Group prenatal care for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: Preliminary evidence for acceptability and benefits compared with individual prenatal care.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of group prenatal care (G-PNC) compared with individual prenatal care (I-PNC) for women with opioid use disorder (OUD) is unknown. The objectives of this study were to (1) assess the acceptability of co-locating G-PNC at an opioid treatment program and (2) describe the maternal and infant characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women in treatment for OUD who participated in G-PNC and those who did not. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 71 women (G-PNC n = 15; I-PNC n = 56) who were receiving treatment for OUD from one center and who delivered in 2019. Acceptability was determined by assessing the representativeness of the G-PNC cohorts, examining attendance at sessions, and using responses to a survey completed by G-PNC participants. The receipt of health services and healthcare use, behaviors, and infant health between those who participated in G-PNC and those who received I-PNC were described. RESULTS: G-PNC was successfully implemented among women with varying backgrounds (e.g., racial, ethnic, marital status) who self-selected into the group. All G-PNC participants reported that they were satisfied to very satisfied with the program. Increased rates of breastfeeding initiation, breastfeeding at hospital discharge, receipt of the Tdap vaccine, and postpartum visit attendance at 1-2 weeks and 4-8 weeks were observed in the G-PNC group compared with the I-PNC group. Fewer G-PNC reported postpartum depression symptomatology. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that co-located G-PNC at an opioid treatment program is an acceptable model for pregnant women in treatment for OUD and may result in improved outcomes.

Donor prone positioning protects lungs from injury during warm ischemia.

A large proportion of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donor lungs are declined because cardiac arrest does not occur within a suitable time after the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. Improved strategies to preserve lungs after asystole may allow the recovery team to arrive after death actually occurs and enable the recovery of lungs from more cDCD donors. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of donor positioning on the quality of lung preservation after cardiac arrest in a cDCD model. Cardiac arrest was induced by withdrawal of ventilation under anesthesia in pigs. After asystole, animals were divided into 2 groups based on body positioning (supine or prone). All animals were subjected to 3 hours of warm ischemia. After the observation period, donor lungs were explanted and preserved at 4°C for 6 hours, followed by 6 hours of physiologic and biological lung assessment under normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion. Donor lungs from the prone group displayed significantly greater quality as reflected by better function during ex vivo lung perfusion, less edema formation, less cell death, and decreased inflammation compared with the supine group. A simple maneuver of donor prone positioning after cardiac arrest significantly improves lung graft preservation and function.

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The application of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based therapy during ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) could repair injured donor lungs before transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of MSC therapy performed during EVLP on ischemia-reperfusion injury using a pig lung transplant model. METHODS: Following 24 hours of cold storage, pig lungs were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 6 each), the control group without MSC vs the MSC group, where 5 × 106 cells/kg MSCs were delivered through the pulmonary artery during EVLP. After 12 hours of EVLP, followed by a 1-hour second cold preservation period, the left lung was transplanted and reperfused for 4 hours. RESULTS: EVLP perfusate hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) level at 12 hours was significantly elevated in the MSC group compared with the control and was associated with a significant decrease in cell death markers, cleaved caspase-3 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling-positive cells, in the MSC group. The MSC group showed significantly lower interleukin (IL)-18 and interferon gamma levels and a significantly higher IL-4 level in lung tissue at 12 hours of EVLP than the control group. After transplantation, the MSC group showed a significant increase in lung tissue HGF level compared with the control group, associated with a significantly reduced lung tissue wet-to-dry weight ratio. Lung tissue tumor necrosis factor-α level and pathological acute lung injury score were significantly lower in the MSC group than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of MSCs ameliorated ischemic injury in donor lungs during EVLP and attenuated the subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury after transplantation.

Pig lung transplant survival model.

Although lung transplant is a life-saving therapy for some patients, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity soon after a transplant. Ischemia reperfusion injury is known to be one of the most critical factors in PGD development. PGD is by definition an acute lung injury syndrome that occurs during the first 3 d following lung transplantation. To successfully translate laboratory discoveries to clinical practice, a reliable and practical large animal model is critical. This protocol describes a surgical technique for swine lung transplantation and postoperative management for a further 3 d post transplant. The protocol includes the background and rationale, required supplies, and a detailed description of the donor operation, transplant surgery, postoperative care, and sacrifice surgery. A pig lung transplant model is reliably produced in which the recipients survive for 3 d post transplant. This 3-d survival model can be used by lung transplant researchers to assess the development of PGD and to test therapeutic strategies targeting PGD. In total, the protocol requires 5 h for the surgeries, plus ~2 h in total for the postoperative care.