Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose oral combination of pyronaridine-artesunate compared with artemether-lumefantrine in children and adults with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for new artemisinin-based combination therapies that are convenient, effective, and safe. We compared the efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate with that of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated P falciparum malaria. METHODS: This phase 3, parallel-group, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial was undertaken in seven sites in Africa and three sites in southeast Asia. In a double-dummy design, patients aged 3-60 years with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive pyronaridine-artesunate once a day or artemether-lumefantrine twice a day, orally for 3 days, plus respective placebo. Randomisation was done by computer-generated randomisation sequence in blocks of nine by study centre. Intervention tablets contained 180 mg pyronaridine and 60 mg artesunate; control tablets contained 20 mg artemether and 120 mg lumefantrine. Both treatments were given according to bodyweight. The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) rate at day 28 in the per-protocol population. Non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference between groups was greater than -5%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00422084. FINDINGS: 1272 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (pyronaridine-artesunate, n=849; artemether-lumefantrine, n=423). The per-protocol population consisted of 784 patients in the pyronaridine-artesunate group and 386 patients in the artemether-lumefantrine group. PCR-corrected ACPR rate at day 28 was 99.5% (780 patients; 95% CI 98.7-99.9) in the pyronaridine-artesunate group and 99.2% (383 patients; 95% CI 97.7-99.8) in the artemether-lumefantrine group (treatment difference 0.3%, 95% CI -0.7 to 1.8; p=0.578). There were 509 (60.0%) adverse events in 849 patients assigned to pyronaridine-artesunate and 241 (57.0%) in 423 patients assigned to artemether-lumefantrine. The most frequent drug-related adverse event was eosinophilia (pyronaridine-artesunate, 53 events [6.2%]; artemether-lumefantrine 24 events [5.7%]). 21 (2.5%) patients in the pyronaridine-artesunate group and seven (1.7%) in the artemether-lumefantrine group discontinued study drugs or were withdrawn from the study. Mild and transient increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations were seen in the pyronaridine-artesunate group but not in the artemether-lumefantrine group. INTERPRETATION: Efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate was non-inferior to that of artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Pyronaridine-artesunate should be considered for inclusion in malaria treatment programmes. FUNDING: Shin Poong Pharmaceutical and the Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Pharmacokinetics of sequential and simultaneous treatment with the combination chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in the Philippines.

The efficacy and kinetics of the combination chloroquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (CQ + SP), given sequentially and simultaneously, were investigated in 32 patients with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Palawan Island, the Philippines. Group 1 with 11 patients received oral CQ 25 mg/kg bw over 3 days followed by a single dose of SP (three tablets 250 mg S + 25 mg P) on Day 4 (CQ0 + SP4). Group 2 with 21 patients received a loading dose of CQ 10 mg/kg plus a single dose of SP three tablets on Day 0, and doses of CQ on Days 1 and 2 (CQ0 + SP0). Patients were followed-up for 28 days until after the clinical and parasitological remission of the disease. Serum samples for CQ, des-ethylchloroquine (DCQ), S and P levels were assayed by high-pressure liquid chromatography with UV and spectrofluorometric detection (HPLC-SF) to determine effective therapeutic concentrations achieved. Parasite and fever clearance times (PCT and FCT) in Group 1 were 48 and 33.5 h, respectively, and 39 and 24 h in Group 2. The parasite elimination half-life (pt1/2) in the CQ + SP0 group was 2.5 h, significantly shorter than the CQ + SP4 group of 5.7 h (P=0.006). Late-treatment failures (R I) were observed in 2/11 patients in Group 1 and in 2/21 patients in Group 2. Serum CQ and DCQ concentrations were effectively adequate. Group 1 pharmacokinetic parameters showed a median maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t1/2) of 285 ng/ml, 2299 day ng/ml and 5.7 days for CQ, and 89 ng/ml 1845 day ng/ml and 7.3 days for DCQ, respectively. SP was not assayed in Group 1 because of very limited time points. In Group 2, the median Cmax, AUC and t1/2 for CQ and DCQ were at 283 ng/ml 1980 day ng/ml and 5.9 days for CQ and 220 ng/ml, 2680 day ng/ml and 8.5 days for DCQ, respectively. For S and P, the median Cmax, AUC and t1/2 were at 169 microg/ml, 2758 day ng/ml and 10.9 days for sulfadoxine, and 591 ng/ml, 3029 day ng/ml and 2.9 days for pyrimethamine, respectively. Both regimens were well tolerated with a minimum of side-effects, mainly nausea and vomiting. The combination CQ + SP administered simultaneously on Day 0 is more efficacious than when administered sequentially. In the absence of an alternative treatment for acute uncomplicated malaria, this combination is well tolerated, and has an advantage over CQ or SP monotherapy, especially in countries where one drug is still highly effective.