Analyzing the Visibility of Gender-Affirming Surgery Education on US Plastic Surgery Residency Program Web Sites.

BACKGROUND: As the demand for gender affirmation grows, teaching gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) programs has become increasingly important. Residency applicants interested in GAS often use program web sites to explore potential training opportunities. Our study aimed to quantify the GAS training opportunities promoted on residency program web sites and determine the characteristics of programs likely to promote GAS training. METHODS: An assessment of 88 integrated PRS residency programs' web sites was conducted between 2021 and 2022. Plastic and reconstructive surgery residency and institutional webpages were queried for geographical location, training opportunities in GAS through residency or fellowship, and the number of faculty performing GAS. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regressions were used to describe and identify factors associated with increased GAS residency training opportunities. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of PRS residencies mentioned training opportunities for GAS on their web sites. Gender-affirming surgery fellowships were offered at 7% of institutions, and an additional 7% were available via adjunct academic programs. Programs with faculty practicing GAS were 54% more likely to mention GAS on their residency page (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.21; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Few PRS residency programs mention GAS on their web sites. As GAS becomes a more robust component of plastic surgery, appropriate information about the extent of GAS training should be available for applicants. Determining how local, state, and federal policies impact programs' abilities to highlight GAS should be investigated in future studies.

Responsiveness of PROMIS Instruments for Trigger Digit After Corticosteroid Injection or A1 Pulley Release.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) is sufficiently sensitive to detect improvement after 2 common treatments of trigger finger: corticosteroid injection or A1 pulley release. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 72 patients in the injection group and 51 in the A1 pulley release group. PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and upper extremity (UE) scores were collected at baseline and 6 weeks after injection for the injection group and at baseline, and 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months after surgery for A1 pulley release patients. Descriptive statistics and paired t tests were used to compare PROMIS scores within each cohort. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated for each PROMIS domain to gauge instrument responsiveness. RESULTS: Average age was 62 years, 65% were female patients, and 86% were White for the steroid injection cohort, compared to 60 years, 71%, and 88%, respectively, for the A1 pulley release cohort. For the steroid injection group, mean PROMIS PI scores (-4.0 points; SRM = -0.6) and PROMIS UE scores (+3.3 points; SRM = 0.5) improved significantly at 6 weeks after injection compared to baseline. Meanwhile, A1 pulley release patients improved significantly in mean PI scores (-3.7 points; SRM = -0.5) and in UE scores (+4.9 points; SRM = 0.7) at 3 months after surgery compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical improvements after trigger digit treatments are reflected in improved PROMIS PI and UE scores that reach previously accepted minimum clinically important difference values for hand patients. PROMIS PI and UE also are more responsive than PROMIS PF in capturing improvement for trigger digit treatments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As health care payers continue to emphasize patient-reported outcomes to determine treatment value and set reimbursement rates, this study helps establish that clinical improvement after trigger digit treatments are reflected in PROMIS PI and UE domains by reaching previously established minimum clinically important difference values for hand patients.

Using MaxDiff Analysis to Elicit Patients' Treatment Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine how the attributes of surgical and nonsurgical distal radius fracture (DRF) treatments affect patient treatment preferences. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients aged 60 years and older were contacted from a single-hand surgeon's practice, and 172 chose to participate. We built a series of best-worst scaling experiments for the MaxDiff analysis to determine the relative importance of treatment attributes. Hierarchical Bayes analysis was used to generate individual-level item scores (ISs) for each attribute that together have a total sum of 100. RESULTS: One hundred general hand clinic patients without a history of a DRF and 43 patients with a history of a DRF completed the survey. For the general hand clinic patients, the most important attributes to avoid when choosing a DRF treatment (in descending order) were the longer time to full recovery (IS, 24.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.4-26.3), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 21.5-24.2), and higher complication rates (IS, 18.4; 95% CI, 16.9-19.8). Meanwhile, for patients with a history of a DRF, the most important attributes to avoid (in descending order) were a longer time to full recovery (IS, 25.6; 95% CI, 23.3-27.9), longer time spent in a cast (IS, 22.8; 95% CI, 19.9-25.7), and abnormal alignment of the radius on x-ray (IS, 18.3; 95% CI, 15.4-21.3). For both the groups, the least concerning attributes based on the IS were appearance-scar, appearance-bump, and the need for anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making and advancing patient-centered care. As conceptualized in this MaxDiff analysis, when choosing a DRF treatment, patients mostly want to avoid a longer time to full recovery and a longer time in a cast, whereas patients have the least concern about appearance and need for anesthesia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Eliciting patient preferences is a vital component of shared decision-making. Our results may provide guidance to surgeons in discussions on the relative benefits of surgical and nonsurgical DRF treatments, by quantifying the most and least important factors to patients.

