Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
World J Emerg Surg ; 14: 8, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30858872

RESUMEN

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/etiología , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/prevención & control , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/tendencias , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Incidencia , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo
3.
World J Emerg Surg ; 13: 37, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140304

RESUMEN

Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of best practices of infection prevention and management, many surgeons worldwide fail to implement them. Evidence-based practices tend to be underused in routine practice. Surgeons with knowledge in surgical infections should provide feedback to prescribers and integrate best practices among surgeons and implement changes within their team. Identifying a local opinion leader to serve as a champion within the surgical department may be important. The "surgeon champion" can integrate best clinical practices of infection prevention and management, drive behavior change in their colleagues, and interact with both infection control teams in promoting antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cirujanos/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirujanos/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
4.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 34, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28775763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. RESULTS: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). CONCLUSION: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Salud Global/tendencias , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 29, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28702076

RESUMEN

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and have been reported as major contributors to non-trauma deaths in the emergency departments worldwide. The cornerstones of effective treatment of IAIs are early recognition, adequate source control, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Prompt resuscitation of patients with ongoing sepsis is of utmost important. In hospitals worldwide, non-acceptance of, or lack of access to, accessible evidence-based practices and guidelines result in overall poorer outcome of patients suffering IAIs. The aim of this paper is to promote global standards of care in IAIs and update the 2013 WSES guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.


Asunto(s)
Guías como Asunto , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/cirugía , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Traumatismos Abdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/cirugía , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Cirujanos/tendencias
6.
World J Emerg Surg ; 11: 33, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27429642

RESUMEN

Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are an important cause of morbidity and are frequently associated with poor prognosis, particularly in high-risk patients. The cornerstones in the management of complicated IAIs are timely effective source control with appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Empiric antimicrobial therapy is important in the management of intra-abdominal infections and must be broad enough to cover all likely organisms because inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy is associated with poor patient outcomes and the development of bacterial resistance. The overuse of antimicrobials is widely accepted as a major driver of some emerging infections (such as C. difficile), the selection of resistant pathogens in individual patients, and for the continued development of antimicrobial resistance globally. The growing emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms and the limited development of new agents available to counteract them have caused an impending crisis with alarming implications, especially with regards to Gram-negative bacteria. An international task force from 79 different countries has joined this project by sharing a document on the rational use of antimicrobials for patients with IAIs. The project has been termed AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections). The authors hope that AGORA, involving many of the world's leading experts, can actively raise awareness in health workers and can improve prescribing behavior in treating IAIs.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Cooperación Internacional , Infecciones Intraabdominales , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Humanos , Infecciones Intraabdominales/diagnóstico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pronóstico
7.
World J Emerg Surg ; 10: 38, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26300956

RESUMEN

In the last two decades there have been dramatic changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), with increases in incidence and severity of disease in many countries worldwide. The incidence of CDI has also increased in surgical patients. Optimization of management of C difficile, has therefore become increasingly urgent. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts prepared evidenced-based World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA