Favorable early outcomes of medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty in active patients presenting a degenerative medial meniscus root tear with meniscal extrusion and mild radiographic osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: There is only limited literature available evaluating the preferable treatment for active mid-age or elderly patients presenting with a degenerative medial meniscus root tear (d-MMRT) with medial meniscal extrusion (MME) and early-phase radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), failing to provide solid evidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of medial unicompartimental arthroplasty (mUKA) in active patients presenting a d-MMRT with meniscal extrusion and mild radiographic OA of the knee. To prove this claim we hypothesized that (1) patients with a d-MMRT with initial grade 1-3 KL OA of the medial compartment of the knee present the same pre-operative symptoms as patients with an end-stage grade 4 K-L OA, and that (2) those patients with d-MMRT and low-grade OA achieve the same early clinical and functional outcomes when treated with mUKA compared to patients with end-stage medial OA. METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of 185 patients undergoing robotic-assisted image-based mUKA from January 2021 to July 2022 at a single Institution. We identified two different cohorts of non-consecutive patients: a group of 24 patients undergoing mUKA surgery following d-MMRT combined with K-L grades 1-3 OA (group 1), and a group of 161 patients who underwent mUKA but presenting with an end-stage bone-on-bone K-L grade 4 OA (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative clinical assessments at one-year follow-up included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L score), and a standard weight-bearing X-ray protocol. The paired t-test was used to compare clinical outcomes and radiologic values of the two cohorts and in-between the two cohorts. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The mean follow-up for group 1 was 16.4 ± 2.5 months, and the mean age at the time of operation was 63 ± 8.6 years with a mean time from diagnosis to intervention of 53 ± 47.5 days. Preoperative impairment was greater in group 1 compared to group 2, but with no significant difference. Postoperatively, both groups showed excellent mean outcomes at 1-year follow-up, with no significant difference. The mean preoperative HKA, mPTA, and LDFA were 176.3 ± 3.1, 88.1 ± 2.3, and 86.6 ± 1.7 respectively. The mean postoperative HKA, coronal femoral component angle, and coronal tibial component angle were 179.1 ± 2.6, 87.2 ± 2.3, and 87.2 ± 3.3. No difference was found between preoperative age, BMI, between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable early clinical outcomes were obtained after mUKA in active mid-age and elderly patients presenting with degenerative medial meniscus root tear and mild isolated medial OA. Patients with mild no bone-on-bone OA but with degenerative medial meniscus root tear and medial meniscal extrusion presented the same or worse pre-operative symptoms as patients with end-stage medial OA and benefit the same from mUKA.

Robotics improves alignment accuracy and reduces early revision rates for UKA in the hands of low-volume UKA surgeons.

PURPOSE: It is known that in uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) low-volume surgeons have a higher complication and revision rate than high-volume surgeons. Further, robotic-assisted UKA leads to lower early revision rate as well as fewer limb and joint line outliers compared to conventional UKA. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outliers' and revision rate of low-volume UKA surgeons with different robotic systems at short-term follow-up. METHODS: In this case-control study, 103 robotic-assisted UKAs were included. The procedures were performed between 2016 and 2019 from two low-volume UKA surgeons with an imageless (IL) (63 patients) and image-based (IB) (40 patients) robotic system. Alignment outliers, joint line (JL) reconstruction, complication and revision rates of the two different robotic systems were analyzed. The minimum follow-up was two years. Outliers were defined as a postoperative valgus malalignment greater than 182°. The surgery time for all procedures was evaluated. RESULTS: The overall revision rate was 3.9% (4 of 103). Two occurred in the IB group (5.0%) and two in the IL group (3.2%). No valgus malalignment outliers were observed in both groups. The mean JL was not distalized by more than 2 mm in both groups (IL: 1.3 ± 1.6 mm vs. IB: 1.8 ± 0.9 mm, p value 0.08). The IL procedures had a significant lower mean surgery time (55 ± 13 min vs. 68 ± 14, p value 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted UKA is a safe procedure in the hand of low-volume UKA surgeons. Robotic-assisted UKA minimizes overcorrection into valgus mal-alignment. Low revision rates are observed at short-term follow-up for robotic-assisted UKA. The choice of the different robotic systems has no impact on the outcome.