Safety of Breast Reconstruction Using Inferiorly Based Dermal Flap for the Ptotic Breast.

INTRODUCTION: The use of an inferiorly based dermal flap (IBDF) with implant insertion allows for 1-step reconstruction of a ptotic breast after mastectomy. An IBDF allows for secondary protection of the inferior pole and provides a vascularized pocket for implant insertion. Previous literature has demonstrated the use of this surgical approach for optimal patient satisfaction and higher patient-reported outcomes.For this approach, the dermal flap epidermis is removed before insetting; however, invaginations containing epithelial components may serve as a nidus for infection. There is no study that has compared the safety of an IBDF technique to standard reconstruction. We hypothesize that there is no increase in surgical complications in the IBDF approach versus standard reconstruction. METHODS: This is a single-institution retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction from June 2016 through December 2020. Patients who did not have a permanent implant placed by December 2020 or had delayed reconstruction were excluded. Two cohorts were established: those who underwent immediate reconstruction after mastectomy via IBDF and reconstruction without an IBDF. Patient demographics, use of the IBDF technique, and surgical complications were recorded and compared. RESULTS: A total of 208 breasts were included: 52 breasts in the IBDF cohort and 156 breasts in the control cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between cohorts, except that the IBDF cohort has a significantly higher body mass index (mean = 30.9 vs 26.5, P ≤ .001).There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications between the IBDF and control groups, including seroma (5.8% vs 3.8%), hematoma (3.8% vs 0.6%), wound dehiscence (0.0% vs. 1.9%), mastectomy flap necrosis (11.5% vs 6.4%), breast infection (5.8% vs 7.1%), implant salvage (0.0% vs 5.8%), and implant loss (5.8% vs. 5.8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using an IBDF to reconstruct a ptotic breast immediately after mastectomy has a similar risk profile to an immediate standard breast reconstruction. This technique has resulted in optimal patient satisfaction scores and allows for a "one-stop reconstruction" of ptotic breasts that normally would undergo sequential revisions. In conclusion, immediate implant-based reconstruction of a ptotic breast after mastectomy using a IBDF can be performed safely.

Evaluation of Opioid Prescription and Consumption Habits Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic rise in opioid-related deaths over the past decade. Most of the reduction strategies have focused on outpatient use; however, recent studies have demonstrated an association between inpatient opioid use and consumption following discharge across a variety of surgical procedures. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association of inpatient use of opioids as well as the consumption of opioids after discharge following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was reviewed for cases between 2015 and 2018. Patients were included in the study if they underwent an elective EVAR, had an intensive care unit stay less than 1 day and total length of stay less than 3 days. Patients were contacted to participate in a survey of opioid use if they received a prescription at discharge. The primary outcome was percent of prescribed opioids consumed following discharge. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of receiving an opioid prescription. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were included in the analysis; 95% patients were white and 85% male. 59% of patients responded to the survey. Seventy-one (42%) received an opioid prescription at discharge. Patients that received a discharge prescription tended to be younger (71 vs. 75 years, P = 0.005) and more likely to have received opioids while in the hospital (79% vs. 45%, P < 0.001). Additionally, patients who received opioids at discharge received a significantly greater amount of milligram oral morphine equivalents (OME) while in the hospital (27.76 ± 38.91 vs. 10.05 ±29.43, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, estimated blood loss (EBL), and OME per day to be significant inpatient predictors of requiring an outpatient opioid prescription. Open femoral access (27%) was not a predictor of opioid prescription at discharge. A total of 1185 pills were prescribed (29.6 ± 2.06 per patient), but only 208 pills consumed (5.2 ± 1.27 per patient). Around 82% of total pills prescribed were not consumed. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates inpatient opioid use and postdischarge consumption following EVAR. These data identify key factors associated with receiving an opioid prescription at discharge and demonstrate that patients consume far fewer opioids than prescribed. These findings provide insight as to which patients may not require an outpatient prescription following EVAR, leading to potential practice-changing opioid reduction strategies.

