RESUMEN
Background and objectives: We aimed to investigate changes in the radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) network using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients who recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 bilateral pneumonia between March and May 2021. The control group included healthy individuals matched for age and sex. Two months after discharge, the patients underwent ophthalmological examination, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. The RPC network and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of the optic disc (RNFL optic disc) were automatically evaluated and compared between the study groups. Additionally, the RPC parameters were compared between the men and women in the COVID-19 group, and correlations between the RPC and RNFL optic disc parameters were assessed. Results: A total of 63 patients (120 eyes) with bilateral pneumonia caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were examined. No ophthalmic symptoms were reported by the patients. No significant differences were observed in the RPC parameters between the patients from the COVID-19 group and the 43 healthy controls. Moreover, the RPC parameters did not differ between the men and women in the COVID-19 group. A positive correlation was found between the RPC and RNFL optic disc parameters in the COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: No changes in the RPC network were observed among the patients with COVID-19 bilateral pneumonia in the early period after hospital discharge. However, a longer follow-up is needed to monitor COVID-19-related changes in the microvasculature of the optic nerve head.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disco Óptico , Neumonía , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Disco Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Disco Óptico/irrigación sanguínea , Vasos Retinianos , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Campos Visuales , Células Ganglionares de la Retina , COVID-19/complicaciones , AngiografíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) share a similar transmission route, which increases coinfection odds and worsens clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate coinfected patients undergoing HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to understand their characteristics, risk of HBV reactivation, and effectiveness of the therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study comprehensively analyzed 1118 patients with chronic HCV infection, divided into 3 subgroups based on their HBV status. RESULTS: We documented that 0.7% of the analyzed population was positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), while 14.3% had evidence of a past HBV infection. The patients without HBV coinfection were less burdened with comorbidities, and were mostly treatment-naive, while the individuals suffering from coinfection were younger and more likely to have a history of a previous therapy. Infection with HCV genotype 3 was more common among the HBsAg-positive patients than in the other studied groups. Response to DAA therapy was comparable between the groups, and most patients completed the course of treatment as planned. Only 3 cases of HBV reactivation were observed, all of which achieved sustained virologic response after DAA therapy. Two were women on immunosuppressants with antihepatitis B core positive antibodies, and the third patient was an HBsAgpositive man. These patients remained in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the presence of HBV markers nor HBV reactivation during DAA treatment reduced effectiveness of the therapy. Our findings are important for future recommendations and guidelines on managing HBV/HCV coinfection.
Asunto(s)
Coinfección , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Virus de la Hepatitis B/fisiología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/inducido químicamente , Estudios de Seguimiento , Activación ViralRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This review aimed to evaluate the significance of assessing radial peripheral capillary (RPC) network parameters by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database to select high-quality reviews and original articles on the use of OCTA for visualizing the RPC network and calculating RPC parameters. RESULTS: The study revealed that systemic hypoxia, hypercoagulable state, and inflammation affect the RPC network in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Reduced RPC parameters were observed early in the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and after several months of follow-up. Additionally, there was a correlation between reduced RPC parameters and subsequent thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer. CONCLUSIONS: The OCTA examination of the retina and optic disc should be considered in patients with a history of COVID-19 to assess the impact of systemic hypoxia and inflammation on ocular function. Follow-up assessment of these patients is also necessary to understand the potential consequences of ischemia affecting the optic nerve, retina, and choroid.