Safety and Facial Nerve Outcomes of Intracisternal Papaverine Irrigation for Vestibular Schwannoma Resection.

BACKGROUND: Papaverine, a vasodilator approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, has shown efficacy in treating vasospasm in cardiology, urology, and nephrology. The vasodilatory effect of papaverine is also hoped to protect the facial nerve from ischemic damage and nerve manipulation during vestibular schwannoma surgery. Our institution uses intracisternal papaverine irrigation during vestibular schwannoma resection to protect the facial nerve in patients with neuromonitoring changes. Our objective was to investigate the safety and facial nerve outcomes of intracisternal papaverine irrigation during vestibular schwannoma resection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent resection of vestibular schwannoma at our institution between 2008 and 2021. Patients received papaverine if the intraoperative facial nerve stimulation threshold increased above 0.05 mA. Postoperative outcomes were compared with control patients who did not receive papaverine. RESULTS: A total of 283 cases were included in our analysis. Patients who received papaverine (n = 60) had lower immediate postoperative House-Brackmann (HB) grades than did control individuals (mean, 1.54 vs. 1.95; P = 0.029) and a lower likelihood of immediate postoperative HB grade >1 (odds ratio, 0.514; P = 0.039). At long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in HB grade. Papaverine use was not associated with increased rates of perioperative complications (P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The off-label use of intracisternal papaverine irrigation during vestibular schwannoma resection can certainly be used safely for select cases. It is associated with improved immediate postoperative facial nerve outcomes, similar long-term facial nerve outcomes, and no significant increase in complications.

Microsurgical Management of Vestibular Schwannoma (Acoustic Neuroma): Facial Nerve Outcomes, Radiographic Analysis, Complications, and Long-Term Follow-Up in a Series of 420 Surgeries.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and surgical outcomes of a large surgical series of vestibular schwannoma from North America over 20 years. METHODS: After institutional review board approval a retrospective review of the senior author's personal case logs to identify patients who had operations for vestibular schwannoma was performed. The clinical notes, operative record, preoperative and postoperative imagings, and long-term clinical follow-up notes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 415 patients who underwent 420 surgeries were identified from the years 1998-2021. The average length of follow-up was 3 years and 9 months. Overall, at last follow-up the rate of "good" facial nerve outcomes (House-Brackmann [HB] score I and II) was 86% and "poor" facial nerve outcomes (HB III-VI) was 14%. The amount of cerebellopontine angle extension (P = 0.023), tumor volume (P = 0.015), facial nerve consistency (P < 0.001), preoperative HB score (P < 0.001), and FN stimulation threshold at the end of the procedure (P < 0.001) were correlated to facial nerve function at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the largest recently reported surgical series of vestibular schwannoma in North American literature with available long term follow-up. Facial nerve outcomes correlated with cerebellopontine angle extension, tumor volume, facial nerve stimulation threshold, facial nerve consistency, preoperative facial nerve function, and history of a prior resection. Tumor recurrence remains significantly higher after subtotal resection. We believe the data supports a continuation of a strategy of general intent of gross total resection, greatly modifiable by intraoperative findings and judgment.

Resection of a meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, and placement of auditory brainstem implant using translabyrinthine approach.

The authors present the case of a 34-year-old patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) who underwent a left translabyrinthine approach for resection a meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, and placement of an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). They review the preoperative workup, technical nuances of the surgery, and cadaveric dissections with anatomical diagrams, and provide a review on ABIs. The patient remained neurologically intact and had improvement in lip reading when using the ABI device in the postoperative period. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID2163.

Airway findings in children with tracheostomies: When is diagnostic bronchoscopy and laryngoscopy indicated?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the utility of diagnostic laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy in children with tracheostomies and to describe the incidence of airway findings. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study examining children with tracheostomies who underwent direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (DLB) at Duke University Hospital between 2008 and 2016. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients who underwent 114 bronchoscopies met inclusion criteria. The median time between tracheostomy and first DLB was 13 months (IQR 4.25-14.75). Sixty-six patients were diagnosed with findings on DLB (81.5%). Suprastomal granulation tissue was the most common complication (59.0%), followed by increased tracheal secretions (23%), stomal and peristomal granulation (13.2%), tracheal ulcer (3.3%), and suprastomal collapse (1.6%). The proportion of patients with airway findings who underwent endoscopy >6 months post-tracheostomy was higher than those <6 months post-tracheostomy, although this did not reach statistical significance (90.6% vs. 75.5%, p = 0.087). However, when examining tracheostomy-related findings, the proportion of patients with airway findings who underwent DLB >6 months post-tracheostomy (61%) compared to <6 months post-tracheostomy (36%) was significantly different (p = 0.026). Patients who were symptomatic before bronchoscopy were more likely to have positive findings (91.9% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.027) and patients were more likely to be symptomatic if they had DLB >6 months after tracheostomy versus <6 months after tracheostomy (68.8% vs. 30.6%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The high incidence of airway findings, especially tracheostomy-related findings, noted on DLB supports the continued use of airway endoscopies in children post-tracheostomy. Timing of DLB may play a role in determining utility with evaluation and symptomatic patients should be more closely monitored as they demonstrate higher rates of airway findings.