A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Felzartamab in Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection is a leading cause of kidney-transplant failure. The targeting of CD38 to inhibit graft injury caused by alloantibodies and natural killer (NK) cells may be a therapeutic option. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with antibody-mediated rejection that had occurred at least 180 days after transplantation to receive nine infusions of the CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab (at a dose of 16 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo for 6 months, followed by a 6-month observation period. The primary outcome was the safety and side-effect profile of felzartamab. Key secondary outcomes were renal-biopsy results at 24 and 52 weeks, donor-specific antibody levels, peripheral NK-cell counts, and donor-derived cell-free DNA levels. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients underwent randomization (11 to receive felzartamab and 11 to receive placebo). The median time from transplantation until trial inclusion was 9 years. Mild or moderate infusion reactions occurred in 8 patients in the felzartamab group. Serious adverse events occurred in 1 patient in the felzartamab group and in 4 patients in the placebo group; graft loss occurred in 1 patient in the placebo group. At week 24, resolution of morphologic antibody-mediated rejection was more frequent with felzartamab (in 9 of 11 patients [82%]) than with placebo (in 2 of 10 patients [20%]), for a difference of 62 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 19 to 100) and a risk ratio of 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.83). The median microvascular inflammation score was lower in the felzartamab group than in the placebo group (0 vs. 2.5), for a mean difference of -1.95 (95% CI, -2.97 to -0.92). Also lower was a molecular score reflecting the probability of antibody-mediated rejection (0.17 vs. 0.77) and the level of donor-derived cell-free DNA (0.31% vs. 0.82%). At week 52, the recurrence of antibody-mediated rejection was reported in 3 of 9 patients who had a response to felzartamab, with an increase in molecular activity and biomarker levels toward baseline levels. CONCLUSIONS: Felzartamab had acceptable safety and side-effect profiles in patients with antibody-mediated rejection. (Funded by MorphoSys and Human Immunology Biosciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05021484; and EUDRACT number, 2021-000545-40.).

Continuous glucose monitoring for the prediction of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance on day 90 after kidney transplantation-A prospective proof-of-concept study.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) and prediabetes represent serious complications after kidney transplantation and are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the predictive performance of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared with plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c in 46 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without known preexisting diabetes mellitus. CGM (14-day recording duration) was performed on days 8, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 180 posttransplant. Eight patients (17%) developed PTDM and nine (20%) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), as diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT)-derived 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) or glucose-lowering therapy on day 90. CGM-readouts percent of time >140 mg/dL (%TAR (140 mg/dL)) and percent of time >180 mg/dL (%TAR (180 mg/dL)) showed excellent in-sample test characteristics regarding PTDM from day 8 onward (days 8-90 receiver operating characteristic area under the curve: 0.88-0.99) and regarding PTDM/IGT with the commencement of maintenance immunosuppression from day 30 onward (days 30-90 receiver operating characteristic area under the curve: 0.88-0.91). Exploratory CGM-%TAR (140 mg/dL)-screening thresholds of 31.8% on day 8 and 13.2% on day 30 yielded sensitivities/specificities of 88%/83% for PTDM and 94%/78% for PTDM/IGT on day 90, respectively. Although our findings need to be replicated in studies with larger sample sizes, CGM bears promising potential to facilitate clinical practice and research regarding PTDM.

Subthreshold rejection activity in many kidney transplants currently classified as having no rejection.

Most kidney transplant patients who undergo biopsies are classified as having no rejection based on consensus thresholds. However, we hypothesized that because these patients have normal adaptive immune systems, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) may exist as subthreshold activity in some transplants currently classified as no rejection. To examine this question, we studied genome-wide microarray results from 5086 kidney transplant biopsies (4170 patients). An updated archetypal analysis designated 56% of biopsies as no rejection. Subthreshold molecular TCMR and/or ABMR activity molecular activity was detectable as elevated classifier scores in many biopsies classified as no rejection, with ABMR activity in many TCMR biopsies and TCMR activity in many ABMR biopsies. In biopsies classified as no rejection histologically and molecularly, molecular TCMR classifier scores correlated with increases in histologic TCMR features and molecular injury, lower eGFR, and higher risk of graft loss, and molecular ABMR activity correlated with increased glomerulitis and donor-specific antibody. No rejection biopsies with high subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity had a higher probability of having TCMR or ABMR respectively diagnosed in a future biopsy. We conclude that many kidney transplant recipients have unrecognized subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity, with significant implications for future problems.