Higher revision rate for posterior cruciate-retaining than posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of valgus osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: Determining the point at which a valgus deformity requires a more invasive therapy-in this case PS TKA-is surgically challenging. Retaining the posterior cruciate ligament has both advantages and disadvantages. The aim was to evaluate the failure rate and clinical outcomes. METHODS: 248 patients with valgus gonarthrosis underwent surgical treatment: 167 CR TKA cases and 81 PS TKA cases. The KOOS and the OKS were recorded, and 201 patients (133 CR, 68 PS) were recruited into the retrospective study. The influence of BMI and degree of preoperative valgus deformity on the clinical outcome was determined. The revision rate was documented and analysed. RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 10 required revision surgery owing to instability (10/133 CR, 0/68 PS). Based on the KOOS and the OKS, no significant difference between CR TKA and PS TKA was found. BMI and degree of valgus deformity had no effect on the clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in the clinical outcome between the CR and PS TKA patients was found. In the CR group, significantly more patients showed 'excellent' OKS than in the PS group. However, 8.0% of the patients in the CR group and none in the PS group underwent surgery due to instability. A higher rate of dissatisfied patients in the CR group is likely. In our clinic, we no longer perform CR TKA for valgus cases.

[New technologies (robotics, custom-made) in unicondylar knee arthroplasty-pro]. / Neue Technologien (Robotik, "custom made") in der unikondylären Endoprothetik ­ Pro.

BACKGROUND: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty offers the advantage that partial degenerative changes can be addressed with partial prosthetic solutions, thus preserving as much of the native joint as possible, including the cruciate ligaments. On the other hand, the number of revisions is still higher than for total knee endoprosthetics. In the literature, the causes mentioned are insufficient fit of the components as well as surgical errors. The use of new technologies to achieve a better fit and higher surgical precision and reproducibility, therefore, represents a promising approach. INDIVIDUAL ENDOPROSTHETICS: Individual endoprosthetics offers the advantage that the prosthesis is adapted to the individual anatomy of each patient and not the patient's anatomy to the prosthesis, as is the case with standard prostheses. This allows for an optimal fit of the prosthesis while avoiding excessive bone resections and soft tissue releases. ROBOTICS: The use of robotics in endoprosthetics makes it easier to correctly perform bone resections and align components. This ensures high and reproducible precision even for surgeons with lower case numbers. Studies on individual unicondylar endoprosthetics and robotics are reporting promising results. However, long-term results of high-quality randomized studies must be awaited in order to make a scientifically sound statement.

Improved diagnostic accuracy with the classification tree method for diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections by quantitative measurement of synovial fluid alpha-defensin and C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is challenging, because patients may present with unspecific symptoms, false-negative cultures, or marginally elevated values of serum biomarkers like C-reactive protein (CRP). This may lead to the unintended implantation of a revision prosthesis into an infected surgical site with a repeat risk of short-term failure. Conversely, false diagnosis of joint infection may result in multistage revision procedures, which expose the patient to unnecessary surgical procedures and inappropriate antibiotic treatment. Here, we investigated whether synovial biomarkers can preoperatively distinguish between aseptic prosthesis loosening and low-grade joint infection and the most accurate biomarker combinations. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for the study were indication for revision arthroplasty due to aseptic implant failure, acute high-grade infection, or (suspected) low-grade infection. We prospectively collected synovial fluid of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for quantitative measurement of alpha defensin, CRP, interleukin (IL-6), IL-10, and lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP). RESULTS: The classification tree method revealed alpha defensin and CRP as the most suitable biomarker combination to distinguish between aseptic loosening and low-grade joint infection. The combination of CRP > 2.0 mg/L and alpha defensin > 90.000 pg/mL correctly identified nine  of 11 patients with low-grade infection. CONCLUSIONS: Alpha defensin plus CRP seems to be the most helpful combination for pre-operative discrimination of aseptic loosening vs. low-grade joint infection.

[Limits of kinematic alignment and recommendations for its safe application]. / Grenzen des kinematischen Alignments und Empfehlungen für die sichere Anwendung.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing clinical evidence "pro" kinematic alignment (KA) in primary total knee arthroplasty, the idea of this individualized implant positioning has not (yet) become established throughout the community. Many surgeons have concerns about the safety of the method and the universality of its application. Interestingly, comparative studies with unlimited indications for KA showed only little or no advantage over standard mechanical alignment in contrast to studies with strict indications showing a significant benefit. QUESTION AND METHODOLOGY: This results in a discussion about possible indication limits for KA. The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence and theoretical considerations regarding ideal and possibly non-ideal patients. Furthermore, the paper describes the "lessons learned" of the past years as a recommendation for safe use of the method. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on current evidence, primary varus osteoarthritis appears to be a good indication for KA. A limitation, however, is extra-articular deformities that lead to a pathologically joint line angle. Instabilities of the collateral ligaments are to be considered as a contraindication. In contrast to varus type osteoarthritis, valgus deformities appear to be more critical for KA. Even though there is yet only limited evidence, especially the accompanying extra-articular pathologies of the hip and ankle pose an increased risk of failure. In our opinion, a restricted KA with an individualized component position but neutral overall limb alignment makes sense here. To analyze the suitability of KA and estimate the post-operative component position, weight-bearing long-leg x­rays are recommended. Additional stress radiography is helpful in certain cases, as is the three-dimensional analysis of the anatomy by CT or MRI scans.

Individualized alignment in total knee arthroplasty using image-based robotic assistance : Video article.

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades many innovations were introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) focusing on implant longevity and higher procedural precision; however, there are still a high number of dissatisfied patients. It was reported that better anatomical alignment may result in improved patient outcome; however, current technologies have limitations to achieve this. The aim of this video article is to describe the technique of individualized alignment in TKA with the use of image-based robotic assistance. METHODS: The technology is based on an individual patient knee model computed from segmented computed tomography (CT) scans. A preoperative planning of prosthesis position is conducted following the principle of kinematic alignment. Intraoperatively the soft tissue envelope is recorded and the computer predicts the gap balance based on the virtual planning. The prosthesis position is then adapted to achieve balanced gaps and to avoid soft tissue release. This technique is shown in a cadaver operation and clinical examples of two patients are described. RESULTS: With the combination of anatomically oriented prosthesis positioning and minor adaptations with respect to the soft tissue, an individualized alignment is achieved with reduced need of soft tissue release. The robotic-assisted surgery guarantees a precise implementation of the planning. The initial experience showed a promising outcome in short-term follow-up.

PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study.

PURPOSE: Kinematic alignment in TKA is supposed to restore function by aligning the components to the premorbid flexion-extension axis instead of altering the joint line and natural kinematic axes of the knee. The purpose of this study was to compare mechanically aligned TKA to kinematic alignment. METHODS: In this study, 200 patients underwent TKA and were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 100 TKAs were performed using kinematic alignment with custom-made cutting guides in order to complete cruciate-retaining TKA; the other 100 patients underwent TKA that was manually performed using mechanical alignment. The WOMAC and combined Knee Society Score (KSS), as well as radiological alignment, were determined as outcome parameters at the 12-month endpoint. RESULTS: WOMAC and KSS significantly improved in both groups. There was a significant difference in both scores between groups in favour of kinematic alignment. Although the kinematic alignment group demonstrated significantly better overall results, more outliers with poor outcomes were also seen in this group. A correlation between post-operative alignment deviation from the initial plan and poor outcomes was also noted. The most important finding of this study is that applying kinematic alignment in TKA achieves comparable results to mechanical alignment in TKA. This study also shows that restoring the premorbid flexion-extension axis of the knee joint leads to better overall functional results. CONCLUSION: Kinematic alignment is a favourable technique for TKA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The kinematic alignment idea might be a considerable alternative to mechanical alignment in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Does a positioning rod or a patient-specific guide result in more natural femoral flexion in the concept of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE: Flexion of the femoral component in 5° increments downsizes the femoral component, decreases the proximal reach and surface area of the trochlea, delays the engagement of the patella during flexion, and is associated with a higher risk of patellar-femoral instability after kinematically aligned TKA. The present study evaluated flexion of the femoral component after use of two kinematic alignment instrumentation systems. We determined whether a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod inserted perpendicular to the distal femoral joint line in the axial plane and 8-10 cm into the distal femur anterior and posterior to the distal cortex of the femur in the sagittal plane or a femoral patient-specific cutting guide sets the femoral component in more natural flexion. METHODS: Flexion of the femoral component was measured with respect to the sagittal femoral anatomic axis of the distal diaphysis and the sagittal femoral axis on rotationally controlled long-leg lateral computer scanograms. Measurements were performed on 53 consecutive patients treated with a kinematically aligned TKA performed with a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod, and 53 consecutive patients treated with a kinematically aligned TKA performed with a femoral patient-specific cutting guide. RESULTS: The average flexion and variability (±standard deviation) of the femoral component of patients treated with a positioning rod was 1° ± 2° and 7° ± 4° with respect to the anatomic and mechanical axes, respectively, which was 5° less than the average flexion of the femoral component of patients treated with a femoral patient-specific cutting guide of 6° ± 4° and 12° ± 5° (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Because a distal cutting block attached to a positioning rod sets the femoral component in 5° less flexion and with less variability than a femoral patient-specific cutting guide, we prefer this instrumentation system when performing kinematically aligned TKA to reduce the risk of patellar-femoral instability. Each surgeon should determine the repeatability of setting the flexion of the femoral component with this instrumentation system.