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: With the introduction of highly effective and safe therapies with next-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), that act without interferon, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains the only treatable chronic infectious disease. AREAS COVERED: The review aims to provide an overview of the therapy revolution with a description of specific DAAs, their mechanisms of action, a summary of the safety and efficacy of specific regimens, and a discussion of populations requiring special therapeutic approaches. EXPERT OPINION: DAAs are highly effective, safe, and easy to use. However, challenges such as access to health services and loss of patients from the cascade of care, especially in groups disproportionately affected by HCV infection, such as substance abusers, make it difficult to achieve the WHO's goal of HCV elimination. The proposed strategy to combat these difficulties involves a one-step approach to diagnosing and treating the infection, the availability of long-lasting forms of medication, and the development of an effective vaccine. The aforementioned opportunities are all the more important as the world is facing an opioid epidemic that is translating into an increase in HCV prevalence. This phenomenon is of greatest concern in women of childbearing age and in those already pregnant due to treatment limitations.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an insidious pathogen. Most people infected with HCV will develop chronic infections that may not give any symptoms for years or decades but eventually lead to liver disease and liver cancer. It is essential to diagnose infected individuals as soon as possible and start the treatment to increase the elimination of the virus from the organism and prevent harmful long-term effects.Fortunately, these goals are possible nowadays, and this is due to a remarkable example of translational research at work. The discovery of the virus in 1989 (for which Harvey J. Alter, Michael Houghton, and Charles M. Rice received the Nobel Prize in 2020) was followed by the rapid development of diagnostic tests and later by the introduction of the first interferon therapies, which had numerous shortcomings. The revolution started in 2011 when the first oral drugs that act directly on HCV (direct-acting antivirals, DAAs) were registered. Another giant leap for HCV treatment was made in 2018 when the combinations of DAAs that act on different HCV genotypes were introduced.In this paper, we review in detail the DAAs used to treat HCV infection and explain different combinations in which they can be used while showing their favorable safety profile, short-term and convenient treatment regimen, and impressive effectiveness in clearing HCV infection. Although we believe eliminating HCV is eventually reachable, we also argue that there is room for improvement. HCV testing and DAAs availability must improve in selected groups, including people without health insurance, prisoners, and drug addicts. There are still people living with chronic HCV infection without knowing it. Their identification and start of effective treatment is equal to savings in future medical care related to liver disease and cancer, not to mention benefits from the individual health perspective. In addition, and in line with a popular phrase that prevention is better than cure, it is reasonable to pursue the development of the HCV vaccine, which is currently unavailable. The last word on managing the health burden caused by this pathogen is yet to be said.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Hepatitis C Crónica , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Femenino , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 50 million people worldwide with around 242,000 deaths annually, mainly due to complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Portal hypertension (PH) caused by cirrhosis leads to severe consequences, including esophageal varices (EV). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment in patients with and without EV. METHODS: This retrospective analysis involved consecutive HCV-infected adults undergoing DAA therapy at 22 Polish hepatology centers from July 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. Patients with cirrhosis were categorized based on the presence of EV diagnosed by gastroscopy. Treatment effectiveness was measured by sustained virologic response (SVR), with safety outcomes monitored for 12 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: A population of 3393 HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis was divided into groups with (A, n = 976) and without (B, n = 2417) EV. Group A showed a significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities and concomitant medications. Genotype (GT)1b infections predominated in both groups, and GT3 infections were more common in the EV group. Group A exhibited more severe liver disease, and higher rates of decompensation, HCC, and HBV co-infection. SVR was significantly higher in group B (91.5% vs. 96.3%, p < 0.0001). Male gender, GT3, EV presence, and Child-Pugh grade B were identified as independent negative SVR predictors. Group A had a worse safety profile, with notably higher adverse event incidence and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: DAA therapies are highly effective and well tolerated in patients with cirrhosis, but EV presence predicts poorer virologic responses.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with their effectiveness and safety has revolutionized the approach to treating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Nevertheless, elderly patients have often been excluded from clinical trials, so the results of real-world studies are particularly important in the context of the geriatric population. