Factors Associated with Neonatal Arterial Hypertension: Case and Control Study.

Background. Neonatal high blood pressure has been diagnosed more frequently in recent years, and its impact extends to adulthood. However, the knowledge gaps on associated factors, diagnosis, and treatment are challenging for medical personnel. The incidence of this condition varies depending on neonatal conditions. Patients in the Newborn Unit are at increased risk of developing high blood pressure. The persistence of this condition beyond the neonatal stage increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease in childhood and adulthood. Methodology. A case-control study was carried out. It included hospitalized patients with neonatal hypertension as cases. Three controls were randomly selected for each case and matched by gestational age. The variables were analyzed based on their nature. Multivariate analysis was performed using a multivariate conditional regression model to identify variables associated with the outcome. Finally, the model was adjusted for possible confounders. Results. 37 cases were obtained and matched with 111 controls. In the univariate analysis, heart disease (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.22-6.71), kidney disease (OR 7.24; 95% CI 1.92-28.28), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR 6.62; 95% CI 1.42-50.82) and major surgical procedures (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.64-8.39) had an association with neonatal arterial hypertension. Only the latter maintained this finding in the multivariate analysis (adjusted OR 2.88; 95% CI 1.14-7.30). A significant association of two or more comorbidities with neonatal arterial hypertension was also found (OR 3.81; 95% CI 1.53-9.49). Conclusions. The study analyzed the factors related to high blood pressure in hospitalized neonates, finding relevant associations in the said population. The importance of meticulous neonatal care and monitoring of risk factors such as birth weight and major surgeries is highlighted.

Autosomic Dominant Tubulo Interstitial Kidney Disease: Case Report of a New Variant of the UMOD Gene.

Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD) is a low-prevalence pathology mainly associated with pathogenic variants of the UMOD gene. It is characterized by the progressive deterioration of renal function, associated with hyperuricemia and accompanied by a family history of gout or hyperuricemia. Often, clinical variability and a lack of molecular testing results in diagnostic failure to determine the ADTKD-UMOD association. Case presentation: We describe the case of a 14-year-old male who presented to the nephrology service with hyperuricemia, renal ultrasonographic changes, and progression to chronic kidney disease in 4 years. He had a family history of hyperuricemia. A probable genetic disease with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern was considered, confirmed by the presence of a probably pathogenic variant of the UMOD gene, not previously reported in the literature. Conclusion: The investigation of this case led to the identification of a new variant in the UMOD gene, broadening the spectrum of known variants for ADTKD-UMOD. In addition, in this case, a comprehensive anamnesis, that takes into account family history, was the key point to carry out genetic tests that confirmed the diagnosis suspicion. Directed Genetic tests are currently an essential diagnostic tool and should be performed as long as they are available and there is an indication to perform them.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento y seguimiento de personas con cáncer diferenciado de tiroides. Parte I: Vigilancia activa

Introducción: El cáncer de tiroides es una enfermedad frecuente en el mundo, con mayor prevalencia del tipo diferenciado. El diagnóstico temprano y manejo pertinente, individualizado y adaptable puede mejorar su pronóstico. Objetivo: Generar recomendaciones basadas en evidencia sobre el tratamiento y seguimiento de personas adultas con cáncer diferenciado de tiroides (CDT). Metodología: Guía de práctica clínica (GPC) a partir de revisión sistemática de literatura (RSL) y consenso de expertos clínicos. El grupo desarrollador definió el alcance y cuatro preguntas que se resolvieron a través de revisión de evidencia de GPC existentes, RSL, estudios primarios publicadas en español o inglés en diferentes fuentes de información desde 2013. Las preguntas de investigación fueron: 1. ¿Cuáles son las indicaciones de la vigilancia activa?, ¿cómo realizarla?, ¿cuándo y con que periodicidad realizarla? 2. ¿Cuál es el tratamiento y su indicación en pacientes con nódulos tiroideos sospechosos de cáncer? 3. ¿Cómo y cuándo realizar seguimiento de pacientes con CDT de acuerdo con el riesgo dinámico? 4. ¿Cuál es el manejo actual de los pacientes iodo refractarios? Se propusieron recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia, y analizadas y discutidas por el colectivo experto en sesiones asincrónicas. Se evalúo la calidad de la evidencia y las recomendaciones fueron gradadas en fuerte o condicional y a favor o en contra a partir del análisis de la calidad de la evidencia, contexto de implementación (disponibilidad e implementación) y la experticia clínica. En el presente documento se desarrollada la primera pregunta, referente a vigilancia activa. Resultados: 86 recomendaciones fueron propuestas y acordadas por el grupo desarrollador, categorizadas en tratamiento y seguimiento para resolver las preguntas planteadas. 10 de las recomendaciones corresponden a vigilancia activa y se incluyen en el presente documento. Recomendaciones claves incluyen, brindar información completa y oportuna a pacientes, conformación de equipos multidisciplinarios, análisis individualizado del paciente para la decisión de tratamiento, estadificación rutinaria de riesgo dinámico para evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento y ajustarlo, minimización de procedimientos fútiles o que aportan poco a la supervivencia y calidad de vida de los pacientes. Conclusión: Se presentan recomendaciones que esperan incidir en la estandarización de la práctica clínica cotidiana de pacientes con CDT y mejores resultados en salud.