Office or home versus 24-hour blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to quantify hypertension control and evaluate concordance between all commonly available blood pressure modalities in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). METHODS: For this prospective cross-sectional study 89 stable KTR were recruited at the Charité Transplant Outpatient Clinic. For each study participant office (manual office blood pressure 'MOBP' and automated office blood pressure 'AOBP'), 7-day home (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement (24h-ABPM) were performed. RESULTS: 80 of the 89 patients recruited had sufficient blood pressure recordings. Mean blood pressure for MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and 24h-ABPM was 129/73, 126/71, 131/85 and 130/81 mmHg, respectively. Uncontrolled hypertension, as defined by 24h-ABPM (mean ≥ 130/80 mmHg), was present in 53 (66%) patients. MOBP, AOBP and HBPM classified 19 (24%), 22 (28%) and 41 (51%) patients respectively as 'uncontrolled hypertensive'. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between systolic MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and Daytime-ABPM (mean bias ± SD: -1 ± 13 mmHg, -4 ± 13 mmHg, 1 ± 10 mmHg, respectively). Uncontrolled nighttime hypertension was present in 74 (93%) KTR, with 71 (89%) patients showing a non-physiological dipping pattern. Moderate positive correlation between Daytime-ABPM/HBPM and Nighttime-ABPM (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.62-0.73), followed by MOBP/AOBP (Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.49-0.59) was noted. eGFR and proteinuria displayed weak correlation with 24h-, Daytime- and Nighttime-ABPM (absolute values of Pearson Correlation Coefficients: 0.04-0.41). No robust association with either 24h-, Daytime- or Nighttime-ABPM was observed for volume status exams. CONCLUSIONS: Masked hypertension is highly prevalent in KTR, especially due to high rates of uncontrolled nighttime hypertension. HBPM shows the narrowest limits of agreement with Daytime-ABPM. Daytime-ABPM and HBPM show the highest, albeit clinically insufficient, correlation with Nighttime-ABPM. Systematic integration of 24h-ABPM into clinical practice, as proposed by the '2023 ESH Guidelines for the Management of arterial hypertension', should not be withheld for the KTR population. Clinical trials evaluating treatment of hypertension in KTR are urgently needed.

Retrospective analysis of the perioperative outcome in living donor kidney transplantation with multiple renal arteries: does accessory vessel ligation affect the outcome?

PURPOSE: Accurate surgical reconstruction of arterial vascular supply is a crucial part of living kidney transplantation (LDKT). The presence of multiple renal arteries (MRA) in grafts can be challenging. In the present study, we investigated the impact of ligation versus anastomosis of small accessory graft arteries on the perioperative outcome. METHODS: Clinical and radiological outcomes of 51 patients with MRA out of a total of 308 patients who underwent LDKT with MRA between 2011 and 2020 were stratified in two groups and analyzed. In group 1 (20 patients), ligation of accessory arteries (ARAs) and group 2 (31 patients) anastomosis of ARAs was performed. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the anastomosis-, surgery-, and warm ischemia time (WIT) in favor of group 1. Students t-test showed comparable serum creatinine levels of 2.33 (± 1.75) to 1.68 (± 0.83) mg/dL in group 1 and 2.63 (± 2.47) to 1.50 (± 0.41) mg/dL in group 2, were seen from 1 week to 1 year after transplant. No increased rates of Delayed graft function (DGF), primary transplant dysfunction and transplant rejection were seen, but graft loss and revision rates were slightly higher when the ARAs were ligated. Analysis of Doppler sonography revealed that segmental perfusion deficits tend to regenerate during the clinical course. CONCLUSION: Ligation of smaller accessory renal arteries may not affect the outcome of living kidney transplantation, except for a minor increase in the reoperation rate. Segmental perfusion deficits of the graft seem to regenerate in most cases as seen in Doppler sonography.

Old for young kidney transplantation: a responsible option for our patients to reduce waiting time?