Patella tracking and patella contact pressure in modular patellofemoral arthroplasty: a biomechanical in vitro analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In the recent years modular partial knee prosthesis with the opportunity to combine unicompartmental tibiofemoral (UKA) and patellofemoral prosthesis (PFJ) were introduced to the clinics. To date, little is known about the biomechanics of these bi-cruciate retaining prosthetic designs. Aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a PFJ in bicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA + PFJ) on patella tracking and retropatella pressure distribution. METHODS: A dynamic in vitro knee kinemator simulating an isokinetic extension cycle of the knee was used on eight knee specimen. Patella tracking and patellofemoral contact pressure were evaluated using pressure sensitive films after implantation of a medial UNI and after subsequent implantation of a PFJ. RESULTS: Whereas the area contact pressure remained the same after PFJ implantation, the contact area was reduced significantly and significantly elevated peak pressures were determined in deep flexion and close to extension. The patella tracking was not significantly altered, however, effects of edge loading could be shown. CONCLUSION: When using PFJ prosthesis, one must be aware of altered pressure introduction on the retropatella surface compared to the physiological situation. The elevated peak pressures and reduced contact area may be an argument for patella resurfacing and the problems of edge loading indicate that care must be taken on the correct implantation of the device with no implant overhang.

Circulating biomarkers for discrimination between aseptic joint failure, low-grade infection, and high-grade septic failure.

BACKGROUND: Late-onset chronic (low-grade) periprosthetic joint infections are often accompanied by unspecific symptoms, false-negative cultures or nonspecific low values of serum biomarkers. This may lead to the unintended implantation of a revision prosthesis into an infected surgical site with the risk of short-term failure developing again. Conversely, false diagnosis of joint infection may result in multistage revision procedures, which expose the patient to unnecessary surgical procedures and inappropriate antibiotic treatment. Here, we investigated whether circulating biomarkers can preoperatively distinguish between aseptic prosthesis loosening and low-grade joint infection, and which biomarker combinations are most accurate. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for the study were indication for revision arthroplasty due to aseptic implant failure, acute high-grade infection, or (suspected) low-grade infection. C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 10, and lipopolysaccharide binding protein were assessed preoperatively in the serum of 98 adult patients. RESULTS: The classification tree method revealed IL-6 and CRP as the most suitable biomarker combination for the discrimination of aseptic loosening vs low-grade joint infection. The combination of IL-6 >5.12 pg/mL and CRP >0.3 mg/dL correctly identified 15 of 16 patients as having low-grade infection (94%) whereas just one patient was aseptic (6%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive prospective clinical study to our knowledge investigating the significance of a combined biomarker approach in differentiating between aseptic prosthesis loosening and low-grade joint infection. CRP plus IL-6 seems to be the most helpful combination for preoperative discrimination of aseptic loosening vs low-grade joint infection.

T2-mapping at 3 T after microfracture in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus at an average follow-up of 8 years.