Introduction: Thyroid cancer is a common disease in the world, with a higher prevalence of the differentiated type. Early diagnosis individualized and adaptive management can improve prognosis. Objective: Generate evidence-based recommendations on the treatment and follow-up of adults with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). Methodology: Clinical practice guideline (CPG) based on systematic literature review (RSL) and consensus of clinical experts. The development group defined the range and four questions that were resolved through a review of evidence from existing CPGs, RSLs, primary studies published in Spanish or English in various sources of information since 2013. The research questions were: 1. What are the indications for active surveillance? How to carry it out? When and how often to carry it out? 2. What is the treatment and its indication in patients with thyroid nodules suspicious for cancer? 3. How and when to follow up patients with CDT according to dynamic risk? 4. What is the current management of iodine refractory patients? Evidence-based recommendations analyzed and discussed by the expert group in asynchronous sessions were proposed. The quality of the evidence was evaluated, and the recommendations were graded as strong or conditional and in favor or against based on the analysis of the quality of the evidence, implementation context (availability and implementation) and clinical expertise. In this document, is developed the first question, referring to active surveillance. Results: 86 recommendations were proposed and agreed upon by the development group, categorized into treatment and follow-up to solve the questions raised. 10 of the recommendations correspond to active surveillance and are included in this document. Key recommendations include providing complete and timely information to patients, develop of multidisciplinary teams, individualized patient analysis for treatment decisions, routine dynamic risk staging to evaluate response to treatment and adjust it, minimization of futile procedures or that contribute little to the survival and quality of life of patients. Conclusion: Recommendations are presented that longs to influence the standardization of the daily clinical practice of patients with DTC and better health outcomes.

Consenso de expertos sobre recomendaciones basadas en evidencia para el diagnóstico, tratamiento y seguimiento de enfermedad de Fabry en pediatría / Expert Consensus on Evidence-Based Recommendations for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Fabry Disease in Pediatric Patients / Consenso de especialistas colombianos sobre recomendações baseadas em evidências para o diagnóstico, tratamento e acompanhamento da doença de Fabry em pediatria

Antecedentes: la enfermedad de Fabry (Ef) es una enfermedad rara ligada a X secundaria al depósito lisosomal de glicoesfingolípidos, debido a la deficiencia de la enzima alfa galactosidasa A (α-Gal A). A pesar de su baja frecuencia, es una condición que afecta la calidad de vida de los pacientes y disminuye su esperanza de vida. Objetivo: generar recomendaciones informadas para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos (menores de 18 años) con Ef. Material y Métodos: revisión de literatura en bases de datos y literatura gris a partir de 2010, incluyendo guías de práctica clínica, revisiones sistemáticas y estudios primarios. La calidad de evidencia se evaluó de acuerdo con el tipo. Las recomendaciones se sometieron a consenso de expertos a través de metodología Delphi modificada. El acuerdo se definió a partir del 80 %. Resultados: A partir del análisis de la evidencia recolectada se formularon un total de 45 recomendaciones para tamización, diagnóstico y tratamiento de paciente pediátrico con Ef. El panel revisor estuvo conformado por once expertos en el tema. Las recomendaciones fueron aprobadas con puntuaciones entre 82.3 % y 100 %. Conclusiones: las recomendaciones resultantes del consenso de expertos permitirán la toma de decisiones clínicas y estandarización de la práctica en la atención de pacientes pediátricos con Ef en el país y la región. El diagnóstico temprano y oportuno garantiza una disminución del impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y sus familiares