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of antiviral DAA treatment in HCV-infected patients over the age of 65, with notable inclusion of those over the age of 85. METHODS: The analyzed patients were divided by age into three groups: group A (65-74 years), group B (75-84 years) and group C (85 years or older). Patients started DAA based therapy at 22 hepatology centers between July 2015 and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 3505 elderly patients were included in the analysis, and this group consisted of 2501 patients in group A, 893 in group B, and 111 in group C. The study population, regardless of age, was dominated by women. Patients had a high prevalence of comorbidities (84.9%, 92.2%, and 93.7%, respectively) as well as a high rate of concomitant medications. The sustained virological response was 97.9% in groups A and B and 100% in group C. The therapy was well-tolerated, with a comparable safety profile observed in all analyzed groups. CONCLUSIONS: DAA-based therapies are highly effective and well tolerated by the elderly patients, including those over 85. Age should not be a barrier to treatment, but careful management is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales , Hepatitis C Crónica , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Edad , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a major health problem and one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. The purpose of this paper was to summarize knowledge about the epidemiology of HCV genotype (GT) 4 infection, similarities and differences with other genotypes, specific problems associated with this genotype, and treatment regimens used to treat GT4-infected patients. METHODS: We performed an accurate search for literature using the PubMed database to select high-quality reviews and original articles concerning this topic. RESULTS: GT4 with a global prevalence of 8% takes third place, closing the global HCV podium in terms of frequency. However, there are regions where GT4 infections are dominant, such as sub-Saharan and North Africa, and the Middle East. The disease course and complications are generally similar to those of chronic hepatitis C caused by other genotypes, although the faster progression of fibrosis was demonstrated in patients with coexisting schistosomiasis. In the era of interferon-based therapy, GT4-infected patients were described as difficult to treat due to suboptimal response. A breakthrough in the treatment of HCV-infected patients, including those with GT4 infection, was the introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of safe and effective therapy has created a real opportunity for HCV eradication in line with the goal set by the World Health Organization. An example of a country where this is happening is Egypt, where GT4 accounts for more than 90% of HCV infections. There, broad access to therapy has been effectively supported by population-based screening.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Hepacivirus/genética , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genotipo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a major health problem affecting approximately 58 million people worldwide. In the era of interferon (IFN)-based regimens, patients particularly infected with genotypes 1 and 4 achieved a low response rate. The implementation of direct-acting antivirals changed the landscape of HCV treatment. The increase in effectiveness provided us with the hope of eliminating HCV as a significant public threat by 2030. In the following years, there was an observed improvement in the treatment of HCV with genotype-specific regimens and highly effective pangenotypic options that are the most recent stage of the revolution. The optimization of therapy was accompanied by changes in the patient profile from the beginning of the IFN-free era over time. Patients treated with antiviral therapies were younger in successive periods, less burdened with comorbidities and comedications, more frequently treatment-naïve and had less advanced liver disease. Before the IFN-free era, specific subpopulations such as patients with HCV/HIV coinfection, those with a history of previous treatment, patients with renal impairment or with cirrhosis had lower chances for a virologic response. Currently, these populations should no longer be considered difficult to treat. Despite the high effectiveness of HCV therapy, there is a small percentage of patients with treatment failure. However, they can be effectively retreated with pangenotypic rescue regimens.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Interferones/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepacivirus/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Genotipo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Up to now, COVID19 caused more than 6 million deaths worldwide. So far, 5 variants of concerns have been identified, with Delta and Omicron being the subject of our analysis. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized during the Delta and Omicron predominance in Poland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 2225 patients divided into 2 groups depending on the variant with which they were infected during the corresponding period of the pandemic. RESULTS: During the Delta wave, the median age of patients was significantly lower (65 vs 73 years; P <0.001), and the cohort was significantly less burdened with comorbidities than during the Omicron surge. The Omicroninfected patients presented significantly less often in an unstable symptomatic state with SpO2 equal to or below 90% on admission (49.9% for Delta vs 29.9% for Omicron; P <0.001). Regardless of the pandemic period, the 2 most common early symptoms of COVID19 were fever and cough. Inhospital treatment consisted of antiviral drugs, more frequently used in the Omicron wave, and immunomodulatory drugs, more frequently used during the Delta wave. The risk of mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in the patients infected with the Omicron variant (7.2% for Delta vs 3.1% for Omicron; P <0.001). For the age group above 80 years old, the risk of death was significantly higher during the Delta wave than during the Omicron wave. The risk of death was significantly lower in the patients treated with antiviral drugs regardless of the pandemic wave. CONCLUSIONS: The Delta variant is associated with a more severe clinical course of the disease and a higher risk of death than the Omicron variant.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Polonia , SARS-CoV-2 , AntiviralesRESUMEN
