An Evaluation of Racial Diversity in Craniofacial Surgery Literature.

ABSTRACT: Implicit bias can lead to discrimination of certain populations within healthcare. Representation in medical literature is no exception and it is hypothesized that images with lighter skin tone are more prevalent than darker skin tones in craniofacial literature. Clinical photographs and figure graphics from 5 journals were examined for pre-defined years. Annals of Plastic Surgery, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journals were reviewed. All craniofacial-focused articles containing at least one color image depicting human skin were included. 10,477 images and 627 graphics were evaluated using the Fitzpatrick scale as a guide. Most journals trended toward broader inclusion of nonwhite photographs and graphics over time. In 2016, 47% of articles published in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery included nonwhite images compared to Annals of Plastic Surgery (16%), Aesthetic Surgery Journal (40%), Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (25%), and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (7%). Comparison of domestic and international publications demonstrated that author's country of origin impacted the percentage of nonwhite clinical photographs for most journals. Comparisons of publications by country demonstrated increased diversity in Asia and the Middle East for clinical photographs but not graphics. The frequency of nonwhite figure graphics was staggeringly low, identified in only 18 articles across all journals and years. Craniofacial literature more commonly reflects white skin tones. The trend over time suggests increasing inclusion of racial diversity in clinical photographs; however, figure graphics remain less racially diverse. Time, country of origin, and publishing journal appear to play a role.

Underrepresentation of Racial Minorities in Breast Surgery Literature: A Call for Increased Diversity and Inclusion.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the extent of racial diversity in images of breast-related plastic surgery published literature was investigated to better understand disparities that exist in breast surgery. BACKGROUND: The lack of racial diversity in images of skin color in surgery literature can perpetuate implicit bias and stereotypes. Implicit bias can affect the way patients are evaluated, diagnosed, and treated. The visual aspects of plastic surgery make a lack of diversity in imagery especially impactful on patient care and outcomes. METHODS: Published medical images and graphics depicting human skin were analyzed across 4 major plastic surgery journals. Up to 4 years were chosen a priori to evaluate from each journal and represented the initial year of color image publication, the year of study initiation (2016), and representative years for a given decade (2000 and 2010). Images and graphics were tabulated, rated by Fitzpatrick scale and categorized into "White" or "non-White." Data were evaluated with pair-wise and linear regression statistics. RESULTS: Of the 2774 images and 353 graphics that met inclusion criteria, only 184 (8.18%) images and 9 graphics (6.34%) depicted non-White skin. Temporal analysis showed that there is an increased diversity of images published since 2010 with 0% of images being non-White before and 7.3% to 10.3% after 2010. International and multi-national authors tended to publish more non-White images. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient racial diversity visually represented in the breast-related plastic surgery literature with a small degree of progress made towards more equitable imagery over time. Increasing awareness of image content, and the need for equitable visual representation may allow for improved racial diversity in surgical literature.

Patient Representation in Medical Literature: Are We Appropriately Depicting Diversity?

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities exist in the accessibility, delivery, and quality of healthcare. Clinical images are central to plastic surgery, but choice of images in the literature is susceptible to implicit biases. The objective of this study was to determine if published images reflect the racial demographic of patients. METHODS: A search for color photographs and rendered graphics depicting human skin was completed in 6 plastic surgery journals and the New England Journal of Medicine Images in Clinical Medicine for each decade between 1992 and 2017. For each article, images were categorized as white or nonwhite based on Fitzpatrick Scale (1-3 versus 4-6). Additionally, the authors' geographic region was documented. Proportional data and average number of nonwhite images per article were compared. Regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation of time and geographic region on nonwhite images. RESULTS: In total, 24,209 color photographs and 1,671 color graphics were analyzed. In plastic surgery journals, 22% of photographs were nonwhite and the average number of photographs per article with white skin was 5.4 compared with 1.6 with nonwhite skin (P < 0.0001). There was a significant increase in nonwhite photographs over time (r = 0.086, P < 0.001) and association of nonwhite photographs with international authors (r = 0.12, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Roughly 60%-70% of the world population and 30% of US cosmetic patients are nonwhite. Images in plastic surgery literature reflect neither racial demographics by global region nor the patient population seeking surgery. To advance equitable care, images should better represent the racial composition of the populations served.