Identification and characterization of Dicer1e, a Dicer1 protein variant, in oral cancer cells.

BACKGROUND: The human dicer1 gene has been predicted to produce several mRNA variants that encode truncated Dicer1 proteins of varying lengths. One of these Dicer1 variants, Dicer1e, was recently found to be differentially expressed in breast cancer cells. Because the expression and function of the Dicer1e protein variant has not been well characterized and the underlying molecular mechanisms for the development of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) are poorly understood, the present study sought to characterize the biological role of Dicer1e and determine its relationship, if any, to OSCC pathogenesis. METHODS: Western blot analyses were used to examine Dicer1e expression levels in a panel of oral cancer cells/tissues and during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), followed by 5'/3'-RACE analyses to obtain the full-length Dicer1e transcript. Biochemical fractionation and indirect immunofluorescent studies were performed to determine the cellular localization of Dicer1e and the effects of Dicer1e silencing on cancer cell proliferation, clonogenicity, and drug sensitivity were also assessed. RESULTS: Dicer1e protein levels were found to be overexpressed in OSCC cell lines of epithelial phenotype and in OSCC tissues with its levels downregulated during EMT. Moreover, the Dicer1e protein was observed to predominantly localize in the nucleus. 5'/3'-RACE analyses confirmed the presence of the Dicer1e transcript and silencing of Dicer1e impaired both cancer cell proliferation and clonogenicity by inducing either apoptosis and/or G2/M cell cycle arrest. Lastly, Dicer1e knockdown enhanced the chemosensitivity of oral cancer cells to cisplatin. CONCLUSION: The expression levels of Dicer1e influence the pathogenesis of oral cancer cells and alter their response to chemosensitivity, thus supporting the importance of Dicer1e as a therapeutic target for OSCCs.

Profibrotic role of myostatin in Peyronie's disease.

INTRODUCTION: The primary histologic finding in many urologic disorders, including Peyronie's disease (PD), is fibrosis, mainly mediated by the transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1). AIM: To determine whether another member of the TGFbeta family, myostatin, (i) is expressed in the human PD plaque and normal tunica albuginea (TA), their cell cultures, and the TGFbeta1-induced PD lesion in the rat model; (ii) is responsible for myofibroblast generation, collagen deposition, and plaque formation; and (iii) mediates the profibrotic effects of TGFbeta1 in PD. METHODS: Human TA and PD tissue sections, and cell cultures from both tissues incubated with myostatin and TGFbeta1 were subjected to immunocytochemistry for myostatin and alpha-smooth muscle actin (ASMA). The cells were assayed by western blot, Real time-Polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and ribonuclease protection. Myostatin cDNA and shRNA were injected, with or without TGFbeta1, in the rat penile TA, and plaque size was estimated by Masson. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Myostatin expression in the human TA, the PD plaque, and their cell cultures, and myostatin effects on the PD-like plaque in the rat. RESULTS: A threefold overexpression of myostatin was found in the PD plaque as compared with the TA. In PD cells, myostatin expression was mainly in the myofibroblasts, and in the TA cells, it increased upon passage paralleling myofibroblast differentiation and was up-regulated by TGFbeta1. Myostatin or its cDNA construct increased the myofibroblast number and collagen in TA cells. Myostatin was detected in the TGFbeta1-induced PD-like plaque of the rat partly in the myofibroblasts, and in the TA. Myostatin cDNA injected in the TA induced a plaque and intensified the TGFbeta1 lesion, which was not reduced by myostatin shRNA. CONCLUSIONS: Myostatin is overexpressed in the PD plaque, partly because of myofibroblast generation. Although myostatin induces a plaque in the rat TA, it does not appear to mediate the one triggered by TGFbeta1, thus suggesting that both proteins act concurrently and that therapy should target their common downstream effectors.

