Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 23(5): 455-61, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22082312

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with the WATCHMAN device has become one of the therapeutic options in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are at high risk for ischemic stroke. However, the incidence and evolution of incomplete occlusion of the LAA during and after placement of the WATCHMAN device has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients who had undergone WATCHMAN device implant were included in the study. Intraprocedural, 45-day and 12-month transesophageal echocardiogram images were reviewed and analyzed. Peridevice gap was noted in 16 (27.6%), 17 (29.3%), and 20 (34.5%) patients across the 3 time points. Intraprocedural gaps are more likely to be persistent until 12 months and become larger in size over time. New gap also occurs during follow-up even if the LAA was completely sealed at implantation. One patient had an ischemic stroke 4.7 months after implant; another patient developed a left atrial thrombus over the device 21.6 months after implant. Both patients had intraprocedural gap and discontinued warfarin therapy after the 45-day evaluation. CONCLUSION: Incomplete LAA occlusion with a gap between the WATCHMAN device surface and the LAA wall is relatively common. Intraprocedural gaps are more likely to become bigger over time and persist, while new gaps also occur during follow-up. Further studies are warranted to verify whether the presence and persistence of a peridevice gap is associated with increased risk of thromboembolic event in AF patients implanted with a WATCHMAN device.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ecocardiografía Doppler en Color , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Texas , Tromboembolia/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/administración & dosificación
2.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 8(2): 279-87, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25682124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We examined the influence of catheter ablation and periprocedural anticoagulation regimen on trajectory of migraine in atrial fibrillation patients with or without migraine history. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with (group 1: 64 ± 8 years; men 78%) and 85 (group 2: 61 ± 10 years; men 73%) without migraine history undergoing atrial fibrillation-ablation were enrolled. Migraine status and quality of life were evaluated using standardized questionnaires. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of brain was performed for all at pre and 24 hours post procedure. Catheter ablation was performed with (88, 70%) or without (37, 30%) continuous warfarin treatment. Fifty-four patients (11 and 43 from groups 1 and 2, respectively) had subtherapeutic international normalized ratio on procedure day. At 17 ± 5 months follow-up, from group 1, 25 (63%) reported no migraine, 10 (25%) had < 1, and 3 (8%) had 2 to 3 monthly symptoms. Intensity of pain decreased from baseline 7 (Q1-Q3, 4-8) to 2 (0-4) scale points at follow-up (P < 0.001) and duration of headache from median 8 (Q1-Q3, 4-15) to 0.5 (Q1-Q3, 0-2) hours (P < 0.001). Two patients from group 1 reported increased migraine severity and 2 from group 2 had new-onset migraine. Follow-up diffusion magnetic resonance imaging revealed new infarcts in 9.6% (12/125) patients; of which 11 had subtherapeutic preprocedural international normalized ratio on or off continuous warfarin. Quality of life improved significantly in patients with successful ablation, being more pronounced in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, migraine symptoms improved substantially after catheter ablation. Interestingly, the only cases of new migraine and aggravation of pre-existent headache had subtherapeutic international normalized ratio during the procedure and new cerebral infarcts.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Ablación por Catéter , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/efectos adversos
3.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 3(5): 445-51, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20689107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be associated with pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) failure. The aim of the present study was to investigate if treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improved PVAI success rates. METHODS AND RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 3000 consecutive patients underwent PVAI. Patients were screened for OSA and CPAP use. Six hundred forty (21.3%) patients had OSA. Patients with OSA had more procedural failures (P=0.024) and hematomas (P<0.001). Eight percent of the non-OSA paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients had nonpulmonary vein antrum triggers (non-PV triggers) and posterior wall firing versus 20% of the OSA group (P<0.001). Nineteen percent of the non-OSA nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation population had non-PV triggers versus 31% in the OSA group (P=0.001). At the end of the follow-up period (32±14 months), 79% of the non-CPAP and 68% of the CPAP group were free of atrial fibrillation (P=0.003). Not using CPAP in addition to having non-PV triggers strongly predicted procedural failure (hazard ratio, 8.81; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OSA was an independent predictor for PVAI failure. Treatment with CPAP improved PVAI success rates. Patients not treated with CPAP in addition to having higher prevalence of non-PV triggers were 8 times more likely to fail the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodos , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/cirugía , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA