Multiplex pyrosequencing assay using AdvISER-MH-PYRO algorithm: a case for rapid and cost-effective genotyping analysis of prostate cancer risk-associated SNPs.

BACKGROUND: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have generally moderate association with related complex diseases. Accordingly, Multilocus Genetic Risk Scores (MGRSs) have been computed in previous studies in order to assess the cumulative association of multiple SNPs. When several SNPs have to be genotyped for each patient, using successive uniplex pyrosequencing reactions increases analytical reagent expenses and Turnaround Time (TAT). While a set of several pyrosequencing primers could theoretically be used to analyze multiplex amplicons, this would generate overlapping primer-specific pyro-signals that are visually uninterpretable. METHODS: In the current study, two multiplex assays were developed consisting of a quadruplex (n=4) and a quintuplex (n=5) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) each followed by multiplex pyrosequencing analysis. The aim was to reliably but rapidly genotype a set of prostate cancer-related SNPs (n=9). The nucleotide dispensation order was selected using SENATOR software. Multiplex pyro-signals were analyzed using the new AdvISER-MH-PYRO software based on a sparse representation of the signal. Using uniplex assays as gold standard, the concordance between multiplex and uniplex assays was assessed on DNA extracted from patient blood samples (n = 10). RESULTS: All genotypes (n=90) generated with the quadruplex and the quintuplex pyroquencing assays were perfectly (100 %) concordant with uniplex pyrosequencing. Using multiplex genotyping approach for analyzing a set of 90 patients allowed reducing TAT by approximately 75 % (i.e., from 2025 to 470 min) while reducing reagent consumption and cost by approximately 70 % (i.e., from ~229 US$ /patient to ~64 US$ /patient). CONCLUSIONS: This combination of quadruplex and quintuplex pyrosequencing and PCR assays enabled to reduce the amount of DNA required for multi-SNP analysis, and to lower the global TAT and costs of SNP genotyping while providing results as reliable as uniplex analysis. Using this combined multiplex approach also substantially reduced the production of waste material. These genotyping assays appear therefore to be biologically, economically and ecologically highly relevant, being worth to be integrated in genetic-based predictive strategies for better selecting patients at risk for prostate cancer. In addition, the same approach could now equally be transposed to other clinical/research applications relying on the computation of MGRS based on multi-SNP genotyping.

Comparative pharmacogenetic analysis of risk polymorphisms in Caucasian and Vietnamese children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prediction of therapeutic outcome?

AIMS: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common of all paediatric cancers. Aside from predisposing to ALL, polymorphisms could also be associated with poor outcome. Indeed, genetic variations involved in drug metabolism could, at least partially, be responsible for heterogeneous responses to standardized leukemia treatments, hence requiring more personalized therapy. The aims of this study were to (a) to determine the prevalence of seven common genetic polymorphisms including those that affect the folate and/or thiopurine metabolic pathways, i.e. cyclin D1 (CCND1-G870A), γ-glutamyl hydrolase (GGH-C452T), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR-C677T and MTHFR-A1298C), thymidylate synthase promoter (TYMS-TSER), thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT*3A and TPMT*3C) and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA-C94A), in Caucasian (n = 94, age < 20) and Vietnamese (n = 141, age < 16 years) childhood ALL and (b) to assess the impact of a multilocus genetic risk score (MGRS) on relapse-free survival (RFS) using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: The prevalence of MTHFR-677TT genotype was significantly higher in Caucasians (P = 0.008), in contrast to the prevalence of TYMS-TSER*3R/3R and ITPA-94AA/AC genotypes which were significantly higher in Vietnamese (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). Compared with children with a low MGRS (≤ 3), those with a high MGRS (≥ 4) were 2.06 (95% CI = 1.01, 4.22; P = 0.04) times more likely to relapse. Adding MGRS into a multivariate Cox regression model with race/ethnicity and four clinical variables improved the predictive accuracy of the model (AUC from 0.682 to 0.709 at 24 months). CONCLUSION: Including MGRS into a clinical model improved the predictive accuracy of short and medium term prognosis, hence confirming the association between well determined pharmacogenotypes and outcome of paediatric ALL. Whether variants on other genes associated with folate metabolism can substantially improve the predictive value of current MGRS is not known but deserves further evaluation.

Does genotyping of risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms improve patient selection for prostate biopsy when combined with a prostate cancer risk calculator?

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with higher risk of prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to evaluate whether published SNPs improve the performance of a clinical risk-calculator in predicting prostate biopsy result. METHODS: Three hundred forty-six patients with a previous prostate biopsy (191 positive, 155 negative) were enrolled. After literature search, nine SNPs were selected for their statistically significant association with increased PCa risk. Allelic odds ratios were computed and a new logistic regression model was built integrating the clinical risk score (i.e., prior biopsy results, PSA level, prostate volume, transrectal ultrasound, and digital rectal examination) and a multilocus genetic risk score (MGRS). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) of the clinical score alone versus the integrated clinic-genetic model were compared. The added value of the MGRS was assessed using the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) statistics. RESULTS: Predictive performance of the integrated clinico-genetic model (AUC = 0.781) was slightly higher than predictive performance of the clinical score alone (AUC = 0.770). The prediction of PCa was significantly improved with an IDI of 0.015 (P-value = 0.035) and a continuous NRI of 0.403 (P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive performance of the clinical model was only slightly improved by adding MGRS questioning the real clinical added value with regards to the cost of genetic testing and performance of current inexpensive clinical risk-calculators.

Practical guide to bone health in the spectrum of advanced prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the advanced stage of prostate cancer, bone is consistently the first and, later on, the dominant extra-nodal metastatic site. Bone metastases account for most of prostate cancer's morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have performed a literature review using the MEDLINE database for publications on: 1) bone metastases (androgen deprivation therapy); 2) cancer treatment induce bone loss; 3) skeletal related events; 4) denosumab; 5) zoledronic acid. RESULTS: Prostate cancer cells disrupt the normal bone remodeling process, invade the skeletal environment, and ultimately weaken the bone structure. This may result in skeletal complications, also known as skeletal related events (SREs), including pain, fractures, spinal cord compressions requiring surgery, radiotherapy or change in anti-cancer treatments. SREs negatively impact quality-of-life and survival and represent a major cost for the healthcare system. The bone metastases conundrum is further aggravated by the fact that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the reference systemic treatment of advanced prostate cancer, profoundly affects the skeletal integrity as well. ADT accelerates the physiological bone resorption, leading to osteoporosis and fragility fractures. CONCLUSION: The concept of "bone health" or "skeletal heath" refers to the diagnostic, prevention, and treatment of cancer treatment induced bone loss (CTIBL) and metastasis, and their respective complications, osteoporotic fractures and SREs.