Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Ultrasound Med ; 35(11): 2343-2352, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27629755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To report our success and complication rates with emergency department (ED) technician-performed ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter placement and to compare our results to similar studies in the literature. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement attempts for clinical care in the ED. All patients meeting difficult IV access criteria who had a US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement attempted by a trained ED technician were included. Average attempts per success and overall success rates were compared to similar published studies. RESULTS: There were 830 participants, with an overall success rate of ED technician- performed US-guided peripheral IV catheter placement of 97.5%. Clinicians categorized 82.6% of participants as having difficult IV access and reported that in 46.5%, a central venous catheter would have been necessary if the US-guided peripheral IV catheter failed. Of successful catheter attempts, 86.8% were placed on the first attempt; 11.6% were placed on the second attempt; and 1.6% were placed on the third attempt. For this study, the average number of attempts per success was 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.18), which was lower than in 6 other published studies, ranging from 1.27 to 1.70. The overall success rate of our ED technician-performed attempts was 0.970 (95% confidence interval, 0.956-0.983), which was higher than that reported in previous ED technician studies (0.79-0.80), and closer to that reported for physicians or nurses (0.87-0.97). The arterial puncture complication rate was 0.8%, which was also lower than in other published studies (1.25%-9.80%). CONCLUSIONS: With brief but comprehensive training, ED technicians can successfully obtain US-guided peripheral IV catheter access in patients with difficult IV access.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Auxiliares de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonido/educación , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
2.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 24(3): 328-330, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441687

RESUMEN

Hourly rounding by nursing staff helps to proactively manage patient needs and minimize the number of unscheduled calls from patients. The focus of this study was to determine if an increased emphasis on hourly rounding had an effect on call bell usage on an oncology unit. Patient call bell usage requests, such as asking for water or repositioning, and the total number of all alarms, such as bed exit alarms and lavatory assist alarms, decreased. Subsequent patient satisfaction surveys showed an increase in patient perception of how quickly help was received.


Asunto(s)
Alarmas Clínicas/normas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/normas , Enfermería Oncológica/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alarmas Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Oncológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA