Prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangement in benign and malignant thyroid nodules and its clinical application.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the primary means to distinguish benign thyroid nodules from malignant ones. About 20% of FNAC yields indeterminate results leading to unnecessary or delayed surgery. Many studies of tissue samples, the majority of which are retrospective advocate testing for RET rearrangements as a diagnostic adjunctive tool in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytological findings. Because of the uncertain prevalence of RET rearrangements, its utility as a tumor marker is still controversial. The goal of this study was to establish the prevalence and the utility of testing for RET rearrangements in FNAC suspicious of cancer in a clinical setting. In this prospective study, we analysed a large series of thyroid aspirates by RT-PCR only and Southern blot on RT-PCR products for type 1 and 3 RET rearrangements. Results were compared with clinical findings, cytological diagnosis and final histopathology. By the higher sensitive Southern-blot on RT-PCR method, RET rearrangements were present in 36% of papillary thyroid carcinomas (RET/PTC-1, 12%; RET/PTC-3, 20%; both, 4%) and of 13.3% of benign nodules. By means of RT-PCR only, RET rearrangements were disclosed only in 14.3% of PTC and in 3.6% of benign nodules. No significant correlation was found between RET rearrangements and clinicopathological features of patients. These results indicate that molecular testing of thyroid nodules for RET/PTC must take into account of its high prevalence in benign nodules, inducing false positive diagnoses when the highly sensitive assay Southern-blot on RT-PCR is used. Its searching by means of RT-PCR only, has a specificity superior of conventional cytology and can be used to refine inconclusive FNAC.

Growing thyroid nodules with benign histology and RET rearrangement.

Some benign thyroid nodules are stationary in size over time while others grow progressively, indicating that there is a broad individual variability within benign nodules. To date, it is very difficult to predict if a benign thyroid nodule will grow in size and which will be its trend over time. While BRAF(V600E) is a highly specific marker of thyroid cancer, RET rearrangements have been disclosed also in non malignant thyroid lesions and their biological significance is debated. We compared the clinical history of three histologically benign thyroid nodules harboring RET rearrangements with that of 6 benign nodules bearing wild type RET. The nodules negative for RET rearrangements were followed for 10 years by ultrasonographic evaluation, showing a slow, constant enlargement. Three patients with benign nodules diagnosed at FNAC, were followed for 11, 9 and 7 years by annual ultrasonographic evaluation. After several years of latency, the nodules had an unexpected and gradual increase in their dimensions, reaching a large final size. A second FNAC confirmed the previous cytologic diagnosis of benign lesion. Because of the increasing size of the nodules, the patients were advised to surgery. Before undergoing thyroidectomy, we performed molecular diagnostic tests that revealed the absence of BRAF(V600E) and the presence of RET/PTC-1 in one nodule and RET/PTC-3 in the two others. Despite the presence of this oncogene, the samples were histologically classified as benign hyperplastic nodules. These findings lead us to speculate that histologically benign hyperplastic thyroid nodules containing RET rearrangements might represent a subgroup of nodules with a rapid size increase.

The primary occurrence of BRAF(V600E) is a rare clonal event in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

CONTEXT: BRAF(V600E) is considered a primary event, a negative prognostic marker, and a site for pharmacological intervention in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We asked whether BRAF(V600E) can occur as a subclonal event in PTC and whether this and other oncogenes can coexist in the same tumor. STUDY DESIGN: We determined by pyrosequencing the percentage of mutant BRAF, NRAS, and KRAS alleles in a series of conventional PTC. We also analyzed the BRAF mutation status in PTC cell clones in culture. RESULTS: BRAF(V600E) alleles were present in 41 of 72 PTC (56.9%) in the range 44.7 to 5.1% of total BRAF alleles. In four PTC samples, mutant BRAF alleles were about 50%, being therefore compatible with a clonal heterozygous mutation. In 27 PTC samples, BRAF(V600E) alleles were in the range of 25 to 5.1%. This finding was confirmed after exclusion of the presence of a large contamination by lymphoreticular cells and by the analysis of PTC cells selected by laser capture. Analysis of clones derived from a single cell confirmed the presence of two distinct PTC populations with wild-type or mutated BRAF. Simultaneous subclonal BRAF and KRAS mutations were demonstrated in two PTC. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that clonal BRAF(V600E) is a rare occurrence in PTC, although frequently this cancer consists of a mixture of tumor cells with wild-type and mutant BRAF. These results suggest that BRAF mutation in PTC is a later subclonal event, its intratumoral heterogeneity may hamper the efficacy of targeted pharmacotherapy, and its association with a more aggressive disease should be reevaluated.

High growth rate of benign thyroid nodules bearing RET/PTC rearrangements.

CONTEXT: Benign thyroid nodules display a broad range of behaviors from a stationary size to a progressive growth. The RET/PTC oncogene has been documented in a fraction of benign thyroid nodules, besides papillary thyroid carcinomas, and it might therefore influence their growth. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present work was to evaluate whether RET/PTC in benign thyroid nodules associates with a different nodular growth rate. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective multicentric study, 125 subjects with benign nodules were included. RET rearrangements were analyzed in cytology samples; clinical and ultrasonographic nodule characteristics were assessed at the start and at the end of the study. RESULTS: RET/PTC was present in 19 nodules. The difference between the mean baseline nodular volume of the RET/PTC- and RET/PTC+ nodules was not significant. After 36 months of follow-up, the RET/PTC+ group (n = 16) reached a volume higher than the RET/PTC- group (n = 90) (5.04 ± 2.67 vs. 3.04 ± 2.26 ml; P = 0.0028). We calculated the monthly change of nodule volumes as a percentage of baseline. After a mean follow-up of 36.6 months, the monthly volume increase of nodules bearing a RET rearrangement was 4.3-fold that of nodules with wild-type RET (1.83 ± 1.2 vs. 0.43 ± 1.0% of baseline volume; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Benign thyroid nodules bearing RET rearrangements grow more rapidly than those with wild-type RET. Searching for RET rearrangements in benign thyroid nodules might be useful to the clinician in choosing the more appropriate and timely therapeutic option.