PURPOSE: To compare repaired cartilage with native cartilage, and inter-observer reliability, using T2 mapping at 3 T for assessing cartilage repair in osteochondral defects of the talus after the microfracture technique. METHODS: We enrolled eight females and seven males undergoing arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral defects of the talus at an average follow-up of 7.9 ± 2.2 years (range 5-13 years). Cartilage tissue was assessed using a 3-T magnetic resonance imaging unit with an 8-channel phased array foot and ankle coil (gradient strength, 50 mT/m; slew rate, 200 T/m/s). T2 maps were then calculated. Three independent boarded specialists evaluated the images, and magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue scores was used to assess the cartilage and joint status. Clinical results were assessed using the Hannover Scoring System (HSS) for the ankle and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hind-foot score. RESULTS: No significant mean differences were found between the T2 properties of the repair tissue and those of the native reference cartilage (T2 = 38.6 ± 5.3 ms, range 30.2-55.8 ms vs. 40.3 ± 8.5 ms, range 31.4-59.8 ms, respectively; intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.94; confidence interval 0.84-0.99, P ≤ 0.001). Despite ≥50 % defect filling in all patients, subchondral bone changes were considerable. The HSS at the follow-up revealed a mean score of 87 ± 12 (range 51-97), and the AOFAS-Score was 90 ± 13 (range 59-100). CONCLUSIONS: 3 T T2 maps were similar in repaired and native cartilage with good inter-observer reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

In vitro kinematics of fixed versus mobile bearing in unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: When performing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA), the surgeon can choose between two fundamentally different designs: a mobile-bearing (MB) inlay with high conformity, or a low-conformity, fixed bearing (FB) inlay. There is an ongoing debate in the orthopaedic community about which design is superior. To date, there have been no comparative biomechanical studies regarding each system's effects on the quadriceps force and the medial contact pressure. The purpose of this study was to investigate these alterations in vitro before and after UKA with two prosthesis systems, representing the MB and FB designs. METHODS: FB and MB unicondylar knee prosthesis designs were tested in sequence under isokinetic extension in an in vitro simulator. In each case, the required quadriceps extension force was determined before and after implantation of a medial UKA. Furthermore, the tibiofemoral contact pressures were evaluated for both prosthesis designs. RESULTS: The quadriceps force maximum was achieved at 106° and 104° of flexion with the FB and MB designs, respectively. Implantation of the FB UKA resulted in a significant increase in the necessary maximum quadriceps force (p = 0.006). In addition, implantation of the MB UKA resulted in a significantly higher extension force (p = 0.03). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant in deep flexion (p = 0.03), with higher forces in MB UKA. CONCLUSION: The MB design showed significantly increased quadriceps extension force compared with the FB inlay in deep flexion. Although the FB design showed higher maximum peak pressures concentrated on a smaller area, the pressure introduction in deep flexion was lower, compared to MB inserts.

Clinical evaluation of a mobile sensor-based gait analysis method for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty.

Clinical scores and motion-capturing gait analysis are today's gold standard for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty, although they are criticized for bias and their ability to reflect patients' actual quality of life has been questioned. In this context, mobile gait analysis systems have been introduced to overcome some of these limitations. This study used a previously developed mobile gait analysis system comprising three inertial sensor units to evaluate daily activities and sports. The sensors were taped to the lumbosacral junction and the thigh and shank of the affected limb. The annotated raw data was evaluated using our validated proprietary software. Six patients undergoing knee arthroplasty were examined the day before and 12 months after surgery. All patients reported a satisfactory outcome, although four patients still had limitations in their desired activities. In this context, feasible running speed demonstrated a good correlation with reported impairments in sports-related activities. Notably, knee flexion angle while descending stairs and the ability to stop abruptly when running exhibited good correlation with the clinical stability and proprioception of the knee. Moreover, fatigue effects were displayed in some patients. The introduced system appears to be suitable for outcome measurement after knee arthroplasty and has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of stationary gait labs while gathering additional meaningful parameters regarding the force limits of the knee.

