Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of treating opportunistic fungal cellulitis: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Cellulitis is an infection most commonly caused by bacteria and successfully treated with antibiotics. However, certain patient populations, especially the immunocompromised, are at risk for fungal cellulitis, which can be misidentified as bacterial cellulitis and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We describe three cases of opportunistic fungal cellulitis in immunosuppressed patients that were initially mistaken for bacterial infections refractory to antibiotic therapy. However, atypical features of cellulitis ultimately prompted further diagnostics to identify fungal cellulitis and allow initiation of appropriate antifungals. We discuss: (1) a 52-year-old male immunosuppressed hematopoietic cell transplant recipient with Fusarium solani cellulitis on his right lower extremity that was treated with amphotericin B and voriconazole with full resolution of the cellulitis; (2) a 70-year-old male lung transplant recipient with Fusarium solani cellulitis on his left lower extremity that ultimately progressed despite antifungals; and (3) a 68-year-old male with a history of kidney transplantation with suspected Purpureocillium lilacinum cellulitis on his left lower extremity ultimately treated with posaconazole with resolution of the skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Fusarium solani and Purpureocillium lilacinum are important pathogens causing opportunistic fungal cellulitis. These cases remind providers to be vigilant for fungal cellulitis when skin and soft tissue infection does not adequately respond to antibiotics and atypical features of cellulitis are present.

The changing impact of cytomegalovirus among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients during the past decade: A single institutional cohort study.

BACKGROUND: With advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the need for cytomegalovirus (CMV) surveillance persists. METHODS: We present a retrospective analysis on the impact of CMV with preemptive therapy in 1065 alloHCT patients with donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity from 2009 to 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent developed clinically significant CMV infection (CMV-CSI); 6.5% had CMV disease. In multivariate analysis stratified by serostatus and preparative regimen, the use of anti-thymocyte globulin (hazard ratios 2.97, 95% confidence interval 2.00-4.42, p < .001) was associated with development of CMV-CSI. Median length of stay for index hospitalization was longer in patients with CMV-CSI (27 vs. 25 days, respectively; p = .002), as were rates (32.9% vs. 17.7%; p < .001) and duration (9 d vs. 6 d; p < .001) of rehospitalization, and median total inpatient days (28 d vs. 26 d; p < .001). Patients with CMV-CSI had higher rates of neutropenia (47% vs. 20%; p < .001) and transfusion support (packed red blood cell, median 5 vs. 3; p < .001; platelets, median 3 vs. 3; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Preemptive therapy does not negate the impact of CMV-CSI on peri-engraftment toxicity and healthcare utilization. This cohort represents a large single center study on the impact of CMV in the preletermovir era and serves as a real-world comparator for assessing the impact of future prophylaxis.

Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; P < .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; P < .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; P= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; P < .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; P = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.