Continuous evaluation of real-world treatment effectiveness of COVID-19 medicines is required due to the ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and the possible emergence of resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze, in a retrospective manner, the outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the pandemic waves dominated by Delta and Omicron variants and treated with remdesivir (RDV) (n = 762) in comparison to a demographically and clinically matched group not treated with any antivirals (n = 1060). A logistic regression analysis revealed that RDV treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of death during both Delta wave (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.29-0.60; p < 0.0001) and Omicron-dominated period (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.35-0.92; p = 0.02). Moreover, RDV-treated groups were characterized by a lower percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, but the difference was not statistically significant. This study is the first real-world evidence that RDV remains effective during the dominance of more pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 variants and those that cause a milder course of the disease, and continues to be an essential element of COVID-19 therapy.
RESUMEN
Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) regimens have provided hope for eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Patients following ineffective therapy with DAA, especially those previously treated with inhibitors of non-structural protein 5A (NS5A), remain a challenge. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of DAA pangenotypic options in patients after failure of NS5A containing genotype-specific regimens. The analysis included 120 patients selected from the EpiTer-2 database with data on 15675 HCV-infected individuals treated with IFN-free therapies from 1 July 2015 to 30 June 2022 at 22 Polish hepatology centres. The majority of them were infected with genotype (GT) 1b (85.8%) and one-third was diagnosed with fibrosis F4. Among the rescue pangenotypic regimens, the most commonly used was the sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) ± ribavirin (RBV) combination. The sustained virologic response, which was a measure of treatment effectiveness, was achieved by 102 patients, resulting in cure rate of 90.3% in the per protocol analysis. All 11 non-responders were infected with GT1b, 7 were diagnosed with cirrhosis, and 9 were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV. We demonstrated the high effectiveness of the pangenotypic rescue options in patients after genotype specific NS5A-containing regimens failures, identifying cirrhosis as a negative prognostic factor of treatment effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Interferones/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , GenotipoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nearly 290000 patients with chronic hepatitis C die annually from the most severe complications of the disease. One of them is liver cirrhosis, which occurs in about 20% of patients chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), which replaced interferon (IFN)-based regimens, significantly improved the prognosis of this group of patients, increasing HCV eradication rates and tolerability of therapy. Our study is the first to assess changes in patient profile, effectiveness, and safety in the HCV-infected cirrhotic population in the IFN-free era. AIM: To document changes in patient characteristics and treatment regimens along with their effectiveness and safety profile over the years. METHODS: The studied patients were selected from 14801 chronically HCV-infected individuals who started IFN-free therapy between July 2015 and December 2021 in 22 Polish hepatology centers. The retrospective analysis was conducted in real-world clinical practice based on the EpiTer-2 multicenter database. The measure of treatment effectiveness was the percentage of sustained virologic response (SVR) calculated after excluding patients lost to follow-up. Safety data collected during therapy and the 12-wk post-treatment period included information on adverse events, including serious ones, deaths, and treatment course. RESULTS: The studied population (n = 3577) was balanced in terms of gender in 2015-2017, while the following years showed the dominance of men. The decline in the median age from 60 in 2015-2016 to 57 years in 2021 was accompanied by a decrease in the percentage of patients with comorbidities and comedications. Treatment-experienced patients dominated in 2015-2016, while treatment-naive individuals gained an advantage in 2017 and reached 93.2% in 2021. Genotype (GT)-specific options were more prevalent in treatment in 2015-2018 and were supplanted by pangenotypic combinations in subsequent years. The effectiveness of the therapy was comparable regardless of the period analyzed, and patients achieved an overall response rate of 95%, with an SVR range of 72.9%-100% for the different therapeutic regimens. Male gender, GT3 infection, and prior treatment failure were identified as independent negative predictors of therapeutic success. CONCLUSION: We have documented changes in the profile of HCV-infected cirrhotic patients over the years of accessibility to changing DAA regimens, confirming the high effectiveness of IFN-free therapy in all analyzed periods.