Anticoagulation following mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Anticoagulation after mitral valve repair is controversial and guidelines are not well-established. This study evaluated the association between postoperative warfarin use and complications after mitral valve repair, including bleeding and thromboembolic incidents, readmission, and mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated 1097 patients who underwent elective mitral valve repair between April 2003 and March 2017, and was naïve to atrial fibrillation or prior cardiac surgery. This cohort had no other indication for or against anticoagulation. About 775 patients were placed on warfarin with international normalized ratio goal 2.5 and 322 patients were not anticoagulated. The association between anticoagulation and complications was assessed with univariate comparisons between groups and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Postoperative warfarin use was associated with a reduced composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (pulmonary embolism, TIA, stroke, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, gastrointestinal bleeding, and reoperation for bleeding) with an odds ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.64, P = .003). There was no difference in 30-day or 6-month mortality or readmission rate between groups. Long-term survival estimates were superior in the warfarin group (10-year: 92% vs 85%; log-rank P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that postoperative warfarin use was associated with an overall reduced composite of bleeding and thromboembolic incidents and superior long-term survival. These findings suggest that anticoagulation with warfarin following mitral valve repair may be a safe and effective means for avoiding postoperative complications and that a large prospective randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair Restores Life Expectancy.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair (MVr) for severe, degenerative mitral regurgitation is the gold standard, because medical management carries poor prognosis. However, despite clear benefit of MVr, many eligible patients are untreated. This study investigated whether MVr restores patients to normal life expectancy, at any age of operation, by comparing long-term survival of patients after MVr with the life expectancy of the general United States population. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated 1011 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated MVr between 2003 and 2017. Parametric distribution analysis was applied to long-term post-MVr mortality data, and Weibull probability plots provided the best-fit distribution by Anderson-Darling Goodness-of-Fit testing. Confidence intervals of the estimated distribution were used to compare additional life expectancy after MVr to the general US population across multiple decades of life. Patients after MVr were categorized by age into decade (range, 20-89 years). RESULTS: The life expectancy of patients after MVr matched the life expectancy of the general US population at any age between 40 and 89 years. Lower-bound one-sided 95% confidence intervals for additional life expectancy were not appreciably different from corresponding median additional life expectancy of the general population. There were few deaths in the 20- to 39-year-old group, limiting predictability, but survival also appeared normative. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that degenerative MVr restores anticipated life expectancy to that of the general population, regardless of age. Although our findings underscore the importance of repair for degenerative mitral disease, larger studies with longer term follow-up are needed to reinforce this finding, particularly for younger patients.