Inactivated varicella zoster vaccine in autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients: an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recipients of autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplants (auto-HSCT) have an increased risk of herpes zoster and herpes zoster-related complications. The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy and safety of an inactivated varicella zoster vaccine for the prevention of herpes zoster after auto-HSCT. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 135 medical centres (ie, stem-cell transplant centres and hospitals) in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, scheduled to receive an auto-HSCT within 60 days of enrolment, and had a history of varicella infection or were seropositive for antibodies to varicella zoster virus, or both. Exclusion criteria included a history of herpes zoster within the previous year of enrolment, and intended antiviral prophylaxis for longer than 6 months after transplantation. Participants were randomly assigned according to a central randomisation schedule generated by the trial statistician, to receive either the inactivated-virus vaccine from one of three consistency lots, a high-antigen lot, or placebo, stratified by age (<50 vs ≥50 years) and intended duration of antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation (≤3 months vs >3 to ≤6 months). Participants, investigators, trial staff, and the funder's clinical and laboratory personnel were masked to group assignment. Participants were given four doses of inactivated vaccine or placebo, with the first dose 5-60 days before auto-HSCT, and the second, third, and fourth doses at about 30, 60, and 90 days after transplantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of herpes zoster, confirmed by PCR or adjudication by a masked clinical committee, or both, assessed in all participants randomly assigned to the vaccine consistency lot group or placebo group who received at least one dose of vaccine and had auto-HSCT. Safety was assessed in all randomised participants who received at least one dose of vaccine and had follow-up data. A prespecified vaccine efficacy success criterion required the lower bound of the 95% CI be higher than 25% for the relative reduction of the hazard ratio of herpes zoster infection in participants given the vaccine from one of the consistency lots compared with those given placebo. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01229267) and EudraCT (2010-020150-34). FINDINGS: Between Dec 7, 2010, and April 25, 2013, 560 participants were randomly assigned to the vaccine consistency lot group, 106 to the high-antigen lot group, and 564 to the placebo group. 249 (44%) of patients in the vaccine consistency lot group, 35 (33%) in the high-antigen lot group, and 220 (39%) in the placebo group discontinued before study end, mostly because of death or withdrawal. 51 participants were excluded from the primary efficacy endpoint analyses because they did not undergo auto-HSCT or were not vaccinated, or both (22 [4%] in the vaccine consistency lot group, and 29 [5%] in the placebo group). Mean follow-up for efficacy was 2·4 years (SD 1·3) in the vaccine consistency lot group and 2·3 years (SD 1·3) in the placebo group. 42 (8%) of 538 participants in the vaccine consistency lot group (32·9 per 1000 person-years) and 113 (21%) of 535 in the placebo group (91·9 per 1000 person-years) had a confirmed case of herpes zoster. The estimated vaccine efficacy was 63·8% (95% CI 48·4-74·6), meeting the pre-specified success criterion. For the combined vaccine groups versus the placebo group, the proportion of patients with serious adverse events (216 [33%] of 657 vs 181 [33%] of 554; risk difference 0·2%, 95% CI -5·1 to 5·5) and serious vaccine-related adverse events (five [1%] vs five [1%]; risk difference 0·1%, -1·4 to 1·1) were similar. Vaccine-related injection-site adverse events occurred more frequently in participants given vaccine than those given placebo (191 [29%] vs 36 [7%]; risk difference 22·6%, 95% CI 18·5-26·6; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: This study shows for the first time in a large phase 3 trial that early vaccination of auto-HSCT recipients during the peri-transplant period can be effective for the prevention of an opportunistic infection like herpes zoster and that the vaccine is well tolerated. FUNDING: Merck & Co., Inc.

Infections after Transplantation of Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cells from Unrelated Donors.

Infection is a major complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Prolonged neutropenia and graft-versus-host disease are the 2 major complications with an associated risk for infection, and these complications differ according to the graft source. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized trial (Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network [BMT CTN] 0201) of transplantation of bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) from unrelated donors showed no significant differences in 2-year survival between these graft sources. In an effort to provide data regarding whether BM or PBSC could be used as a preferential graft source for transplantation, we report a detailed analysis of the infectious complications for 2 years after transplantation from the BMT CTN 0201 trial. A total of 499 patients in this study had full audits of infection data. A total of 1347 infection episodes of moderate or greater severity were documented in 384 (77%) patients; 201 of 249 (81%) of the evaluable patients had received a BM graft and 183 of 250 (73%) had received a PBSC graft. Of 1347 infection episodes, 373 were severe and 123 were life-threatening and/or fatal; 710 (53%) of these episodes occurred on the BM arm and 637 (47%) on the PBSC arm, resulting in a 2-year cumulative incidence 84.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79.6 to 89.8) for BM versus 79.7% (95% CI, 73.9 to 85.5) for PBSC, P = .013. The majority of these episodes, 810 (60%), were due to bacteria, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of 72.1% and 62.9% in BM versus PBSC recipients, respectively (P = .003). The cumulative incidence of bloodstream bacterial infections during the first 100 days was 44.8% (95% CI, 38.5 to 51.1) for BM versus 35.0% (95% CI, 28.9 to 41.1) for PBSC (P = .027). The total infection density (number of infection events/100 patient days at risk) was .67 for BM and .60 for PBSC. The overall infection density for bacterial infections was .4 in both arms; for viral infections, it was .2 in both arms; and for fungal/parasitic infections, it was .04 and .05 for BM and PBSC, respectively. The cumulative incidence of infection before engraftment was 47.9% (95% CI, 41.5 to 53.9) for BM versus 32.8% (95% CI, 27.1 to 38.7) for PBSC (P = .002), possibly related to quicker neutrophil engraftment using PBSC. Infections remain frequent after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation, particularly after BM grafts.

Real-World Experience of Cryopreserved Allogeneic Hematopoietic Grafts during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Report.