PURPOSE: The Eurotransplant Senior program allocating grafts from donors ≥ 65 years to recipients aged ≥ 65 years has proven good results within the last 20 years. However, "old" grafts are also allocated to younger recipients < 65 years, and this outcome of "old for young" kidney transplantations (KT) still lacks detailed investigations. METHODS: All "old for young" KT performed at four tertiary referral centers were retrospectively compared including a recent follow-up, stratifying for "old for young" (donor ≥ 65 years to recipient < 65 years) vs. "very old for young" KT (donor ≥ 70 years to recipient < 65 years). RESULTS: Overall, 99 patients were included with 56 (56.6%) "old for young" and 43 (43.4%) "very old for young" KT. The median waiting time did not differ (60.7 vs. 45.8 months, respectively) at comparable living donation rates (57.1% vs. 44.2%) as well as intra- and postoperative results. At a median follow-up of 44 months (range 1; 133), the 3-year graft survival of 91% vs. 87% did not significantly vary. In subgroup analyses assessing living donation or donation after brain death (DBD) KT only, the graft survival was significantly longer for "old for young" KT within the living donation subgroup. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, the presence of panel-reactive antibodies was the only significant impact factor on graft survival (HR 8.32, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This analysis clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the "old for young" approach, enabling favorable perioperative results as well as comparable data of graft- and overall survival, while reducing waiting time for eligible patients.

Transplant nephrectomy: indication, surgical approach and complications-experiences from a single transplantation center.

PURPOSE: Management of a failed kidney allograft, and the question whether it should be removed is a challenging task for clinicians. The reported risks for transplant nephrectomy (TN) vary, and there is no clear recommendation on indications or surgical approach that should be used. This study gives an overview of indications, compares surgical techniques, and identifies risk factors for higher morbidity. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was conducted on all transplant nephrectomies performed between 2005 and 2020 at Charité Hospital Berlin, Department of Urology. Patient demographics, laboratory parameters, graft survival data, indication for TN, and surgical complications were extracted from medical reports. RESULTS: A total of 195 TN were performed, with graft intolerance syndrome being the most common indication in 52 patients (26.7%), acute rejection in 36 (18.5%), acute infection in 30 (15.4%), and other reasons to stop immunosuppression in 26 patients (13.3%). Rare indications were vascular complications in 16 (8.2%) and malignancies in the allograft in six (3.1%) cases. Extracapsular surgical approach was significantly more often used in cases of vascular complications and earlier allograft removal, but there was no difference in complication rates between extra- and intracapsular approach. Acute infection was identified as an independent risk factor for a complication grade IIIb or higher according to Clavien-Dindo classification, with a HR of 12.3 (CI 2.2-67.7; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Transplant nephrectomy should only be performed when there is a good indication, and non-elective surgery should be avoided, when possible, as it increases morbidity.

European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study.

An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Companion Biomarker for AMR Treatment With Daratumumab: Case Series.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is among the most frequent causes for graft loss after kidney transplantation. While there are no approved therapies, several case reports with daratumumab and the very recent phase 2 trial of felzartamab in AMR have indicated the potential efficacy of therapeutic interventions targeting CD38. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker with injury-specific release and a short half-life, which could facilitate early diagnosis of AMR and monitoring of treatment response. We describe two cases of patients with chronic active AMR, who were treated with monthly daratumumab infusions, and in whom donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was measured longitudinally to monitor treatment response. In both patients, daratumumab treatment led to stabilization of kidney function parameters, a strong decline of dd-cfDNA below the previously established threshold for rejection, and partial or complete histologic resolution of AMR activity. Our case series suggests that dd-cfDNA may be a useful companion biomarker for longitudinal monitoring of anti-CD38 treatment in patients with AMR.

Antibody Mediated Rejection and T-cell Mediated Rejection Molecular Signatures Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Kidney Transplant Biopsies.

Recently, interest in transcriptomic assessment of kidney biopsies has been growing. This study investigates the use of NGS to identify gene expression changes and analyse the pathways involved in rejection. An Illumina bulk RNA sequencing on the polyadenylated RNA of 770 kidney biopsies was conducted. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were determined for AMR and TCMR using DESeq2. Genes were segregated according to their previous descriptions in known panels (microarray or the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel) to obtain NGS-specific genes. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the Reactome and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) public repositories. The differential gene expression using NGS analysis identified 6,141 and 8,478 transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR. While most of the genes identified were included in the microarray and the B-HOT panels, NGS analysis identified 603 (9.8%) and 1,186 (14%) new specific genes. Pathways analysis showed that the B-HOT panel was associated with the main immunological processes involved during AMR and TCMR. The microarrays specifically integrated metabolic functions and cell cycle progression processes. Novel NGS-specific based transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR were discovered, which might represent a novel source of targets for drug designing and repurposing.

