Does E-learning Facilitate Medical Education in Pediatric Neurology?

BACKGROUND: E-learning has become commonplace in medical education. Incorporation of multimedia, clinical cases, and interactive elements has increased its attractiveness over textbooks. Although there has been an expansion of e-learning in medicine, the feasibility of e-learning in pediatric neurology is unclear. This study evaluates knowledge acquisition and satisfaction using pediatric neurology e-learning compared to conventional learning. METHODS: Residents of Canadian pediatrics, neurology, and pediatric neurology programs and medical students from Queens University, Western University, and the University of Ottawa were invited to participate. Learners were randomly assigned two review papers and two ebrain modules in a four-topic crossover design. Participants completed pre-tests, experience surveys, and post-tests. We calculated the median change in score from pre-test to post-test and constructed a mixed-effects model to determine the effect of variables on post-test scores. RESULTS: In total, 119 individuals participated (53 medical students; 66 residents). Ebrain had a larger positive change than review papers in post-test score from pre-test score for the pediatric stroke learning topic but a smaller positive change for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, childhood absence epilepsy, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Learning topics showed statistical relationship to post-test scores (p = 0.04). Depending on topic, 57-92% (N = 59-66) of respondents favored e-learning over review article learning. CONCLUSIONS: Ebrain users scored higher on post-tests than review paper users. However, the effect is small and it is unclear if it is educationally meaningful. Although the difference in scores may not be substantially different, most learners preferred e-learning. Future projects should focus on improving the quality and efficacy of e-learning modules.

Referral practices for epilepsy surgery in pediatric patients: A North American Study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with epilepsy who do not respond to two trials of appropriate antiepileptic drugs are considered to have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The International League Against Epilepsy recommends patients with DRE be referred for surgical evaluation; however, prior literature suggests this is an underutilized intervention, especially in the pediatric setting. This study captures practices of North American pediatric neurologists regarding the management of DRE and factors that may promote or limit referrals for epilepsy surgical evaluation. METHODS: A REDCap survey was distributed via the Child Neurology Society mailing list to pediatric neurologists practicing in North America. Ethics approval from the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board was granted prior to the start of data collection. RESULTS: Ninety-eight responses were included in the analysis; 77% of participants currently practice in the United States; 73.5% of respondents reported they would refer a patient for surgical consultation after two failed medications. Of all potential predictors tested in a binary logistic regression model, only annual referral volume predicted whether participants refer patients after three or more failed medications. Centers with high referral volume were 37% more likely to adhere to the guideline of referral after two failed medications. SIGNIFICANCE: Pediatric neurologists demonstrate fair knowledge of formal recommendations to refer patients for surgical evaluation after two failed medication trials, although referral rates remain unacceptably low. Participants continue to report that they would not refer patients with generalized electroencephalographic findings for surgical evaluation; this should continue to be addressed. Other modifiable factors reported, especially family perceptions of epilepsy surgery, should be prioritized when developing tools to enhance effective referrals and increase utilization of epilepsy surgery in the management of pediatric DRE.

Continuous Electroencephalography Monitoring for Critically Ill Neonates: A Canadian Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Continuous EEG monitoring, in the form of amplitude-integrated (aEEG) or conventional EEG (cEEG), is used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to detect subclinical central nervous system pathologies, inform management, and prognosticate neurodevelopmental outcomes. To learn more about provider attitudes and current practices in Canada, we evaluated neurologist and neonatologist opinions regarding NICU EEG monitoring. METHODS: A 15-item electronic questionnaire was distributed to 114 pediatric neurologists and 176 neonatologists working across 25 sites. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 87 of 290 physicians. Continuous EEG monitoring is utilized by 97% of pediatric neurologists and 92% of neonatologists. Neurologists and neonatologists differ in their EEG monitoring preferences. For seizure detection and diagnosis of encephalopathy, significantly more neonatologists favor aEEG alone or in combination with cEEG, whereas most neurologists prefer cEEG (p = 0.047, 0.001). There is a significant difference in the perceived gaps in monitoring patients with cEEG between neonatologists (13% would monitor more) and neurologists (41% would monitor more) (p = 0.007). Half of all respondents (53%) reported that they would be interested in attending an education session on neonatal EEG monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian neurologists and neonatologists do not agree on the best monitoring approach for critically ill neonates. Furthermore, neonatologists perceive a smaller cEEG monitoring gap as compared with neurologists. However, many participants from both specialties would like to increase long-term EEG monitoring in the NICU setting. Facilitating access to EEG monitoring and enhancing education may help to address these needs.

La surveillance continue par électroencéphalographie dans le cas de nouveau-nés gravement malades : une perspective canadienne. Contexte: La surveillance continue par électroencéphalographie (EEG), que ce soit à amplitude intégrée (EEGai) ou conventionnelle (EEGc), est utilisée dans les unités de soins intensifs néonatals (USIN) afin de détecter des pathologies sous-cliniques du système nerveux central, de fournir des indications en matière de prise en charge et d'établir des pronostics quant à l'évolution neuro-développementale de ces nouveau-nés. Afin d'en savoir plus au sujet des attitudes des prestataires de soins et des pratiques actuelles dans ce domaine au Canada, nous avons cherché à évaluer les points de vue de neurologues et de néonatologistes en ce qui regarde la surveillance continue par EEG dans les USIN. Méthodes: Un questionnaire en ligne abordant 15 aspects a été envoyé à 114 neuro-pédiatres et à 176 néonatologistes travaillant dans 25 établissements différents. Résultats: Ce sondage a été complété par 87 médecins sur 290. Il en ressort que la surveillance continue par EEG est utilisée par 97 % des neuro-pédiatres et par 92 % des néonatologistes. Cela dit, les neuro-pédiatres et les néonatologistes n'ont pas les mêmes préférences quant à l'utilisation de cet examen. Quand il s'agit de détecter des crises convulsives et de diagnostiquer des cas d'encéphalopathie, on remarque qu'un nombre nettement plus élevé de néonatologistes favorisent la seule EEGai ou la combinent avec la EEGc tandis que davantage de neurologues ont dit préférer la seule EEGc (p = 0,047 ; p = 0,001). Qui plus est, on peut dénoter une différence notable entre les néonatologistes et les neurologues en ce qui a trait aux écarts perçus de surveillance des patients au moyen de la EEGc, 13 % des premiers assurant une surveillance supérieure alors qu'ils sont 41 % parmi les deuxièmes à assurer une surveillance supérieure (p = 0,007). Enfin, plus de la moitié des répondants (53 %) ont affirmé être intéressés à assister à des séances de formation portant sur la surveillance continue par EEG destinée aux nouveau-nés. Conclusions: Les neurologues et les néonatologistes canadiens divergent quant à la meilleure approche de surveillance dans le cas de nouveau-nés gravement malades. En outre, les néonatologistes ont tendance à percevoir un écart de surveillance moins important si on les compare aux neurologues. Néanmoins, nombreux sont les répondants formés dans ces deux spécialités qui souhaiteraient augmenter à long terme la surveillance par EEG dans les USIN. Le fait de faciliter l'accès à ces examens et d'améliorer l'enseignement pourrait ainsi permettre de répondre aux besoins.

Combined Conventional and Amplitude-Integrated EEG Monitoring in Neonates: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Seizure monitoring via amplitude-integrated EEG is standard of care in many neonatal intensive care units; however, conventional EEG is the gold standard for seizure detection. We compared the diagnostic yield of amplitude-integrated EEG interpreted at the bedside, amplitude-integrated EEG interpreted by an expert, and conventional EEG. METHODS: Neonates requiring seizure monitoring received amplitude-integrated EEG and conventional EEG in parallel. Clinical events and amplitude-integrated EEG were interpreted at bedside. Subsequently, amplitude-integrated EEG and conventional EEG were independently analyzed by experienced neonatology and neurology readers. Sensitivity and specificity of bedside amplitude-integrated EEG as compared to expert amplitude-integrated EEG interpretation and conventional EEG were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen neonates were monitored for an average duration of 33 hours (range 15-94, SD 25). Fourteen seizure-like events were detected by clinical observation, and 12 others by bedside amplitude-integrated EEG analysis. One of the clinical, and none of the bedside amplitude-integrated EEG events were confirmed as seizures on conventional EEG. Post hoc expert amplitude-integrated EEG interpretation revealed eight suspected seizures, all different from the ones detected by the bedside amplitude-integrated EEG team, of which one was confirmed via conventional EEG. Eight seizures were recorded on conventional EEG. Expert amplitude-integrated EEG interpretation had a sensitivity of 13% with 46% specificity for individual seizure detection, and a sensitivity of 50% with 46% specificity for detecting patients with seizures. CONCLUSION: Real-world bedside amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring failed to detect all seizures evidenced via conventional EEG, while misclassifying other events as seizures. Even post hoc expert amplitude-integrated EEG interpretation provided limited sensitivity and specificity. Considering the poor sensitivity and specificity of bedside amplitude-integrated EEG interpretation, combined monitoring may provide limited clinical benefit.

Pointed rhythmic theta waves: a unique EEG pattern in KCNQ2-related neonatal epileptic encephalopathy.

We report the case of an infant with KCNQ2-related neonatal epileptic encephalopathy presenting with intractable seizures beginning on the second day of life, which were resistant to multiple antiepileptic drugs. Continuous EEG recordings starting on the sixth day of life demonstrated a unique pattern of inter-and postictal focal rhythmic pointed theta waves of lambdoid morphology in the immediate postictal period, localizing to the side of the antecedent seizure. Interictal EEG exhibited discontinuous background, including patterns of burst suppression and multifocal discharges, predominantly in the centrotemporal regions, which were aggravated during sleep. MRI demonstrated T1 signal abnormalities in the basal ganglia, bilaterally. Genetic testing revealed a de novo missense mutation in KCNQ2 at position c.545 T>G, encoding a previously unreported substitution (p.Val182Gly). Seizure control was achieved immediately after starting a lidocaine infusion at age 4 weeks. The patient remained largely seizure-free following add-on oral carbamazepine for maintenance therapy and weaning off lidocaine. This is the first report of a patient with KCNQ2-related neonatal epileptic encephalopathy and therapy-refractory seizures aborted by lidocaine, demonstrating a unique EEG pattern of inter- and postictal focal rhythmic pointed theta waves. Whether this pattern could be an early EEG marker for this disorder remains to be confirmed. [Published with video sequences on www.epilepticdisorders.com].