Dual peptide-mediated targeted delivery of bioactive siRNAs to oral cancer cells in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: Despite significant advances in cancer treatment, the prognosis for oral cancer remains poor in comparison to other cancer types, including breast, skin, and prostate. As a result, more effective therapeutic modalities are needed for the treatment of oral cancer. Consequently, in the present study, we examined the feasibility of using a dual peptide carrier approach, combining an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting peptide with an endosome-disruptive peptide, to mediate targeted delivery of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) into EGFR-overexpressing oral cancer cells and induce silencing of the targeted oncogene, cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (CIP2A). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluorescence microscopy, real-time PCR, Western blot analysis, and in vivo bioimaging of mice containing orthotopic xenograft tumors were used to examine the ability of the dual peptide carrier to mediate specific delivery of bioactive siRNAs into EGFR-overexpressing oral cancer cells/tissues. RESULTS: Co-complexation of the EGFR-targeting peptide, GE11R9, with the endosome-disruptive 599 peptide facilitated the specific uptake of siRNAs into oral cancer cells overexpressing EGFR in vitro with optimal gene silencing observed at a 60:30:1 (GE11R9:599:siRNA) molar ratio. Furthermore, when administered systemically to mice bearing xenograft oral tumors, this dual peptide complex mediated increased targeted delivery of siRNAs into tumor tissues in comparison to the 599 peptide alone and significantly enhanced CIP2A silencing. CONCLUSION: Herein we provide the first report demonstrating the clinical potential of a dual peptide strategy for siRNA-based therapeutics by synergistically mediating the effective targeting and delivery of bioactive siRNAs into EGFR-overexpressing oral cancer cells.

GSK3ß inhibition blocks melanoma cell/host interactions by downregulating N-cadherin expression and decreasing FAK phosphorylation.

This study addresses the role of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3ß signaling in the tumorigenic behavior of melanoma. Immunohistochemical staining revealed GSK3ß to be focally expressed in the invasive portions of 12 and 33% of primary and metastatic melanomas, respectively. GSK3 inhibitors and small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of GSK3ß were found to inhibit the motile behavior of melanoma cells in scratch wound, three-dimensional collagen-implanted spheroid, and modified Boyden chamber assays. Functionally, inhibition of GSK3ß signaling was found to suppress N-cadherin expression at the messenger RNA and protein levels, and was associated with decreased expression of the transcription factor Slug. Pharmacological and genetic ablation of GSK3ß signaling inhibited the adhesion of melanoma cells to both endothelial cells and fibroblasts and prevented transendothelial migration, an effect rescued by the forced overexpression of N-cadherin. A further role for GSK3ß signaling in invasion was suggested by the ability of GSK3ß inhibitors and siRNA knockdown to block phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and increase the size of focal adhesions. In summary, we have, to our knowledge, demonstrated a previously unreported role for GSK3ß in modulating the motile and invasive behavior of melanoma cells through N-cadherin and FAK. These studies suggest the potential therapeutic utility of inhibiting GSK3ß in defined subsets of melanoma.

The future of targeted therapy approaches in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The past 30 years have seen little improvement in the survival of patients with stage IV melanoma. Following the discovery of activating BRAF mutations in most melanomas, a wealth of preclinical experimentation has validated the BRAF/MAPK pathway as an excellent therapeutic target in melanoma. Despite these encouraging results, early clinical trials on BRAF/MAPK inhibition have been disappointing. OBJECTIVE: In the current review, we discuss how differences between the preclinical and clinical settings may influence the response of melanoma cells to BRAF/MEK inhibition. As the BRAF/MEK signaling pathway is not solely responsible for the growth and survival of melanoma cells, we further discuss the therapeutic utility of inhibiting the PI3K/AKT and mTOR pathways both alone and in combination with BRAF/MEK. CONCLUSION: In looking ahead to the future, it is likely that new advances in melanoma biology, such as the identification of melanoma stem cells and a greater understanding of intratumoral heterogeneity, may play a role in the design of any future melanoma targeted therapy.