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Masculino , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Interferones/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Cirrosis Hepática/inducido químicamente , Quimioterapia Combinada , GenotipoRESUMEN
Aim of the study: The aim is to summarize the effectiveness and safety of genotype-specific and pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments in patients with renal failure. Material and methods: In the EpiTer-2 database, which includes data from 22 hepatology centers in Poland, 593 patients with HCV infection and kidney failure were identified. According to KDIGO 2022, they fulfilled the criteria of chronic kidney disease. Patients were divided into two groups: treated with genotype-specific regimens (n = 428) and pangenotypic options (n = 165), in relation to the stage of kidney disease determined using the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (Cockcroft and Gault equation). Two separate groups were created for hemodialyzed patients (n = 134) and patients after kidney transplantation (n = 89). Results: In a total of 593 patients, 78.7% were treatment-naïve and 23.9% had liver cirrhosis, in 27.5% of cases decompensated. In both groups, the dominant genotype was GT1b. Among patients treated with genotype-specific regimens, LDV/SOF ± RBV, OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV, and GZR/EBR ± RBV treatments were given to 31.5%, 31.5%, and 34.8% of patients respectively. In pangenotypic regimens, GLE/PIB was chosen in 50.3%. Ninety-six percent and 98.8% of patients in the genotype-specific regimen and 88.5% and 94.8% in the pangenotypic regimen achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat and per protocol population respectively. Liver cirrhosis was identified as a risk factor for virological failure. During the study, 14 patients died, 7 in each of the two groups, none related to the antiviral treatment. Conclusions: Both types of treatment regimens are equally effective and safe in patients with renal failure. The stage of renal failure or transplant does not influence the antiviral response.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The highly effective and safe interferon (IFN)-free options were a breakthrough in the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). OBJECTIVE: The current analysis was designed to evaluate changes in the patient profile and antiviral treatment characteristics over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 963 consecutive HCVinfected patients who started IFNfree regimens between July 2015 and December 2020 in the Department of Infectious Diseases in Kielce, Poland. The analysis was carried out for 5 time intervals. RESULTS: The studied group was sexbalanced, with the median (interquartile range) age changing from 58 (44.8-63) in 2015-2016 to 43 (35-61) in 2020. The proportion of patients with comorbidities decreased over the years. The rate of treatmentnaïve individuals increased from 40.9% in 2015-2016 to 91% in 2020, while the percentage of patients with liver cirrhosis decreased from 51.1% in 2015-2016 to 13.3% in 2020. Genotypespecific regimens dominated in the years 2015-2017, while pangenotypic options gained an advantage in 2019 and reached 91% in 2020. Overall effectiveness achieved 98.4% in the perprotocol analysis and was comparable over the years with lower efficacy among patients with liver cirrhosis and those infected with genotype 3. The therapy was welltolerated, and the safety profile improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: The median age of HCVinfected patients decreased over the years. They were less burdened with comorbidities and comedications, more likely to be treatmentnaïve, and had less advanced liver disease. The genotypespecific regimens, predominantly used at the beginning of the IFNfree era, were superseded by the pangenotypic regimens.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Interferones , Cirrosis Hepática , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In the light of the lack of authorized COVID-19 vaccines adapted to the Omicron variant lineage, the administration of the first and second booster dose is recommended. It remains important to monitor the efficacy of such an approach in order to inform future preventive strategies. The present paper summarizes the research progress on the effectiveness of the first and second booster doses of COVID-19. It also discusses the potential approach in vaccination strategies that could be undertaken to maintain high levels of protection during the waves of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Although this approach can be based, with some shortcomings, on the first-generation vaccines, other vaccination strategies should be explored, including developing multiple antigen-based (multivariant-adapted) booster doses with enhanced durability of immune protection, e.g., through optimization of the half-life of generated antibodies.