Postdischarge Opioid Use after Lower Extremity Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overprescription for acute postoperative pain is an inadvertent contributor to the opioid epidemic via pill diversion and misuse. In response, the surgical community advocates for evidence-based postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines. The objective of this study is to evaluate patient-reported opioid consumption after lower extremity bypass surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of infrainguinal bypass operations from 2016 to 2019. For patients receiving an opioid prescription at discharge, a telephone survey was administered questioning the percentage of pills used. Exclusion criteria included chronic opioid use and reoperations or amputations within 30 days. The primary outcome was the difference in opioids prescribed versus opioids consumed. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Forty-one (84%) were prescribed opioids at discharge, and 27 (65.9%) completed the survey. The average age was 65.8 ± 7.7 years; 29.6% were women. Oxycodone immediate-release was most commonly prescribed (78%). On average, patients received 318 ± 156 morphine milligram equivalent. A total of 940 opioid pills were prescribed (36.0 ± 11.3 per patient), but only 37% were consumed. This difference resulted in 568 unused pills. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to specifically evaluate opioid use in a strictly lower extremity bypass population. Over 60% of pills were unused, which poses significant societal risk for misuse. Our findings contribute to knowledge of operation-specific opioid use, which may shape practice recommendations and reduce opioid overprescription after vascular surgery.

Epidemiology of Gender Diversity.

In the United States, approximately 1.6 million individuals identify as transgender and gender diverse (TGD), encompassing a wide range of identities and experiences. Despite progress in visibility and acceptance, TGD people continue to face health care and societal disparities, especially affecting racial minorities. Although legal advancements have been achieved, the key to addressing these persistent health care disparities lies in implementing comprehensive and culturally sensitive health care practices and supportive policies. With a growing number of TGD people seeking gender-affirming care, it is imperative that health care practitioners understand the unique challenges faced by this community and provide tailored services with sensitivity and expertise.

Evaluation of PROMIS Scores 6 Weeks after Conservative Management of Carpometacarpal Thumb Arthritis.

Patient-reported outcome measures are being increasingly emphasized to assign value to care' given the current trend toward pay-for-performance healthcare. We sought to determine if the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), a general questionnaire, is sensitive enough to detect improvement after corticosteroid injection or splinting/hand therapy for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. Methods: This is a retrospective study analyzing two groups with thumb CMC arthritis: 88 patients who received splinting/hand therapy and 6-week follow-up and 70 patients with steroid injection and 6-week follow-up. PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) scores were collected at each visit. We used paired t-tests to compare 6-week follow-up scores to baseline scores within each group. Results: The mean age for the steroid injection group was 60.1 years old, and it was 61.8 years old for the returning splinting/hand therapy group. There were no significant differences in PROMIS PF, PI, Depression, or UE scores for patients who returned after 6 weeks of treatment with splinting/hand therapy. Moreover, at 6 weeks postinjection, PROMIS PF and UE scores marginally increased, whereas PI and Depression scores decreased with statistical significance. Conclusions: Hand surgeons should be aware of the limitations of PROMIS when evaluating patients after conservative treatment for thumb CMC arthritis. There were no significant differences in PROMIS scores for patients with thumb CMC arthritis who returned after receiving splinting/hand therapy for 6 weeks. Meanwhile, PI scores can be used primarily to monitor for improvement after steroid injection for thumb CMC arthritis.

Clinical and radiographic predictors of the need for facial CT in pediatric blunt trauma: a multi-institutional study.

Background: Facial injuries are common in children with blunt trauma. Most are soft tissue lacerations and dental injuries readily apparent on clinical examination. Fractures requiring operative intervention are rare. Guidelines for utilization of maxillofacial CT in children are lacking. We hypothesized that head CT is a useful screening tool to identify children requiring dedicated facial CT. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of children aged 18 years and under with blunt facial injury who underwent both CT of the face and head from 2014 through 2018 at five pediatric trauma centers. Penetrating injuries and animal bites were excluded. Imaging and physical examination findings as well as interventions for facial fracture were reviewed. Clinically significant fractures were those requiring an intervention during hospital stay or within 30 days of injury. Results: 322 children with facial fractures were identified. Head CT was able to identify a facial fracture in 89% (287 of 322) of children with facial fractures seen on dedicated facial CT. Minimally displaced nasal fractures, mandibular fractures, and dental injuries were the most common facial fractures not identified on head CT. Only 2% of the cohort (7 of 322) had facial injuries missed on head CT and required an intervention. All seven had mandibular or alveolar plate injuries with findings on physical examination suggestive of injury. Discussion: In pediatric blunt trauma, head CT is an excellent screening tool for facial fracture. In the absence of clinical evidence of a mandibular or dental injury, a normal head CT will usually exclude a clinically significant facial fracture. Level of evidence: III.

Plastic Surgeons Nationwide Share Experience Regarding Telemedicine in Initial Patient Screening and Routine Postoperative Visits.

