in dosing with either crizotinib or concomitant medications that are renally excreted, use of a non-creatinine-based assessment of kidney function, such as iothalamate assessments, should be considered before making a final decision.