Background: Fabry disease (fD) is a rare X-linked disease characterized by the accumulation of glyco- sphingolipids in lysosomes due to the deficiency in the production of alpha-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) enzyme. Despite its low frequency, this disease has a serious impact on the life expectancy and quality. Objective: To make evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of fD in pediatric patients (<18 years of age). Materials and Methods: A study of databases and gray literature was conducted in 2010, including clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and primary research. The type of evidence was used to determine the quality of evidence. The recommendations were submitted to an expert consensus using the modified Delphi process. The agreement was set at 80%. Conclusions: The recommendations emerging from this expert consensus will enable the standardization of care provision for pediatric patients with fD in Colombia and Latin America and clinical decision-making for disease management. Notably, making an early diagnosis ensures a reduction in the impact of this disease on the quality of life of patients and their families

Fundamento: a doença de Fabry (Df) é uma rara doença ligada ao cromossomo X secundária à deposi- ção lisossômica de glicoesfingolipídeos devido à deficiência da enzima alfa galactosidase A (α-Gal A). Apesar de sua baixa frequência, é uma condição que afeta a qualidade de vida dos pacientes e diminui sua expectativa de vida. Objetivo: gerar recomendações baseadas em evidências para o diagnóstico e tratamento de pacientes pediátricos (com menos de 8 anos de idade) com Df. Materais e Métodos: foi realizada uma revisão da literatura em bases de dados e literatura cinza a partir de 2010, incluindo diretrizes de prática clínica, revisões sistemáticas e estudos primários. A qualidade da evidência foi avaliada de acordo com o tipo de evidência. As recomendações foram submetidas ao consenso de especialistas usando a metodologia Delphi modificada. A concordância foi definida a partir de 80%. Resultados: com base na análise das evidências coletadas, foram formuladas um total de 45 recomendações para triagem, diagnóstico e tratamento de pacientes pediátricos com doença de Fabry. O painel de revisão foi composto por onze especialistas no assunto. As recomendações foram aprovadas com pontuações entre 82,3% e 100%. Conclusões: as recomendações resultantes do consenso de especialistas permitirão a tomada de decisão clínica e a padronização da prática no cuidado de pacientes pediátricos com Df em nível nacional e regional; o diagnóstico precoce e oportuno garante a redução do impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes e seus familiares.

Consenso colombiano de expertos sobre recomendaciones informadas en la evidencia para la prevención, diagnóstico y manejo de la infección por SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 en paciente pediátrico con enfermedad renal crónica o lesión renal aguda asociada a COVID-19 / Colombian consensus of experts on evidence-informed recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 infection in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury associated with COVID-19

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Abstract Introduction: The numbers of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the pediatric population are low so far. There is limited information about the behavior of SARS-CoV-2 in a pediatric patient with chronic kidney disease. Objective: To formulate informed recommendations to the prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pediatric patients with kidney disease or acute kidney injury associated with COVID-19 in Colombia. Methodology: A rapid systematic review was performed in Embase and Pubmed databases and scientific societies, to answer questions prioritized by clinical experts in pediatric nephrology. The quality of the evidence was evaluated with validated tools according to the type of study. The preliminary recommendations were consulted by an expert group. The agreement was defined when approval was obtained from at least 70% of the experts consulted. Results: A response was obtained from ' 9 experts in pediatric nephrology in Colombia, who declared the conflict of interest before the consultation. The range of agreement for the recommendations ranged from 78.9% to '00%. The recommendations did not require a second consultation. Conclusion: The evidence-based recommendations for the management of a patient with kidney disease and COVID-19 in the Colombian context are presented.