RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is a leading cause of traumatic exsanguination, requiring emergent damage control surgery performed by a highly trained surgeon in a sterile operating environment. A self-expanding, intraabdominally deployed, thermoreversible foam is one proposed method to potentially task shift temporizing hemostasis to earlier providers and additional settings. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using Fast Onset Abdominal Management (FOAM) in a lethal swine model of NCTH. METHODS: This was a proof-of-concept study comparing FOAM intervention in large Yorkshire swine to historical control animals in the established Ross-Burns model of NCTH. After animal preparation, a Grade IV liver laceration was surgically induced, followed by a free bleed period of 10 min. FOAM was then deployed to a goal intraabdominal pressure of 60 mm Hg for 5 min, followed by a total 60-min observation period following injury. RESULTS: At the end of the experiment, the FOAM agent was found to be distributed throughout the peritoneal cavity in all animals, without signs of iatrogenic injury. The FOAM group demonstrated a significantly higher mean arterial pressure compared with historical controls and a trend toward improved survival: 82% (9/11) compared with 50% for controls (7/14; P = 0.082). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the use of a thermoresponsive foam to manage NCTH and successfully demonstrated proof-of-concept feasibility of FOAM deployment. These results provide strong support for future, higher-powered studies to confirm improved survival with this novel intervention.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Exsanguinación/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/mortalidad , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Exsanguinación/mortalidad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Poloxámero , Porcinos , TorsoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study compared a novel topical hydrogel burn dressing (CI-PRJ012) to standard of care (silver sulfadiazine) and to untreated control in a swine thermal burn model, to assess for wound healing properties both in the presence and absence of concomitant bacterial inoculation. METHODS: Eight equal burn wounds were created on six Yorkshire swine. Half the wounds were randomized to post-burn bacterial inoculation. Wounds were subsequently randomized to three treatments groups: no intervention, CI-PRJ012, or silver sulfadiazine cream. At study end, a blinded pathologist evaluated wounds for necrosis and bacterial colonization. RESULTS: When comparing CI-PRJ012 and silver sulfadiazine cream to no treatment, both agents significantly reduced the amount of necrosis and bacteria at 7 days after wound creation (p < 0.01, independently for both). Further, CI-PRJ012 was found to be significantly better than silver sulfadiazine (p < 0.02) in reducing bacterial colonization. For wound necrosis, no significant difference was found between silver sulfadiazine cream and CI-PRJ012 (p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: CI-PRJ012 decreases necrosis and bacterial colonization compared to no treatment in a swine model. CI-PRJ012 appeared to perform comparably to silver sulfadiazine. CI-PRJ012, which is easily removed with the application of room-temperature water, may provide clinical advantages over silver sulfadiazine.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quemaduras , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Necrosis , Sulfadiazina de Plata , Cicatrización de Heridas , Animales , Quemaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Quemaduras/microbiología , Quemaduras/patología , Sulfadiazina de Plata/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Porcinos , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Hidrogeles/uso terapéutico , Vendajes , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de Heridas/prevención & control , Distribución AleatoriaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury is a major public health concern. Among patients with severe traumatic brain injury, epidural hemorrhage is known to swiftly lead to brain herniation and death unless there is emergent neurosurgical intervention. However, immediate neurosurgeon availability is frequently a problem outside of level I trauma centers. In this context, the authors desired to test a novel device for the emergent management of life-threatening epidural hemorrhage. A review of existing animal models determined that all were inadequate for this purpose, as they were found to be either inappropriate or obsolete. Here, we describe the development of a new epidural hemorrhage model in swine (Sus scrofa, 18-26 kg) ideal for translational device testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vascular access was achieved using an ultrasound-guided percutaneous Seldinger catheter-over-wire technique with 5 Fr catheters placed in the bilateral carotid arteries, for continuous blood pressure and to allow for withdrawal of blood for creation of epidural hemorrhage. To simulate an actively bleeding and life-threatening epidural hemorrhage, unadulterated autologous blood was infused from the vascular access point into the epidural space. To be useful for this application and clinical scenario, brain death needed to occur after the planned intervention time but before the end of the protocol period (if no intervention took place). An iterative approach to model development determined that this could be achieved with an initial infusion rate of 1.0 mL/min, slowed to 0.5 mL/min after the first 10 minutes, paired with an intervention time at 15 minutes. All experiments were performed at Oregon Health & Science University, an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care accredited facility. Oregon Health & Science University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, as well as the United States Army Animal Care and Use Review Office, reviewed and approved this protocol before the initiation of experiments (respectively, protocol numbers IP00002901 and 18116010.e001). RESULTS: The final developed model allows for the infusion of a known volume of autologous, unadulterated blood directly into the epidural space, without the use of a balloon or other restricting membranes, and is rapidly fatal in the absence of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This animal model is the first to mirror the expected clinical course of epidural hemorrhage in a physiologically relevant manner, while allowing translational testing of emergency devices. This model successfully allowed the initial testing of a novel interventional device for the emergent management of epidural hemorrhage that was designed for use in the absence of traditional neurosurgical capabilities.