Physicians attempted to continue providing patient care through the SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Surgeons embraced telemedicine as patient evaluation transitioned from physical encounters to virtual appointments. However, there is a paucity in the literature on the utility of telemedicine within plastic surgery or how it can meet patients' needs. A survey study was created to assess surgeons' involvement and experience with telemedicine. Subjective experience was assessed on a five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). This survey was distributed to the members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Data were collected and analyzed via RedCap. Of the total 177 plastic surgeons who responded, 139 (78.5%) surgeons reported the implementation of telemedicine during the pandemic. Plastic surgeons felt that they were able to establish rapport (3.9 ± 0.9), meet the goals of the encounter (3.6 ± 1.0), and efficiently evaluate patients (3.5 ± 1.2). Plastic surgeons reported their overall experience was between helpful and neutral (3.2 ± 1.3). Most plastic surgeons have implemented telemedicine in their practice. The majority of telemedicine use was for breast, cosmetic, and reconstructive patient care. Telemedicine was most frequently used for initial patient screening and routine postoperative visits. Surgeons plan to continue using telemedicine when appropriate for patient screening and routine or unexpected postoperative visits in the future. Many have found utility of telemedicine in providing patient care and it is likely that telemedicine will be a part of routine practice moving forward.

Opioid stewardship in pediatric surgery: Approaching zero.

INTRODUCTION: In response to the opioid epidemic, we hypothesized that adequate pain control can be achieved with few, if any, opioid prescriptions at discharge following pediatric surgical procedures. METHODS: All records for patients 0-15 years old who underwent pediatric surgical operations from December 2017 through May 2018 were reviewed. Opioids prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed on a scale from 0 to 10 via phone call within three days of discharge. RESULTS: 352 patients underwent 394 surgical procedures. Three patients were prescribed opioids at discharge. There were no pain-related readmissions. One patient returned to the ED owing to pain. 116 unique pain scores were obtained from 114 patients: score 0 (n = 69, 59%), 1-3 (n = 31, 27%), 4-5 (n = 11, 9%), 6-8 (n = 5, 4%), and 9-10 (n = 0, 0%). There was a positive association between pain and increasing age (r = 0.26, p = 0.005). No patients who underwent hernia repair reported a pain score greater than 3. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate pain control at discharge after pediatric general surgical procedures can be achieved for most children with scheduled nonopioid medications only. A limited supply of opioids for analgesia after discharge may benefit small subset of patients. This strategy would help reduce opioid prevalence in the community. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Emergency department utilization following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement is driven by a small cohort of patients.

PURPOSE: Pediatric gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are associated with frequent postoperative problems and consumption of healthcare resources. We hypothesized that a small cohort of patients disproportionately drives healthcare resource utilization after G-tube insertion. This study aimed to characterize this population in order to implement evidence-based pathways to reduce healthcare utilization after G-tube insertion. METHODS: All surgically placed pediatric G-tubes at a quaternary care center between March 2011 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Healthcare utilization including radiographic studies, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, procedures, and diagnoses was abstracted. Encounter specific charges based on CPT codes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann Whitney U, Fisher's Exact Test, and multivariate nominal logistic regression. Institutional review board approval was obtained. RESULTS: During the study period, 189 patients underwent G-tube insertion; 24% of patients presented to the ED two or more times and accounted for 82% of ED visits. This cohort of high ED utilizers was more likely to present with G-tube dislodgement [both within the first three months (early) and after three months (late)], required more radiographic studies, and accrued significantly more charges compared to low ED utilizers. Multivariate analyses demonstrated high ED utilization was significantly associated with non-Caucasian race and the surgeon performing the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, a significant proportion of healthcare utilization following G-tube placement is consumed by a relatively small cohort of children. Future efforts will target patients with two or more G-tube related ED visits or an early G-tube dislodgement for additional education and integration with outpatient resources. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Platelets and platelet extracellular vesicles in hemostasis and sepsis.

Platelets, cell fragments traditionally thought of as important only for hemostasis, substantially and dynamically contribute to the immune system's response to infection. In addition, there is increasing evidence that externally active platelet entities, including platelet granules and platelet extracellular vesicles (PEVs), play a role not only in hemostasis, but also in inflammatory actions previously ascribed to platelets themselves. Given the functions of platelets and PEVs during inflammation and infection, their role in sepsis is being investigated. Sepsis is a condition marked by the dysregulation of the body's normal activation of the immune system in response to a pathogen. The mechanisms for controlling infection locally become detrimental to the host if they are applied systemically. Similar to cells traditionally ascribed to the immune system, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages, platelets are instrumental in helping a host clear an infection, but are also implicated in the uncontrolled amplification of the immune response that leads to sepsis. Clearly, the function of platelets is more complicated than its simple structure and primary role in hemostasis initially suggest. This review provides an overview of platelet and platelet extracellular vesicle structure and function, highlighting the complex role platelets and PEVs play in the body in the context of infection and sepsis.