The biomechanics of biodegradable versus titanium interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament augmentation and reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) is one of the options available for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To date, however, there are no published data regarding the biomechanical properties of LARS fixation for ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of various LARS interference-screw fixations. METHODS: A total of 100 LARS ligaments were fixed in porcine femurs with five different interference screws (four biodegradable screws and one titanium interference screw) introduced from inside-out or extra-articularly outside-in. Each group consisted of ten specimens. The constructs were cyclically stretched and subsequently loaded until failure. We evaluated the maximum load before failure, elongation during cyclic loading, stiffness, and failure mode. RESULTS: Elongation during cyclical loading for all devices tested was significantly larger between the first and 20th cycles than between the 20th and 500th cycles (p < 0.05). Maximum failure load was not significantly lower for the biodegradable screws than for the titanium screws (p > 0.05). All specimens failed because of ligament pull-out from the bony tunnel. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that biomechanical secure fixation of the LARS for ACL reconstruction can be achieved using either biodegradable or titanium interference screws. The stability of fixation is independent of the approach, type of investigation, and type of fixation (extra-articular outside-in or intra-articular inside-out).

[The combination of partial knee arthroplasties in knee osteoarthritis with an intact anterior cruciate ligament - a future model?] / Kombination von Knieteilprothesen bei intaktem vorderem Kreuzband ­ ein Zukunftsmodell?

BACKGROUND: Preserving both cruciate ligaments in knee prosthetics enables approximately physiological joint kinematics. In this way, faster rehabilitation and a higher return-to-sports rate can be achieved. Accordingly, there are considerations to preserve both cruciate ligaments by combining two partial prostheses in the case of symptomatic bicompartmental (BiCom) knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: This article summarizes the literature on BiCom arthroplasty and describes our own experiences from 54 consecutive cases with robotic-assisted technology. RESULTS: According to current data, BiCom arthroplasty shows good clinical results, without being able to demonstrate a clear advantage over conventional TKA. The revision risk is slightly increased in the short-term interval, which could be positively addressed with robotic-assistance. The disadvantages are the increased implant costs and the risk of subsequent osteoarthritis. Accordingly, patients who may potentially take advantage of this treatment must be critically selected.

[Evolving indications for partial knee replacement : New aspects]. / Update Indikation Teilprothese : Neue Aspekte.

BACKGROUND: Partial knee replacement has proven to be an effective therapy for advanced unicompartmental arthrosis of the knee. Despite continuous advancements in implants and surgical techniques over the past decades, the global preference for total knee arthroplasty still persists for historical reasons. OBJECTIVES: This report aims to illuminate advantages and disadvantages of partial knee replacement considering long-term results, the evolution of indication criteria over recent decades and new aspects in patient selection with potential improvements through emerging technologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis involves the examination of long-term results from clinical studies and registry data, highlighting the risk factors for potential failures and their influence on the development of indication criteria. RESULTS: Present-day long-term results demonstrate excellent prosthetic survival, aligning with outcomes from total knee arthroplasty. New perspectives for expanding indication criteria are discussed, including the possible application of partial knee replacement in cases of severe varus deformity > 15°, anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, young active patients, anterior knee pain, and/or patellofemoral arthritis, as well as mild radiographic arthritis with degenerative medial meniscus root tear and meniscal extrusion. DISCUSSION: Indication criteria have consistently expanded in recent years, taking into account modern insights, and the application of advanced technologies can enhance precision and minimize surgical errors. Furthermore, this report emphasizes that revision rates are not the sole criterion for success and underscores the necessity for a comprehensive examination of clinical results.

Maintaining the Physiological Lateral Flexion Gap in the Kinematically Aligned TKA Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcomes at One-Year Follow-Up.

Background: Instability is a common cause of (total knee arthroplasty) TKA failure, which can be prevented by achieving proper gap balance during surgery. There is no consensus on the ideal gap balance in TKA, and different alignment philosophies result in varying soft-tissue tightness. Traditional TKA aims for symmetric compartment balance, while kinematic alignment (KA) restores anatomy and accepts asymmetric flexion gaps. This study evaluated the impact of these philosophies on the flexion gap balance and clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of 167 patients who received true or restricted KA robotic-assisted TKA with at least one year of follow-up was conducted. The groups were based on intraoperative flexion gap differences: symmetric (0-1 mm) (n = 94) and asymmetric (2-5 mm) (n = 73). Results: Preoperative demographics and postoperative clinical and functional scores were compared. Both groups were similar in demographics and preoperative scores. True KA alignment was more likely to result in an asymmetric flexion gap, while restricted KA produced symmetric gaps. Conclusions: The study found no adverse effects from the physiological asymmetric flexion gap, with clinical and functional outcomes comparable to symmetric gaps. A 5 mm difference between the medial and lateral gap width did not negatively impact the outcomes. True KA more frequently results in a physiological asymmetric flexion gap.