[The German Transplant Registry - An Analysis of Legacy Data 2006-2016]. / Das Deutsche Transplantationsregister ­ eine Analyse der Altdaten 2006­2016.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, medical transplant data from three institutions were merged to create a German transplant registry. Since June 2021, access to data of the registry has been available. It was planned to analyze the registry data in order to compare special allocation rules with regular allocation for heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation. Our approach led to a quality analysis of the registry. METHODS: Upon request, legacy data (2006-2016) of the registry was provided, divided into 61 elements. From these elements, the user had to compile the required dataset. Data checks were performed for completeness, correct allocation of information, and consistency among different sources. Software used for these tasks included R, SQL, and Excel. RESULTS: The initial elements ("waiting list" elements) of the four types of transplantations contained data from a total of 80,259 originally listed patients. However, these patients were only partially present in other elements resulting in complete datasets reflecting waiting time in only 23%, 30%, 50%, and 96%, and for post-transplantation outcomes in 14%, 11%, 38%, and 13% (heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation, respectively). The linking of urgency information with clinical data was successful in only a small proportion, with only 6% for heart transplantation. Incorrect and thus implausible allocations in the case of special allocation rules indicated incorrect entries in the registry. Data from different data providers were inconsistent. DISCUSSION: The incompleteness and incorrect data allocation raise doubts about the reliability of scientific studies based on the transplant registry. The complex structure also hinders the compilation of a reliable dataset, which is uncommon internationally. New data (acquisition since 2017) has only been available since December 2023. CONCLUSION: The transplant registry urgently needs restructuring. Competent clinical data management, involving transplant medical expertise, and continuous quality controls are essential in this process.

Positive Long-Term Outcome of Kidney Allocation via Acceptable Mismatch Program in Highly Sensitized Patients.

Introduction: Eurotransplant established the acceptable mismatch (AM) program to facilitate timely kidney transplantations of highly sensitized patients, but long-term granular clinical and immunological outcomes regarding overall graft survival and de novo DSA (dnDSA) formation are still intensively researched. The right choice of induction therapy in patients with differing immunological risk is not conclusively determined, as well as the impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitope matching on dnDSA formation. Methods: This monocentric, retrospective study analyzed 94 patients transplanted within the AM program between 2000 and 2019 compared to case-control matched cohorts of non- (PRA 0-5%; PRA-0) and intermediately sensitized (PRA 6-84%; PRA-6/84) patients transplanted through Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System. Results: Estimated 10-year overall graft survival between the PRA-0 and AM cohorts was similar, whereas PRA-6/84 was significantly disadvantageous compared to PRA-0. Estimated 10-year incidence of antibody-mediated rejection rates was significantly lower in the PRA-0 group compared to AM and PRA-6/84 groups. Compared to the AM group, estimated incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) was significantly lower in PRA-0 patients, with no differences between the AM and PRA-6/84 cohorts. The PRA-6/84 cohort was the only subgroup in which interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) induction was associated with longer overall graft survival, patient survival, and graft survival compared to depleting induction (ATG or OKT3). Broad HLA-A, -B, -DR mismatches (mmABDR) and HLA epitope mismatches determined by Eplets and PIRCHE-II were predictive for dnDSA formation in the total cohort, and the AM subgroup. Discussion: The high efforts expended on AM patients are justified to allow timely organ transplantation with acceptable risk profile and non-inferior outcomes. IL2RA induction in intermediately sensitized patients is associated with superior overall graft survival, patient survival, and graft survival compared to ATG/OKT3 induction, without negative effects on rejection episodes or dnDSA formation. In silico epitope matching might further help reduce dnDSA formation, particularly in high-risk AM patients.

Successful Desensitization with Imlifidase and Daratumumab in a Highly Immunized, Crossmatch Positive, Blood Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Re-Transplant Recipient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Syndrome.

