A phase I trial of the single-chain immunotoxin SGN-10 (BR96 sFv-PE40) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Our purpose in the study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of SGN-10 (or BR96 sFv-PE40), a single-chain immunotoxin. SGN-10 is composed of the fused gene products encoding the translocating and ADP-ribosylating domains of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE40) and the variable heavy (V(H)) and variable light (V(L)) regions of BR96 monoclonal antibody. This antibody is specific for a Lewis(Y) (Le(Y))-related carbohydrate antigen expressed on multiple carcinomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 46 patients with Le(Y)-positive metastatic carcinoma were enrolled in a Phase I dose-escalation study in cohorts of three to six patients who received SGN-10 at doses ranging from 0.024 to 0.962 mg/m(2), administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, followed by 2 weeks of rest and a second cycle of therapy. Pharmacokinetics and human antibody response to SGN-10 were also determined. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of SGN-10 was 0.641 mg/m(2) with gastrointestinal dose-limiting toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies performed in eight patients at the 0.641-mg/m(2) dose revealed a t([1/2]) of 2.5 +/- 0.3 h and a C(max) of 389 +/- 112 ng/ml. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated a rapid clearance of the drug by day 11 associated with an antitoxin human antitoxin antibody (HATA) response in most patients. Signs consistent with a modest vascular leak syndrome, specifically, transient hypoalbuminemia, were observed in patients treated with doses of > or =0.384 mg/m(2). No complete or partial tumor responses were observed at an 8-week evaluation, although 31% of patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The maximal tolerated dose of SGN-10 given twice weekly for 2 weeks is 0.641 mg/m(2) with gastrointestinal dose-limiting toxicity. The immunogenicity of the toxin moiety limits the ability of SGN-10 to circulate by day 11 of therapy. Studies are ongoing to evaluate strategies to ameliorate toxicities and to inhibit the development of the anti-SGN-10 immune response.

Phase II study of docetaxel plus enoxaparin in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results.

Activation of coagulation appears to play a role in tumor progression. This report describes the preliminary results of a phase II study using docetaxel plus enoxaparin in 15 patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Time to progression was the primary endpoint. Several surrogate markers of coagulation and angiogenesis were evaluated. Enoxaparin was administered at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg (subcutaneously). The initial dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2, given as a 60 min infusion every 21 days with prophylactic dexamethasone. Eight patients achieved an objective response (53%) and four had stable disease, with a median duration of 3.5 months. The median time to progression was 5 months (range, 2 to >15 months). The median survival was 11 months. The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia and asthenia. No significant bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Eleven patients had elevated D-dimer plasma levels prior to therapy, and seven of these patients with a response or stable disease had a significant decline of the D-dimer during therapy. There were no consistent changes of the plasma levels of the angiogenic factors, except for transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-beta1). The median baseline level of TGF-beta1 prior to therapy was 34,867 pg/ml. Twelve out of 13 patients who achieved a response or stable disease had a significant reduction of the TGF-beta1 levels during therapy. Enoxaparin in combination with chemotherapy was safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC. This preliminary data suggests that enoxaparin may prolong the time to progression, and therefore justify the continuation of this trial.

Modulation of renal glomerular disease using remote delivery of adenoviral-encoded solubletype II TGF-beta receptor fusion molecule.

BACKGROUND: Systemic adenoviral (Ad) gene therapy for renal disorders is largely hampered by the unique architecture of the kidney. Consequently, currently available Ad vectors are of only limited therapeutic utility in the context of glomerular and fibroproliferative renal diseases. METHODS: The Ad vectors studied in the context of blocking renal fibrosis were AdTbeta-ExR and AdCATbeta-TR. AdTbeta-ExR encodes a chimeric soluble molecule comprising the entire ectodomain of the human type II TGF-beta receptor, genetically fused to the Fc fragment of the human IgG1 (sTbetaRII), while AdCATbeta-TR encodes only the dominant-negative truncated ectodomain of the human type II TGF-beta receptor. The biologic activity of the type II TGF-beta receptor was evaluated in vitro by its ability to inhibit cellular proliferation and in vivo in a unilateral ureter obstruction fibrosis model. Renal targeting with sTbetaRII was evaluated immunohistochemically after intramuscular (IM) delivery of AdTbeta-ExR. The renal antifibrotic effect of the Ad vectors was evaluated in a lupus murine model with both light and electron microscopy and urinalysis. RESULTS: sTbetaRII was detected in the glomeruli after remote IM injection of AdTbeta-ExR, but not the control AdCATbeta-TR, indicating renal deposition of the heterologous soluble fusion protein after its expression in the muscle and secretion into the circulation. AdTbeta-ExR, but not AdCATbeta-TR, could transiently inhibit mesangial expansion, glomerular hypercellularity, proteinuria and cortical interstitial fibrosis in a murine lupus model. However, the autoimmune renal disease eventually surpassed the antifibrotic effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the superiority of a soluble type II TGF-beta receptor over a dominant-negative, non-soluble type II TGF-beta receptor in the context of blocking renal fibrosis in murine models.

Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: comparisons of outcomes in surgical Stage I patients with and without adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the outcomes of Stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) patients with and without adjuvant therapy after comprehensive surgical staging. METHODS: Patients with FIGO Stage I UPSC diagnosed from 1987 to 2000 were identified from tumor registry databases at four institutions. A retrospective chart review identified 60 women who underwent comprehensive surgical staging, including a total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and peritoneal cytology. Fisher's exact, chi(2), and log-rank tests were used for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: Of the 60 Stage I patients, 40 (66%) patients received no adjuvant therapy, 12 (20%) received adjuvant radiation therapy (XRT), 7 (12%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (CHM), and 1 (2%) received both XRT and CHM. There were seven recurrences in the observation group versus two recurrences in the XRT group (17% vs 16%, P = 0.9). No recurrences or deaths were observed in the CHM group. The mean disease-free survival rates for the observation and the XRT groups were 31 and 41 months, respectively. The mean overall survival rates for the observation and XRT groups were 39 and 40 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival rates for the observation and XRT groups were 65 and 60%, respectively; the 5-year overall survival rates for observation and XRT groups were 66 and 59%. There was no statistical difference in overall survival among the three groups. CONCLUSION: In this largest reported series of surgical Stage I UPSC patients, recurrence rates were lower than those published in previous studies, suggesting a potential benefit of comprehensive surgical staging in these patients. The risk of recurrence and the mean overall survival were similar between surgical Stage I UPSC patients who were managed conservatively and those treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. These data question the benefit of radiation therapy in UPSC patients with disease confined to the uterus. Finally, given the absence of recurrences and disease-related deaths for adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients, a Phase II/III trial evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in surgical Stage I UPSC patients should be considered.