RESUMEN
Difficult-to-treat populations with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), in the era of interferon treatment, included patients with liver cirrhosis, kidney impairment, treatment-experienced individuals, and those coinfected with the human immunodeficiency virus. The current study aimed to determine whether, in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), there are still patients that are difficult-to-treat. The study included all consecutive patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who started interferon-free therapy between July 2015 and December 2020 in the Department of Infectious Diseases in Kielce. The analyzed real-world population consisted of 963 patients, and most of them were infected with genotype 1 (87.6%) with the predominance of subtype 1b and were treatment-naïve (78.8%). Liver cirrhosis was determined in 207 individuals (21.5%), of whom 82.6% were compensated. The overall sustained virologic response, after exclusion of non-virologic failures, was achieved in 98.4%. The univariable analysis demonstrated the significantly lower response rates in males, patients with liver cirrhosis, decompensation of hepatic function at baseline, documented esophageal varices, concomitant diabetes, body mass index ≥25, and previous ineffective antiviral treatment. Despite an overall very high effectiveness, some unfavorable factors, including male gender, genotype 3 infection, liver cirrhosis, and treatment experience, significantly reduce the chances for a virologic response were identified.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coinfección , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Hepacivirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The COVID-19 vaccination has been the subject of unprecedented misinformation, false news, and public concerns. This study presents a unique analysis comprising persons who were not vaccinated and became ill. It investigates reasons for not vaccinating and evaluates how the personal experience of COVID-19 affected further attitudes and decisions related to health. The study included 730 consecutive unvaccinated patients hospitalized in 12 centers in Poland during the autumn 2021 pandemic wave. The most frequent reason behind the refusal to receive the vaccine was concern over the adverse effects, disbelief that the vaccine was sufficiently tested, and one's conviction that COVID-19 will not affect a patient. Online information, friends, spouse, children/grandchildren, and other family members were most often the source of discouragement from vaccination. Most individuals regretted their decision not to receive a vaccine (66.0%), declared to promote COVID-19 vaccination after discharge (64.0%), and to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in the time recommended for convalescents (69.5%). Individuals expressing no regrets of vaccine refusal more frequently revealed conspiracy beliefs. The study shows that personal experience with severe COVID-19 can influence the perception of vaccination, but approximately one-third of unvaccinated hospitalized patients still appear to express vaccine hesitancy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The revolution in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection dates back to the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). The increase in efficacy was most pronounced in patients infected with genotype (GT) 1b, as this was the most poorly responsive population to treatment during the interferon era. AIM: To identify the most effective interferon-free therapy for GT1b-infected patients and to determine positive and negative predictors of virological response. METHODS: This real-world retrospective analysis included patients chronically infected with GT1b HCV whose data were obtained from the multicenter observational EpiTer-2 database. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated for each therapeutic regimen as the percentage of sustained virological responses (SVR). Assessment of the safety was based on the evaluation of the course of therapy, the occurrence of adverse events including serious ones, deaths during treatment and in the post 12-wk follow-up period. RESULTS: The studied population consisted of 11385 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 14.8 years and a female predominance (53.4%). The majority of them were treatment-naïve (74.6%) and patients with cirrhosis accounted for 24.3%. Of the DAA regimens used, 76.9% were GT-specific with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin being the most used option (32.4%). A total of 10903 patients responded to treatment resulting in a 98.1% in the per-protocol analysis after excluding 273 patients without SVR data. The effectiveness of all regimens exceeded 90% and the highest SVR of 98.9% was achieved in patients treated with a combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. Logistic regression analyses showed that the virologic response was independently associated with female sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.67], absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline (OR = 2.42) and higher baseline platelets (OR = 1.004 per 