Introduction: The transplantation of highly sensitized patients remains a major obstacle. Immunized patients wait longer for a transplant if not prioritized, and if transplanted, their transplant outcome is worse. Case Presentation: We report a successful AB0- and HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in a 35-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient had a positive T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and previous graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis. We treated the patient with intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, daratumumab, and imlifidase, besides standard immunosuppression. All IgG antibodies were sensitive to imlifidase treatment. Besides donor-specific HLA antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies were cleaved. The patient initially had delayed graft function. Two kidney biopsies (day 7 and day 14) revealed acute tubular necrosis without signs of HLA antibody-mediated rejection. On posttransplant day 30, hemodialysis was stopped, and creatinine levels declined over the next weeks to a baseline creatinine of about 1.7 mg/dL after 12 months. Conclusion: In this case, a novel multimodal treatment strategy including daratumumab and imlifidase enabled successful kidney transplantation for a highly immunized patient with antiphospholipid antibodies.

Glucometabolism in Kidney Transplant Recipients with and without Posttransplant Diabetes: Focus on Beta-Cell Function.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication after kidney transplantation. Pathophysiologically, whether beta-cell dysfunction rather than insulin resistance may be the predominant defect in PTDM has been a matter of debate. The aim of the present analysis was to compare glucometabolism in kidney transplant recipients with and without PTDM. To this aim, we included 191 patients from a randomized controlled trial who underwent oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) 6 months after transplantation. We derived several basic indices of beta-cell function and insulin resistance as well as variables from mathematical modeling for a more robust beta-cell function assessment. Mean ± standard deviation of the insulin sensitivity parameter PREDIM was 3.65 ± 1.68 in PTDM versus 5.46 ± 2.57 in NON-PTDM. Model-based glucose sensitivity (indicator of beta-cell function) was 68.44 ± 57.82 pmol∙min-1∙m-2∙mM-1 in PTDM versus 143.73 ± 112.91 pmol∙min-1∙m-2∙mM-1 in NON-PTDM, respectively. Both basic indices and model-based parameters of beta-cell function were more than 50% lower in patients with PTDM, indicating severe beta-cell impairment. Nonetheless, some defects in insulin sensitivity were also present, although less marked. We conclude that in PTDM, the prominent defect appears to be beta-cell dysfunction. From a pathophysiological point of view, patients at high risk for developing PTDM may benefit from intensive treatment of hyperglycemia over the insulin secretion axis.

Investigating the Impact of AI on Shared Decision-Making in Post-Kidney Transplant Care (PRIMA-AI): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients after kidney transplantation eventually face the risk of graft loss with the concomitant need for dialysis or retransplantation. Choosing the right kidney replacement therapy after graft loss is an important preference-sensitive decision for kidney transplant recipients. However, the rate of conversations about treatment options after kidney graft loss has been shown to be as low as 13% in previous studies. It is unknown whether the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk prediction models can increase the number of conversations about treatment options after graft loss and how this might influence the associated shared decision-making (SDM). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the impact of AI-based risk prediction for the risk of graft loss on the frequency of conversations about the treatment options after graft loss, as well as the associated SDM process. METHODS: This is a 2-year, prospective, randomized, 2-armed, parallel-group, single-center trial in a German kidney transplant center. All patients will receive the same routine post-kidney transplant care that usually includes follow-up visits every 3 months at the kidney transplant center. For patients in the intervention arm, physicians will be assisted by a validated and previously published AI-based risk prediction system that estimates the risk for graft loss in the next year, starting from 3 months after randomization until 24 months after randomization. The study population will consist of 122 kidney transplant recipients >12 months after transplantation, who are at least 18 years of age, are able to communicate in German, and have an estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with multi-organ transplantation, or who are not able to communicate in German, as well as underage patients, cannot participate. For the primary end point, the proportion of patients who have had a conversation about their treatment options after graft loss is compared at 12 months after randomization. Additionally, 2 different assessment tools for SDM, the CollaboRATE mean score and the Control Preference Scale, are compared between the 2 groups at 12 months and 24 months after randomization. Furthermore, recordings of patient-physician conversations, as well as semistructured interviews with patients, support persons, and physicians, are performed to support the quantitative results. RESULTS: The enrollment for the study is ongoing. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in 2025. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the influence of AI-based risk prediction on physician-patient interaction in the context of kidney transplantation. We use a mixed methods approach by combining a randomized design with a simple quantitative end point (frequency of conversations), different quantitative measurements for SDM, and several qualitative research methods (eg, records of physician-patient conversations and semistructured interviews) to examine the implementation of AI-based risk prediction in the clinic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06056518; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06056518. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/54857.

Fixed low dose versus concentration-controlled initial tacrolimus dosing with reduced target levels in the course after kidney transplantation: results from a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial (Slow & Low study).