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Hemorragia , Animales , Porcinos , Cateterismo , Catéteres , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Noncompressible torso hemorrhage is the leading cause of exsanguination on the battlefield. A self-expanding, intraperitoneal deployed, thermoreversible foam has been developed that can be easily administered by a medic in austere settings to temporarily tamponade noncompressible torso hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term safety and physical characteristics of using Fast Onset Abdominal Management (FOAM; Critical Innovations LLC) in swine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Yorkshire swine (40-60 kg) were sedated, intubated, and placed on ventilatory support. An external jugular catheter was placed for sampling of blood. Continuous heart rate, temperature, saturation of peripheral oxygen, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and peak airway pressures were monitored for a 4-hour period after intervention (i.e., FOAM agent injection or a sham introducer without agent delivery). The FOAM agent was injected to obtain an intra-abdominal pressure of 60 mmHg for at least 10 minutes. After 4 hours, the animals were removed from ventilatory support and returned to their housing for a period of 7-14 days. Group size analysis was not performed, as this was a descriptive safety study. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and at 1-hour post-intervention and then on days 1, 3, 7, and 14. Euthanasia, necropsy, and harvesting of samples for histologic analysis (from kidneys, terminal ilium, liver, pancreas, stomach, spleen, and lungs) were performed upon expiration. Histologic scoring for evidence of ischemia, necrosis, and abdominal compartment sequela was blinded and reported by semi-quantitative scale (range 0-4; 0 = no change, 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = marked). Oregon Health & Science University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, as well as the U.S. Army Animal Care and Use Review Office, approved this protocol before the initiation of experiments (respectively, protocol numbers IP00003591 and MT180006.e002). RESULTS: Five animals met a priori inclusion criteria, and all of these survived to their scheduled endpoints. Two animals received sham injections of the FOAM agent (one euthanized on day 7 and one on day 14), and three animals received FOAM agent injections (one euthanized on day 7 and two on day 14). A transitory increase in creatinine and lactate was detected during the first day in the FOAM injected swine but resolved by day 3. No FOAM agent was observed in the peritoneal cavity upon necropsy at day 7 or 14. Histologic data revealed no clinically relevant differences in any organ system between intervention and control animals upon sacrifice at day 7 or 14. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the characteristics, survival, and histological analysis of using FOAM in a porcine model. In our study, FOAM reached the desired intra-abdominal pressure endpoint while not significantly altering basic hematologic parameters, except for transient elevations of creatinine and lactate on day 1. Furthermore, there was no clinical or histological relevant evidence of ischemia, necrosis, or intra-abdominal compartment syndrome. These results provide strong support for the safety of the FOAM device and will support the design of further regulatory studies in swine and humans.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Humanos , Porcinos , Animales , Creatinina , Hemorragia/terapia , Torso , Necrosis , Lactatos , IsquemiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tube thoracostomy is the definitive treatment for most significant chest trauma, including injuries resulting in pneumothorax, hemothorax, and hemopneumothorax. However, traditional chest tubes fail to sufficiently remove blood up to 20% of the time (i.e., retained hemothorax), which can lead to empyema and fibrothorax, as well as significant morbidity and mortality. Here we describe the use of a novel chest tube system in a swine model of hemothorax. METHODS: This was an intra-animal-paired, randomized-controlled study of hemothorax evacuation using the PleuraPath™ Thoracostomy System (PPTS) compared to a traditional chest tube in large Yorkshire-Landrace swine (75-85 kg). One liter of autologous whole blood was infused into each pleural cavity simultaneously with subsequent drainage from each device individually monitored for a total of 120 minutes, before the end of the experiment and necroscopy. RESULTS: Six animals completed the full protocol. On average, the PPTS removed 17% more blood (P=0.049) and left 19.1% less residual hemothorax (P=0.023) as compared to the standard of care during the first two hours of use. No complications or iatrogenic injury were identified in any animal for either device. CONCLUSIONS: The novel PPTS device was superior to the traditional chest tube drainage system in this acute, large-animal model of retained hemothorax. While this study supports clinical translation, further research will be required to assess efficacy and optimize device use in humans.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Noncompressible hemorrhage is a leading cause of potentially survivable combat death, with the vast majority of such deaths occurring in the out-of-hospital environment. While large animal models of this process are important for device and therapeutic development, clinical practice has changed over time and past models must follow suit. Developed in conjunction with regulatory feedback, this study presents a modernized, out-of-hospital, noncompressible hemorrhage model, in conjunction with a randomized study of past, present, and future fluid options following a hypotensive resuscitation protocol consistent with current clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled experiment comparing three fluid resuscitation options in Yorkshire swine. Baseline data from animals of same size from previous experiments were analyzed (n = 70), and mean systolic blood pressure was determined, with a permissive hypotension resuscitation target defined as a 25% decrease from normal (67 mm Hg). After animal preparation, a grade IV to V liver laceration was induced. Animals bled freely for a 10-minute "time-to-responder" period, after which resuscitation occurred with randomized fluid in boluses to the goal target: 6% hetastarch in lactated electrolyte injection (HEX), normal saline (NS), or fresh whole blood (FWB). Animals were monitored for a total simulated "delay to definitive care" period of 2 hours postinjury. RESULTS: At the end of the 2-hour study period, 8.3% (1 of 12 swine) of the HEX group, 50% (6 of 12 swine) of the NS group, and 75% (9 of 12 swine) of the FWB had survived (p = 0.006), with Holm-Sidak pairwise comparisons showing a significant difference between HEX and FWB and (p = 0.005). Fresh whole blood had significantly higher systemic vascular resistance and hemoglobin levels compared with other groups (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Survival data support the movement away from HEX toward NS and, preferably, FWB in clinical practice and translational animal modeling. The presented model allows for future research including basic science, as well as translational studies of novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and devices.