1000/µL increase), while the presence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection significantly decreased the odds of response (OR = 0.39). About 95%-100% of patients completed therapy irrespective of the drug regimen. At least one adverse effect occurred in 10.9%-36.3% and most of them were mild. No treatment related deaths have been reported. CONCLUSION: We documented very high effectiveness and a good safety profile across all DAA regimens. Positive predictors of SVR were female sex, absence of decompensated cirrhosis at baseline and higher platelet count while HIV coinfection reduced the effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Compuestos Macrocíclicos , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepacivirus/genética , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Compuestos Macrocíclicos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Valina/uso terapéutico , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , GenotipoRESUMEN
Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) have increased susceptibility to viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to analyse the SARD patient population with COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) in terms of baseline characteristics, severity, course and outcomes of the disease compared with the non-SARD group, and to identify factors associated with prognosis, including remdesivir therapy efficacy. Retrospective study comprised 8220 COVID-19 cases from the SARSTer database, including 185 with SARD. Length of hospitalisation, duration of oxygen therapy, mortality and the need for HFNO (high-flow nasal oxygen) and/or NIV (noninvasive ventilation) were significantly higher in the SARD versus non-SARD group. There was no difference in clinical features on admission to hospital. Patients with SARD were older and more likely to have cardiovascular, pulmonary and chronic kidney diseases. Age, the presence of cardiovascular disease, more severe conditions on admission and higher inflammatory marker values were found to be risk factors for death in the SARD group. In patients with SARD treated with remdesivir, there was a trend towards improved mortality but without statistical significance. Length of hospitalisation, 28-day mortality and the need for HFNO and/or NIV were higher in the SARD group. These patients often had other chronic diseases and were older.
RESUMEN
The emergence of a highly transmissible and a more pathogenic B.1.617.2 (delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2 has brought concern over COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and the increased risk of severe breakthrough infections. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency and the clinical characteristics of severe breakthrough COVID-19 cases recorded in 10 Polish healthcare units between 1 June and 31 December 2021, a period during which a rapid surge in the share of B.1.617.2 infections was seen, while a significant number of populations were already fully vaccinated. Overall, 723 individuals who completed the initial vaccination regime (fully vaccinated group) and an additional 18 who received a booster dose were identifiedtogether, they represented 20.8% of all the COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the same period in the same healthcare institutions (0.5% in the case of a group that received a booster dose). Although laboratory and clinical parameters did not differ between both groups, patients who received a booster tended to have lower CRP, IL-6, PCT, and d-dimer levels and they required oxygen therapy less frequently. The most common early COVID-19 symptoms in the studied group were fatigue, cough, fever (>38 °C), and dyspnea. Individuals with no detectable anti-spike IgG antibodies constituted 13%; the odds of being a humoral non-responder to the vaccine were increased in patients aged >70 years. Fully vaccinated patients hospitalized after more than 180 days from the last vaccine dose were significantly older and they were predominantly represented by individuals over 70 years and with comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular disease. Contrary to mRNA vaccines, most patients vaccinated with adenoviral vector vaccines were infected within six months. A total of 102 fatal cases (14% of all deaths among vaccinated individuals; 0.7% in the case of a group that received a booster dose) were recorded, representing 17.6% of all the COVID-19 fatalities recorded in June−December 2021 in the considered healthcare units. The odds of death were significantly increased in men, individuals aged >70 years, patients with comorbidities, and those identified as humoral non-responders to vaccination; in fully vaccinated patients the odds were also increased when the second vaccine dose was given >180 days before the first COVID-19 symptoms. The mortality rate in immunocompromised subjects was 19%. The results indicate that compared to vaccinated individuals, severe COVID-19 and deaths in the unvaccinated group were significantly more prevalent during the B.1.617.2-dominated wave in Poland; and, it highlight the protective role of a booster dose, particularly for more vulnerable individuals.