In response to the widespread COVID-19 pandemic, cryopreservation of allogeneic donor apheresis products was implemented to mitigate the challenges of donor availability and product transport. Although logistically beneficial, the impact of cryopreservation on clinical outcomes and graft composition remains unclear. In this study, we compared outcomes and graft composition with cryopreserved versus fresh allografts in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 30 consecutive patients who received cryopreserved allografts between March and August 2020 and 60 consecutive patients who received fresh allografts before the COVID-19 pandemic. Primary endpoints were hematopoietic engraftment and graft failure (GF), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In addition, extended immunophenotype analysis was performed on cryopreserved and prospectively collected fresh apheresis samples. Compared with recipients of fresh allografts, both neutrophil and platelet recovery were delayed in recipients of cryopreserved reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT, with a median time to engraftment of 24 days versus 18 days (P = .01) for neutrophils and 27 days versus 18 days (P = .069) for platelets. We observed primary GF in 4 of 30 patients in the cryopreserved cohort (13.3%) versus only 1 of 60 patients (1.7 %) in the fresh cohort (P = .03). Cryopreserved RIC allo-HCT was associated with significantly lower median total, myeloid, and T cell donor chimerism at 1 month. OS and RFS were inferior for cryopreserved graft recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 4.67) and HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.95 to 3.79, respectively. Using an extended immunophenotype analysis, we compared 14 samples from the cryopreserved cohort to 6 prospectively collected fresh apheresis donor samples. These analyses showed both a decrease in total cell viability and a significantly reduced absolute number of natural killer cells (CD3-CD56+) in the cryopreserved apheresis samples. In this single-institution study, we found delayed engraftment and a trend toward clinical inferiority of cryopreserved allografts compared with fresh allografts. Further evaluation of the use of cryopreserved allografts and their impact on clinical and laboratory outcomes is warranted.

Continuous-Infusion Foscarnet Facilitates Administration in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients.

Infections due to herpesviruses resistant to first-line antivirals remains an ever-present and serious complication in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and other cellular therapies. Foscarnet is the most common therapy for patients who have resistant herpesvirus infections or intolerable cytopenias due to ganciclovir or valganciclovir; however, the widespread use of foscarnet is limited by its associated nephrotoxicity and challenges in administration. In the earliest published small case series investigating the optimal infusion modality, patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) due to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) received either continuous infusion or intermittent dosing of foscarnet. Moreover, there was no standardization of hydration strategies to minimize side effects. Eventually, intermittent foscarnet infusions became the standard of care; however, the true impact of hydration and infusion duration on nephrotoxicity has not been adequately studied, and the reports of foscarnet administration in HCT patients has been limited primarily to intermittent infusions. In this report, we characterize the administration of foscarnet as a 24-hour continuous infusion in both the inpatient and outpatient settings compared with intermittent infusion in HCT recipients. This retrospective, single-center, observational study at Stanford University Medical Center assessed HCT recipients who received foscarnet between January 2009 and May 2019. Twenty-eight of 45 patients (62.2%) who received continuous-infusion foscarnet experienced an acute kidney injury (AKI) as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes classification, compared with 39 of 62 patients (62.9%) who received conventional infusion (P = .94). The average duration of outpatient antiviral days for the continuous infusion group was 9 days (range, 0 to 121 days), compared with 6.3 days (range, 0 to 70 days) in the intermittent infusion group (P = .54). Our findings suggest that foscarnet given as a continuous infusion or as an intermittent infusion have similar rates of adverse reactions, most notably similar rates of AKI. Administering foscarnet as a continuous infusion is a feasible option to facilitate outpatient treatment.

Immune reconstitution and infectious complications following axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 has significantly improved outcomes in the treatment of refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). We evaluated the long-term course of hematologic recovery, immune reconstitution, and infectious complications in 41 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) at a single center. Grade 3+ cytopenias occurred in 97.6% of patients within the first 28 days postinfusion, with most resolved by 6 months. Overall, 63.4% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion, 34.1% of patients received a platelet transfusion, 36.6% of patients received IV immunoglobulin, and 51.2% of patients received growth factor (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) injections beyond the first 28 days postinfusion. Only 40% of patients had recovered detectable CD19+ B cells by 1 year, and 50% of patients had a CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells per µL by 18 months postinfusion. Patients with durable responses to axi-cel had significantly longer durations of B-cell aplasia, and this duration correlated strongly with the recovery of CD4+ T-cell counts. There were significantly more infections within the first 28 days compared with any other period of follow-up, with the majority being mild-moderate in severity. Receipt of corticosteroids was the only factor that predicted risk of infection in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-16.5). Opportunistic infections due to Pneumocystis jirovecii and varicella-zoster virus occurred up to 18 months postinfusion in patients who prematurely discontinued prophylaxis. These results support the use of comprehensive supportive care, including long-term monitoring and antimicrobial prophylaxis, beyond 12 months after axi-cel treatment.