Investigation of an Outcomes-Driven, Computer-Assisted Approach to CI Fitting in Newly Implanted Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of outcomes received by newly implanted cochlear implant recipients when an outcomes-driven, computer-assisted approach to cochlear implantation fitting was used. This approach, referred to as "Fitting to Outcome eXpert," or FOX, was developed by Otoconsult in Antwerp, Belgium. DESIGN: Thirty-one newly implanted subjects participated in a nonrandomized, single-subject, repeated measures design that involved a within-subject comparison of preoperative and postoperative speech recognition scores. Sound processors for all subjects were programmed using the FOX software that utilized the evidence-based results of various psychoacoustic tests to adjust MAP parameters and improve performance. Additionally, mean word and sentence recognition scores obtained by the subjects programmed with FOX were compared to results obtained by newly implanted patients enrolled in the Nucleus CI532 clinical trial whose devices were programmed using traditional methods. RESULTS: Subjects whose sound processors were programmed using FOX obtained a mean 6-month postactivation Consonant Nucleus Consonant word score of 60.2% correct. This represented an improvement of 46% age points when mean preactivation and postactivation scores were compared and represented a statistically significant change in score (p < 0.001). This mean score is similar to the mean 6-month Consonant Nucleus Consonant Word score of 61% obtained by 96 subjects enrolled in the Nucleus CI532 trial. Additionally, subjects in this study obtained a mean 6-month postactivation AzBio Sentence score of 42.7% correct when stimuli were presented at 65 dBA using a +10 signal-to-noise ratio. This score is also similar to the mean score of 43% obtained by 96 subjects enrolled in the Nucleus CI532 trial using the same test material and signal-to-noise ratio. Patients enrolled in this study attended 43% fewer programming appointments than the number reported by cochlear implantation centers in recent surveys of clinical care. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the use of an outcomes-driven, computer-assisted approach to supplement the management of newly implanted cochlear implant recipients. Subjects whose devices were programmed using such an approach demonstrated mean postoperative word in quiet and sentence in noise scores comparable to those obtained by subjects in the Nucleus CI532 clinical trial whose devices were programmed using traditional programming techniques. Use of this approach positively impacted patient care by reducing the number of postoperative visits needed to optimize sound processor programs, simplified patient testing via the use of direct streaming, and ensured that patients received consistent programming of their sound processor, regardless of the location where the programming was performed.

Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of electric and acoustic overlap for speech understanding in typical listening conditions using semidiffuse noise. DESIGN: This study used a within-subjects, repeated measures design including 11 experienced adult implant recipients (13 ears) with functional residual hearing in the implanted and nonimplanted ear. The aided acoustic bandwidth was fixed and the low-frequency cutoff for the cochlear implant (CI) was varied systematically. Assessments were completed in the R-SPACE sound-simulation system which includes a semidiffuse restaurant noise originating from eight loudspeakers placed circumferentially about the subject's head. AzBio sentences were presented at 67 dBA with signal to noise ratio varying between +10 and 0 dB determined individually to yield approximately 50 to 60% correct for the CI-alone condition with full CI bandwidth. Listening conditions for all subjects included CI alone, bimodal (CI + contralateral hearing aid), and bilateral-aided electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS; CI + bilateral hearing aid). Low-frequency cutoffs both below and above the original "clinical software recommendation" frequency were tested for all patients, in all conditions. Subjects estimated listening difficulty for all conditions using listener ratings based on a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Three primary findings were that (1) there was statistically significant benefit of preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear for most overlap conditions, (2) the default clinical software recommendation rarely yielded the highest level of speech recognition (1 of 13 ears), and (3) greater EAS overlap than that provided by the clinical recommendation yielded significant improvements in speech understanding. CONCLUSIONS: For standard-electrode CI recipients with preserved hearing, spectral overlap of acoustic and electric stimuli yielded significantly better speech understanding and less listening effort in a laboratory-based, restaurant-noise simulation. In conclusion, EAS patients may derive more benefit from greater acoustic and electric overlap than given in current software fitting recommendations, which are based solely on audiometric threshold. These data have larger scientific implications, as previous studies may not have assessed outcomes with optimized EAS parameters, thereby underestimating the benefit afforded by hearing preservation.

Effects of an evidence-based model for cochlear implant aftercare delivery on clinical efficiency and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess an evidence-based model (EBM) approach to cochlear implant (CI) aftercare that includes a modified, reduced treatment schedule for newly-implanted adult CI recipients consisting of four appointments (initial activation, 1-, 3- and 6- months postactivation) in the first year post-surgery. METHOD: This prospective multicenter proof-of-concept study was conducted across three clinics in the United States by five experienced CI clinicians. Seventeen newly-implanted adult patients with postlingual hearing loss enrolled in the study. Hearing outcomes were measured using objective speech testing and subjective self-report measures. RESULTS: Most recipients (14/17; 82%) were able to follow the four-appointment EBM schedule. The reduced number of visits translated into an average time savings of 3 hours per patient. Significant improvements in speech perception were observed at both 3- and 6-months postactivation, as measured by CNC words in quiet and AzBio sentences at +10 dB SNR, consistent with published results achieved by traditional practices. Recipients were significantly satisfied with telephone, music, small group conversation, and television listening at 6 months postactivation. Recipient satisfaction with overall service was rated as "excellent" by 14/14 (100%) respondents. CONCLUSION: The four-appointment EBM approach delivered efficient and effective audiological aftercare to CI recipients in the first year following CI implantation.