Background: Optimal initial tacrolimus dosing and early exposure of tacrolimus after renal transplantation is not well studied. Methods: In this open-label, 6 months, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority study, we randomly assigned 432 renal allograft recipients to receive basiliximab induction, mycophenolate and steroids and either standard prolonged-release tacrolimus (trough levels: 7-9 ng/ml; Standard Care arm), or an initial 7-day fixed 5 mg/day dose of prolonged-release tacrolimus followed by lower tacrolimus predose levels (trough levels: 5-7 ng/ml; Slow & Low arm). The primary end point was the combined incidence rate of biopsy-proven acute rejections (BPAR; including borderline), graft failure, or death at 6 months with a non-inferiority margin of 12.5%. (EudraCT-Nr: 2013-001770-19. Findings: The combined primary endpoint in the Slow & Low arm was non-inferior compared to the Standard Care arm (22.1% versus 20.7%; difference: 1.4%, 90% CI -5.5% to 8.3%). The overall rate of BPAR including borderlines was similar (Slow & Low 17.4% versus Standard Care 16.6%). Safety parameters such as delayed graft function, kidney function, donor specific HLA-antibodies, infections, or post-transplantation diabetes mellitus did not differ. Interpretation: This is the first study to show that an initial fixed dose of 5 mg per day followed by lower tacrolimus exposure is non-inferior compared to standard tacrolimus therapy and equally efficient and safe within 6 months after renal transplantation. These data suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring for prolonged release tacrolimus can be abandoned until start of the second week after transplantation. Funding: Investigator-initiated trial, financial support by Astellas Pharma GmbH.

Long-Term Outcome after Early Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Background: The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORis) in kidney transplantation increases the risk of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody formation and rejection. Here, we investigated the long-term consequences of early mTORi treatment compared to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment. Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis, key outcome parameters were compared between patients participating in randomized controlled immunosuppression trials between 1998 and 2011, with complete follow-up until 2018. The outcomes of eligible patients on a CNI-based regimen (n = 384) were compared with those of patients randomized to a CNI-free mTORi-based regimen (n = 81) and 76 patients randomized to a combination of CNI and mTORi treatments. All data were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Results: Deviation from randomized immunosuppression for clinical reasons occurred significantly more often and much earlier in both mTORi-containing regimens than in the CNI treatment. Overall patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival did not differ between the treatment groups. Donor-specific HLA antibody formation and BPARs were significantly more common in both mTORi regimens than in the CNI-based immunosuppression. Conclusions: The tolerability and efficacy of the mTORi treatment in kidney graft recipients are inferior to those of CNI-based immunosuppression, while the long-term patient and graft survival rates were similar.

Continuous Insulin Therapy to Prevent Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale & Objectives: Hyperglycemia is frequently observed early after transplantation and associated with development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Here, we assessed continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) targeting afternoon hyperglycemia. Study Design: Open-label randomized parallel 3-arm design. Settings & Participants: In total, 85 kidney transplant recipients without previous diabetes diagnosis were randomized to postoperative CSII therapy, basal insulin, or control. Interventions: Insulin was to be initiated at afternoon capillary blood glucose level of ≥140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L; CSII and basal insulin) or fasting plasma glucose level of ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L; control). Outcomes: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at 3 months post-transplant (primary endpoint). PTDM assessed using oral glucose tolerance test at 12 and 24 months. Results: CSII therapy lasted until median day 18 and maximum day 88. The median HbA1c value at month 3 was 5.6% (38 mmol/mol) in the CSII group versus 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) in the control group (P = 0.70) and 5.4% (36 mmol/mol) in the basal insulin group (P = 0.02). At months 12 and 24, the odds for PTDM were similar compared with the control group (odds ratios [95% confidence intervals], 0.80 [0.18-3.49] and 0.71 [0.15-3.16], respectively) and the basal insulin group (0.96 [0.18-5.68] and 1.51 [0.24-12.84], respectively). Mild hypoglycemia events occurred in the CSII and the basal insulin groups. Limitations: This study is limited by outdated insulin pump technology, frequent discontinuations of CSII, a complex protocol, and concerns regarding reliability of HbA1c measurements. Conclusions: CSII therapy was not superior at reducing HbA1c levels at month 3 or PTDM prevalence at months 12 and 24 compared with the control or basal insulin group.