Reconstructive trends following mastectomies in Scotland: A comparison with England.

INTRODUCTION: In England there has been a substantial increase in the use of immediate implant-based reconstruction, accounting for over half of all immediate reconstructions (IR). Less than one third of patients in England undergo autologous reconstruction IR. Our aim was to examine IR trends in Scotland. METHODS: Data was extracted from the Scottish Morbidity Record held at the Information Services Division of the NHS National Services Scotland. All patients discharged from Scottish hospitals between 2011 and 2016 who had a diagnosis of breast cancer including DCIS and underwent mastectomy were identified. Patients undergoing IR were identified by coding at the time of mastectomy to identify who had IR and what method was used. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2016, 7358 patients underwent a mastectomy for breast cancer. 1845 patients (25%) had an IR. The percentage of patients undergoing IR increased from 22% in 2011 to 26% in 2016. The dominant annual procedure type was autologous reconstruction (free flap and pedicled flaps), accounting for 58% in 2011 and 54% in 2016. Pedicled flaps alone decreased from 40% in 2011 to 28% in 2016 and free flaps increased from 18% in 2011 to 26% in 2016. Implant based reconstruction rates were broadly consistent, 37% in both 2011 and 2016. Pedicled flaps with implant reconstruction decreased from 13% in 2011 to 5% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous reconstruction (with increasing trend for free flaps procedures) remains a constant preferred technique for IR in Scotland, accounting for over half of IR performed.

Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature.

Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (OBCS) is increasingly becoming part of routine breast cancer surgical management. OBCS may be viewed as an extension of standard breast conservation surgery for resecting tumors of larger sizes without compromising on cosmetic outcome, or as an alternative to mastectomy. High quality evidence to support the oncological safety and benefits of OBCS is lacking. This review will focus on the best available level of evidence and address key issues regarding oncological safety in OBCS, such as tumor resection margins and re-excision rates, local recurrence and patient outcome, postoperative complications and adjuvant therapy delivery, and briefly discuss cosmetic outcome in OBCS. Comparative observational studies and systematic review report no poorer outcomes compared with standard breast conservation surgery. More evidence needs to be generated to support the oncological safety and improved aesthetic outcome. Prospective data collection will significantly contribute to the generation of stronger evidence.