Stiffness and ultimate load of osseointegrated prosthesis fixations in the upper and lower extremity.

BACKGROUND: Techniques for the skeletal attachment of amputation-prostheses have been developed over recent decades. This type of attachment has only been performed on a small number of patients. It poses various potential advantages compared to conventional treatment with a socket, but is also associated with an increased risk of bone or implant-bone interface fracture in the case of a fall. We therefore investigated the bending stiffness and ultimate bending moment of such devices implanted in human and synthetic bones. METHODS: Eight human specimens and 16 synthetic models of the proximal femora were implanted with lower extremity prostheses and eight human specimens and six synthetic humeri were implanted with upper extremity prostheses. They were dissected according to typical amputation levels and underwent loading in a material testing machine in a four-point bending setup. Bending stiffness, ultimate bending moment and fracture modes were determined in a load to failure experiment. Additionally, axial pull-out was performed on eight synthetic specimens of the lower extremity. RESULTS: Maximum bending moment of the synthetic femora was 160.6±27.5 Nm, the flexural rigidity of the synthetic femora was 189.0±22.6 Nm2. Maximum bending moment of the human femora was 100.4±38.5 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 137.8±29.4 Nm2. The maximum bending moment of the six synthetic humeri was 104.9±19.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity was 63.7±3.6 Nm2. For the human humeri the maximum bending moment was 36.7±11.0 Nm, and the flexural rigidity at was 43.7±10.5 Nm2. The maximum pull-out force for the eight synthetic femora was 3571±919 N. CONCLUSION: Significant differences were found between human and synthetic specimens of the lower and upper extremity regarding maximum bending moment, bending displacement and flexural rigidity. The results of this study are relevant with respect to previous finding regarding the load at the interfaces of osseointegrated prosthesis fixation devices and are crucial for the development of safety devices intended to protect the bone-implant interface from damaging loadings.

Setting the Tibial Component Rotation Based on Femoral Landmarks Allows Congruent Knee Kinematics in Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

The accurate positioning of the prosthetic components is essential for achieving successful results in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA). The tibial component rotation in image-based robotic-assisted UKA is usually based on tibial bony landmarks matched to the pre-operative CT model. The study aimed to evaluate whether setting the tibial rotation on femoral CT-based landmarks allows congruent knee kinematics. We retrospectively analyzed data from 210 consecutive image-based robotic-assisted mUKA cases. In every case, we set the tibia rotation landmark parallel to the posterior condylar axis and centered it on the trochlea groove defined on the preoperative CT scan. The implant positioning was primarily set parallel to this rotation landmark and then adjusted based on tibial sizes avoiding component over- or under-hang. During surgery, we recorded the knee kinematics under valgus stress to reduce the arthritic deformity. A femoral-tibial contact point was recorded over the entire range of motion and displayed as a tracking profile on the tibia implant. The femoro-tibial tracking angle (FTTA) was then calculated based on a tangent line to the femoro-tibial tracking-points and the difference to the femur-based rotation landmark. In 48% of the cases, we could position the tibia component exactly to the femoral rotation landmark, whereas in 52% of cases, minimal adjustments were made to avoid component's under- or over-hang. The mean tibia component rotation (TRA) with reference to our femur-based landmark was +0.24° (SD ± 2.9°). The femur-based tibia rotation landmark showed a high correspondence to the FTTA with 60% of the cases having less than 1° of deviation. Mean FTTA was +0.7° (SD ± 2.2°). The mean difference between the absolute value of the TRA and the FTTA (|TRA| - |FTTA|) was -0.18° (SD ± 2°). Setting the tibial component rotation based on CT scan femoral landmarks and not on tibial anatomical landmarks is a reliable method to obtain congruent knee kinematics during image-based robotic-assisted medial UKA with less the 2° deviations on average.